Compose started at Thu Jul 16 17:00:04 UTC 2015
New package: felix-scr-1.6.2-3.fc24
Apache Felix Declarative Services Runtime
New package: go-srpm-macros-1-1.fc24
RPM macros for building Golang packages for various architectures
New package: java-hll-1.6.0-1.fc24
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 08:22:36 +0200
Jakub Jelen wrote:
> It happened to me yesterday also during updates. Usually first and
> the second attempt failed and then it succeed so I managed to push
> all updates I wanted during day. Is the cause know at the moment?
Yes, it was a selinux labeling issue
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 12:28:04AM +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> On 07/16/2015 07:53 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > One thing which I find very annoying when creating new packages is the
> > need to use bare rpmbuild commands. I find the split between
> > ~/rpmbuild/{SPECS,SOURCES} a
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 02:12:37PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 07/16/2015 12:37 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:14:17PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> >> On 07/16/2015 11:53 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >>> One thing which I find very annoyi
On 07/16/2015 07:53 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> One thing which I find very annoying when creating new packages is the
> need to use bare rpmbuild commands. I find the split between
> ~/rpmbuild/{SPECS,SOURCES} anachronistic (*), and much prefer the
> fedpkg / distgit approach of havin
On 07/16/2015 12:37 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:14:17PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> On 07/16/2015 11:53 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>>> One thing which I find very annoying when creating new packages is the
>>> need to use bare rpmbuild comman
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:14:17PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 07/16/2015 11:53 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > One thing which I find very annoying when creating new packages is the
> > need to use bare rpmbuild commands. I find the split between
> > ~/rpmbuild/{SPECS,SOURCES} an
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 08:04:12PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:53:31 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> > One thing which I find very annoying when creating new packages is the
> > need to use bare rpmbuild commands. I find the split between
> > ~/rpmbuild/{S
On Tuesday, July 14, 2015 01:11:53 PM Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> This is being post to remixes, test and devel since people on test and devel
> may not ordinarily be involved with remixes, but might want to comment.
> Replies have been pointed back to the remixes list (hopefully won't be
> munged) an
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Przemek Klosowski
wrote:
> On 07/16/2015 01:19 PM, Eric Griffith wrote:
>
> I tried to do an install and an update on two different terminals on my
> machine yesterday. The second one didn't yell about an rpmdb lock but it did
> say that it was waiting on a process
On 07/16/2015 11:53 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> One thing which I find very annoying when creating new packages is the
> need to use bare rpmbuild commands. I find the split between
> ~/rpmbuild/{SPECS,SOURCES} anachronistic (*), and much prefer the
> fedpkg / distgit approach of havin
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:53:31 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> One thing which I find very annoying when creating new packages is the
> need to use bare rpmbuild commands. I find the split between
> ~/rpmbuild/{SPECS,SOURCES} anachronistic (*), and much prefer the
> fedpkg / distgit appr
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 11:05:40AM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> When I looked into packaging, I found extensive documentation but
> very few tutorial-style materials. I like the hands-on approach so I
> wrote a 'user story' about packaging a simple project:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How
On 07/16/2015 01:19 PM, Eric Griffith wrote:
I tried to do an install and an update on two different terminals on
my machine yesterday. The second one didn't yell about an rpmdb lock
but it did say that it was waiting on a process. So unless it broke
from an update last night / this morning t
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> For a while now it's been possible for desktops to have their own mime
> info (which is great), but it seems we have also gotten rid of the
> generic one, which causes some strange behavior:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243049
>
> ie, /usr
I tried to do an install and an update on two different terminals on my
machine yesterday. The second one didn't yell about an rpmdb lock but it
did say that it was waiting on a process. So unless it broke from an update
last night / this morning then idk
On Jul 16, 2015 11:20 AM, "Richard Shaw" w
I remember frequently (to my dismay) getting messages from yum saying that
another process had a lock on the RPM database.
Due to a recent rash of issues with the akmods package I have been
investigating why the kmods are not getting installed.
Out of curiosity I tried running two dnf update inst
I can't tell you anything about your first problem, but the second one
sounds similar to this one (last paragraph):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225629#c0
Have you tried switching VTs to the one hosting the previous session?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
Hi folks,
I would like to share my experience with multiple monitors.
I have installed Fedora 22.
Nowadays I have ThinkPad T430 notebook and dockstation where are joined
two external LCD monitors.
First problem:
If I insert notebook to docking station then after entering crypt
password durin
Compose started at Thu Jul 16 07:15:03 UTC 2015
New package: java-hll-1.6.0-1.fc23
Java library for the HyperLogLog algorithm
New package: nghttp2-1.1.1-1.fc23
Experimental HTTP/2 client, server and proxy
New package: osmpbf-1.3.3-5.20150712git17fd0cc.fc23
C
There's already plenty of console ROM types in shared-mime-info.
To add more, please make sure to contribute the new items upstream, following
the HACKING file in the shared-mime-info git repository.
- Original Message -
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> hi
> I'm i
- Original Message -
> Greetings.
>
> For a while now it's been possible for desktops to have their own mime
> info (which is great), but it seems we have also gotten rid of the
> generic one, which causes some strange behavior:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243049
>
Hi everybody,
we will do an update of SELinux userspace tools
to 2015-02-02 release and selinux-policy packages as it was proposed in
"SELinux policy store migration" Fedora system wide change [1].
What does it mean for you:
1. You use only Fedora default SELinux policy.
You shouldn't notice an
Am Wed, 15 Jul 2015 21:08:18 +
schrieb devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org:
> Message: 9
> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:47:14 -0600
> From: Kevin Fenzi
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: shared-mime-info and desktops
> Message-ID: <20150715144714.2063c...@voldemort.scrye.com>
> Con
24 matches
Mail list logo
