# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2015-11-02
# Time: ** 16:00 ** UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's QA meeting time again! We've finished up Fedora 23 - big thanks to
everyone for all your w
On 11/01/2015 09:06 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Today we got 531 updates for F23 , IMO, you should include it on Fedora
> 23 Final before GA , doesn't make sense (to me) after download an ISO
> have 1/2 Giga of updates, but this happens since RedHad 9 at least .
> IMO, testing team should respin ISO
On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 11:02 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-11-01 at 18:48 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
> > On 10/30/2015 05:36 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 11:50:48 -0400
> > > Steve Dickson wrote:
> > > > 2) find and rebuild all the dependencies?
> > >
> > > Should be so
On Sun, 2015-11-01 at 18:48 +0100, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 10/30/2015 05:36 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 11:50:48 -0400
> > Steve Dickson wrote:
> > > 2) find and rebuild all the dependencies?
> >
> > Should be something like:
> >
> > % sudo dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libt
On Dom, 2015-11-01 at 17:53 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Sex, 2015-10-30 at 17:47 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
> >> At the third round of Fedora 23 Final Go/No-Go Meeting, that just
> >> ends, has been Fedora 23 Final-RC10 declared as GOLD.
>
Am 02.11.2015 um 00:36 schrieb Michael Catanzaro:
*who* if not the package maintainer which hopefully uses his own
packages should have the final say? some group of people not
understanding the issues really?
The counterargument is that we keep seeing major version updates that
violate our ex
To be clear, my email proposed two orthogonal solutions -- service
packs, and an oversight body to approve updates -- and here Reindl is
objecting to the later. We could do one or the other, or both, or
neither.
On Sun, 2015-11-01 at 23:31 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> refrain from updates may kee
Am 01.11.2015 um 23:20 schrieb Michael Catanzaro:
On Sun, 2015-11-01 at 17:53 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
The problem is we have to freeze sometime to ensure stability in the
installer platform, the live and other images which are static. If
not
it's too much of a moving target to try and QA
On Sun, 2015-11-01 at 17:53 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> The problem is we have to freeze sometime to ensure stability in the
> installer platform, the live and other images which are static. If
> not
> it's too much of a moving target to try and QA and ensure everything
> works as expected. To f
On Sun, 2015-11-01 at 20:03 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Peter Robinson wrote:
> > The problem is we have to freeze sometime to ensure stability in
> > the
> > installer platform, the live and other images which are static. If
> > not
> > it's too much of a moving target to try and QA and ensure
>
> Just curious, what are you using the package for?
I was just exploring. and found that it's strange that f21 but not f22 and
asked to see if this was intentional or a slip.
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Jan Chaloupka wrote:
> Hi Muayyad,
>
> i have requested to push the build into f22 st
Missing expected images:
Cloud disk raw i386
Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64
Generic boot x86_64
Workstation live x86_64
Workstation live i386
Generic boot i386
Kde disk raw armhfp
Kde live i386
Cloud disk raw x86_64
Kde live x86_64
No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151031
Images in Rawhi
Peter Robinson wrote:
> The problem is we have to freeze sometime to ensure stability in the
> installer platform, the live and other images which are static. If not
> it's too much of a moving target to try and QA and ensure everything
> works as expected. To freeze is a fairly standard procedure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/07/2015 01:37 PM, Randy Barlow wrote:
> I've filed a request to add a new package called ari-backup:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269609
My package reviewer and I had some questions about whether the
permissions I have set
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sex, 2015-10-30 at 17:47 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
>> At the third round of Fedora 23 Final Go/No-Go Meeting, that just
>> ends, has been Fedora 23 Final-RC10 declared as GOLD.
>> GA of this release is planed on Tuesday 2015-Nov-03.
>>
> Today
On 10/30/2015 05:36 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 11:50:48 -0400
> Steve Dickson wrote:
>> 2) find and rebuild all the dependencies?
>
> Should be something like:
>
> % sudo dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libtirpc.so.1()(64bit)'
> Last metadata expiration check performed 0:01:17 a
On 01/11/15 12:06 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sex, 2015-10-30 at 17:47 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
>> At the third round of Fedora 23 Final Go/No-Go Meeting, that just
>> ends, has been Fedora 23 Final-RC10 declared as GOLD.
>> GA of this release is planed on Tuesday 2015-Nov-03.
>>
> Today we got 531
On Sex, 2015-10-30 at 17:47 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
> At the third round of Fedora 23 Final Go/No-Go Meeting, that just
> ends, has been Fedora 23 Final-RC10 declared as GOLD.
> GA of this release is planed on Tuesday 2015-Nov-03.
>
Today we got 531 updates for F23 , IMO, you should include it on
On 10/30/2015 10:07 PM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
hi,
I'm on f22 and have consul and etcd from the repos
ldd /usr/bin/consul
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x7ffc98fa2000)
liblmdb.so.0.0.0 => /lib64/liblmdb.so.0.0.0 (0x7f99bc1b5000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x7f99bbf99000)
libc.so
Hi Muayyad,
i have requested to push the build into f22 stable. Still, there is no
influxdb subpackage with binaries. Just curious, what are you using the
package for?
Regards
Jan
On 10/31/2015 05:19 PM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
but there is an old "stable" one for fedora 21?!
https://bodhi.f
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 5:56 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 29.10.2015 um 10:09 schrieb Christopher Meng:
>>
>> You have a chance to get your rpmfusion softwares wiped after the sync.
>>
>> [1]---https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263677
>
>
> unacceptable
>
> the software upgrade jus
Hi devel list (and cc'ed eclipse-sig list),
I'm going to orphan the eclipse-jbosstools package in rawhide, as I'm no
longer able to give it the time that it needs. My understanding is that
if nobody takes it, it will be auto-retired after 6 weeks (please
correct me if I'm wrong here).
If you're i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi all,
current WildMagic5 (http://www.geometrictools.com/) libraries, rebuilt
with flags for hardened builds
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Harden_All_Packages), are:
# checksec --dir /usr/lib64 | grep Wm5
Full RELRO No canary found
Compose started at Sun Nov 1 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0
24 matches
Mail list logo
