On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 21:30 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 18:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > I think I'm gonna go and do one of my deep dives into the history of
> > these rules tonight. I have a definite memory that at one point the
> > accepted wisdom was that only
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 18:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I think I'm gonna go and do one of my deep dives into the history of
> these rules tonight. I have a definite memory that at one point the
> accepted wisdom was that only bundling of *already packaged* stuff
> was forbidden, but now i loo
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 3:39 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 07:35:03PM +0200, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
>> > I just discovered that trying to install the Noto font family in
>> > Software will reliably kill a (relatively powerful) system. This will
>> > fix that, righ
On September 10, 2015 6:25:48 PM PDT, Adam Williamson
wrote:
>On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 18:13 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 20:04 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>> > > > > > > "AW" == Adam Williamson writes:
>> >
>> > AW> I think the fact that we can't even have a discu
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 18:13 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 20:04 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > > > > > "AW" == Adam Williamson writes:
> >
> > AW> I think the fact that we can't even have a discussion of this
> > where
> > AW> we both understand what the current
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 20:04 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > > > > "AW" == Adam Williamson writes:
>
> AW> I think the fact that we can't even have a discussion of this
> where
> AW> we both understand what the current rules actually *are* clearly
> AW> indicates they have a clarity probl
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 18:59 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > > > > "AW" == Adam Williamson
> > > > > > writes:
>
> AW> That just says 'multiple, separate upstream projects' (nothing
> about
> AW> being 'compiled in'), and implies that absolutely any such case
> can
> AW> only be included
> "AW" == Adam Williamson writes:
AW> I think the fact that we can't even have a discussion of this where
AW> we both understand what the current rules actually *are* clearly
AW> indicates they have a clarity problem =)
You may recall my earlier message in this thread where I indicated that
> "AM" == Adam Miller writes:
AM> I also like the proposal for the bundled() macro definition
AM> for tracking purposes.
Just a note that it isn't a proposal; that is the current requirement
for anything which bundles things.
- J<
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https:
> "AW" == Adam Williamson writes:
AW> That just says 'multiple, separate upstream projects' (nothing about
AW> being 'compiled in'), and implies that absolutely any such case can
AW> only be included with an explicit 'Bundling Exception'.
OK, so "compiled in" isn't really the right term if y
> "MM" == Matthew Miller writes:
MM> I think it's because overriding a different group seems hostile,
MM> even if it isn't meant that way. And FESCo doesn't want to feel like
MM> they're second-guessing other groups all the time.
Well, FPC even has a "bounce to FESCo clause" in the rules we
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 14:33 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:15:51 -0700
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > Huh, maybe it changed? Or there's a different license somewhere.
> > I'm
> > almost sure it used to be, and this was intentional. Oh well,
> > substitute some other example, y
On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:15:51 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Huh, maybe it changed? Or there's a different license somewhere. I'm
> almost sure it used to be, and this was intentional. Oh well,
> substitute some other example, you get the point - Sun's Java or
> something. It was just an example.
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 03:50:27PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 02:41:13PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > Anyway, what I don't get is why we're to the point of tossing out the
> > primary anti-bundling rule when FESCo has always had the power to
> > override any FP
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 13:11 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:02:31 -0700
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > Kernel modules are kind of a grey area because there are differing
> > opinions on their legality in re the GPL, but in general terms,
> > it's
> > not correct to say we don't
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 02:59:41PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 12:39 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > "MM" == Matthew Miller writes:
> >
> > MM> That said, I do recognize that "provides high-quality packages" has
> > MM> also always been an underlying Fedora value
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 02:41:13PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> Anyway, what I don't get is why we're to the point of tossing out the
> primary anti-bundling rule when FESCo has always had the power to
> override any FPC decision. So FPC says "this isn't good packaging" and
> FESCo can say
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 09:53 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> I assume that subject line got your attention.
>>
>> I know this is a long-standing debate and that this thread is likely
>> to turn into an incomprehensible flamewar filled wi
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> > I would like to propose that the no-bundled-libraries policy be
>>> > amended as follows: "Any package that has an existing mechanism to
>>> > link against a shared system library and functions correctly when
>>> > doing so must link a
> "SS" == Simo Sorce writes:
SS> I have the impression (which may be totally wrong) that you are
SS> taking the binary approach here: either we care maximally or we do
SS> not care at all.
I sure hope that's not the tack I'm taking.
SS> It seem to me Stephen is making a proposal to tweak ju
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 09:03 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Stephen Gallagher > om> wrote:
>> > I assume that subject line got your attention.
>> >
>> Most definitely. :)
>>
>> So it's basically the same
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> I assume that subject line got your attention.
>
> I know this is a long-standing debate and that this thread is likely
> to turn into an incomprehensible flamewar filled with the same tired
> arguments, but I'm going to make a proposal a
On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 11:02:31 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Kernel modules are kind of a grey area because there are differing
> opinions on their legality in re the GPL, but in general terms, it's
> not correct to say we don't include non-free software for *legal*
> reasons. There are plenty of
On 09/10/2015 09:53 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
The point of software is to provide a service to an end-user. Users
don't run software because it has good packaging policies, they run
software because it meets a need that they have. If they can't get
that software from Fedora, they *will* get it
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 21:01 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 10.09.2015 um 20:37 schrieb Matthew Miller:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 07:48:22PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > > if i would want a operating system where i have no idea after
> > > security updates for a library if *all* applicatio
Am 10.09.2015 um 20:37 schrieb Matthew Miller:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 07:48:22PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
if i would want a operating system where i have no idea after
security updates for a library if *all* applications are fixed i
could just have gone to Apple OSX or stayed at Windows
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 12:39 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "MM" == Matthew Miller writes:
>
> MM> That said, I do recognize that "provides high-quality packages" has
> MM> also always been an underlying Fedora value even if unstated. But, I
> MM> think that _that_ value should be in s
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 07:35:03PM +0200, nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote:
> > I just discovered that trying to install the Noto font family in
> > Software will reliably kill a (relatively powerful) system. This will
> > fix that, right?
> I fear that's the cause, not the solution. The previous
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 07:48:22PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> if i would want a operating system where i have no idea after
> security updates for a library if *all* applications are fixed i
> could just have gone to Apple OSX or stayed at Windows
Unbundling is one approach to that problem. It
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 11:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 12:58 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 11:02 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > "SG" == Stephen Gallagher writes:
> > > SG> If they can't get that software from Fedora, t
Missing expected images:
Cloud atomic Disk x86_64
Cloud base Disk i386
Images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20150909:
Kde Live i386
Kde Live x86_64
Scientific_kde Live x86_64
Scientific_kde Live i386
Kde Disk armhfp
No images in 23 Branched 20150909 but not this.
Failed openQA tests: 21
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 12:39:54PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> MM> That said, I do recognize that "provides high-quality packages" has
> MM> also always been an underlying Fedora value even if unstated. But, I
> MM> think that _that_ value should be in support of the Big Four, and in
> MM>
Hello all,
My name is David Muse. I'm the lead developer of the SQL Relay database
connection management system (http://sqlrelay.sourceforge.net) as well
as several other software projects (http://www.firstworks.com). I've
been developing and integrating open source software for over 15 year
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 12:58 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 11:02 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>
> > > > > > > "SG" == Stephen Gallagher writes:
> > SG> If they can't get that software from Fedora, they *will* get it
> > from
> > SG> another source (or use a differen
Am 10.09.2015 um 19:45 schrieb Stephen Gallagher:
Right, so that's basically the point of this thread. It's time to
decide if we as the Fedora Community still care enough to go through
all that process. I didn't want to just have one group (FESCo)
deciding something of that import without bring
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 12:39 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > > > > "MM" == Matthew Miller writes:
>
> MM> That said, I do recognize that "provides high-quality packages"
> has
> MM> also always been an underlying Fedora value even if unstated.
> But, I
> MM> think that _that_ value should
> "MM" == Matthew Miller writes:
MM> That said, I do recognize that "provides high-quality packages" has
MM> also always been an underlying Fedora value even if unstated. But, I
MM> think that _that_ value should be in support of the Big Four, and in
MM> support of our mission in general, not
- Mail original -
De: "Matthew Miller"
> I just discovered that trying to install the Noto font family in
> Software will reliably kill a (relatively powerful) system. This will
> fix that, right?
I fear that's the cause, not the solution. The previous solution was very
careful to onl
Am 10.09.2015 um 18:58 schrieb drago01:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 10.09.2015 um 17:38 schrieb David Sommerseth:
On 10/09/15 15:31, Reindl Harald wrote:
what in the world is that garbage instead a clear and simple log as
/var/log/yum.log just listing installe
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:02:27AM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> I know that's something of a straw man, but my point is that we must
> have some principles, and must work with upstreams to attempt to get
> them to at least understand those principles. And we shouldn't give up
> on that jus
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Adam Williamson <
adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 11:02 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > > > > > "SG" == Stephen Gallagher writes:
> >
> > SG> Right now, we have a policy that essentially forbids source code
> > SG> from being b
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 10.09.2015 um 17:38 schrieb David Sommerseth:
>>
>> On 10/09/15 15:31, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
>>> what in the world is that garbage instead a clear and simple log as
>>> /var/log/yum.log just listing installed, removed and updated pack
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 11:02 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > > > > "SG" == Stephen Gallagher writes:
> SG> If they can't get that software from Fedora, they *will* get it
> from
> SG> another source (or use a different OS that doesn't get in their
> SG> way).
>
> Exactly. Let's ship bin
Hi,
I just submit po4a-0.47 into F23 ... , po4a don't have any soname bump
[1] but is wild used , so some attention is advised .
[1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=6751460
Thanks,
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproje
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 11:02 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > > > > > "SG" == Stephen Gallagher writes:
>
> SG> Right now, we have a policy that essentially forbids source code
> SG> from being bundled into a package.
>
> Technically we only care if that bundled code is actually compiled
>
On 10/09/15 17:46, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 10.09.2015 um 17:38 schrieb David Sommerseth:
>> On 10/09/15 15:31, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>> what in the world is that garbage instead a clear and simple log as
>>> /var/log/yum.log just listing installed, removed and updated packages?
>>>
>>> frank
On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 02:13:28PM +0900, Akira TAGOH wrote:
> I've added the file triggers for fonts in rawhide to update the cache
> and dropped the call of fc-cache in %post/un from fontpackages. we may
> need to rebuild all of font packages eventually though, please let me
> know if you see an
On 09/10/2015 05:40 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> Even if the problems did occur, the user is going to see it whether
> they get the app from Fedora or from a 3rd party repo.
Not necessarily. Even more bundling (everything except glibc) tends to
fix it.
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Se
> "SG" == Stephen Gallagher writes:
SG> Right now, we have a policy that essentially forbids source code
SG> from being bundled into a package.
Technically we only care if that bundled code is actually compiled in.
SG> In technical terms, this means essentially that the packaging
SG> polici
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Adam Williamson <
adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 09:03 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Stephen Gallagher > om>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I assume that subject line got your attention.
> > >
> > > Most definitel
Am 10.09.2015 um 17:38 schrieb David Sommerseth:
On 10/09/15 15:31, Reindl Harald wrote:
what in the world is that garbage instead a clear and simple log as
/var/log/yum.log just listing installed, removed and updated packages?
frankly it's impossible to write worksheets as admin what happened
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 09:03 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Stephen Gallagher om>
> wrote:
>
> > I assume that subject line got your attention.
> >
> > Most definitely. :)
>
> So it's basically the same but without FPC as a gatekeeper? Do you
> have
> any proposals
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 09:53 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> I assume that subject line got your attention.
>
> I know this is a long-standing debate and that this thread is likely
> to turn into an incomprehensible flamewar filled with the same tired
> arguments, but I'm going to make a proposal
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Doesn't that affect logging to stdout, rather than to dnf.log?
I was under the impression it did both.
Brandon Vincent
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:25:00AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 16:04 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > > > I would like to propose that the no-bundled-libraries policy be
> > > > > amended as follows: "Any package that has an existing
> > > > > mechanism to
> > > > > l
On 10/09/15 15:31, Reindl Harald wrote:
> what in the world is that garbage instead a clear and simple log as
> /var/log/yum.log just listing installed, removed and updated packages?
>
> frankly it's impossible to write worksheets as admin what happened in
> the last few weeks with such needless
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 16:04 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > > I would like to propose that the no-bundled-libraries policy be
> > > > amended as follows: "Any package that has an existing
> > > > mechanism to
> > > > link against a shared system library and functions correctly
> > > > when
> >
On 10/09/15 08:06 -0700, Brandon Vincent wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:31 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
what in the world is that garbage instead a clear and simple log as
/var/log/yum.log just listing installed, removed and updated packages?
frankly it's impossible to write worksheets as admin
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:31 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> what in the world is that garbage instead a clear and simple log as
> /var/log/yum.log just listing installed, removed and updated packages?
>
> frankly it's impossible to write worksheets as admin what happened in the
> last few weeks with s
>> > I would like to propose that the no-bundled-libraries policy be
>> > amended as follows: "Any package that has an existing mechanism to
>> > link against a shared system library and functions correctly when
>> > doing so must link against that library and not bundle it
>> > internally.
>> > A
On 09/10/2015 04:51 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> How do you propose to resolve symbol conflicts if both the system
>> library and the bundled library are loaded into the same process?
>> The
>> current ELF linking scheme lacks good support for bundling libraries
>> whose exported symbols have
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 16:42 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 09/10/2015 03:53 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> > I would like to propose that the no-bundled-libraries policy be
> > amended as follows: "Any package that has an existing mechanism to
> > link against a shared system library and fun
Missing expected images:
Kde Live i386
Workstation Live i386
Cloud base Disk i386
Cloud base Disk x86_64
Kde Live x86_64
Cloud atomic Disk x86_64
Kde Disk armhfp
Workstation Live x86_64
Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20150909:
Xfce Live x86_64
Xfce Live i386
Robotics Live i386
Xfce Disk
On 09/10/2015 03:06 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> My view: It's an ongoing struggle and fight against upstream
> incompetence, carelessness, sloppiness and low-quality crap software.
> It's a fight we should not give up to, because it would cause damage the
> quality of Fedora.
>
> In that sense,
On 09/10/2015 03:53 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> I would like to propose that the no-bundled-libraries policy be
> amended as follows: "Any package that has an existing mechanism to
> link against a shared system library and functions correctly when
> doing so must link against that library and
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 04:18:00PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 09/10/2015 04:06 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 09:03 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Stephen Gallagher >>om> wrote:
> >>>I assume that subject line got your attentio
Hi all,
Tuesday was an important day on the Fedora 23 schedule[1], with two
significant cut-offs.
Tuesday was the Beta freeze[2]. This means that only packages which
fix accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs[3][4] will be marked as
'stable' and included in the Beta composes. Other builds wil
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 09/10/2015 04:08 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Stephen Gallagher
>> wrote:
>
>
>> Is the intention of your proposal to also allow Chromium into the main
>> Fedora repos? I honestly can't tell where it dra
On 09/10/2015 04:08 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Is the intention of your proposal to also allow Chromium into the main
Fedora repos? I honestly can't tell where it draws the line.
We have a long list of bundling exceptions in Fedora. I do
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 10:08 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Stephen Gallagher om> wrote:
> > I assume that subject line got your attention.
> >
> > I know this is a long-standing debate and that this thread is
> > likely
> > to turn into an incomprehensible flamewar fi
Hello,
I've pushed man-db with file triggers and crontab dependency dropped to
rawhide. Removing cron job means that there will be no periodic cache
update for user-configured manpaths. There has already been discussion
about this: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-Octobe
r/thre
On 09/10/2015 04:06 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 09:03 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I assume that subject line got your attention.
Most definitely. :)
So it's basically the same but without FPC as a gatekeeper? D
On 10/09/15 15:31 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
what in the world is that garbage instead a clear and simple log as
/var/log/yum.log just listing installed, removed and updated packages?
Yes, it's unhelpful nonsense. There doesn't seem to be a replacement
for yum.log :-(
--
devel mailing list
d
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> I assume that subject line got your attention.
>
> I know this is a long-standing debate and that this thread is likely
> to turn into an incomprehensible flamewar filled with the same tired
> arguments, but I'm going to make a proposal a
On 10/09/15 14:53, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> I assume that subject line got your attention.
> The reason for this proposal is relatively simple: we know the
> advantages to unbundling, particularly with security and resource-
> usage. However, the world's developer community largely *does not
> c
On 09/10/2015 03:53 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I assume that subject line got your attention.
The reason for this proposal is relatively simple: we know the
advantages to unbundling, particularly with security and resource-
usage. However, the world's developer community largely *does not
ca
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 09:03 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Stephen Gallagher om> wrote:
> > I assume that subject line got your attention.
> >
> Most definitely. :)
>
> So it's basically the same but without FPC as a gatekeeper? Do you
> have any proposals for
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> I assume that subject line got your attention.
>
> Most definitely. :)
So it's basically the same but without FPC as a gatekeeper? Do you have
any proposals for enforcement? A periodic query of Provides (bundled-foo)
and a BZ requesti
I assume that subject line got your attention.
I know this is a long-standing debate and that this thread is likely
to turn into an incomprehensible flamewar filled with the same tired
arguments, but I'm going to make a proposal and then attempt to
respond to many of those known arguments up-front
what in the world is that garbage instead a clear and simple log as
/var/log/yum.log just listing installed, removed and updated packages?
frankly it's impossible to write worksheets as admin what happened in
the last few weeks with such needless verbose logging
Sep 10 15:26:08 INFO Gesamtgrö
==
#fedora-meeting-2: Env and Stacks (2015-09-10)
==
Meeting started by hhorak at 12:01:04 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2015-09-10/env-and-stacks.2015-
Should be time to drop istanbul, since it's no longer developed.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://awk.io
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Already took nec2c, I've been maintaining it for over a year anyway.
Thanks,
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Compose started at Thu Sep 10 07:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[ScientificPython]
ScientificPython-2.8-20.fc22.armv7hl requires libmpi.so.1
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.jud
I will take care of python-xlib and python-couchdb.
On Wednesday, September 9, 2015, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> Due to FESCo ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1474
>
> * #1474 Non-responsive maintainer - Jef Spaleta (jwb, 18:10:08)
> * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco
On 2015-09-10, 09:24 GMT, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 11:16 +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote:
>> On 2015-09-09, 19:37 GMT, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> > pytz
>> > python-dateutil
>>
>> I see these two as too important to let them fall, so I am
>> taking them. However, I would really really lik
Matěj Cepl schrieb am Do., 10. Sep. 2015 um 12:56 Uhr:
> On 2015-09-10, 09:24 GMT, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 11:16 +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> >> On 2015-09-09, 19:37 GMT, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >> > pytz
> >> > python-dateutil
> >>
> >> I see these two as too important to let
Compose started at Thu Sep 10 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
[ScientificPython]
On 2015-09-10, 09:24 GMT, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 11:16 +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote:
>> On 2015-09-09, 19:37 GMT, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> > pytz
>> > python-dateutil
>>
>> I see these two as too important to let them fall, so I am
>> taking them. However, I would really really lik
On 9 September 2015 at 19:21, James Antill wrote:
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
> meeting Thursday at 2015-09-10 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
> irc.freenode.net.
>
> Local time information (via. rktime):
>
> 2015-09-10 09:00 Thu US/Pacific
Good News everyone,
after another 3 weeks, new versions of DNF and DNF-PLUGINS-CORE have been
released. DNF 1.1.1
brings mark command [1] feature while DNF-PLUGINS-CORE adds 4 new filters from
"dnf list" command
and extending functionality of `--arch` and `--tree` switches. Additionally
around
WG meeting will be at 12:00 UTC (9:00 EST, 14:00 Brno, 8:00 Boston,
21:00 Tokyo, 22:00 Brisbane) in #fedora-meeting-2 on Freenode.
= Topics =
* Developer portal -- whatever is needed for finalizing
* RepoFunnel and the Software Component Pipeline -- any feedback
https://lists.fedoraproject.or
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 11:16 +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> On 2015-09-09, 19:37 GMT, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > pytz
> > python-dateutil
>
> I see these two as too important to let them fall, so I am
> taking them. However, I would really really like to have some
> co-maintainers, because I don’t feel l
On 2015-09-09, 19:37 GMT, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> pytz
> python-dateutil
I see these two as too important to let them fall, so I am
taking them. However, I would really really like to have some
co-maintainers, because I don’t feel like I really understand
the matter.
Orion?
Best,
Matěj
--
htt
94 matches
Mail list logo
