2015-09-30 16:40 GMT-03:00 Kevin Fenzi :
> proftpd (el5)
> proftpd (el6)
> proftpd (epel7)
> proftpd (f21)
> proftpd (f22)
> proftpd (f23)
> proftpd (master)
I took proftpd all branches,
--
Itamar Reis Peixoto
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedora
On 09/30/2015 11:47 PM, Jens Lody wrote:
I want to take these theree, but they are still not official orphaned,
so I can not take ownership.
Should I just wait until the status changed in pkgdb ?
Those packages were orphaned but they were immediately picked up. Send a
message to the new POC t
Am Mittwoch, den 30.09.2015, 13:40 -0600 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
> In today's FESCo meeting we marked 2 maintainers as no longer
> responsive and I have just orphaned the packages that they were point
> of contact on.
>
> Please take a look at this list and if you wish to become the point
> of
> con
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 08:13:45 -0700
> Dave Johansen wrote:
>
> > Can I open a ticket requesting this feature enhancement? If so, is
> > https://fedorahosted.org/koji/wiki the right place?
>
> Sure.
>
I created a ticket:
https://fedorahosted.o
Thank you kindly, sir!
I will study these texts with great tenacity.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Alexander Ploumistos <
alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 2:50 AM, Pete V wrote:
> > Hi all my name is Pete V.
> > As a long time Linux user, I feel the time has c
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 2:50 AM, Pete V wrote:
> Hi all my name is Pete V.
> As a long time Linux user, I feel the time has come to step up and
> contribute big time.
Welcome aboard!
> were do I assign these to myself, in BZ?
There's some light reading ahead, start with these:
http
Il 01/10/2015 01:35, Michael Cronenworth ha scritto:
Hi,
Please look over the following reviews and let me know if you are able
to swap.
They have been pre-reviewed so they should be easy to do.
i take these for the moment
regards
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231353 php-c
Hi all my name is Pete V.
As a long time Linux user, I feel the time has come to step up and
contribute big time. Since Fedora core was officially my first
distribution
I really liked, Fedora would be my chosen target to do this
for.(nostalgia):)
As of my limited understanding
Hi,
Please look over the following reviews and let me know if you are able to swap.
They have been pre-reviewed so they should be easy to do.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231353 php-cssjanus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264179 php-mediawiki-at-ease
https://bugzil
On Qua, 2015-09-30 at 13:40 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> p7zip (el5)
> p7zip (el6)
> p7zip (epel7)
> p7zip (f21)
> p7zip (f22)
> p7zip (f23)
> p7zip (master)
I took it , I already had opened some bugzilla reports, I done some work
on this package .
I can take some more packages, if no one take it
I've taken yasm.
Greetings,
Christian
On 09/30/2015 09:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> In today's FESCo meeting we marked 2 maintainers as no longer
> responsive and I have just orphaned the packages that they were point
> of contact on.
>
> Please take a look at this list and if you wish to become
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 09/30/2015 03:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> htop (epel7) htop (f21) htop (f22) htop (f23) htop (master)
Taken htop.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWDFqsAAoJEHE/1K3lyLxnCwoP/0BPh1OAekkWfY7JV975goJb
sMDvgV+UoAGxnveITX
On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 22:54:15 +0200
Matthias Saou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Given the amount of notifications I just got... I'm one of the two
> maintainers :-/
Yeah, I meant to link the tickets, but I guess I failed. ;(
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1482
> Could someone from FESCo have at lea
* Kevin Fenzi [30/09/2015 13:40] :
>
> Please take a look at this list and if you wish to become the point of
> contact for that package do so in pkgdb.
> perl-Algorithm-FastPermute (master)
> perl-libintl (master)
I've taken these two packages on all their Fedora branches.
Emmanuel
--
devel ma
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:54:15PM +0200, Matthias Saou wrote:
> And sorry for all the trouble (two kids... some of you will
> understand for sure...).
I do indeed. Glad to hear from you! :)
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://adm
Hi,
Given the amount of notifications I just got... I'm one of the two
maintainers :-/
Could someone from FESCo have at least pinged me personally that this
was about to happen? I know that I've been wy too absent for the
last few years, my optimism about "getting back in the game" being a
bi
2015-09-30 15:40 GMT-04:00 Kevin Fenzi :
> In today's FESCo meeting we marked 2 maintainers as no longer
> responsive and I have just orphaned the packages that they were point
> of contact on.
>
> Please take a look at this list and if you wish to become the point of
> contact for that package do
2015-09-30 20:40 GMT+01:00 Kevin Fenzi :
> In today's FESCo meeting we marked 2 maintainers as no longer
> responsive and I have just orphaned the packages that they were point
> of contact on.
>
> Please take a look at this list and if you wish to become the point of
> contact for that package do
In today's FESCo meeting we marked 2 maintainers as no longer
responsive and I have just orphaned the packages that they were point
of contact on.
Please take a look at this list and if you wish to become the point of
contact for that package do so in pkgdb.
Thanks.
kevin
--
advancecomp (el5)
a
No missing expected images.
No images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20150929
No images in 23 Branched 20150929 but not this.
Failed openQA tests: 10 of 52
ID: 4282Test: i386 universal server_software_raid
ID: 4276Test: x86_64 workstation_live default_install
ID: 4275
No missing expected images.
Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20150929:
Cloud_atomic vagrant virtualbox x86_64
Cloud_atomic vagrant libvirt x86_64
No images in Rawhide 20150929 but not this.
Failed openQA tests: 52 of 52
ID: 4278Test: x86_64 universal server_btrfs
ID: 4225
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2015-10-01 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2015-10-01 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT
2015-10-01 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT
2015-10-01 1
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 12:28:06PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> The only way to ever make declaration of bundling reliable is to
> automate it somehow.
I'm in support of more package automation for any case.
With languages like Go, and for that matter I think basically any
modern language with
As scheduled [1], Fedora 23 Final Test Compose 1 (TC1) is now
available for testing (actually it's earlier than the schedule says,
but hey, we may as well get to testing). Please help us complete all
the validation testing!
openQA results for this one (all the results from 'coconut') look
pretty g
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015, at 12:28 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> The only way to ever make declaration of bundling reliable is to
> automate it somehow.
FWIW when I bundle, I use git submodules.
A major benefit of this is that it makes it a lot harder to patch
the upstream "accidentally" - you have t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/30/2015 11:37 AM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 08:35:41AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> * All packages not in the critical path whose upstreams have no
>> mechanism to build against system libraries '''must''' be
>> conta
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 04:52:48PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >people not declaring their bundles and not care about policies did the
> >same before: not declare it and not ask for exceptions - there is a
> >logical flow in "now that i don't need to ask FPC i don't declare it"
> Exactly, that's
On Wed, 2015-09-30 at 08:13 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> I'd just like to point out that we have always had the requirement
> for
> package that bundled libraries to carry the "Provides:
> bundled(libname)"
> metadata. What's new here is not needing to go through the FPC to
> get
> an ex
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 08:35:41AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> * All packages not in the critical path whose upstreams have no
> mechanism to build against system libraries '''must''' be contacted
> publicly about a path to supporting system libraries. If upstream
> refuses, this must be reco
On 30/09/15 14:35, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Just to circle around here (in case people don't read my reply to the
FESCo meeting agenda), I'm making the following revised proposal[1] to
FESCo which may or may not be discussed at today's meeting (given that
it was submitted late):
FWIW, I also fi
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Ralf Corsepius
wrote:
> On 09/30/2015 04:25 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> the opposite is more likely: people trying to avoid the FPC burden now
>>
> can declare it without fearing somebody takes notice and points out a
>> violation
>>
> If they don't care or are
On 09/30/2015 04:25 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 30.09.2015 um 16:13 schrieb Orion Poplawski:
On 09/30/2015 07:45 AM, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
Yes, I also see this as a good compromise.
We then have the ability to at least track bundling.
I'd just like to point out that we have always had the r
On St, 2015-09-30 at 16:25 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 30.09.2015 um 16:13 schrieb Orion Poplawski:
> > On 09/30/2015 07:45 AM, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
> >> Yes, I also see this as a good compromise.
> >> We then have the ability to at least track bundling.
> >>
> > I'd just like to point out
Am 30.09.2015 um 16:13 schrieb Orion Poplawski:
On 09/30/2015 07:45 AM, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
Yes, I also see this as a good compromise.
We then have the ability to at least track bundling.
I'd just like to point out that we have always had the requirement for
package that bundled libraries
Il 30/09/2015 16:13, Orion Poplawski ha scritto:
On 09/30/2015 07:45 AM, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 08:35:41AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
* All packages not in the critical path whose upstreams allow
On 09/30/2015 07:45 AM, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 08:35:41AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
* All packages not in the critical path whose upstreams allow them to
be build against system libraries '''must''
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 8:35 AM, Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> Just to circle around here (in case people don't read my reply to the
> FESCo meeting agenda), I'm making the following revised proposal[1] to
> FESCo which may or may not be discussed at today's meeting (given that
> it was submitted la
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 08:35:41AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> * All packages not in the critical path whose upstreams allow them to
>> be build against system libraries '''must''' be built against system
>> libraries.
>>
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 08:35:41AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> * All packages not in the critical path whose upstreams allow them to
> be build against system libraries '''must''' be built against system
> libraries.
> * All packages not in the critical path whose upstreams have no
> mechanis
Just to circle around here (in case people don't read my reply to the
FESCo meeting agenda), I'm making the following revised proposal[1] to
FESCo which may or may not be discussed at today's meeting (given that
it was submitted late):
=== Mandatory ===
* The Fedora Base Working Group has been ta
On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 14:35 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> meeting tomorrow at 18:00UTC (1:00pm EST) in #fedora-meeting on
> irc.freenode.net.
>
> Links to all tickets below can be found at:
> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report
Compose started at Wed Sep 30 07:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[CableSwig]
CableSwig-3.20.0-13.fc23.armv7hl requires gccxml
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws)
Am 30.09.2015 um 13:35 schrieb Vít Ondruch:
Or simpler:
dnf update
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/dnf/1.1.2/3.fc23/noarch/dnf-1.1.2-3.fc23.noarch.rpm
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/dnf/1.1.2/3.fc23/noarch/dnf-automatic-1.1.2-3.fc23.noarch.rpm
https://kojipkgs.fedora
Or simpler:
dnf update
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/dnf/1.1.2/3.fc23/noarch/dnf-1.1.2-3.fc23.noarch.rpm
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/dnf/1.1.2/3.fc23/noarch/dnf-automatic-1.1.2-3.fc23.noarch.rpm
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/dnf/1.1.2/3.fc23/noarch/dn
Compose started at Wed Sep 30 05:15:02 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[CableSwig]
CableSwig-3.20.0-13.fc23.i686 requires gccxml
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.f
W dniu 30.09.2015 o 10:39, Pavel Lisý pisze:
For others
I have found discussion in other maillist
For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases
mailto:for%20testing%20and%20quality%20assurance%20of%20fedora%20releases%20%3ct...@lists.fedoraproject.org%3e>>
It was bug in dnf:
workaround:
For others
I have found discussion in other maillist
For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases <
t...@lists.fedoraproject.org>
It was bug in dnf:
workaround:
mkdir /tmp/dnfbug
cd /tmp/dnfbug
wget https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/dnf/1.1.2/3.fc23/noarch/d
nf-1.1.2-3.fc23.noar
I have strange problem in f23 beta
Every action returns only this line:
Last metadata expiration check performed 0:00:00 ago on Wed Sep 30 10:21:21
2015.
ex.:
$ sudo dnf list --refresh
Last metadata expiration check performed 0:00:00 ago on Wed Sep 30 10:22:26
2015.
with --verbose
sudo dnf list
48 matches
Mail list logo
