On 7/18/15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> I thought I'd ask here first: is there a strong reason *not* to include
> those keys?
It's not recommended to encourage end users installing EOL releases.
However a seperate package for gpg keys from EOL releases is OK.
But is it worthwhile to mo
Hello Fedora,
The Fedora 22 release cycle is in full swing, and beats have been opened
for the F22 Releasae Notes. Over the coming weeks, the release notes
for the next version of Fedora will be assembled by Docs team writers,
packageers, developers, and community members of all forms.
Yeah, tha
On Aug 5, 2015 2:55 AM, "Miroslav Lichvar" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 10:09:34AM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On 4 August 2015 at 04:33, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> > > As for updating the ncurses package, my current plan is to build the
> > > libs in both ABIs (so there are four
On 08/05/2015 10:02 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> As a test balloon, I've now added file triggers to gdk-pixbuf2-2.31.5
> -2.fc24, and librsvg2-2.40.9-3.fc24 now relies on them to get its
> pixbuf loader registered.
>
> Let me know if you see any problems with those updates that might be
> caused
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 10:11:26 +0300
> Ville Skyttä wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III
>> wrote:
>> > The big change is that the Python guidelines have been extensively
>> > reorganized and partially rewritten, and
On Wed, 2015-07-29 at 09:49 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 28.7.2015 v 18:15 Matthias Clasen napsal(a):
> > On Tue, 2015-07-28 at 14:49 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >
> > > Just out of curiosity, do you have already any candidates for
> > > File
> > > Triggers? I suppose "/sbin/ldconfig" is one
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2015-08-06 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2015-08-06 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT
2015-08-06 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT
2015-08-06 1
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2015-08-05)
===
Meeting started by paragan at 18:00:09 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-08-05/fesco.2015-08-05-18.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
--
[sorry this is late, I sent it from the wrong email address :< RC2 will
be landing in ~8 hours]
Somewhat later than scheduled [1], Fedora 23 Alpha Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now available for testing. Please help us complete as much of
the validation testing as we can!
We already know we'll nee
On Wednesday, August 05, 2015 01:36:20 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 10:38:07AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > > In Fedora 23, rpm has grown support for weak dependencies (Recommends:
> > > and Suggests: tags). However, the
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Over the last few months (since Fedora 22 beta's release), I've been using
> Btrfs as my daily driver filesystem across a multitude of machines. After
> Fedora 22 released, I tried it with RAID 5 and RAID 6 enabled on a few
> machi
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 01:36:20PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 10:38:07AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > > In Fedora 23, rpm has grown support for weak dependencies (Recommends:
> > > and Suggests: tags). However,
On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 13:36 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> What keeps us from completing livemedia-creator Koji integration for
> Fedora 23? And what of the state of pungi?
>
Time and resources. We don't have enough of either to do it in F23.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed me
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 10:38:07AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > In Fedora 23, rpm has grown support for weak dependencies (Recommends:
> > and Suggests: tags). However, the compose tools have not been ported to
> > dnf/libsolv yet, which m
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 05:45:59PM +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I have orphaned the python-ufc package. This package has been
> superceded by python-ffc, and upstream have abandoned python-ufc.
> FWIW, python-ffc is under review[0], but it seems the submission has
> been abando
Hi all,
Next week I'm going to update to the new libappstream-glib with a
soname bump in F23 and rawhide. The only deps (gnome-software and
fwupd) just needs updating to the newest releases and these are my
packages also. Any problems, please squeak.
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fed
Dear All,
I have orphaned the python-ufc package. This package has been
superceded by python-ffc, and upstream have abandoned python-ufc.
FWIW, python-ffc is under review[0], but it seems the submission has
been abandoned by the submitter (Fabian Abfolter).
I actually tried to retire this package
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 10:38:07AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> In Fedora 23, rpm has grown support for weak dependencies (Recommends:
> and Suggests: tags). However, the compose tools have not been ported to
> dnf/libsolv yet, which means these tags will have no effect at image
> compose time.
To
On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 22:47:31 +0200
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Obviously. ;) If the Rawhide broken deps report had found it,
> breakage could have been avoided.
>
> A different try:
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6225
>
> Or file it in the infrastructure tracker instead? I don't k
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 10:11:26 +0300
Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III
> wrote:
> > The big change is that the Python guidelines have been extensively
> > reorganized and partially rewritten, and new macros are available
> > which simplify packaging by remo
On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 18:57:20 +0200
Sandro Mani wrote:
> > ok. I will transfer libzrtcpp to you. ;)
> >
> > You should talk to dyfet directly about sipwitch...
> >
> Well I just did the non-reponsive maintainer procedure for ucommon,
> his other package. I suppose it is fair to assume that he'll al
On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 11:12 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Here's my perspective as an i686 Fedora user...
>
> I have a box (2009-ish) that's in use as a file/backup server. As
> such, I don't
> spend a lot of time futzing with it - it doesn't run rawhide, it
> rarely runs
> the prereleases unt
On 08/04/2015 05:12 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Paul W. Frields (sticks...@gmail.com) said:
Here's my perspective as an i686 Fedora user...
I have a box (2009-ish) that's in use as a file/backup server.
I have 3 i686 boxen.
2 are 2009-ish atom-netbook, one is a 2000-ish PIII-desktop.
As s
On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 11:33 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> > In Fedora 23, rpm has grown support for weak dependencies (Recommends:
> > and Suggests: tags). However, the compose tools have not been ported to
> > dnf/libsolv yet, which means the
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>>
>> In Fedora 23, rpm has grown support for weak dependencies (Recommends:
>> and Suggests: tags). However, the compose tools have not been ported to
>> dnf/libsolv yet, which means these t
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> In Fedora 23, rpm has grown support for weak dependencies (Recommends:
> and Suggests: tags). However, the compose tools have not been ported to
> dnf/libsolv yet, which means these tags will have no effect at image
> compose time.
>
> This h
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Ryan S. Brown wrote:
> On 08/01/2015 03:25 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 10:40:45AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >> On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 17:28:48 +
> >> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >>
> >>> [In light of https://bugzi
In Fedora 23, rpm has grown support for weak dependencies (Recommends:
and Suggests: tags). However, the compose tools have not been ported to
dnf/libsolv yet, which means these tags will have no effect at image
compose time.
This has implications for spin kickstarts: the set of packages included
On 08/01/2015 03:25 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 10:40:45AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 17:28:48 +
>> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>>
>>> [In light of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241383]
>>>
>>> 'dnf install --inst
Compose started at Wed Aug 5 07:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws)
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires
mvn(org.apache.juddi:
On Thursday, 23 July 2015 at 19:21, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 23/07/15 14:27 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:46:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >>Any problems rebuilding either open a bug or feel free to email me or
> >>ping me on IRC (my freenode nick is
On Wed, 05 Aug 2015 06:37:41 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015, at 01:38 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >
> > Either %config or %config(noreplace) can cause problems during update.
> > Neither one is completely safe with regard to breaking a program at
> > runtime. It can be necessa
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 14:00:59 +0300, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > How to reproduce:
> >
> > 1. Use Fedora 22.
> > 2. dnf install blktap-devel --disablerepo=updates-testing
> Can you send debugdata from dnf?
> # dnf install blktap-devel --disablerepo=updates-testing --debugsolver
> and then archive '
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 13:47:42 +0300, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>
>> I can't reproduce this issue.
>
> Believe me, you can. You only created a completely different test-case,
> which may not suffer from the same problem.
>
> How to reproduce:
>
>
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 13:47:42 +0300, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> I can't reproduce this issue.
Believe me, you can. You only created a completely different test-case,
which may not suffer from the same problem.
How to reproduce:
1. Use Fedora 22.
2. dnf install blktap-devel --disablerepo=updates-t
Hi folks,
I can't reproduce this issue.
$ sudo dnf install
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/blktap/3.0.0/3.fc23.git0.9.2/x86_64/blktap-devel-3.0.0-3.fc23.git0.9.2.x86_64.rpm
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/blktap/3.0.0/3.fc23.git0.9.2/x86_64/blktap-3.0.0-3.fc23.git0.9.2.x8
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015, at 01:38 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> Either %config or %config(noreplace) can cause problems during update.
> Neither one is completely safe with regard to breaking a program at
> runtime. It can be necessary to switch from %config(noreplace) to %config,
> or vice versa, in
On 31/07/15 14:49 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Ceph failed to build with some impenetrable C++ error:
In file included from /usr/include/boost/optional/optional.hpp:28:0,
from /usr/include/boost/optional/optional_io.hpp:19,
from ./include/encoding.h:289,
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2015-08-05 18:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets belo
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> The big change is that the Python guidelines have been extensively
> reorganized and partially rewritten, and new macros are available which
> simplify packaging by removing some of the boilerplate which was
> previously required.
I h
40 matches
Mail list logo
