On 04/01/2015 05:11 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 17:01:06 -0600
Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'm trying to debug a crash in openmpi on the armv7hl builders:
Open MPI tried to bind a new process, but something went wrong. The
process was killed without launching the target application
On Wed, 2015-04-01 at 13:56 -0400, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > Humans I can
> > understand having different views, but the tools should provide
> > the humans with
> > what we need here. In this case I think that means one of the
> > following:
> >
> > 1) Require that the bot ignore bugs that are
On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 17:01:06 -0600
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I'm trying to debug a crash in openmpi on the armv7hl builders:
>
> Open MPI tried to bind a new process, but something went wrong. The
> process was killed without launching the target application. Your job
> will now abort.
> Loca
I'm trying to debug a crash in openmpi on the armv7hl builders:
Open MPI tried to bind a new process, but something went wrong. The
process was killed without launching the target application. Your job
will now abort.
Local host:arm02-builder01
Application name: ./tst_parallel4
Er
Following is the list of topics that may be discussed in the FPC meeting
Thursday at 2015-04-02 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2015-03-12 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT
2015-03-12 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT
2015-03-1
There's some confusion around this, so I thought I would post to try
and clear up things. In the event I am wrong on any of the below, please
do feel free to correct me. ;)
In the past the proposal was to have a yum-dnf package that provided
/usr/bin/yum, called dnf and conflicted with the yum pa
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2015-04-01)
===
Meeting started by mitr at 18:00:41 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-04-01/fesco.2015-04-01-18.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
OK, thanks for clearing that up!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 1 April 2015 at 19:25, Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
> If CC0-1.0 is (at least almost) equivalent, I am perfectly fine with
> that, no need to specify a new tag.
I think it's very similar indeed. I use CC0 myself when I want Public
Domain that's legally clear in all countries.
Richard.
--
deve
Since the metadata_license tag covers the metadata files themselves
and not the fonts and documentation, I would feel bad to choose
something more restrictive than what the original creator has chosen.
If CC0-1.0 is (at least almost) equivalent, I am perfectly fine with
that, no need to specify a n
On 1 April 2015 at 19:06, Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
> As far as I can tell, that makes them public domain. Is it the same as
> CC0-1.0 or is there another license I should choose?
You don't *have* to choose SPDX license IDs -- something like "Public
Domain" would be fine I suppose, although I'd
Hello everyone,
While writing metainfo files for a few fonts, I noticed that their
creator states on his website:
"Fonts and documents in this site are not pieces of property or
merchandise items; they carry no trademark, copyright, license or
other market tags; they are free for any use."
As fa
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
>
>
> Am 01.04.2015 um 19:36 schrieb Dave Johansen:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:32 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 01.04.2015 um 06:53 schrieb Dave Johansen:
>>
>> I added the call to mlockall() (it did have to be run as root)
> Humans I can
> understand having different views, but the tools should provide the humans
> with
> what we need here. In this case I think that means one of the following:
>
> 1) Require that the bot ignore bugs that are closed (assuming a majority
> consensus agrees, which I understand isn't
Am 01.04.2015 um 19:36 schrieb Dave Johansen:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:32 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.04.2015 um 06:53 schrieb Dave Johansen:
I added the call to mlockall() (it did have to be run as root)
on a F21
machine with no swap and the slow down was still
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:32 AM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
>
>
> Am 01.04.2015 um 06:53 schrieb Dave Johansen:
>
>> I added the call to mlockall() (it did have to be run as root) on a F21
>> machine with no swap and the slow down was still visible in the "CPU
>> bound task"
>>
>
> surely, as expected
>
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Stephen John Smoogen
wrote:
>
>
> On 31 March 2015 at 22:53, Dave Johansen wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Richard W.M. Jones
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:21:55PM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
>>> > You're right that is a problem because
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 16:16:25 +0100
Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> On 1 April 2015 at 16:00, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > I'm trying to get this library added to Fedora. It's quite small and
> > the code is public domain:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205376
> >
> >
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 08:57:56AM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> There the problem is, that dracut runs a fsck check before deciding
> whether to resume. This can result in a big file system corruption,
> since the kernel had a different idea of the file system state after
> resuming from hibernation
On 31 March 2015 at 22:53, Dave Johansen wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Richard W.M. Jones
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:21:55PM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
>> > You're right that is a problem because my "purely CPU bound task" was
>> > actually writing to disk every 10 sec
Hi Jeff,
On 1 April 2015 at 16:00, Jeff Layton wrote:
> I'm trying to get this library added to Fedora. It's quite small and
> the code is public domain:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205376
>
> An unsponsored reviewer has already had a look and I've addressed his
> comment
On 01/04/15 15:16 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
Do you mind clarifying? I thought should provide that
http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/string/string/operator+/ or is that
what fno-implicit-templates is turning off?
Of course string provides it, but it's a template, so it needs to be
instantiated.
I'm trying to get this library added to Fedora. It's quite small and
the code is public domain:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205376
An unsponsored reviewer has already had a look and I've addressed his
comments, but I need someone who can officially review it.
Thanks!
--
Jef
Hi,
I reported a new package in bugzilla, it need a review or review swap with
me, anyone is interested?.
The bug link is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199829
Greetings
--
Atte. Tonet Jallo
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai
On 1 April 2015 at 14:32, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 28/03/15 16:45 -0300, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
>>
>> 2015-03-28 16:06 GMT-03:00 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
>> :
>>>
>>> Is this expected to not compile with -fno-implicit-templates?
>>>
>>> ---%<---
>>> $ cat test.cc
>>> #inclu
On 28/03/15 16:45 -0300, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
2015-03-28 16:06 GMT-03:00 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
:
Is this expected to not compile with -fno-implicit-templates?
---%<---
$ cat test.cc
#include
std::string test(int i)
{
std::string t;
std::string s = "(";
t =
On 1 April 2015 at 11:50, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Is it alright to just commit it as an extra package source existing within
> the package script sources repo (like how we handle patches) until we can
> get it upstreamed?
Sure, that's fine as well, thanks.
Richard.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists
Compose started at Wed Apr 1 07:15:02 UTC 2015
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[aeskulap]
aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.armv7hl requires libofstd.so.3.6
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 4:34 AM, David Timms wrote:
> On 01/04/15 12:54, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > David Timms (dti...@iinet.net.au) said:
> ...
> > I thought about trying to reliably parse major/minor/subminor versions in
> > bash, and track it against where things were implemented. But then jus
On 01/04/15 12:54, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> David Timms (dti...@iinet.net.au) said:
...
> I thought about trying to reliably parse major/minor/subminor versions in
> bash, and track it against where things were implemented. But then just went
> the lazy route:
>
> if appstream-util --help | grep
Am 01.04.2015 um 06:53 schrieb Dave Johansen:
I added the call to mlockall() (it did have to be run as root) on a F21
machine with no swap and the slow down was still visible in the "CPU
bound task"
surely, as expected
http://serverfault.com/questions/12679/can-anyone-explain-precisely-what-
> > pm-hibernate is obsolete as others already mentioned.
>
> Do the pm-utils maintainers/upstream know this?
>
Hi,
I am pm-utils maintainer. I own some other "legacy" packages and
I am retiring them only if there are good reasons for it
(e.g. unfixed security bugs, breakage, etc.), because the
32 matches
Mail list logo
