display state of package generation on KOJI

Hi developers, sometimes I'm searching for new packages on KOJI, for example for new kernels, but I see only a "Finished" column (beside others) on the specific website. It would be helpful if the "Finished" column could display a little bit more: The time of *starting* the package generation

Re: FC1 in archive missing a bunch of RPMs?

Also, intel wasn't shipping x86_64 systems at the time, FC1 was pretty specifically AMD64, and there was a lot of weirdness back then. On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:08 PM, Justin Forbes wrote: > FC1 32bit was a little bit different. Technically x86_64 was a secondary > arch at the time, in fact th

Re: FC1 in archive missing a bunch of RPMs?

FC1 32bit was a little bit different. Technically x86_64 was a secondary arch at the time, in fact the RH build system couldn't get everything together and the ISOs were built on my home system. By FC2, this wasn't an issue anymore. I would not be surprised if the archives were a bit off as the o

Re: rpm changed behavior it terminates build if wrong version is specified

On 10/26/2015 10:48 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 10/23/2015 07:47 AM, Lubos Kardos wrote: Hi, I want to just to inform you that the new version of rpmbuild (rpm-build-4.13.0-0.rc1.6.fc24) that is available in rawhide terminates build when a wrong version format is used in spec i. e. epoch is n

Re: make unmaintained ??

On Mon, 26 Oct, 2015 at 12:49:23 GMT, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > * New variables: $(MAKE_TERMOUT) and $(MAKE_TERMERR) are set to non-empty > values if stdout or stderr, respectively, are believed to be writing to a > terminal. These variables are exported by default. Hrm. This doesn

Re: Bodhi updates not pushed?

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015, 04:46 Peter Robinson wrote: On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Christopher wrote: > On https :// bugzilla.redhat.com

Re: Packaging question on MPI requires

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:34:17PM +, Dave Love wrote: > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes: > > >> Surely this isn't scalable. What would happen with a common API for N > >> different Scheme implementations, for instance? I'm also interested in > >> Haskell; others might want the bindings

Re: Packaging question on MPI requires

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes: >> Surely this isn't scalable. What would happen with a common API for N >> different Scheme implementations, for instance? I'm also interested in >> Haskell; others might want the bindings to Common Lisp, ruby, Tcl... >> Currently CLASSPATH isn't set for the

Attempting to contact unresponsive maintainer - jamielennox

Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested in maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their email addresses in FAS). If they're not int

Re: No emails about bodhi updates

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 06:56:51PM +0100, Jan Pokorný wrote: > On 26/10/15 17:36 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Seems like I'm no longer getting emails about significant bodhi > > events, particularly when a package has spent days in testing and > > can be pushed to stable. > > > > Example

Re: DNF 1.1.3 and DNF-PLUGINS-CORE 0.1.13 Released + bonus

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:03:47PM -0400, Honza Šilhan wrote: > [3] http://dnf.baseurl.org/2015/10/26/mark-command-usecase/ Is there any work on integrating the history of user-installed packages with packagekit / GNOME Software? That seems like that'd knock out a gigantic class of cases when 'ma

Re: No emails about bodhi updates

On 26/10/15 17:36 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Seems like I'm no longer getting emails about significant bodhi > events, particularly when a package has spent days in testing and > can be pushed to stable. > > Example update that I never got email about: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.o

Re: To distro-sync or not distro-sync?

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 06:24:43PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > I am trying to upgrade to F23 (I know still not finished but...) > > In past I always done 'distro-sync'. Albeit with yum. > > Now I tried: > dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=23 --distro-sync > dnf system-upgrade downlo

No emails about bodhi updates

Seems like I'm no longer getting emails about significant bodhi events, particularly when a package has spent days in testing and can be pushed to stable. Example update that I never got email about: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-072d89c28d I've checked my email pretty

Re: make unmaintained ??

On 10/26/2015 05:21 PM, drago01 wrote: On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Oct 25, 2015 12:53, "Jan Kratochvil" wrote: On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: I built 4.1 for rawhide. If that checks out to be OK, I can push an upda

Fedora Rawhide 20151026 compose check report

Missing expected images: Kde disk raw armhfp No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151025 Images in Rawhide 20151025 but not this: Kde disk raw armhfp Soas disk raw armhfp Failed openQA tests: 14 of 52 ID: 7404Test: x86_64 kde_live default_install ID: 7403Test: x86_64 wo

To distro-sync or not distro-sync?

I am trying to upgrade to F23 (I know still not finished but...) In past I always done 'distro-sync'. Albeit with yum. Now I tried: dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=23 --distro-sync dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=23 --distro-sync --best dnf system-upgrade download --releas

Re: rpm changed behavior it terminates build if wrong version is specified

On 10/23/2015 07:47 AM, Lubos Kardos wrote: > Hi, > > I want to just to inform you that the new version of rpmbuild > (rpm-build-4.13.0-0.rc1.6.fc24) that is available in rawhide terminates build > when a wrong version format is used in spec i. e. epoch is not unsigned > integer > or mutilple sep

Re: make unmaintained ??

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:21 PM, drago01 wrote: > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Stephen John Smoogen > wrote: > > > > On Oct 25, 2015 12:53, "Jan Kratochvil" > wrote: > >> > >> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >> > I built 4.1 for rawhide. If that che

Re: make unmaintained ??

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Oct 25, 2015 12:53, "Jan Kratochvil" wrote: >> >> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> > I built 4.1 for rawhide. If that checks out to be OK, I can push >> > an update for F23 also. >> >> I d

DNF 1.1.3 and DNF-PLUGINS-CORE 0.1.13 Released + bonus

New release of DNF stack (dnf, dnf-plugins-core, dnf-plugins-extras, hawkey and libsolv) is going to Fedora 21, 22, 23 and rawhide. Most of the fixes happened under the hood in DNF libraries. The emphasis was on stability and making smooth system upgrades. For more information take a look at rel

Re: make unmaintained ??

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > In this case it is worth looking at the actual changelog for 4.1: > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2014-10/msg0.html > The list of new features is: > > * New variables: $(MAKE_TERMOUT) and $(MAKE_TERMERR) are set to non-empty > values if stdo

[Bug 1268632] perl-experimental-0.015 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268632 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- perl-experimental-0.016-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: Yo

Re: C++11 enabling in F22?

https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Cxx11AbiCompatibility I guess this is what is causing problems if mongo-cxx-driver and an application using it do not use the same language version. Tim On 26.10.2015 14:09, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 26/10/15 13:01, Tim Niemueller wrote: >> On 26.10.2015 13:59, Tom Hughe

Re: C++11 enabling in F22?

On 26/10/15 13:01, Tim Niemueller wrote: On 26.10.2015 13:59, Tom Hughes wrote: On 26/10/15 12:50, Tim Niemueller wrote: - the driver works only with software which is built for the same ABI, it is one of the cases where things break immediately otherwise You need to be very clear what you m

Re: C++11 enabling in F22?

On 26.10.2015 13:59, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 26/10/15 12:50, Tim Niemueller wrote: > >> - the driver works only with software which is built for the same ABI, >> it is one of the cases where things break immediately otherwise > > You need to be very clear what you mean here. Do you mean built with

Re: C++11 enabling in F22?

On 26/10/15 12:50, Tim Niemueller wrote: - the driver works only with software which is built for the same ABI, it is one of the cases where things break immediately otherwise You need to be very clear what you mean here. Do you mean built with -std=c++11 or built with -D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_AB

Re: C++11 enabling in F22?

Hi. As the reporter let me briefly phrase the main concerns: - the driver works only with software which is built for the same ABI, it is one of the cases where things break immediately otherwise - we ran into this problem when building 3rd-party software (referee box of the RoboCup Logistics Leag

Re: make unmaintained ??

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 08:37:05AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/25/2015 06:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Sun, 2015-10-25 at 19:53 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > >> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek

Re: make unmaintained ??

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/25/2015 06:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sun, 2015-10-25 at 19:53 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote: >> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 01:07:47 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek >> wrote: >>> I built 4.1 for rawhide. If that checks out to be OK, I can >>>

[POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates

Change in package status over the last 168 hours 2 packages were orphaned gdesklets-goodweather [f22] was orphaned by sergiomb Themeable weather and condition display for gdesklet https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pk

Re: C++11 enabling in F22?

I'm afraid of some runtime dependencies clash, small amount of rebuilds to all (r-)deps? -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://awk.io -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.or

Re: C++11 enabling in F22?

On Mon, 2015-10-26 at 11:29 +, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 26/10/15 11:23, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Marek Skalický > > wrote: > >> Hello everyone, > >> I would like to ask what do you think about enabling c++11 in library in > >> F22? Is it permitted by Fedora gu

F-23 Branched report: 20151026 changes

Compose started at Mon Oct 26 07:15:03 UTC 2015 Summary: Added Packages: 0 Removed Packages: 0 Modified Packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 (0 ) Size change of modified packages: 0 (0 ) Size of removed packages: 0 (0 ) Size change: 0 (0 ) Compose finished at Mon Oct 26 11:26:17 UTC 2015

Re: C++11 enabling in F22?

On 26/10/15 11:23, Peter Robinson wrote: On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Marek Skalický wrote: Hello everyone, I would like to ask what do you think about enabling c++11 in library in F22? Is it permitted by Fedora guidelines? I am asking because of this bug - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sho

Re: C++11 enabling in F22?

On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Marek Skalický wrote: > Hello everyone, > I would like to ask what do you think about enabling c++11 in library in > F22? Is it permitted by Fedora guidelines? > > I am asking because of this bug - > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274307 . And I want

C++11 enabling in F22?

Hello everyone, I would like to ask what do you think about enabling c++11 in library in F22? Is it permitted by Fedora guidelines? I am asking because of this bug - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274307 . And I want to know the opinion of someone else, to decide. Thank you, Marek

rawhide report: 20151026 changes

Compose started at Mon Oct 26 05:15:02 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [IQmol] IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2015-10-26)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 10/26/2015 12:52 AM, wrote: > python-reportlab [...] I'll gladly take care of this one, since it's needed by Gourmet and a handful of other packages. My first goal will be to bump it to 3.2 in Rawhide after classes tomorrow. :) Regards. -

Re: Bodhi updates not pushed?

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 5:52 PM, Christopher wrote: > On https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272694 it was brought to my > attention that my updates for the zookeeper package weren't pushed to the > f22 and f21 updates-testing repos, though I do see the one in the f23 repo. > > Did I do s

Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2015-10-26)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If y

Review request for qbs package

Hello, I've got a review request for the qbs package (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262515, https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jakepetroules/qbs/, http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11578581). It would be greatly appreciated if someone could look into getting t

Re: Bug dnf update

On 10/26/15, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Albino B Neto wrote: > >> Yes. He were loading for more time. >> >> > Well, having a slow connection to your nearest mirror is not really a bug > in dnf. Try again later or specify a different mirror. And I believe users