Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 23 Rawhide 20150607. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_pla
Dan Book wrote on 09.06.2015 22:01:
> This has also been a problem for several releases with the akmods from
> rpmfusion.
There was always a problem; there where just less people running into
it, because yum/dnf installed "kernel-devel" most of the time, which
matched the kernel that was running o
Devel,
Fedora is my favorite Linux distribution by a wide margin and I currently
enjoy Workstation on both my work (devops) and home computer. I've started
working with Python and I want to contribute back to Fedora by taking on
small tasks where needed. Can you suggest a list of Python based/or
Hey all,
We have a bug that affects booting cloud images (see [1]). There are
denials that don't allow cloud-init to install packages. I'm not
exactly where a fix needs to be applied but I
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 09.06.2015 um 22:38 schrieb Dan Book:
>>
>> That's great, for people who already know what to do. The problem is for
>> people who try to install dkms or akmods and then it doesn't work. There
>> are plenty of people who use dkms or akm
Am 09.06.2015 um 22:38 schrieb Dan Book:
That's great, for people who already know what to do. The problem is for
people who try to install dkms or akmods and then it doesn't work. There
are plenty of people who use dkms or akmods modules but don't compile
anything themselves (and those people
That's great, for people who already know what to do. The problem is for
people who try to install dkms or akmods and then it doesn't work. There
are plenty of people who use dkms or akmods modules but don't compile
anything themselves (and those people are less likely to understand the
kernel-deve
Am 09.06.2015 um 22:01 schrieb Dan Book:
This has also been a problem for several releases with the akmods from
rpmfusion. I think the more "correct" solution (read to the end) would
be to somehow prioritize the kernel-devel package (possibly multiple)
that matches the installed kernel(s). kerne
This has also been a problem for several releases with the akmods from
rpmfusion. I think the more "correct" solution (read to the end) would be
to somehow prioritize the kernel-devel package (possibly multiple) that
matches the installed kernel(s). kernel-debug-devel is never the "correct"
choice
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 09:07:02PM +0200, Noa Resare wrote:
> Greetings. It seems I'm back in the fold once more, having done some tiny
> contributions to Fedora way back in the early days.
NICE! Welcome back!
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorapro
On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 21:07 +0200, Noa Resare wrote:
> Greetings. It seems I'm back in the fold once more, having done some
> tiny contributions to Fedora way back in the early days.
>
> I work as an engineer at Spotify in Stockholm, and for the last two
> years or so I have been involved in an e
On 09.06.2015 21:04, Neal Gompa wrote:
> I've noticed that when dkms is installed, it's not grabbing the right
> kernel-devel package as a dependency.
Because that's not possible with ordinary dependencies (might be
possible with soft dependencies [Suggests, Enhances etc]) unless we
change someth
Greetings. It seems I'm back in the fold once more, having done some tiny
contributions to Fedora way back in the early days.
I work as an engineer at Spotify in Stockholm, and for the last two years
or so I have been involved in an effort to support the Free Software work
going in our company.
W
Hey all,
I've noticed that when dkms is installed, it's not grabbing the right
kernel-devel package as a dependency. Instead, it grabs
kernel-debug-devel. This occurs on Fedora 21 and 22, and I'm not sure
why. If I install kernel-devel first, everything is fine. Otherwise,
it grabs the wrong kerne
On Tue, 9 Jun 2015 19:31:01 +0200
Andreas Tunek wrote:
> Currently the #fedora channel on freenode requires some kind of
> registration.
Yeah. It has for many years...
> In my opinion it is pretty difficult to register on
> freenode (I have tried but haven't managed).
What part of the proce
From ebad93caf206bfd21e5bdccc422df1bcf01b4bd1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 19:45:07 +0200
Subject: Perl 5.22 rebuild
diff --git a/perl-Coro.spec b/perl-Coro.spec
index 1fa33c8..e569b74 100644
--- a/perl-Coro.spec
+++ b/perl-Coro.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name
Currently the #fedora channel on freenode requires some kind of
registration. In my opinion it is pretty difficult to register on
freenode (I have tried but haven't managed). Do you think it would be
possible to drop the registration requirement? It is a pretty big
barrier to newbies and people lik
Hi,
I like have gdesklets on my desktop , so instead have it in my own , I
prefer to share.
gdesklets is not active but still working, so anyone that can review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229518
I hope not waste much time.
Thanks
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
devel mailing list
deve
Dne 9.6.2015 v 17:35 Tonet Jallo napsal(a):
I experimented the same yesterday, anyone knows which is the problem?
count me in -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223803
Zdenek
PS: had great fun with db rebuild and recovery...
2015-06-09 8:41 GMT-05:00 Richard Fearn mailto:rich
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:34:39AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> decision needs to then be made by the system. I believe that's been
> mostly due to lack of time for the various parties to sit down and
> plan and then program this further.
We should try to make that happen.
>
> >I see that there
On 2015-06-09, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Unfortunately, this is wrong assumption. It comes quite natural that if
> I want to use git command, I can do "dnf install /usr/bin/git" and I
> don't care which package ships this command. And this scenario is broken
> now, since this will not install "full" gi
I experimented the same yesterday, anyone knows which is the problem?
2015-06-09 8:41 GMT-05:00 Richard Fearn :
> I've experienced the same problem with a F22 VM running in VirtualBox.
> (Is yours a VM?) Disabling IPv6 seemed to help a bit, but the problem
> never went away completely.
>
> There
On Tue, 9 Jun 2015, Matthew Miller wrote:
One (new!) thing I'm concerned with, now that I've enabled it on my
system, is the persistant tray notification. This is... confusing and
ugly. Can we (for F23 if possible, and F24 if not) get better GNOME
Shell integration here?
That's been on the TOD
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015, at 08:02 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Unfortunately, this is wrong assumption. It comes quite natural that if
> I want to use git command, I can do "dnf install /usr/bin/git" and I
> don't care which package ships this command. And this scenario is broken
> now, since this will no
I've experienced the same problem with a F22 VM running in VirtualBox.
(Is yours a VM?) Disabling IPv6 seemed to help a bit, but the problem
never went away completely.
There a few bugs that talk about similar issues, e.g.:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206878
https://bugzilla.redh
[nbecker@nbecker2 scma-unframed.py3]$ sudo dnf install h5py python3-h5py
[sudo] password for nbecker:
Last metadata expiration check performed 2:15:03 ago on Tue Jun 9 07:02:31
2015.
Dependencies resolved.
Package
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 01:23:22PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > As per F23 schedule, it's post 28 Jul 2015
> > -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/23/Schedule
>
> That is the latst possible date when it should be definitely available.
> I can't see any reason why it should not be possi
Dne 3.6.2015 v 13:19 Colin Walters napsal(a):
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015, at 05:23 AM, Petr Stodulka wrote:
>> E.g. missing git-add--interactive will bring one unusable option which
>> will cause error message like this. I have two other bugs where I solve
>> similar troubles. Separate whole git-add d
Dne 9.6.2015 v 13:18 P J P napsal(a):
> Hello Vit,
>
>
>> On Tuesday, 9 June 2015 12:22 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> I hope that I won't need to do this steps manually after F23
>> installation, otherwise it could be hardly called "default". So when
>> there will be available final version which doe
Hello Vit,
> On Tuesday, 9 June 2015 12:22 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> I hope that I won't need to do this steps manually after F23
> installation, otherwise it could be hardly called "default". So when
> there will be available final version which does not need any additional
> configuration ava
Compose started at Tue Jun 9 05:15:04 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[ambari]
ambari-server-1.5.1-3.fc22.noarch requires
mvn(com.sun.jersey:jersey-server)
ambari-server-1.5.1-3.fc22.noarch requires
mvn(com.sun.jersey:jerse
Hi everyone!
Fedora 23 and especially Changes submission deadline [1] is coming pretty soon
- in two weeks on June 23rd. With Alpha release in August.
Please, submit your System Wide Changes by this deadline, earlier better. As
the deadline mainly applies for System Wide changes it is always goo
On Tue, 09 Jun 2015 11:18:06 +0200, Jakob Hirsch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just upgraded to F22 and noticed, that mate-dialogs was uninstalled
> and cannot be reinstalled due to mate-desktop having an Obsoletes entry
> for it. The corresponding changelog entry is quite short:
>
> > * Sat Jul 12 2014 Wo
Hi,
I just upgraded to F22 and noticed, that mate-dialogs was uninstalled
and cannot be reinstalled due to mate-desktop having an Obsoletes entry
for it. The corresponding changelog entry is quite short:
> * Sat Jul 12 2014 Wolfgang Ulbrich - 1.9.1.1
...
> - obsolete mate-dialogs for f22
What w
34 matches
Mail list logo
