Hi,
Is anyone else seeing this?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275462
Basically, starting any GTK-using app takes ~20 to 30 seconds before the
timeout happens. It also happens with finch (I think), so it might be a
libgio thing?
Am I missing a package or session daemon?
Thank
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 3:22 PM, gil wrote:
> Hi Jerry,
> Take!
> can you take this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039299 for
> me?
> regards
> gil
Will do. Thanks, gil!
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedor
Hi Jerry,
Take!
can you take this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039299
for me?
regards
gil
Il 05/11/2015 22:29, Jerry James ha scritto:
Some of the GAP packages require TTH (TeX To HTML) to generate their
documentation.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276831
I'll r
Some of the GAP packages require TTH (TeX To HTML) to generate their
documentation.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276831
I'll review something for you if you review this for me. Thanks,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
h
On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 16:21:07 +0100,
Jos Vos wrote:
With F22 I had the unpleasant surprise that, using the Xfce live image,
Midori was for some reason not able to sign in (web form) on a store's
public wifi network, because of some issue when redirecting to a HTTPS
page with an own-signed c
On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 12:23 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> September: 34 bugs with impact "Visiting a maliciously crafted
> website
> may lead to an unexpected application termination or arbitrary code
> execution" https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT205377
Corrected link: https://support.apple.c
On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 17:35 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> At least one image that is still consistent with its goals in its
> application choice. The KDE image is now polluted by Firefox, which
> sticks
> out like a sore thumb. :-(
I miss QtWebKit. :(
For those not familiar with the history, QtW
On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 09:37 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> So, in no particular order:
>
> * I don't really think it's 'irresponsible' to ship midori in it's
> current state. It's not ideal, but if you know of specific critical
> issues not fixed, please let me know.
There are two ways to look
On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 10:22 -0600, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 09:53 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 16:21 +0100, Jos Vos wrote:
> > > I see that the F23 Xfce live image still includes only Midori as
> > > the
> > > internet browser, similar to the F22
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Kevin Kofler
wrote:
> Jos Vos wrote:
> > I see that the F23 Xfce live image still includes only Midori as the
> > internet browser, similar to the F22 image.
>
> At least one image that is still consistent with its goals in its
> application choice. The KDE image
On Thu, 05 Nov 2015 10:22:23 -0600
Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 09:53 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 16:21 +0100, Jos Vos wrote:
> > > I see that the F23 Xfce live image still includes only Midori as
> > > the internet browser, similar to the F22 im
Jos Vos wrote:
> I see that the F23 Xfce live image still includes only Midori as the
> internet browser, similar to the F22 image.
At least one image that is still consistent with its goals in its
application choice. The KDE image is now polluted by Firefox, which sticks
out like a sore thumb.
- Original Message -
> On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 09:53 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 16:21 +0100, Jos Vos wrote:
> > > I see that the F23 Xfce live image still includes only Midori as the
> > > internet browser, similar to the F22 image.
> >
> > Midori still depen
On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 09:53 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 16:21 +0100, Jos Vos wrote:
> > I see that the F23 Xfce live image still includes only Midori as the
> > internet browser, similar to the F22 image.
>
> Midori still depends on an old version of WebKitGTK+, so it h
On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 16:21 +0100, Jos Vos wrote:
> I see that the F23 Xfce live image still includes only Midori as the
> internet browser, similar to the F22 image.
Midori still depends on an old version of WebKitGTK+, so it has not had
any security updates in a long time. It's irresponsible to
Hi,
I see that the F23 Xfce live image still includes only Midori as the
internet browser, similar to the F22 image.
With F22 I had the unpleasant surprise that, using the Xfce live image,
Midori was for some reason not able to sign in (web form) on a store's
public wifi network, because of some
Missing expected images:
Cloud disk raw i386
Cloud disk raw x86_64
Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64
Generic boot i386
Generic boot x86_64
Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151104:
Security live x86_64
Mate live i386
Games live x86_64
Design_suite live x86_64
Workstation live x86_64
Lxde live
2015-11-05 11:29 GMT+01:00 Jan Kurik :
> Hi,
>
> as Fedora 23 has been successfully released, we are starting with
> preparations for Elections. You can find schedule for these Elections
> at [1].
>
> Currently I am aware of the following teams we are going to organize
> Elections for:
>
> * FAmSCo
Hi,
I think the better approach is to allow more updates, as Kevin suggested,
usually they fix more than they break.
I also think shorter freezes with unfreeze on slip are better than the
current approach of accumulated updates on release day.
>From my point of view, the best approach is rolling r
Compose started at Thu Nov 5 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0
Hi,
as Fedora 23 has been successfully released, we are starting with
preparations for Elections. You can find schedule for these Elections
at [1].
Currently I am aware of the following teams we are going to organize
Elections for:
* FAmSCo (7 seats) - There were no Elections for more then a yea
>> On 11/04/2015 12:23 PM, Robert Kuska wrote:
>> > There is ongoing rebuild of Python3.5 in rawhide's side-tag f24-python3.
>> >
>> > I would like to ask all maintainers to rebuild their packages (which
>> > depend on python3) within the f24-python3 side-tag.
>> >
>> > To rebuild your package simp
- Original Message -
> From: "Kalev Lember"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, November 5, 2015 10:10:59 AM
> Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] Ongoing rebuild of Python3.5 in Rawhide
>
> On 11/04/2015 12:23 PM, Robert Kuska wrote:
> > There is ongoing rebuild of Python3.5 in r
On 11/04/2015 12:23 PM, Robert Kuska wrote:
> There is ongoing rebuild of Python3.5 in rawhide's side-tag f24-python3.
>
> I would like to ask all maintainers to rebuild their packages (which
> depend on python3) within the f24-python3 side-tag.
>
> To rebuild your package simply run:
> `fedpkg b
24 matches
Mail list logo
