With this coming Monday being a US holiday, I propose that we cancel the
Blocker review meeting. We're currently sitting at 3/1 proposals for
Beta and Final - so I don't think it'll put us too far behind.
Of course, if someone else wants to run the meeting in my stead, that's
also fine. Otherwise,
Kevin Fenzi writes:
On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 08:37:13 -0400
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> I use LightDM with XFCE, and the "Switch User" option is disabled.
>
> I tested the following fix, and it works perfectly:
>
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/LightDM#User_switching_under_Xfce4
>
> I think thi
On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 08:37:13 -0400
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> I use LightDM with XFCE, and the "Switch User" option is disabled.
>
> I tested the following fix, and it works perfectly:
>
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/LightDM#User_switching_under_Xfce4
>
> I think this is a bug in Fedora
On Fri, 04 Sep 2015 11:10:40 +0100
Dave Love wrote:
> I already filed an issue in bugzilla, per instructions for EPEL
> packages, since the client crashes. (It may well actually be a
> problem with python-fedora.) Was that a waste of time?
No. Just might not be the first place maintainers are
04.09.2015, 21:18, "Jan Lukas" :Okay, here it is: https://launchpad.net/feedreader/1.2/1.2.1/+download/FeedReader-1.2.1.tar.gzNow with license and build-time-switch for webkit2gtk so you don't have to replace 3.0 with 4.0 in the CMakeLists.txt anymore (use -DUSE_WEBKIT_4=ON) Already updated :) Than
Hello!
I've been trying to get some old CVE's fixed in the nagios package and
it appears to be falling on deaf ears
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958305
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046333
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066580
I was wondering if anyo
Okay, here it is:
https://launchpad.net/feedreader/1.2/1.2.1/+download/FeedReader-1.2.1.tar.gz
Now with license and build-time-switch for webkit2gtk so you don't have
to replace 3.0 with 4.0 in the CMakeLists.txt anymore (use
-DUSE_WEBKIT_4=ON)
On Do, Sep 3, 2015 at 7:37 , Pete Walter wrote:
04.09.2015, 14:19, "Jan Lukas" :Already done. I will release something like a 1.2.1 soon (with the license), since I received a few bug reports after the release :) Thanks. I see you've now released 1.2.1, so I went ahead and updated my spec file as well in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?
Missing expected images:
Kde Live i386
Kde Live x86_64
Cloud base Disk i386
Kde Disk armhfp
Cloud base Disk x86_64
Images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20150903:
Workstation Live x86_64
Images in 23 Branched 20150903 but not this:
Kde Live i386
Lxde Live x86_64
Mate Live x86_64
Kde Live
On 09/04/2015 07:11 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 03:58:12PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> On 09/04/2015 03:49 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>
>>> Clearly it is used by some programs, so it should be considered part of the
>>> public API. If it wasn't meant to be exported, it sh
On September 3, 2015 9:50:35 AM PDT, Eric Griffith
wrote:
>That's a shame. I run an owncloud instance for the family right now, I
>guess I'll be swapping it out for an upstream package. Is there
>anything
>you're aware of that I should watch for during the migration?
>On Sep 2, 2015 22:37, "Adam
Missing expected images:
Kde Live i386
Workstation Live i386
Cloud base Disk i386
Cloud base Disk x86_64
Kde Live x86_64
Cloud atomic Disk x86_64
Kde Disk armhfp
Workstation Live x86_64
Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20150903:
Lxde Live i386
Security Live i386
Soas Live x86_64
Images in
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 05:00:15PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 09/04/2015 04:11 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 03:58:12PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> On 09/04/2015 03:49 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >>
> >>> Clearly it is used by some programs, so it should be consid
On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 13:23:43 +1000
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> > On 1 Sep 2015, at 1:15 am, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
> > for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
> > unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they a
On 09/04/2015 04:11 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 03:58:12PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> On 09/04/2015 03:49 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>
>>> Clearly it is used by some programs, so it should be considered part of the
>>> public API. If it wasn't meant to be exported, it sh
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 03:58:12PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 09/04/2015 03:49 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > Clearly it is used by some programs, so it should be considered part of the
> > public API. If it wasn't meant to be exported, it should not have been
> > exported. The ld.so warn
On 09/04/2015 03:49 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Clearly it is used by some programs, so it should be considered part of the
> public API. If it wasn't meant to be exported, it should not have been
> exported. The ld.so warning is only emitted if there is a copy relocation
> against that symbol an
On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 15:41 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 09/04/2015 03:38 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 13:14 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> >> On Pá, 2015-09-04 at 00:38 -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> >>> On 08/28/2015 03:23 PM, Josh Stone wrote:
> I update from nss-3.19.3
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 01:14:08PM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On Pá, 2015-09-04 at 00:38 -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> > On 08/28/2015 03:23 PM, Josh Stone wrote:
> > > I update from nss-3.19.3-1.0.fc22.x86_64 to nss-3.20.0-1.0.fc22.x86_64
> > > this morning, and now I get this stderr output:
> >
On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 13:14 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On Pá, 2015-09-04 at 00:38 -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> > On 08/28/2015 03:23 PM, Josh Stone wrote:
> > > I update from nss-3.19.3-1.0.fc22.x86_64 to nss-3.20.0-1.0.fc22.x86_64
> > > this morning, and now I get this stderr output:
> > >
> >
On 09/04/2015 03:38 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 13:14 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
>> On Pá, 2015-09-04 at 00:38 -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>>> On 08/28/2015 03:23 PM, Josh Stone wrote:
I update from nss-3.19.3-1.0.fc22.x86_64 to nss-3.20.0-1.0.fc22.x86_64
this morning, a
I use LightDM with XFCE, and the "Switch User" option is disabled.
I tested the following fix, and it works perfectly:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/LightDM#User_switching_under_Xfce4
I think this is a bug in Fedora's packaging. Either xfwm4 should be patched
to look foreither gdmflexi
Compose started at Fri Sep 4 07:15:02 UTC 2015
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[ScientificPython]
ScientificPython-2.8-20.fc22.armv7hl requires libmpi.so.1
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.jud
Already done. I will release something like a 1.2.1 soon (with the
license), since I received a few bug reports after the release :)
On Do, Sep 3, 2015 at 7:37 , Pete Walter wrote:
03.09.2015, 12:57, "Miroslav Suchý" :
Dne 3.9.2015 v 00:16 janlukasgern...@freenet.de napsal(a):
repo is now
On Pá, 2015-09-04 at 00:38 -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On 08/28/2015 03:23 PM, Josh Stone wrote:
> > I update from nss-3.19.3-1.0.fc22.x86_64 to nss-3.20.0-1.0.fc22.x86_64
> > this morning, and now I get this stderr output:
> >
> > $ /usr/bin/stap -V >/dev/null
> > /usr/bin/stap: Symbol `SSL_I
Hi,
It seems Fedora Jam is not included in current test composes for F23
and is not being included in nightly composes
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?state=all&view=tree&method=livecd&order=-id
(not failing to build as Live Workstation is, simply not being
included in attempted builds).
Jeff Backus writes:
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
>> > When I remember the non-obvious way to do it on the bodhi web site
>> > and try, I get a pop-up saying just "Required", though I managed to
>> > operate it previously.
>>
>> That's also pretty weird. Can you file an
Kevin Fenzi writes:
> On Thu, 03 Sep 2015 17:33:44 +0100
> Dave Love wrote:
>
>> Is there a currently-working way to push an update?
>>
>> fedpkg update (running on rhel6, but with the latest available
>> versions of bodhi and python-fedora as far as I can tell) crashes.
>
> Can you please file
On 08/31/2015 09:55 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> Just a quick heads up that it's GNOME 3.17.91 release this week and we
> are still using the f23-gnome side tag for builds - please use 'fedpkg
> build --target f23-gnome' if you are helping with builds.
>
> I'll take care of submitting them all in a s
29 matches
Mail list logo