systemd and dmcrypt/luks question

2015-03-20 Thread Eric Smith
I'm using a non-Fedora filesystem (zfsonlinux) which provides appropriate services and a target for systemd. The services state: Requires=systemd-udev-settle.service After=systemd-udev-settle.service This works fine for basic usage, but if trying to use zfs over dmcrypt/LUKS, the mount se

Swap problem in rawhide

2015-03-20 Thread Ömer Fadıl USTA
anaconda or systemd creates swap partition/file values in /etc/fstab with a wrong pri value. in /etc/fstab it shows as uuid= swap swap pri=-1 0 0 on the other hand after system reboots systemd's fstab-generator gives error and not enables swap. ( So if you didn't edit your /etc/fstab and chang

Re: /boot on Btrfs still not supported, main problem is anaconda and grubby

2015-03-20 Thread Chris Murphy
This is interesting. This patch for Anaconda runs grub2-mkconfig twice when media is live + /boot is on Btrfs. https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/commit/0fc01e834082f20896728f330faea8e0b200a159 and fixes this blocker bug: Boot fails because grub initrd entry isn't generated https://bugzilla

Re: /boot on Btrfs still not supported, main problem is anaconda and grubby

2015-03-20 Thread Chris Murphy
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 2:27 PM, drago01 wrote: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:51 PM, drago01 wrote: >>> Just use grubby for those? >> >> I'm not quite following the question. Grubby always gets used in any >> case. And the same Btrfs subvolu

Re: /boot on Btrfs still not supported, main problem is anaconda and grubby

2015-03-20 Thread Josef Bacik
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:27 PM, drago01 wrote: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:51 PM, drago01 wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Chris Murphy >>> wrote: On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 11:58 AM, drago01 wrote: > That is not the on

Re: /boot on Btrfs still not supported, main problem is anaconda and grubby

2015-03-20 Thread drago01
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:51 PM, drago01 wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Chris Murphy >> wrote: >>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 11:58 AM, drago01 wrote: That is not the only issue. If grub itself gets updated and you run g

Re: /boot on Btrfs still not supported, main problem is anaconda and grubby

2015-03-20 Thread Chris Murphy
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:51 PM, drago01 wrote: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 11:58 AM, drago01 wrote: >>> That is not the only issue. >>> If grub itself gets updated and you run grub2-mkconfig the generated >>> config file might cause issues w

Re: /boot on Btrfs still not supported, main problem is anaconda and grubby

2015-03-20 Thread drago01
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 11:58 AM, drago01 wrote: >> That is not the only issue. >> If grub itself gets updated and you run grub2-mkconfig the generated >> config file might cause issues with the grub that is actually >> installed on disk (we

Re: Something in Rawhide spams SELinux or audit messages to every terminal

2015-03-20 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 02:14:38PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Message from syslogd@trick at Mar 20 14:13:46 ... > journal: pid=2038 uid=0 auid=1000 ses=2 > subj=system_u:system_r:sshd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 msg='op=destroy kind=server > fp=SHA256:5e:91:96:9b:d3:3c:42:5c:21:e8:fe:8e:4c:c6:a8:ef

Re: /boot on Btrfs still not supported, main problem is anaconda and grubby

2015-03-20 Thread Chris Murphy
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 11:58 AM, drago01 wrote: > That is not the only issue. > If grub itself gets updated and you run grub2-mkconfig the generated > config file might cause issues with the grub that is actually > installed on disk (we do not reinstall grub on updates). On UEFI it is. -- Chri

Re: /boot on Btrfs still not supported, main problem is anaconda and grubby

2015-03-20 Thread Chris Murphy
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:08 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > Well there's u-boot on ARMv7 and probably on aarch64 (uEFI is for the > server spec, not necessarily other form factors), what about those > users interested in using gummiboot instead of grub2? Gummiboot supports no file systems, only what

Re: /boot on Btrfs still not supported, main problem is anaconda and grubby

2015-03-20 Thread Colin Walters
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015, at 03:11 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/BootLoaderSpec/ > > It seems to have died. See also https://www.redhat.com/archives/anaconda-devel-list/2014-July/msg2.html (The current status quo for OSTree is that it writes /boo

Re: /boot on Btrfs still not supported, main problem is anaconda and grubby

2015-03-20 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Andrew Lutomirski said: > Please let's pick a standard (or at least Fedora standard) way to > store boot loader entries. The current system is awful. It's extra > awful when you have to reinstall or switch boot loaders for whatever > reason and all your boot entries are only li

Re: /boot on Btrfs still not supported, main problem is anaconda and grubby

2015-03-20 Thread Andrew Lutomirski
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Josef Bacik wrote: >> Seems like it's easier to just ditch grubby than patch it, if it takes >> years to merge patches to provide simple functionality that other >> distro's already have then we just need to

Re: /boot on Btrfs still not supported, main problem is anaconda and grubby

2015-03-20 Thread Chris Murphy
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Josef Bacik wrote: > Seems like it's easier to just ditch grubby than patch it, if it takes > years to merge patches to provide simple functionality that other > distro's already have then we just need to drop it and go with some > other solution. Thanks, Linux

Re: /boot on Btrfs still not supported, main problem is anaconda and grubby

2015-03-20 Thread Andrew Lutomirski
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 10:58 AM, drago01 wrote: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Josef Bacik wrote: >>> Cool so then we use grubby for these other cases and use the grub2 >>> stuff for the grub2 case which covers the majority of installs

[perl-Exporter-Lite] 0.06

2015-03-20 Thread Tom Callaway
commit ad52760ed5bea096bf6b39af6a6f67f0e253e6e9 Author: Tom Callaway Date: Fri Mar 20 14:48:19 2015 -0400 0.06 .gitignore | 1 + perl-Exporter-Lite.spec | 7 +-- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/.gitignore b

Re: /boot on Btrfs still not supported, main problem is anaconda and grubby

2015-03-20 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 20.03.2015 um 18:58 schrieb drago01: That is not the only issue. If grub itself gets updated and you run grub2-mkconfig the generated config file might cause issues with the grub that is actually installed on disk (we do not reinstall grub on updates) and you can't update grub that easy in

Re: Heads up: nss-3.18 released: coming to fedora

2015-03-20 Thread Kai Engert
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 16:54 -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 17:41 -0400, Elio Maldonado wrote: > > nss-3.18 was released. Please see the upstream release notes at > > > > https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Projects/NSS/NSS_3.18_release_notes > > > > Rawhide is

Re: /boot on Btrfs still not supported, main problem is anaconda and grubby

2015-03-20 Thread drago01
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Josef Bacik wrote: >> Cool so then we use grubby for these other cases and use the grub2 >> stuff for the grub2 case which covers the majority of installs and >> lets us use btrfs for /boot. Then as new featu

Re: /boot on Btrfs still not supported, main problem is anaconda and grubby

2015-03-20 Thread Josef Bacik
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Josef Bacik wrote: >> Cool so then we use grubby for these other cases and use the grub2 >> stuff for the grub2 case which covers the majority of installs and >> lets us use btrfs for /boot. Then as new featu

Re: /boot on Btrfs still not supported, main problem is anaconda and grubby

2015-03-20 Thread Chris Murphy
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Josef Bacik wrote: > Cool so then we use grubby for these other cases and use the grub2 > stuff for the grub2 case which covers the majority of installs and > lets us use btrfs for /boot. Then as new features are added to grub2 > for btrfs we don't have to worry a

Re: Some lua packages are broken in f22

2015-03-20 Thread Bastien Nocera
- Original Message - > On 03/20/2015 02:31 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > Seen this as well. > > Coincidentally, I looked at lua earlier today to fix another package, > and there's what I found: > > > quvi is broken: > > ** (info:11777): CRITICAL **: [_chk_script_ident] > > /usr/share/li

Re: F22 Self Contained Change: Disabled Repositories Support

2015-03-20 Thread Matěj Cepl
On 2015-03-20, 14:28 GMT, Richard Hughes wrote: > Now imagine you're trying to write a command-not-found implementation > that uses python to load yum. The Yum codebase is pretty huge, and by > the time the 50ms "user needs results now" timer expires we're not > even at "loading metadata" let alon

Re: Heads up: nss-3.18 released: coming to fedora

2015-03-20 Thread Elio Maldonado
On 03/19/2015 02:54 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 17:41 -0400, Elio Maldonado wrote: nss-3.18 was released. Please see the upstream release notes at https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Projects/NSS/NSS_3.18_release_notes Rawhide is now updated and it should sta

Re: ad: Something in Rawhide spams SELinux or audit messages to every terminal

2015-03-20 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
My original aim with the message to devel@ was to find out what component to file the BZ against. I've filed it now, against rsyslog for the moment: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204217 and I will follow up in there with the additional information you requested. Thanks, Rich. --

Re: Some lua packages are broken in f22

2015-03-20 Thread Kalev Lember
On 03/20/2015 02:31 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > Seen this as well. Coincidentally, I looked at lua earlier today to fix another package, and there's what I found: > quvi is broken: > ** (info:11777): CRITICAL **: [_chk_script_ident] > /usr/share/libquvi-scripts/0.9/common/quvi/youtube.lua:109: m

Re: gdk-pixbuf2 package splitting

2015-03-20 Thread Richard Hughes
On 20 March 2015 at 15:18, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > i.e. Looks like /usr/include/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/gdk-pixbuf-xlib/ should also be > moved to gdk-pixbuf2-xlib-devel. Good catch, I'll do that now, thanks. Richard. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai

Re: gdk-pixbuf2 package splitting

2015-03-20 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Hello: Richard Hughes wrote on 03/20/2015 11:51 PM: I've just pushed two new gdk-pixbuf2 builds to rawhide *not* F22. * The first splits out the modules (e.g. the ico, jpeg, gif loaders) to a separate subpackage called gdk-pixbuf2-modules -- which we'll certainly need on workstation but really

Re: ad: Something in Rawhide spams SELinux or audit messages to every terminal

2015-03-20 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 03:35:37PM +0100, Tomas Heinrich wrote: > Spamming shells was traditionally the domain of syslogd. In > /etc/rsyslog.conf, there's this line: > > *.emerg :omusrmsg:* Yup, that exists. Note I've not changed /etc/rsyslog.conf from the default configuration. > You can try co

gdk-pixbuf2 package splitting

2015-03-20 Thread Richard Hughes
I've just pushed two new gdk-pixbuf2 builds to rawhide *not* F22. * The first splits out the modules (e.g. the ico, jpeg, gif loaders) to a separate subpackage called gdk-pixbuf2-modules -- which we'll certainly need on workstation but really not on cloud or text-only installs * The second splits

Re: F22 Self Contained Change: Disabled Repositories Support

2015-03-20 Thread Richard Hughes
On 20 March 2015 at 08:59, Matěj Cepl wrote: > Sorry, I am just a stupid idiot writing in one of those hated > interpreted languages Nobody said anything of the sort. I write stuff in python all the time. > What’s the realtionship between the interpreted > languages and said duplication? Okay,

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 20 March 2015 14:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

2015-03-20 Thread Harald Hoyer
On 19.03.2015 13:37, Harald Hoyer wrote: > THIS TIME at 14:00 UTC because of US summer time. > > Agenda: > - Interview candidates for new memberships > - Optionally accept new members > - Open Floor > > Please add items by replying to this mail. > Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fe

Some Big Data packages in need of co-maintainers

2015-03-20 Thread Peter MacKinnon
Hello, I own some packages that have been neglected due to my work on other projects. It would be great to have some co-maintainers to keep these in good health in Fedora. All are reasonably up-to-date but as the hadoop package revs (a key dependency), I fear breakdowns in the not too distant

Something in Rawhide spams SELinux or audit messages to every terminal

2015-03-20 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
I'm not even sure what component I would file this bug against, but since a few days ago, something in Rawhide is causing every ssh terminal, console etc to get spammed with SELinux audit messages. Simply ssh-ing to the box gives you: $ ssh trick Message from syslogd@trick at Mar 20 14:13:46 ..

[perl-Clone] 0.38

2015-03-20 Thread Tom Callaway
commit b2dc8a89b93c1bcee13da045699974def90244ac Author: Tom Callaway Date: Fri Mar 20 09:45:06 2015 -0400 0.38 .gitignore | 1 + perl-Clone.spec | 8 +--- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 18aa8

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 20 March 2015 14:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

2015-03-20 Thread Jon
My regrets. I'm in transit and may be late at best or miss the meeting. On Mar 19, 2015 7:37 AM, "Harald Hoyer" wrote: > THIS TIME at 14:00 UTC because of US summer time. > > Agenda: > - Interview candidates for new memberships > - Optionally accept new members > - Open Floor > > Please add it

Re: F22 Self Contained Change: Disabled Repositories Support

2015-03-20 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 5:01 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > You'd be surprised. There is apparently work under way, in the larger > Fedora ecosystem, on scriptless booting, in the name of securinity > (eventually making Android-style locked bootloaders). > Eliminating scripting from boot do

Re: Some lua packages are broken in f22

2015-03-20 Thread Bastien Nocera
Seen this as well. quvi is broken: ** (info:11777): CRITICAL **: [_chk_script_ident] /usr/share/libquvi-scripts/0.9/common/quvi/youtube.lua:109: module 'socket.url' not found: no field package.preload['socket.url'] no file '/usr/share/lua/5.2/socket/url.lua' no file '/usr

Re: [Test-Announce] 2015-03-19 Fedora 22 I18N Test Day

2015-03-20 Thread pravin....@gmail.com
On 19 March 2015 at 08:57, Akira TAGOH wrote: > Hi, > > We have a test day event for Internationalization on f22 as usual to make > sure if f22 has any issues around i18n. > Please join Freenode #fedora-test-day and try if your primary language > works on f22 when you have a bit of time. > Test c

Re: /boot on Btrfs still not supported, main problem is anaconda and grubby

2015-03-20 Thread Josef Bacik
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> >> What's it going to take to fix this? Ubuntu supports it, openSUSE >>> >> supports it, GRUB 2 has supported it for many years now. >>> >> >>> >> This is a 2.5 year old bug, with patches to fix the problem for ~9 >>> >> months, which have

Re: /boot on Btrfs still not supported, main problem is anaconda and grubby

2015-03-20 Thread Peter Robinson
>> >> What's it going to take to fix this? Ubuntu supports it, openSUSE >> >> supports it, GRUB 2 has supported it for many years now. >> >> >> >> This is a 2.5 year old bug, with patches to fix the problem for ~9 >> >> months, which have been tested and work >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_

Re: /boot on Btrfs still not supported, main problem is anaconda and grubby

2015-03-20 Thread Josef Bacik
On Mar 20, 2015 8:15 AM, "Peter Robinson" wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Josef Bacik wrote: > > On Mar 17, 2015 3:30 PM, "Chris Murphy" wrote: > >> > >> What's it going to take to fix this? Ubuntu supports it, openSUSE > >> supports it, GRUB 2 has supported it for many years now. >

Re: /boot on Btrfs still not supported, main problem is anaconda and grubby

2015-03-20 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Josef Bacik wrote: > On Mar 17, 2015 3:30 PM, "Chris Murphy" wrote: >> >> What's it going to take to fix this? Ubuntu supports it, openSUSE >> supports it, GRUB 2 has supported it for many years now. >> >> This is a 2.5 year old bug, with patches to fix the probl

Re: /boot on Btrfs still not supported, main problem is anaconda and grubby

2015-03-20 Thread Josef Bacik
On Mar 17, 2015 3:30 PM, "Chris Murphy" wrote: > > What's it going to take to fix this? Ubuntu supports it, openSUSE > supports it, GRUB 2 has supported it for many years now. > > This is a 2.5 year old bug, with patches to fix the problem for ~9 > months, which have been tested and work > https:/

F-22 Branched report: 20150320 changes

2015-03-20 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Fri Mar 20 07:15:02 UTC 2015 Broken deps for armhfp -- [Sprog] Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0) [aeskulap] aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.armv7hl requires libofstd.so.3.6

Re: Heads up: nss-3.18 released: coming to fedora

2015-03-20 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2015-03-19, Elio Maldonado wrote: >> nss-3.18 was released. Please see the upstream release notes at >> >> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Projects/NSS/NSS_3.18_release_notes >> > It took only 7 years to make TLS 1.2 default

Re: F22 Self Contained Change: Disabled Repositories Support

2015-03-20 Thread Florian Weimer
On 03/19/2015 07:18 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Wed, 2015-03-18 at 00:36 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Richard Hughes wrote: >>> Perhaps, when we stop writing low level tools with specific >>> latency requirements in interpreted languages... >> >> +1 >> >> In fact, IMHO, we should stop writing ANY

Re: F22 Self Contained Change: Disabled Repositories Support

2015-03-20 Thread Matěj Cepl
On 2015-03-17, 15:51 GMT, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 17 March 2015 at 15:35, Miloslav Trmač wrote: >> Wait, the metadata download and search code is not shared? What would it >> take to make it so? > > No. The dnf code is in python and the libhif code is in C. Sorry, I am just a stupid idiot wr

Re: Heads up: nss-3.18 released: coming to fedora

2015-03-20 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2015-03-19, Elio Maldonado wrote: > nss-3.18 was released. Please see the upstream release notes at > > https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Projects/NSS/NSS_3.18_release_notes > It took only 7 years to make TLS 1.2 default :( -- Petr -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproje

[Test-Announce] Fedora 22 Beta Test Compose 3 (TC3) Available Now!

2015-03-20 Thread Adam Williamson
As per the Fedora 22 schedule [1], Fedora 22 Beta Test Compose 3 (TC3) is now available for testing. Content information, including changes, can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6132# comment:2.Please see the following pages for download links and testing instructions. Normal