On 08/02/2015 08:39 AM, Marcin Haba wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to make informal review following feature request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244353
One from warnings returned by rpmlint is:
ossim-data.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/ossim.sh
Because ossim.sh is
Hello,
I am trying to make informal review following feature request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244353
One from warnings returned by rpmlint is:
ossim-data.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/ossim.sh
Because ossim.sh is not configuration file but shell script (as
On 08/01/2015 09:25 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
Hi,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249325
GDB requires some library libXXX.so.3 by dlopen(). Therefore it is not found
by rpm automatic requires/provides from DT_NEEDED. Therefore one has to add
the libXXX.so.3 by specific BuildRequi
Signed-off-by: Igor Gnatenko
---
.gitignore | 1 +
MuseScore-2.0.1-remove-mp3-support.patch | 71
mscore.spec | 12 +++---
sources | 2 +-
4 files changed, 8 insertions(+
On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 10:48:24PM +0300, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 10:25 PM, Jan Kratochvil
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> Hi,
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249325
> >
> > GDB requires some library libXXX.so.3 by dlopen(). Therefore it is not
> > found
> > by rpm
Am 01.08.2015 um 23:05 schrieb Florian Weimer:
On 07/28/2015 06:59 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Actually, reproducable builds wrt. docs have been subject to Fedora
Packaging since Fedora day #1 and repeatedly have been subject to
discussions of details (e.g. doxygen repeatedly had introduced docs
On 07/28/2015 06:59 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Actually, reproducable builds wrt. docs have been subject to Fedora
> Packaging since Fedora day #1 and repeatedly have been subject to
> discussions of details (e.g. doxygen repeatedly had introduced docs
> breakages)
>
> Packages which do not compl
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 10:25 PM, Jan Kratochvil
wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249325
>
> GDB requires some library libXXX.so.3 by dlopen(). Therefore it is not found
> by rpm automatic requires/provides from DT_NEEDED. Therefore one has to add
> the libXXX.so.
On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 10:40:45AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 17:28:48 +
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> > [In light of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241383]
> >
> > 'dnf install --installroot=... --releasever=XX dnf' can be used to
> > bootstrap
Hi,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249325
GDB requires some library libXXX.so.3 by dlopen(). Therefore it is not found
by rpm automatic requires/provides from DT_NEEDED. Therefore one has to add
the libXXX.so.3 by specific BuildRequires and Requires to the .spec file.
libXXX is l
On Qua, 2015-07-29 at 16:10 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Qua, 2015-07-29 at 10:05 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-07-29 at 12:47 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > > On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 21:27:45 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > >
> > > > As I have thought for some time, I think we
On Sex, 2015-07-31 at 02:34 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Matěj Cepl wrote:
> > I take Gnumeric and Emacs, but all other ones are in-Gnome
> > projects, aren't they (at least having repository in
> > git.gnome.org)?
>
> Gnumeric is part of GNOME Office, so it is also under the GNOME umbrella
> the
On Qua, 2015-07-29 at 18:04 +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> On 2015-07-29, 14:31 GMT, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > FWIW I found the port of Gtk3 pretty straightforward for
> > my Entangle application and find it quite alot nicer to work
> > with than Gtk2 in general, so has been a big plus overall.
>
After seeing my phone (Samsung Galaxy S III) picking-up some media
shared from my mother's Windows 7 laptop and the experience being
reasonably positive (it more-or-less worked to play videos), I decided
to try my hand at getting this to work in Fedora 22. I've been
generally pleased with GNOME vs
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 17:28:48 +
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> [In light of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241383]
>
> 'dnf install --installroot=... --releasever=XX dnf' can be used to
> bootstrap a Fedora chroot. The only snag is that --nogpg is often
> recommended, beca
Reviewed ;)
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 6:47 PM Parag Nemade wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have submitted a python package for review python-os-client-config,
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247177
>
> Appreciate if someone can review it and I can review your package :)
>
> Regards,
> Parag
> --
Hi,
I have submitted a python package for review python-os-client-config,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247177
Appreciate if someone can review it and I can review your package :)
Regards,
Parag
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
> I've filled some bugs while I'm running fedora with kdbus and selinux
> in permissive mode. I've added "kdbus" to whiteboard for easy tracking
> them.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=PO
I've filled some bugs while I'm running fedora with kdbus and selinux
in permissive mode. I've added "kdbus" to whiteboard for easy tracking
them.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=POST&bug_status=MODIFIED&bug_status=ON_DEV&bug_status=ON_QA&bug_s
Compose started at Sat Aug 1 07:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws)
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires
mvn(org.apache.juddi:
Hi
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 07/31/2015 11:07 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>>
>>> Cannot log into KDE with kdbus, I get:
>>>
>>> $ cat .xsession-errors
>>> startkde: Starting up...
>>> startkde:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
wrote:
> 2015-07-28 5:58 GMT-03:00 Florian Weimer :
>> On 07/26/2015 04:05 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
>>
>>> Should I make the doc packages arch specific?
>>
>> No, this is not a reason to make them arch-specific. A l
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 31 July 2015 at 17:27, Radek Holy wrote:
>> One can say that the mirrors should keep the older versions
>
> I would completely agree. As we can't rely that packages referenced in
> metadata just one day old still being on the mirrors mea
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 10:30:37PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> Recently David Gay aka oddshocks has left Red Hat and we have not been able to
> contact him since.
> There are two packages for which he is Point of Contact:
> - python-fedimg (Fedora & EPEL)
> - python-cpio (
24 matches
Mail list logo
