[POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates

2015-08-17 Thread nobody
Change in package status over the last 168 hours 2 packages were orphaned perl-MongoDB [el6, epel7] was orphaned by ktdreyer A MongoDB Driver for Perl https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-MongoDB pyth

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

2015-08-17 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Monday, 17 August 2015 at 19:39, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 19:01:24 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > maybe you should have read the link below becaus ethen maybe you would > > not accuse him "about his attitude" - there is a lot of activity and > > fast respones - what el

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

2015-08-17 Thread Haïkel
Le 17 août 2015 8:47 AM, "Josh Boyer" a écrit : > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > This is current output from my script with updates based on your comments: > > Axel Thimm - no recent sponsor activity > > Had his packages orphaned a while ago due to non-responsive ma

Planned Outage: bodhi2 migration - 2015-08-19 16:00 UTC

2015-08-17 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Planned Outage: bodhi2 migration - 2015-08-19 16:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2015-08-19 16:00 UTC, which will last approximately 6 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2015-08-19 16:0

Planned Outage: fedorahosted lists migration - 2015-08-19 08:00 UTC

2015-08-17 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Planned Outage: fedorahosted lists migration - 2015-08-19 08:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2015-08-19 08:00 UTC, which will last approximately 12 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '20

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

2015-08-17 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 19:01:24 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > maybe you should have read the link below becaus ethen maybe you would > not accuse him "about his attitude" - there is a lot of activity and > fast respones - what else should he do? > > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

2015-08-17 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 17.08.2015 um 18:30 schrieb Michael Schwendt: On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:07:07 +0200, Marcin Haba wrote: There may be a misunderstanding of the How To Get Sponsored Wiki page. If everything works fine with sponsoring, so why does this subject exist? It is not first thread here about sponsorin

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

2015-08-17 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 17:07:07 +0200, Marcin Haba wrote: > Hello, > > On 17.08.2015 16:33, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 15:50:26 +0200, Marcin Haba wrote: > > > >> Yes, exactly! I am waiting from March 2015. > > > > Waiting for what? > > For sponsoring me by somebody. Have yo

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

2015-08-17 Thread Marcin Haba
On 17.08.2015 17:40, Pete Travis wrote: > On Aug 17, 2015 10:07 AM, "Marcin Haba" wrote: >> >> Hello, > > *snip* > >> I am not going to continue this discussion because as I wrote in >> previous mail, it was only feedback from my side. It is not my intention >> to gain something by this feedback

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

2015-08-17 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 16:55:46 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > >> > Yes, exactly! I am waiting from March 2015. > > Waiting for what? > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 You've misunderstood the question. Hence that link isn't an answer. Do you want me to link tickets where I'm

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

2015-08-17 Thread Pete Travis
On Aug 17, 2015 10:07 AM, "Marcin Haba" wrote: > > Hello, *snip* > I am not going to continue this discussion because as I wrote in > previous mail, it was only feedback from my side. It is not my intention > to gain something by this feedback. It is just feedback to potential > consideration if

ttorling pushed to perl-MooX-Roles-Pluggable (f21). "Initial import #1242727)"

2015-08-17 Thread notifications
From 7c0fc5a2f10aadbda0ee0bd020c9d9ce12e9039e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tim Orling Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 07:57:18 -0700 Subject: Initial import #1242727) diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index e69de29..3d07c62 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +/MooX-Roles-Pluggabl

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

2015-08-17 Thread Marcin Haba
Hello, On 17.08.2015 16:33, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 15:50:26 +0200, Marcin Haba wrote: > >> Yes, exactly! I am waiting from March 2015. > > Waiting for what? For sponsoring me by somebody. Please read context. And this thread title either ;-) > There may be a misunderstan

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

2015-08-17 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 17.8.2015 v 16:33 Michael Schwendt napsal(a): >> > Yes, exactly! I am waiting from March 2015. > Waiting for what? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys -- devel mailing list devel@list

Re: F23: Copr build failure: glibc

2015-08-17 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Seg, 2015-08-17 at 13:35 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 16.8.2015 v 21:05 Sérgio Basto napsal(a): > > I still have those failures in fedora-23-ppc64le [1] and > > fedora-rawhide-ppc64le buildroots . > > > > Should we open bug reports in bugzilla , product Copr [3] ? > > This is problem o

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

2015-08-17 Thread Parag Nemade
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: >> Dne 17.8.2015 v 14:47 Josh Boyer napsal(a): >>> I would recommend removing all of the above people from the sponsors group. >> >> -1 >> There is nothing wrong on being inactive. At least

Re: rawhide report: 20150815 changes

2015-08-17 Thread Adam Jackson
On Sat, 2015-08-15 at 11:18 +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > acl-2.2.52-10.fc24 > -- > * Fri Aug 14 2015 Adam Jackson 2.2.52-10 > - Remove bizarre 12 year old libtool invocation workaround that prevented > hardened cflags working On this note: I'll be casually going through

RE: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

2015-08-17 Thread Matt_Domsch
I have used my sponsorship permissions in the past to mentor other Dell employees, but have not had need to do so in quite a while. I have downgraded my rights from sponsor to user, and will re-apply for sponsor status should the need arise again in the future. Thanks, Matt -- Matt Domsch Seni

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

2015-08-17 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 15:50:26 +0200, Marcin Haba wrote: > Yes, exactly! I am waiting from March 2015. Waiting for what? There may be a misunderstanding of the How To Get Sponsored Wiki page. > I am active in a few Fedora > areas (informal reviews, bugs requests, preparing new features requests,

limb changed perl-sig's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Test-MemoryGrowth (f22) to 'Approved'

2015-08-17 Thread notifications
limb changed perl-sig's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Test-MemoryGrowth (f22) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Test-MemoryGrowth/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedor

limb changed ppisar's 'commit' permission on perl-Test-MemoryGrowth (f23) to 'Approved'

2015-08-17 Thread notifications
limb changed ppisar's 'commit' permission on perl-Test-MemoryGrowth (f23) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Test-MemoryGrowth/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

2015-08-17 Thread Marcin Haba
On 17.08.2015 15:18, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: >> Dne 17.8.2015 v 14:47 Josh Boyer napsal(a): >>> I would recommend removing all of the above people from the sponsors group. >> >> -1 >> There is nothing wrong on being inactive. At least as long as o

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

2015-08-17 Thread Josh Boyer
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 17.8.2015 v 14:47 Josh Boyer napsal(a): >> I would recommend removing all of the above people from the sponsors group. > > -1 > There is nothing wrong on being inactive. At least as long as others are > active. > If they would want, the

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

2015-08-17 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 08/17/2015 07:47 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: David Woodhouse - no recent sponsor activity Reports bugs but not otherwise active in Fedora to my knowledge. He's still around. He actively maintains packages for SIPE support (Microsoft Lync / Skype Business) in Pidgin. -- devel mailing list deve

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

2015-08-17 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 17.8.2015 v 14:47 Josh Boyer napsal(a): > I would recommend removing all of the above people from the sponsors group. -1 There is nothing wrong on being inactive. At least as long as others are active. If they would want, they can return any time they want. We should *not* be like turned down

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

2015-08-17 Thread Josh Boyer
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > This is current output from my script with updates based on your comments: > Axel Thimm - no recent sponsor activity Had his packages orphaned a while ago due to non-responsive maintainer. > Christopher Aillon (sabbatical, not receiving b

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

2015-08-17 Thread Miroslav Suchý
This is current output from my script with updates based on your comments: Aurelien Bompard - no recent sponsor activity Adrien Devresse - no recent sponsor activity Adrian Reber - no recent sponsor activity Alexander Kurtakov removed FE-NEEDSPONSOR from BZ 1190728 Alexander Kurtakov removed

F-23 Branched report: 20150817 changes

2015-08-17 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Mon Aug 17 07:15:04 UTC 2015 Broken deps for armhfp -- [QuantLib] QuantLib-test-1.6.1-1.fc23.armv7hl requires libboost_unit_test_framework.so.1.58.0 [apache-scout] apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires

rawhide report: 20150817 changes

2015-08-17 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Mon Aug 17 05:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [IQmol] IQmol-2.3.0-6.fc23.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.57.0 IQmol-2.3.0-6.fc23.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.57.0 [ScientificPython]

GNOME 3.17.90 megaupdate

2015-08-17 Thread Kalev Lember
Hi all, Just a quick heads up that it's GNOME 3.17.90 release this week and we have a f23-gnome side tag for builds - please use 'fedpkg build --target f23-gnome' if you are helping with builds. I'll take care of submitting them all in a single bodhi update ticket later this week. Thanks, Kalev

[Base] No Base Design WG meeting today

2015-08-17 Thread Harald Hoyer
Ssia -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

2015-08-17 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 15.8.2015 v 16:43 Till Maas napsal(a): > I think the script should also consider comments to needsponsor bugs as > sponsoring work, even if the bug was not yet assigned to someone. Good idea, I will think about how to fetch this info. > And > IMHO the wording should be a little bit more frien

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

2015-08-17 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 15.8.2015 v 20:09 Jason L Tibbitts III napsal(a): > H> Using Bugzilla rather than FAS is not a bad idea, as some people > H> abuse their sponsor status by blindly adding people into the packager > H> group without any supervision. Using FAS as the information source > H> would just hide this hi

[Test-Announce] 2015-08-17 @ 15:00 UTC - (Possibly) Fedora QA Meeting

2015-08-17 Thread Adam Williamson
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting(?) # Date: 2015-08-17 # Time: 15:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! It's QA meeting time again! Well, technically it is: I just got back from Flock and I'm pretty tir

Re: Sponsors - who does (not) work on FE-NEEDSPONSOR tickets

2015-08-17 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 15.8.2015 v 11:21 Christopher Meng napsal(a): > And some people contributed a lot in the past, after this result will > you request revoking their sponsorship and wipe them out? NO! There is really no pros if we revoke some sponsors. We just need them more active. And we need more sponsors. (