On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 11:53:18PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I have a patch for a source file that has DOS line endings and
> %patch strips the \r characters causing the patch to fail while
> suggesting the use of the --binary option. However the %patch macro
> will not accept the binary opti
I have a patch for a source file that has DOS line endings and %patch
strips the \r characters causing the patch to fail while suggesting the
use of the --binary option. However the %patch macro will not accept
the binary option.
Is there an easy way to use a patch with DOS line endings or am
# F23 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2015-08-31
# Time: 1600 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
It's that time of week again - Blocker Review! This time around we have
1/3 proposed blockers for Beta/Final. We'll meet up at our regular time
after the QA meeting to go through
Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> I would say that it is a bit better. Now I at least know that it is
> related to Python 2.5 (which we no longer ship)
It means the problem first showed up with 2.5, but chances are all later 2.x
(and maybe also 3.x) are affected too.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel ma
Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> Ever heard of "quilt"? It even has handling of sane spec files built-in.
Sorry, but I'm opposed to requiring a specific tool to generate patches.
Patches are made in many ways in the real world: plain diff, svn diff, git
diff, … Requiring a tool that forces a specific
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> It works well in practice. It's not hard to write, and it more helpful
> than the Fedora tradition of just adding a link to the upstream bug.
> Maintainers in openSUSE understand that it is required.
To be honest, I don't see why we need to REQUIRE patch descriptions to
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 7:41 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Josh Boyer
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2015-08-15, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Out of all of those sugges
On 2015-08-28, 17:09 GMT, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> You mean mass bug reporting for each package where spec file lacks
> information about patches?
No, just for the package where you are bothered by the lack of
information. What I meant is that in the end all those tens of
thousands of patche
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> I discovered an easily reproducible bug in Rawhide back in June which
> affects LVM:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1237136
>
> This breaks many LVM commands, eg. 'lvmchange -a ..' which is used
> during boot.
>
> Th
Hi, folks. So I've been maintaining ownCloud for the last little
while. Unfortunately I sat down today to try again and update the
package to the latest upstream (8.1.1), and somewhere in the second
hour of insanely stupid PHP autoloader code, I just snapped. I can't
take this crap any more.
I onl
Willie is a neat little IRC bot that is very easy to extend, install, and
use, and is written in Python.
Since I was busy with real life stuff, I neglected maintaining the package
for quite a while (sorry!) and the version in Fedora is well behind
upstream now, unfortunately.
I don't think I'll h
I discovered an easily reproducible bug in Rawhide back in June which
affects LVM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1237136
This breaks many LVM commands, eg. 'lvmchange -a ..' which is used
during boot.
The same bug has now started to affect Fedora 23 because of the
backporting of
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 09:19:00AM +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> This was missing from the minutes:
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 09:01:46AM +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> > * #1469 i686 as a non-blocking architecture (nirik, 18:37:47)
> > * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1469 (nirik,
On 08/29/2015 05:40 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 08/28/2015 01:00 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
This morning, bodhi2 doesn't allow me to submit an update. After a
seemingly successful login-in, when trying to submit an update, a popup
pops up telling me:
"AC
Missing expected images:
Kde Live i386
Kde Live x86_64
Cloud base Disk i386
Kde Disk armhfp
No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20150828
Images in Rawhide 20150828 but not this:
Design_suite Live i386
Design_suite Live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 20 of 22
ID: 859 Test: x86_64 workstatio
Missing expected images:
Cloud atomic Disk x86_64
Cloud base Disk i386
Images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20150828:
Cloud base Vagrant x86_64
Docker Filesystem x86_64
Cloud base Disk x86_64
No images in 23 Branched 20150828 but not this.
Failed openQA tests: 2 of 22
ID: 875 Test: x86_
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 08/28/2015 01:00 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>> This morning, bodhi2 doesn't allow me to submit an update. After a
>>> seemingly successful login-in, when trying to submit an update, a popup
>>> pops up telling me:
>>>
>>> "ACL validation mechanism w
On 08/29/2015 06:32 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-08-28 at 16:27 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> bodhi2 at https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/ is unusable for testers
>> because the search field seeks for users, no idea how to get to the
>> current firefox build for give karama as ex
Compose started at Sat Aug 29 07:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[GMT]
GMT-5.1.2-1.fc23.armv7hl requires libgdal.so.1
[ScientificPython]
ScientificPython-2.8-20.fc22.armv7hl requires libmpi.so.1
[airinv]
airinv
Compose started at Sat Aug 29 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[ScientificPython]
ScientificPython-2.8-20.fc22.i686 requires libmpi.so.1
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:ud
On Friday, 28 August 2015 at 11:24, Martin Stransky wrote:
> On 08/28/2015 11:00 AM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> >On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Martin Stransky
> >wrote:
> >>Can we ship addons which are already signed by Mozilla? Or does Fedora
> >>packager modify them somehow?
> >
> >It se
21 matches
Mail list logo
