dnf output to STDOUT/STDERR

2015-08-30 Thread Joachim Backes
Some dnf messages are not relevant me, so I redirect STDERR to /dev/null if using dnf. But this has the disadvantage the the prompt "Is this ok [y/N]:" gets lost too. Obviously it is written to STDERR. So my proposal for dnf: write the prompt "Is this ok [y/N]:" to STDOUT and not to STDERR.

Re: Looking for new maintainer: ownCloud (Fedora / EPEL)

2015-08-30 Thread Matěj Cepl
On 2015-08-29, 21:27 GMT, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi, folks. So I've been maintaining ownCloud for the last little > while. Unfortunately I sat down today to try again and update the > package to the latest upstream (8.1.1), and somewhere in the second > hour of insanely stupid PHP autoloader code

Re: Oops on i686, 4.2.0-0.rc8, was: Summary/Minutes from...

2015-08-30 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 01:07:36PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Richard W.M. Jones > wrote: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258223 > > I have i686 hardware (ancient Dell laptop) running > 4.2.0-0.rc8.git0.1.fc23.i686 for over 24 hours with some

Re: Oops on i686, 4.2.0-0.rc8, was: Summary/Minutes from...

2015-08-30 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 01:07:36PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > And is there a meaningful difference this is an fc23 > kernel, not fc24? I don't know. If fc23 has the same kernel, I see no reason why it wouldn't have the same bug, but I didn't try it on fc23. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualiza

Oops on i686, 4.2.0-0.rc8, was: Summary/Minutes from...

2015-08-30 Thread Chris Murphy
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258223 I have i686 hardware (ancient Dell laptop) running 4.2.0-0.rc8.git0.1.fc23.i686 for over 24 hours with some heavy btrfs + rsync stuff, and no oopses. What would I need to run to try t

Re: Summary/Minutes from yesterday's FESCo Meeting (2015-08-26)

2015-08-30 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 05:47:02PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Still investigating this, and I've not filed a bug yet, but the stack > trace is below. > > [0.067000] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 55501e06 > [0.067000] IP: [] common_interrupt+0xb/0x38 > [0.067000

Fedora 23 Branched 20150830 compose check report

2015-08-30 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Cloud atomic Disk x86_64 Cloud base Disk i386 Cloud base Disk x86_64 No images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20150829 Images in 23 Branched 20150829 but not this: Cloud base Vagrant x86_64 Docker Filesystem x86_64 Cloud base Disk x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 2 of

Re: tagBuild FAILED

2015-08-30 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 17:14:12 +0200 gil wrote: > Hi > any ideas? > resubmit the package? You can just tag it yourself, since that was the only thing that failed... koji tag-pkg f24-boost querydsl3-3.6.6-1.fc24 (or f24). That builder has been disabled until it's disk can be replaced. kevin

Fedora Rawhide 20150830 compose check report

2015-08-30 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Kde Live i386 Cloud base Disk i386 Cloud base Disk x86_64 Kde Live x86_64 Cloud atomic Disk x86_64 Kde Disk armhfp No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20150829 Images in Rawhide 20150829 but not this: Security Live x86_64 Cloud base Disk x86_64 Cinnamon Live i386

tagBuild FAILED

2015-08-30 Thread gil
Hi any ideas? resubmit the package? Konsole output Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10888087 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 10888087 build (rawhide, /querydsl3:58b6751f114e06557a7d3bf81d0df2d4e4434002): open (buildvm-21.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 1

Re: when DEP-3 compliant patches in Fedora?

2015-08-30 Thread Florian Weimer
On 08/30/2015 03:44 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: >> Ever heard of "quilt"? It even has handling of sane spec files built-in. > > Sorry, but I'm opposed to requiring a specific tool to generate patches. > Patches are made in many ways in the real world: plain diff, svn diff,

Re: Do you know how many 64-bit architectures Fedora has?

2015-08-30 Thread Chuck Anderson
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 06:02:35PM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > W dniu 24.08.2015 o 16:09, Jonathan Underwood pisze: > >It would be worthwhile adding this to: > > > >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks > > Added Is there an analagous macro for "all little endian arches"? This w

rawhide report: 20150830 changes

2015-08-30 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sun Aug 30 05:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [ScientificPython] ScientificPython-2.8-20.fc22.i686 requires libmpi.so.1 [apache-scout] apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:ud

F-23 Branched report: 20150830 changes

2015-08-30 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Sun Aug 30 07:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for armhfp -- [GMT] GMT-5.1.2-1.fc23.armv7hl requires libgdal.so.1 [ScientificPython] ScientificPython-2.8-20.fc22.armv7hl requires libmpi.so.1 [airinv] airinv

Re: Firefox addon signing

2015-08-30 Thread Seth Johnson
There can be alternative authorities, and you could opt to choose them nstead. It's really a question of having the option of not relying on Mozilla's decisions. It's not a choice of either each individual's own keys or the "original authority who's the one true authority." Self-signing means cho