Re: copr - hung or out of control build .. ? resolved by itself.

On 14/11/15 01:18, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 13.11.2015 v 13:30 David Timms napsal(a): >> Hi, I submitted an audacity build f22,23,rawhide. Usually it finishes in >> 12-20 mins. 22/23 are done, but rawhide's been 80 minutes, so I think >> something has gone wrong... No logs yet for it. >> >> http

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

A clear example of the mentioned problems for Darktable 32 bit http://redmine.darktable.org/issues/10717 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2015-11-16 Fedora QA Meeting

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel Monday's QA meeting. We met the last few weeks and I think pretty much knocked out all the key discussion topics. I'm going to be out Monday morning, but if anyone has a topic for a meeting, please just reply to this mail and anyone can pick up and run the meeting:

Re: wayland in rawhide

hi, > Here's one on Ironlake, with two monitors plugged in. > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=750610 > > still not fixed, doesn't fall back. Well, black screens obviously aren't good, and we should clearly fix this. If we don't get it fixed by closer to release, than maybe it's a goo

Re: [RFC] DistGit Container Image namespacing for Layered Image Build Service

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:08:25PM -0600, Adam Miller wrote: >> Hello all, >> In the Fedora 24 timeframe the Fedora Release Engineering group is >> aiming to deliver the Layered Image Build Service[0] to allow Fedora >> contributors to bu

Re: [RFC] DistGit Container Image namespacing for Layered Image Build Service

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:08:25PM -0600, Adam Miller wrote: > Hello all, > In the Fedora 24 timeframe the Fedora Release Engineering group is > aiming to deliver the Layered Image Build Service[0] to allow Fedora > contributors to build containers images. In the first iteration of > this we're

python3 rebuild notes: python-testtools

I've been looking at some packages that failed the python 3 rebuild and are sitting underneath some of my packages. I had hoped to untangle things, but it's apparent that I'm not going to be able to do so with the amount of time I have available. Here are some notes in case anybody out there in F

Re: [RFC] DistGit Container Image namespacing for Layered Image Build Service

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Ralph Bean wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 03:01:49PM -0500, Ray Strode wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Adam Miller >> wrote: >> > If we were to go with the former rather than the latter, we would need >> > to find a way to "namespace" contai

Re: [RFC] DistGit Container Image namespacing for Layered Image Build Service

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 03:01:49PM -0500, Ray Strode wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Adam Miller > wrote: > > If we were to go with the former rather than the latter, we would need > > to find a way to "namespace" container images so they can be > > determined as different. I've

Re: FedRTC.org SIP and XMPP service - help needed

Josh Boyer writes: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Michael Catanzaro > wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 1:20 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> In both the FedRTC and debian case how many calls are made a >>> day/month, what is the volume of XMPP etc? In the later case we >>> already use both I

Re: FedRTC.org SIP and XMPP service - help needed

On 13/11/15 19:45, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 1:20 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> In both the FedRTC and debian case how many calls are made a >> day/month, what is the volume of XMPP etc? In the later case we >> already use both IRC and Telegram within the community, I'm n

Re: FedRTC.org SIP and XMPP service - help needed

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 1:45 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 1:20 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> In both the FedRTC and debian case how many calls are made a >> day/month, what is the volume of XMPP etc? In the later case we >> already use both IRC and Telegram within the com

Re: FedRTC.org SIP and XMPP service - help needed

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 1:20 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > In both the FedRTC and debian case how many calls are made a > day/month, what is the volume of XMPP etc? In the later case we > already use both IRC and Telegram within the community, I'm not sure > what value yet another text messaging ser

Re: Summary/Minutes for today's FESCo meeting (2015-11-11)

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 01:54:32PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: > * #1278 establish Fedora Bat-Signal for ultra-critical security updates >   (ajax, 18:02:25) >   * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1278   (ajax, 18:02:31) >   * Removed from meeting agenda until ticket is updated  (ajax, >

Re: Review swaps

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Sandro Mani wrote: > If you're okay with mingw packages, I'd like to have these two reviewed: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265853 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265854 > > Both are straight forward. Sure, will do. Thanks, Sandr

Re: Python 3.5 for Fedora 23 in COPR

Great work! 2015-11-13 7:52 GMT-05:00 Matej Stuchlik : > Hey folks, > a while ago I've created a COPR repo [0] with Python 3.5 for f23, > I haven't had any bug reports so far, so it should be OK to use. > > You can install it with: > > $ dnf copr enable -y mstuchli/Python3.5 > $ dnf install -y py

Re: Review swaps

On 13.11.2015 16:09, Jerry James wrote: Here are the next 2 steps on the long slow march to the gap HAP package for sagemath. Only a few left to go! Let me know what I can review for you in exchange for these reviews. gap-pkg-smallsemi: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281664 gap

Re: Failing builds on rawhide

On 11/13/2015 04:01 PM, Antonio Trande wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi, > > still problems on rawhide/python3.5? > > RPM build errors: > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.sPV9pz (%build) > Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.sPV9pz (%build) > Ch

Review swaps

Here are the next 2 steps on the long slow march to the gap HAP package for sagemath. Only a few left to go! Let me know what I can review for you in exchange for these reviews. gap-pkg-smallsemi: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281664 gap-pkg-semigroups: https://bugzilla.redhat.com

Re: Failing builds on rawhide

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, still problems on rawhide/python3.5? RPM build errors: error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.sPV9pz (%build) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.sPV9pz (%build) Child return code was: 1 EXCEPTION: Command failed. See logs for outpu

Re: copr - hung or out of control build .. ? infrastructure help

Dne 13.11.2015 v 13:30 David Timms napsal(a): > Hi, I submitted an audacity build f22,23,rawhide. Usually it finishes in > 12-20 mins. 22/23 are done, but rawhide's been 80 minutes, so I think > something has gone wrong... No logs yet for it. > > https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/dtimms/audacit

Fedora Rawhide 20151113 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud disk raw i386 Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64 Workstation live x86_64 Workstation live i386 Minimal disk raw armhfp Kde disk raw armhfp Kde live i386 Cloud disk raw x86_64 Kde live x86_64 No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151112 Images in Rawhide 20151112 bu

Python 3.5 for Fedora 23 in COPR

Hey folks, a while ago I've created a COPR repo [0] with Python 3.5 for f23, I haven't had any bug reports so far, so it should be OK to use. You can install it with: $ dnf copr enable -y mstuchli/Python3.5 $ dnf install -y python35-python3 Then you can use the python3.5 and pip3.5 executables.

copr - hung or out of control build .. ? infrastructure help

Hi, I submitted an audacity build f22,23,rawhide. Usually it finishes in 12-20 mins. 22/23 are done, but rawhide's been 80 minutes, so I think something has gone wrong... No logs yet for it. https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/dtimms/audacity-git/build/139224/ Can I, should I kill the build and

Re: Summary/Minutes for today's FESCo meeting (2015-11-11)

On Nov 13, 2015 12:03 AM, "Scott Schmit" wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 01:54:32PM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: > > === > > #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2015-11-11) > > === > > The meeting summary isn't showing the resolutions from the m

Re: DNF is completly unable to act with local packages

Am 13.11.2015 um 12:13 schrieb Reindl Harald: Am 13.11.2015 um 12:09 schrieb Honza Šilhan: From: "Reindl Harald" would not be a topic if DNF would not be completly broken for "dnf update *.rpm", in F22 it works sometimes while in F23 it is just unuseable 99.9% of the time That's an import

Re: packaging golang guidelines (like etcd, consul)

> At this time, Go libraries packaged in Fedora are primarily for the purpose of being BuildRequires for building Fedora binary RPMs, since golang is like statically linked and does not prefer .so for libraries (so far). I suggest never package BuildRequires RPMs for golang (I think of it like .a

Re: DNF is completly unable to act with local packages

Am 13.11.2015 um 12:09 schrieb Honza Šilhan: From: "Reindl Harald" would not be a topic if DNF would not be completly broken for "dnf update *.rpm", in F22 it works sometimes while in F23 it is just unuseable 99.9% of the time That's an important information, it would be great if you would c

Re: DNF is completly unable to act with local packages

> From: "Honza Šilhan" > > From: "Michael Schwendt" > > If an _upgrade_ introduces new sub-packages or new dependencies, you > > need a method that can install those new packages *and* update older > > installed ones at the same time. Running "rpm -U *.rpm" is like asking > > RPM to "upgrade the

Re: DNF is completly unable to act with local packages

> From: "Michael Schwendt" > > On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 06:38:41 -0500 (EST), Honza Šilhan wrote: > > > "rpm -Uvh …" ~ "dnf install" - only difference is that dnf install can > > do downgrades too if you specify the version of the package > > So, if you run "dnf install *.rpm" and one of the local .

Re: FedRTC.org SIP and XMPP service - help needed

On 13/11/15 10:20, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> >> >> On 13/11/15 00:00, Jared K. Smith wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Daniel Pocock >> > wrote: >>> >>> I've been looking at ways to expand on the f

Re: F23: r8169 stopped working

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 08:02:58AM +0100, Jos Vos wrote: > I did some further tests: > > - Also the F23 Live image works fine (with 4.2.3 kernel), no issues >with the Ethernet, I get an immediate connection, flawless... >And: also suspend/resume works fine there (see below). > > - F23

Re: FedRTC.org SIP and XMPP service - help needed

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > On 13/11/15 00:00, Jared K. Smith wrote: >> >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Daniel Pocock > > wrote: >> >> I've been looking at ways to expand on the fedrtc.org >> service and woul

Re: Retire a package from Fedora i686 (not x86_64)

Am 12.11.2015 um 21:49 schrieb Przemek Klosowski: On the other hand, Harald, I have to say that in this case my irony detector bent the needle. You often voice your displeasure in this forum that some setup you used for years was broken by new stuff, and yet you say you CAN NOT HAVE both - lea

Re: FedRTC.org SIP and XMPP service - help needed

On 13/11/15 00:00, Jared K. Smith wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Daniel Pocock > wrote: > > I've been looking at ways to expand on the fedrtc.org > service and would > like to start creating a team around the service just a

Re: Failing builds on rawhide

Peter Robinson writes: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Jan Synacek wrote: >>> I'm getting this error: >>> >>> bash: /usr/bin/rpmbuild: No such file or directory >>> >>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11804093 >>