On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:26:48AM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> > I'd personally prefer to assume the best intentions of our packagers;
> > specifically I'd assume that if there's a question as to the safety of
> > starting something by default, either they'd bring it up voluntarily or
> > some
On 05/22/2015 06:35 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Friday, 22 May 2015 at 05:39, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> we are pulling in sse2 intrinsics. But why is simply including the
>> header failing?
>
> gcc5 doesn't support compiling SSE2 code without -msse2 in the command
> line.
>
>
Thanks a lot for the quick clarifications Matthew, Kevin and Josh! This
is why I love Fedora project, the most awesome community we have! :)
Regards,
Sumit Bhardwaj
On Saturday 23 May 2015 01:16 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sat, 23 May 2015 01:10:21 +0530
Sumit Bhardwaj wrote:
Hi All,
I have
* Sumit Bhardwaj [23/05/2015 01:10] :
>
>Now, for an upgraded system that might happen, but on
> a clean install, why I am getting FC21 packages?
If these packages have not been rebuilt since f22 was forked from rawhide, the
f21 package is the most recent one there is. As s
On Sat, 23 May 2015 01:10:21 +0530
Sumit Bhardwaj wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a fresh installation of Fedora 22 RC1 with all the extra stuff
> I needed installed. Today I was going through the list of packages
> installed on my system and was a little bit surprised to find some
> packages endi
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 01:10:21AM +0530, Sumit Bhardwaj wrote:
> Because per my understanding, for any branched release, packages are
> completely rebuilt. Then how did this happen?
Simple: we didn't do a mass rebuild this time around.
> More to the point, do I have to care about or do something
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for explanation. That cleared things up for me. I was not aware
of the bleed "repo", and indeed all those updates were there. Need to
read the wiki more :)
As a matter of fact, I just got all the updated packages from the RC2
build from "fedora" repository, so its clear to m
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Sumit Bhardwaj
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a fresh installation of Fedora 22 RC1 with all the extra stuff I
> needed installed. Today I was going through the list of packages installed
> on my system and was a little bit surprised to find some packages ending in
>
Hi All,
I have a fresh installation of Fedora 22 RC1 with all the extra stuff I
needed installed. Today I was going through the list of packages
installed on my system and was a little bit surprised to find some
packages ending in "fc21" in their names. Now, for an upgraded system
that might
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 12:47:29AM +0530, Sumit Bhardwaj wrote:
> BTW, does this means that RC3 is the final build?? No more RCs, right?
Until the annoucement goes out Tuesday morning, nothing is certain.
This is the "gold" RC and is intended to be the final release, but
there's always the — unli
pthread condition variables in
rawhide (Siddhesh Poyarekar)
5. F-22 Branched report: 20150522 changes (Fedora Branched Report)
6. Re: ABRT report for package soundconverter has reached 10
occurrences (Michael Schwendt)
7. Re: Getting changes from new RC builds to previous ones
At the Fedora 22 Final Go/No-Go Meeting #2 that just occurred, it was
agreed to Go with the Fedora 22 Final by Fedora QA, Release Engineering
and Development.
Fedora 22 Final will be publicly available on Tuesday, May 26, 2015.
Meeting details can be seen here:
Minutes: http://bit.ly/1Bh2pH1
Log:
Dne 22.5.2015 v 16:05 Michael Schwendt napsal(a):
> On Wed, 20 May 2015 20:50:10 + (UTC), notifications fedoraproject org
> wrote:
>
>> Packages: soundconverter
>> Function: change_mime_type
>> Firtst occurrence: 2015-05-20
>> Type: python
>> Count:10
>> URL:
>> http://retrace.fe
Dne 22.5.2015 v 17:32 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> Dne 22.5.2015 v 16:05 Michael Schwendt napsal(a):
>> On Wed, 20 May 2015 20:50:10 + (UTC), notifications fedoraproject org
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Packages: soundconverter
>>> Function: change_mime_type
>>> Firtst occurrence: 2015-05-20
>>> Type: pyt
Dne 22.5.2015 v 17:32 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> Dne 22.5.2015 v 16:05 Michael Schwendt napsal(a):
>> On Wed, 20 May 2015 20:50:10 + (UTC), notifications fedoraproject org
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Packages: soundconverter
>>> Function: change_mime_type
>>> Firtst occurrence: 2015-05-20
>>> Type: pyt
On 05/22/2015 04:05 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 20 May 2015 20:50:10 + (UTC), notifications fedoraproject org
> wrote:
>
>> Packages: soundconverter
>> Function: change_mime_type
>> Firtst occurrence: 2015-05-20
>> Type: python
>> Count:10
>> URL:
>> http://retrace.fedo
==
#fedora-meeting-2: Env and Stacks (2015-05-21)
==
Meeting started by hhorak at 12:03:27 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2015-05-21/env-and-stacks.2015-
sgallagh wrote:
> [...]
> The definition of "public" was intentionally vague, but perhaps we
> could try to find a better way to say it. I was trying to treat it as
> "network interfaces that accept connections from arbitrary sources".
OK ...
> I'm not sure that there's a tremendously meaningfu
On Fri, 22 May 2015 15:55:34 +0530
Sumit Bhardwaj wrote:
> Hey Parag / Everybody,
>
> RC3 has also been released however, I haven't got a single update yet
> post installation of RC1. If I am not wrong, TC and RC builds are
> composed from Fedora stable repo. So if packages are being added to
On Wed, 20 May 2015 20:50:10 + (UTC), notifications fedoraproject org wrote:
> Packages: soundconverter
> Function: change_mime_type
> Firtst occurrence: 2015-05-20
> Type: python
> Count:10
> URL:
> http://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/reports/bthash/904ea88a8ddd561298140d2978da
Compose started at Fri May 22 07:15:02 UTC 2015
Updated Packages:
PackageKit-1.0.6-4.fc22
---
* Wed May 20 2015 Kalev Lember - 1.0.6-4
- Update cached metadata in preparation for F22 release
Size change: -124165 bytes
anaconda-22.20.13-1.fc22
-
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 06:21:43PM +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> No, these are different. This problem was introduced in
> 2.21.90-7.fc23. The actual bug is much older and was hidden and only
Of course, I meant 2.21.90-8.fc23. It worked correctly on 2.21.90-7.
Siddhesh
pgppya46NMMZs.pgp
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 02:39:11PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Friday, 22 May 2015 at 06:57, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The latest glibc in rawhide (2.21.90-13.fc23) has a new implementation
> > for pthread condition variable functions (pthread_cond_wait,
> > p
On Friday, 22 May 2015 at 06:57, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The latest glibc in rawhide (2.21.90-13.fc23) has a new implementation
> for pthread condition variable functions (pthread_cond_wait,
> pthread_cond_timedwait, etc.). If you experience any weird locking
> issues or bugs that can
On Friday, 22 May 2015 at 05:39, Orion Poplawski wrote:
[...]
> Well, the errors are possibly related to that type of code:
>
> In file included from
> /usr/lib/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/5.1.1/include/xmmintrin.h:31:0,
> from
> /usr/lib/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/5.1.1/include/emmintrin.h:
Compose started at Fri May 22 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[InsightToolkit]
InsightToolkit-4.7.1-4.fc23.i686 requires libhdf5_cpp.so.9
InsightToolkit-4.7.1-4.fc23.i686 requires libhdf5.so.9
[OpenTK]
OpenTK-
Hey Parag / Everybody,
RC3 has also been released however, I haven't got a single update yet
post installation of RC1. If I am not wrong, TC and RC builds are
composed from Fedora stable repo. So if packages are being added to this
repo before composing the RC builds, how come these updates ar
27 matches
Mail list logo
