Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

Am 18.09.2015 um 16:11 schrieb Scott Schmit: On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 09:09:47PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 14.09.2015 um 21:04 schrieb Adam Williamson: But just two posts ago you were drawing a distinction between an 'OS' and a 'distribution' and saying that Fedora ought to be a distribut

rawhide report: 20150918 changes

Compose started at Fri Sep 18 16:44:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [IQmol] IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0 [apache-scout]

F-23 Branched report: 20150918 changes

Compose started at Fri Sep 18 17:05:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for armhfp -- [apache-scout] apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws) apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:

Self Introduction: Gustavo Lima Chaves

Hello I'm an Intel employee, living in Campinas, Brazil. I'm the one that just sent a packaging request for the soletta project, being one of software developers. I'm targeting f22 at first (works on f21 too, according to copr), but f23+ packages will be provided later too, if I'm good with this f

rawhide and branched composes for 2015-09-18

Just a heads up to anyone interested: Both branched and rawhide composes failed this morning due to two issues: 1. There was a space issue on koji's nfs volume. 2. Someone changed the permissions on the 'update-comps' script in the comps repo so it was not executable. Both of these are now

Re: No space left on device: '/mnt/koji/work/tasks/...'

On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 08:23:11 +0200 Jan Synacek wrote: > I can't 'fedpkg build' right now and I'm not sure where to file this. > It seems something went wrong with the koji nfs volume early this morning. It's all back to normal now. kevin pgp1qe1ZuUtdo.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital sign

Re: llvm 3.7 for rawhide and then f23

On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 00:16 -0400, David Airlie wrote: > Hi, > > So I've been updating rawhide to llvm 3.7 upstream, so we can get > OpenGL 4.1 support on the radeonsi GPUs. > > The two depends on llvm I don't control/know about were julia and > pocl, I've done my best to make them work, > pocl I

Orphan some JS packages

Maintaining JS packages is just a mess. So I will orphan soon: ckeditor (siwinski, as coowner, want to take ?) prototype scriptaculous syntaxhighlighter Open ACL request if you want one of them. Remi -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:11:14AM -0400, Scott Schmit wrote: > ...per user. (Mozilla even had multiple user profile support within a > single user. I'm not sure if Firefox still has that or has since > dropped it.) Still has. I occasionally use it for testing. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Proje

Re: request for more visible KDE netinstall

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:31:13AM +0200, Petr Spacek wrote: > > But, it's really that the netinstall is hard to find from the KDE page. > > It's reasonably easy to find if you know what to look for on > > . > > Eh, you *should not* need to know whe

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

2015-09-15 13:02 GMT+02:00 Ralf Corsepius : > > a) We don't have any such tracking system. If maintainers followed FPC recommendations on that matter, it will be very easy to have one. I have in my TODO to implement one for CentOS Cloud SIG to track security issues for some horrible packages > b

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 09:09:47PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > Am 14.09.2015 um 21:04 schrieb Adam Williamson: > >But just two posts ago you were drawing a distinction between an 'OS' > >and a 'distribution' and saying that Fedora ought to be a distribution > >not an OS. > > > >So basically you'r

Re: Applications missing from Fedora 23

On 18 September 2015 at 13:46, Richard Shaw wrote: > Does this mean that only flarq isn't showing up? It's packaged with Fldigi > so as along as it's showing up I'm not too concerned. There doesn't appear to be any AppData file for fldigi so it's not going to show up at all in the software center

Re: Applications missing from Fedora 23

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 5:28 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: > fldigi: Uses XPM icon: flarq > Does this mean that only flarq isn't showing up? It's packaged with Fldigi so as along as it's showing up I'm not too concerned. Thanks, Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://a

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On 09/15/2015 08:16 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 19:59 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: >> On 09/15/2015 03:58 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: >> I'm not sure how difficult this would be because I'm not sure how many symbols rely upon indirect dependencies. I think it would be a worthw

Re: Proposal to reduce anti-bundling requirements

On 09/16/2015 03:47 PM, Dave Love wrote: > Michael Stahl writes: > >>> Symbol interposition is used a lot for very useful features, blocking >>> interposition would break a lot of stuff. >> >> really? i've always thought that it was only useful for libc symbols, >> but maybe that's because i don

Re: llvm 3.7 for rawhide and then f23

Le jeudi 17 septembre 2015 à 00:16 -0400, David Airlie a écrit : > Hi, > > So I've been updating rawhide to llvm 3.7 upstream, so we can get > OpenGL 4.1 support on the radeonsi GPUs. > > The two depends on llvm I don't control/know about were julia and > pocl, I've done my best to make them work

Applications missing from Fedora 23

The following applications are missing from the software center in F23 beta, although they *are* shipping an AppData file (which seems to suggest they wanted to be shown): albumart: No 'Comment' in desktop or in AppData albumart: No 'Name' in desktop or in AppData asylum: icon /usr/share/icons/h

Re: [Fedora-packaging] RFC mass bug reporting: checksec failures

On 09/17/2015 12:53 PM, Alexander Todorov wrote: > Is it realistic to request a RFE with this information stored in the > compiled object and then be read by readelf ? If so I can file bugs in > bugzilla.redhat.com or upstream . elfutils would be a more likely choice to implement that tool. Note

Re: request for more visible KDE netinstall

On 17.9.2015 16:28, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 02:03:16AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: >>> This came in in Bugzilla filed against the >>> fedora-productimg-workstation, which isn't the right place for it, so >>> I'm passing it on: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=12635

Re: [Fedora-packaging] RFC mass bug reporting: checksec failures

На 18.09.2015 в 03:15, Steve Grubb написа: I think Florian answered this. Indeed, the --debug-dump option does find these strings, but they are mixed in with other data. I think that if there is no canary and flags were passed, its not a problem. If the flags are absent, the build scripts are su

R: No space left on device: '/mnt/koji/work/tasks/...'

hi confirm, i have the same problem regards gil >Messaggio originale >Da: jsyna...@redhat.com >Data: 18/09/2015 8.23 >A: >Ogg: No space left on device: '/mnt/koji/work/tasks/...' > >I can't 'fedpkg build' right now and I'm not sure where to file this. > >-- >Jan Synacek >Software Engine