Fedora 23 Mass Branching

Hi All, Fedora 23 has been branched, please be sure to do a git pull --rebase to pick up the new branch, as an additional reminder rawhide/f24 has had inheritance cut off from previous releases, so this means that anything you do for f23 you also have to do in the master branch and do a build the

Re: python 3.5 in Fedora?

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Jonathan Underwood wrote: > On 14 July 2015 at 23:01, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> >> I just got a bug filed against my package not working with Python 3.5 >> ... in *Ubuntu*?! That sort of thing never happens since normally >> Fedora is usually so far ahead of

Re: python 3.5 in Fedora?

On 14 July 2015 at 23:01, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I just got a bug filed against my package not working with Python 3.5 > ... in *Ubuntu*?! That sort of thing never happens since normally > Fedora is usually so far ahead of Ubuntu. > > I notice that Fedora Rawhide is carrying Python 3.4.3,

python 3.5 in Fedora?

I just got a bug filed against my package not working with Python 3.5 ... in *Ubuntu*?! That sort of thing never happens since normally Fedora is usually so far ahead of Ubuntu. I notice that Fedora Rawhide is carrying Python 3.4.3, but Python 3.5.0b1 was released a couple of months ago. Is Fed

tomcat-native orphaned

I've just released ownership of tomcat-native and there are no co-maintainers, go grab it if you like. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Proposal: Drop comps

On Tuesday 14 July 2015 10:13:43 Vít Ondruch wrote: > Can we just drop comps entirely (or at least trim them down > significantly)? I know that this will not happen from day to day, but I > see the comps just as an ugly workaround for missing weak dependencies, > which we have now. With all its ug

Should generic-release issues block releases?

This is being post to remixes, test and devel since people on test and devel may not ordinarily be involved with remixes, but might want to comment. Replies have been pointed back to the remixes list (hopefully won't be munged) and you probably should join remixes temporarily if you want to fol

Re: Unretiring the mumble package

There's already an effort to unretire it, you may join: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181366 btw, I don't think this is a good idea to start as a packager with Mumble. Regards, h. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/

Re: Unretiring the mumble package

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Thomas Daede wrote: > I currently use Mumble quite a bit, but it has been orphaned in F22+. I > have emailed the previous maintainer but didn't get a response. > > I would be interested in maintaining the package, but this would be the > first that I have done for

Re: permanently 404 errors updates-testing

Am 14.07.2015 um 19:39 schrieb Kevin Fenzi: On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 19:14:05 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote: for some days or possibly a few weeks it happens regulary (at least with updates-testing) that deps are solved, some packages are downloaded and others fail with 404 pretedning trying other mi

Re: permanently 404 errors updates-testing

On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 19:14:05 +0200 Reindl Harald wrote: > for some days or possibly a few weeks it happens regulary (at least > with updates-testing) that deps are solved, some packages are > downloaded and others fail with 404 pretedning trying other mirrors > > retry "yum --enablerepo=koji --e

Unretiring the mumble package

I currently use Mumble quite a bit, but it has been orphaned in F22+. I have emailed the previous maintainer but didn't get a response. I would be interested in maintaining the package, but this would be the first that I have done for Fedora. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/mumble/

permanently 404 errors updates-testing

for some days or possibly a few weeks it happens regulary (at least with updates-testing) that deps are solved, some packages are downloaded and others fail with 404 pretedning trying other mirrors retry "yum --enablerepo=koji --exclude=polkit\* upgrade" often enough each time will downloads 1

Re: Proposal: Drop comps

On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:53:49 +0200 Vít Ondruch wrote: ...snip... > > * The comps.xml groups also provide grouping for > > logically-connected packages that do not map to weak dependencies > > well. (For example: an "astronomy" group could pull in numerous > > scientific packages related to astr

Re: Is %autosetup another unwanted baby of Fedora?

On 07/14/2015 06:19 PM, Haïkel wrote: >> I maintain most of patches as commits in private branches of upstream >> git repos and generate them with "git format-patch >> ". %autosetup and %autopatch don't work with patches >> generated this way, while %patch does. >> >> > Works for me, you need to te

Re: Is %autosetup another unwanted baby of Fedora?

2015-07-14 10:24 GMT+02:00 Mikolaj Izdebski : > On 07/13/2015 02:39 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > > When I moved to Fedora after years of doing Debian packages I noticed > > that there is no such thing as patch management when it comes to Fedora > > packages. Everyone is using %patch macro with

Re: Packaged fonts? (and regular audits?)

On 14 July 2015 at 03:55, Dave Johansen wrote: > During the review of cppformat, it was pointed out that it contained a font > that should be removed because it's packaged with Fedora ( > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216279#c3 ). While working on > resolving this, I was looking int

[Test-Announce] Fedora 23 Rawhide 20150714 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 23 Rawhide 20150714. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-13)

Hi, On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 14.7.2015 v 00:40 opensou...@till.name napsal(a): > > > > Package(co)maintainers Status > Change > > > === > > rubygem-rgen

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-13)

Dne 14.7.2015 v 00:40 opensou...@till.name napsal(a): > > Package(co)maintainers Status Change > === > rubygem-rgenskottler 60 weeks ago > Fixe

RE: Packaged fonts? (and regular audits?)

I do not see a maintainability benefit here, we aren't packaging the bootstrap CSS framework, are we? This font in the case of this one package is used in the HTML documentation for the package. The majority use case for this font is to be paired with bootstrap, to be rendered by a web browser,

Fedora 23 Changes Completion deadline in two weeks - 2015-07-28

Greetings! Fedora 23 Change Checkpoint: Completion deadline (testable) is in two weeks - 2015-07-28 [1] and we're getting closer to this date. Other important milestones are scheduled for this date: * Alpha Freeze * Software String Freeze * Bodhi activation point At this point, all accepted chang

Re: F23 Self Contained Change: RPM MPI Requires Provides

On 09.07.2015 23:17, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 07/09/2015 03:06 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: On 09.07.2015 21:42, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 07/09/2015 01:14 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: On 09.07.2015 20:18, Orion Poplawski wrote: Also, it doesn't seem to get all of the requires quite right. For score

Re: Fedora Bootstrap Project

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Jaromir Capik wrote: > Hello everyone. > > As some of you have already noticed, we recently started a Fedora affiliated > project called "Fedora Bootstrap" that had a short kick-off meeting on the > last > Devconf, which took place in February. Unfortunately this

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-13)

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 6:40 AM, wrote: > python-foolscap cicku, dcantrel 60 weeks ago Fixed. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Proposal: Drop comps

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dne 14.7.2015 v 15:21 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): > On Tue, 2015-07-14 at 10:13 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> Can we just drop comps entirely (or at least trim them down >> significantly)?

rawhide report: 20150714 changes

Compose started at Tue Jul 14 05:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [NetworkManager-iodine] NetworkManager-iodine-gnome-0.0.5-1.fc23.i686 requires NetworkManager-gnome [apache-scout] apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requi

Re: Proposal: Drop comps

On Tue, 2015-07-14 at 10:13 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Can we just drop comps entirely (or at least trim them down > significantly)? I know that this will not happen from day to day, but > I see the comps just as an ugly workaround for mi

Fedora Bootstrap Project

Hello everyone. As some of you have already noticed, we recently started a Fedora affiliated project called "Fedora Bootstrap" that had a short kick-off meeting on the last Devconf, which took place in February. Unfortunately this announcement gained a delay due to the Fedora trademark licensing w

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-13)

On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 12:04:13 +0200, Thomas Woerner wrote: > > On 07/14/2015 12:40 AM, opensou...@till.name wrote: > > prelink jakub, mjw60 weeks ago > ... > > twoerner: prelink > > There seems to be a bug in your script ... No, what it tries to tell y

Re: Proposal: Drop comps

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 6:23 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 14.7.2015 v 11:49 Neal Gompa napsal(a): > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 4:13 AM, Vít Ondruch >wrote: > > > > Can we just drop comps entirely (or at least trim them down > significantly)? I know that this will not

Re: Proposal: Drop comps

Dne 14.7.2015 v 11:49 Neal Gompa napsal(a): > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 4:13 AM, Vít Ondruch >wrote: > > > Can we just drop comps entirely (or at least trim them down > significantly)? I know that this will not happen from day to day, but > I see the comps just as an ugly

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-13)

On 07/14/2015 12:40 AM, opensou...@till.name wrote: prelink jakub, mjw60 weeks ago ... twoerner: prelink There seems to be a bug in your script ... -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: Proposal: Drop comps

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 4:13 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Can we just drop comps entirely (or at least trim them down > significantly)? I know that this will not happen from day to day, but I see > the comps just as an ugly workaround for missin

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-13)

Hi, On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 4:10 AM, wrote: > The following packages did not build for two releases and will be > retired before the Alpha Freeze, unless someone takes care of them. If you > know > for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper > reason: > https://fe

Re: Is %autosetup another unwanted baby of Fedora?

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 4:24 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > On 07/13/2015 02:39 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > > When I moved to Fedora after years of doing Debian packages I noticed > > that there is no such thing as patch management when it comes to Fedora > > packages. Everyone is using %patch

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-13)

> mschwendt: rubygem-rgen First time I hear about that package as I have nothing to do with it. Pkgdb says "skottler" is the maintainer. The email is hard to understand. It seems it looks at a dependency tree and somehow lists any leaf package maintainers in an unsorted list of dependencies. Le

Re: updates-testing: multilib broken for days now

And I got this today: Error: Transaction check error: file /usr/share/doc/polkit/NEWS from install of polkit-0.113-2.fc22.x86_64 conflicts with file from package polkit-0.112-7.fc21.1.i686 file /usr/share/doc/polkit/README from install of polkit-0.113-2.fc22.x86_64 conflicts with file from pac

Re: Is %autosetup another unwanted baby of Fedora?

On 07/13/2015 02:39 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > When I moved to Fedora after years of doing Debian packages I noticed > that there is no such thing as patch management when it comes to Fedora > packages. Everyone is using %patch macro with files of random patchlevel > (some even use reverse pat

Re: updates-testing: multilib broken for days now

Am 12.07.2015 um 15:30 schrieb Rex Dieter: Paul Howarth wrote: Oops. Is there a way to handle this cleanly at all? I can’t just do polkit-libs.i686 Obsoletes: polkit.i686, that would break 32-bit-only systems. How about: Obsoletes: polkit < 0.112-7 (assuming this is the EVR at which the s

Proposal: Drop comps

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Can we just drop comps entirely (or at least trim them down significantly)? I know that this will not happen from day to day, but I see the comps just as an ugly workaround for missing weak dependencies, which we have now. Vít Dne 10.7.2015 v

Re: Packaged fonts? (and regular audits?)

On 2015-07-14, Stefan Nuxoll wrote: > This is going to be pretty common for anything that uses the bootstrap > CSS framework, since glyphicons is bundled as part of it. I do not see > much benefit from packaging this separately, especially as the license > for the glyphicons halflings font include