On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
> I noticed on RHEL 6 that when a large amount of disk I/O is happening that
> CPU bound tasks "slow down". I have been able to reproduce it in Fedora 21
> as well and here are the instructions of how I can reproduce it with a
> simple test:
W
On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 16:48 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Dictating use of BZ is usually a futile effort, in Fedora. We have
> > a
> > policy on it which is in practice rarely observed by anyone. What
> > should or should not be the cause is pretty much moot: what *is*
> > the
> > case is that it ma
With an unfortunate issue related to xorg-x11-drv-ati on AMD A10
7400P[1], I am unable to run Gnome on X session without "nomodeset"
parameter.
Current option is to use Gnome on Wayland which lead to an issue with
Touchpad. I don't know if the support of Touchpad is implemented within
libinput[2],
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 3:15 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 2:43 PM, drago01 wrote:
> >
> > https://lwn.net/Articles/572911/
> > https://lwn.net/Articles/467328/
>
Thanks for the info. That's very helpful, but it looks like that discussion
didn't come to any sort of
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 2:43 PM, drago01 wrote:
>
> https://lwn.net/Articles/572911/
> https://lwn.net/Articles/467328/
Yeah, I vaguely remember that discussion. I went down this rabbit hole
in mid-2008, wrote a couple of papers and moved on with my life.
There's no software solution - get faster
Hello,
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 08:28:21PM +0100, drago01 wrote:
> > Actually "machine generated" isn't per se bad ... it saves a lot of
> > effort and should be done more (for other packages too where
> > possible).
> > Why waste man power for something that can be automated?
> >
> > As for tex
> On 03/27/2015 05:22 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >* However, I'll note that the recent texlive updates were security as
*> >* well. ;)
*>
> If texlive packaging is causing issues with update pushes, could maybe
> ask the texlive maintainers to rework the packaging?
TeXLive packager says: No, sorry.
Fedora 22 Alpha Release Announcement
The Fedora 22 Alpha release for the AARCH64 and POWER 64 secondary architectures
has arrived, with a preview of the latest free and open source technology under
development. Take a peek inside!
• Get Fedora 22 Alpha Serve
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
> I noticed on RHEL 6 that when a large amount of disk I/O is happening that
> CPU bound tasks "slow down". I have been able to reproduce it in Fedora 21
> as well and here are the instructions of how I can reproduce it with a
> simple test:
>
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 03:46:13PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "ML" == Mark Lamourine writes:
>
> ML> Is there a recommended way to retrieve, extract and track the files
> ML> so that they can be compiled into the gzipped tarball which can then
> ML> be included in a package?
>
>
> "ML" == Mark Lamourine writes:
ML> "build at runtime"?
Generate the tarball or whatever image you need at runtime. When it's
needed. Not as part of the package build, because I can't see a way
that such a thing would be permitted under current Fedora policies. You
have runtime dependenc
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 16:17 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:27:17AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:55 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
>> > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>>
> "ML" == Mark Lamourine writes:
ML> Is there a recommended way to retrieve, extract and track the files
ML> so that they can be compiled into the gzipped tarball which can then
ML> be included in a package?
I cannot think of anything in existing Fedora policy which would permit
that.
You c
On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 16:17 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:27:17AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:55 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 03/30/2015 08:39 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> > >
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
> I noticed on RHEL 6 that when a large amount of disk I/O is happening that
> CPU bound tasks "slow down". I have been able to reproduce it in Fedora 21
> as well and here are the instructions of how I can reproduce it with a
> simple test:
>
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:27:17AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:55 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> >
> > > On 03/30/2015 08:39 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> > > >
> > > > There are currently no flags set at all.
> > >
> > >
On 28/03/15 04:40, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 28.03.2015 04:42, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 12:34:35AM +, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>>> Following on from
>>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.kernel/5549
>>> Has there been any more considerat
> "LM" == Lokesh Mandvekar writes:
LM> There seem to be a few issues with it currently though, the major
LM> one being using a non-distro-provided systemd (systemd v215):
Just a note that in my opinion there is essentially no chance that the
packaging committee would approve a bundling excep
I noticed on RHEL 6 that when a large amount of disk I/O is happening that
CPU bound tasks "slow down". I have been able to reproduce it in Fedora 21
as well and here are the instructions of how I can reproduce it with a
simple test:
1) Build the disk_test.cc (the "CPU bound task") and run it.
2)
Hi list, I'm working on packaging rocket for Fedora. There's a review request
open for it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966
There seem to be a few issues with it currently though, the major one being
using a non-distro-provided systemd (systemd v215):
- Building rocket involves
>From 9d75531334f53864811610ebddce81b1abd426a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Callaway
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 14:57:03 -0400
Subject: 1.104
diff --git a/perl-Email-Date.spec b/perl-Email-Date.spec
index f925363..fecce02 100644
--- a/perl-Email-Date.spec
+++ b/perl-Email-Date.spec
@@ -1,12 +1
> "GH" == Gerd Hoffmann writes:
GH> Makes sense to me, not only for texlive, stuff like perl pkgs from
GH> cpan have pretty standard way to be built too.
It's not just how the packages are built. There are also bundling and
license issues which require manual inspection. The only reason fo
On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:55 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
> > On 03/30/2015 08:39 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> > >
> > > There are currently no flags set at all.
> >
> > Check the flags on the attachment itself (your second link).
>
> Ohh. there is
On 30 March 2015 at 15:42, drago01 wrote:
> Can/should we just obsolete / retire it?
I tried to, but I don't have enough super powers.
Richard.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 03/30/2015 11:08 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
>> On 30 March 2015 at 07:57, Till Maas wrote:
>>> - provides hibernation support via "systemctl hibernate", which is
>>> also what pm-hibernate does (why do we have two tools for the s
On 2015-03-30 9:55 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 03/30/2015 08:39 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
There are currently no flags set at all.
Check the flags on the attachment itself (your second link).
Ohh. there is shows up. How odd. Thanks. Now at leas
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
1 packages were orphaned
maven-changes-plugin [master] was orphaned by mizdebsk
Plugin to support reporting of changes between releases
https://admin.fedoraproject.o
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 03/30/2015 08:39 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
There are currently no flags set at all.
Check the flags on the attachment itself (your second link).
Ohh. there is shows up. How odd. Thanks. Now at least I know how
to get rid of it, although I th
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 03:48:23PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 09:39:31AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Petr Šabata wrote:
> >
> > >> Bug 815617: PATCH: properly deal with crypt() returning NULL (1043 days
> > >> old)
> > >>https://bugzilla.redha
On 03/30/2015 08:39 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
There are currently no flags set at all.
Check the flags on the attachment itself (your second link).
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproj
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 09:39:31AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Petr Šabata wrote:
>
> >> Bug 815617: PATCH: properly deal with crypt() returning NULL (1043 days
> >> old)
> >>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815617
> >>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachme
Dne 30.3.2015 v 15:39 Paul Wouters napsal(a):
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Petr Šabata wrote:
>
>>> Bug 815617: PATCH: properly deal with crypt() returning NULL (1043
>>> days old)
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815617
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=585827&ac
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Petr Šabata wrote:
Bug 815617: PATCH: properly deal with crypt() returning NULL (1043 days old)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815617
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=585827&action=edit
This bug is already closed. And has no "flags" set.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 09:25:12AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> So I get a regular reminder for "Your Outstanding Requests"
>
> However, a bunch of these are on closed bugs. It seems stuck somehow in
> thinking it needs something from me. For example:
>
> Bug 815617: PATCH: properly
Hi,
So I get a regular reminder for "Your Outstanding Requests"
However, a bunch of these are on closed bugs. It seems stuck somehow in
thinking it needs something from me. For example:
Bug 815617: PATCH: properly deal with crypt() returning NULL (1043 days old)
https://bugzilla.redhat.c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/30/2015 12:55 AM, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> I have updated the package sundials to the latest upstream version
> (2.6.0) on rawhide (only) today.
>
> repoquery indicates bionetgen (zbyszek) and ascend (sagitter)
> depend on
On 30 March 2015 at 11:21, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
> Is systemctl hibernate/suspend the official replacement for
> pm-hibernate/suspend now?
Very much so :)
Richard.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora C
"Luckily", resume from hybernation does not work at all for me on Rawhide:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199708
Vít
Dne 30.3.2015 v 08:57 Till Maas napsal(a):
> Hi,
>
> it seems to be that me have a major problem of core package maintainers
> coordinating features in Fedora.
>
On Monday, 30 March 2015 at 11:08, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 30 March 2015 at 07:57, Till Maas wrote:
> > - provides hibernation support via "systemctl hibernate", which is
> > also what pm-hibernate does (why do we have two tools for the same
> > core task?)
>
> pm-hibernate sho
On 03/30/2015 11:08 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 30 March 2015 at 07:57, Till Maas wrote:
>> - provides hibernation support via "systemctl hibernate", which is
>> also what pm-hibernate does (why do we have two tools for the same
>> core task?)
>
> pm-hibernate should have been
On 30 March 2015 at 07:57, Till Maas wrote:
> - provides hibernation support via "systemctl hibernate", which is
> also what pm-hibernate does (why do we have two tools for the same
> core task?)
pm-hibernate should have been removed from Fedora a long time ago. I
don't know what
Hi,
> If FPC would be open to bulk-approving machine-generated individual
> spec files (given, say, they're provably all following the template,
> which would be reviewed), and rel-eng has some way of bulk-adding the
> necessary branches and builds, that really seems like a step forward to
> me.
On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 12:53:22PM +0100, François Cami wrote:
> * and the zathura stack: girara, zathura, zathura-cb, zathura-djvu,
> zathura-pdf-poppler, zathura-ps (maintained by contyk)
Too late to take it :/
P
pgpi3vSo_qrs7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.f
43 matches
Mail list logo
