Re: Stuck build?

2015-05-10 Thread Jerry James
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > ok. I think this may have been my fault. I upgraded all the builders > the other day, and I attempted to do so when they didn't have any > builds running on them, but I think it might be that buildvm was the > 'master' of your chainbuild, even

Re: UTF-8 locale in rpm build

2015-05-10 Thread Lars Seipel
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 09:02:31AM +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote: > Which part f C.UTF-8 is not covered by en_US.UTF-8? Let's see: % export LC_COLLATE=C % bash -c 'case b in [A-Z]) echo upper;; *) echo lower;; esac' lower Ok. Now en_US.UTF-8: % export LC_COLLATE=en_US.UTF-8 % bash -c 'case b in [A-Z]

Re: Stuck build?

2015-05-10 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, 10 May 2015 20:46:10 -0600 Jerry James wrote: > On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Well, did it say who canceled it? It might have taken more than 24 > > hours? > > Here is a link > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9698462 > > It looks like th

Re: Stuck build?

2015-05-10 Thread Jerry James
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Well, did it say who canceled it? It might have taken more than 24 > hours? Here is a link https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9698462 It looks like the cancellation happened just under 2 hours after the build was started. I

Re: Stuck build?

2015-05-10 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, 10 May 2015 18:48:11 -0600 Jerry James wrote: > Can somebody from infrastructure see what is going on with a build > that seems to be stuck? I launched a fairly large chain build > yesterday, to build a new version of NTL and rebuild all of its > dependencies. Everything went well until

Stuck build?

2015-05-10 Thread Jerry James
Can somebody from infrastructure see what is going on with a build that seems to be stuck? I launched a fairly large chain build yesterday, to build a new version of NTL and rebuild all of its dependencies. Everything went well until the very last stage of the chain build, which holds Macaulay2 a

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2015-05-11 Fedora QA Meeting

2015-05-10 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel today's/tomorrow's QA meeting. I don't see anything that needs meeting discussion. If anyone can think of something urgent to discuss, please reply to this mail and we can get together at the usual time (15:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting). Thanks! -- Adam Williamson

[Test-Announce] 2015-05-11 @ 1600 UTC Fedora Blocker Review Meeting

2015-05-10 Thread Adam Williamson
# F22 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2015-05-11 # Time: 1600 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net It's coming up to that time of the week again: Blocker Review! We have 11 proposed and 8 accepted blockers to review (as I write this). As usual, we're meeting at 1600 UTC. If yo

GNOME 3.16.2 megaupdate

2015-05-10 Thread Kalev Lember
Hi all, One last GNOME megaupdate for F22 to do! Next week is the 3.16.2 release and as usual, please use 'fedpkg build --target f22-gnome' for the builds and list any RHBZ bug numbers that the builds fix in the spreadsheet at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtzJKpbiGX1zdGJzeU9waFJ

Re: GCC 5 compatibility problems: GCC 4.10?

2015-05-10 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 09/05/2015 05:34, Rex Dieter wrote: > > I'm encountering a few problems with GCC 5 due to code that fails to > > work with GCC major releases above 4. In particular, there are at least > > problems with the kernel > > fedora's kernel builds, can you be more specific about the problems you're

rawhide report: 20150510 changes

2015-05-10 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sun May 10 05:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [Macaulay2] Macaulay2-1.6-10.fc22.i686 requires libntl.so.9 [Sprog] Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0) [aeskulap] aesku

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Mono 4

2015-05-10 Thread Moez Roy
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 4:02 AM, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote: > El 2015-05-04 11:02, Jan Kurik escribió: >> >> = Proposed System Wide Change: Mono 4 = >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mono_4 >> >> Change owner(s): Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra Diaz >> >> > > Thanks for pushing forward this change.

F-22 Branched report: 20150510 changes

2015-05-10 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Sun May 10 07:15:02 UTC 2015 Broken deps for armhfp -- [Sprog] Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0) [aeskulap] aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.armv7hl requires libofstd.so.3.6

Re: Roadmap for Mono packages in Fedora ?

2015-05-10 Thread Moez Roy
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 11:37 PM, Timotheus Pokorra wrote: > Hello, > > this is my first post to this list. My name is Timotheus Pokorra, I am > from Germany, and I am also interested to get an uptodate version of > Mono into Fedora and later into CentOS or Epel. > I am developing and deploying Ope

Re: UTF-8 locale in rpm build

2015-05-10 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > More and more tests/builds appear to require a UTF-8 locale. Perhaps it's > time to have rpm set LANG=C.UTF-8? If a build system needs a particular language, it should be in the build scripts themselves. People do local, personal compilat

Self-introduction: hicaponic

2015-05-10 Thread Hica Ponic
Hi, I'm planning to become a Fedora packager so am introducing myself here. I started using Fedora since F20 and have used GNU/Linux for all my personal computers ever since. Actually i'm working as programmer in a transport company, basically i'm in my internship cuz is my last year in the univ

Re: UTF-8 locale in rpm build

2015-05-10 Thread Matěj Cepl
On 2015-05-10, 03:00 GMT, Orion Poplawski wrote: > More and more tests/builds appear to require a UTF-8 locale. Perhaps > it's time to have rpm set LANG=C.UTF-8? Which part f C.UTF-8 is not covered by en_US.UTF-8? Best, Matěj -- http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/, Jabber: mceplceplovi.cz GPG Finger