Hi all,
I would like to introduce a new @vagrant group that should pull in vagrant
with vagrant-libvirt plugin (at the very least) since libvirt might be
the preferred virtualization when used with Vagrant on Fedora and I would
like to encourage users to use the packaged plugin.
Also, we set libv
# F22 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2015-03-02
# Time: 1700 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
It's Blocker Review time again! We have quite the list of proposed
blockers and FEs to review ahead of what's planned as the last week of
Alpha testing, so let's get through th
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2015-03-02
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's QA meeting time again! All I really have for the agenda this week
is F22 status and a follow-up
On 3/2/15, Moez Roy wrote:
> What happens when you use the latest build:
>
> xorg-x11-server-1.17.1-5.fc23
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=616980
No, int vector is unreadable:
http://pastebin.com/8pJt0b7W
Ajax's commit:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/commit/
Summary of changes:
56a0d5a... update to 2.3.16 (*)
75a659f... new sources (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
commit 75a659f2279ef358a248af27f63290d7b404c37c
Author: jehane
Date: Mon Mar 2 08:10:26 2015 +0100
new sources
.gitignore | 1 +
sources| 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index d25ea84..c55cab8 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b
On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 10:31 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I encountered this when I distro-synced my f21 non-product to rawhide
> and kernel updated to 4.0 in this morning.
>
> Now no matter which kernel the system runs under, all couldn't start
> X, with these in Xorg.0.log:
>
> Loading
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for fusioninventory-agent:
89467ae101a89544a6fbade2e7a879fe FusionInventory-Agent-2.3.16.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedora
commit 56a0d5a6bfdeb354399208062be7ddd078ff9759
Author: jehane
Date: Mon Mar 2 08:03:15 2015 +0100
update to 2.3.16
fusioninventory-agent.spec | 36 ++--
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/fusioninventory-agent.spec b/fusionin
Il 27/02/2015 18:26, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade ha scritto:
> 2015-02-27 13:02 GMT-03:00 Sandro Bonazzola :
>> Hi,
>
> Hello and Welcome Sandro!
>
>> following [1] I'm writing for introducing myself.
>> My name is Sandro Bonazzola and I'm a Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat.
>> I'm leadin
Hi,
I encountered this when I distro-synced my f21 non-product to rawhide
and kernel updated to 4.0 in this morning.
Now no matter which kernel the system runs under, all couldn't start
X, with these in Xorg.0.log:
Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/libvbe.so
[99.976] (EE) Failed to load /usr/l
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Carlos Morel-Riquelme
wrote:
> I install F22 workstation today and well firewalld is enable by default. So
> the disable firewall in F21 is out ?
It's enabled by default in Fedora 21 Workstation also. No change.
# firewall-cmd --list-all
FedoraWorkstation (defa
Hi,
I am developing a Dockerfile for X2Go. I intend to submit a PR to
fedora-Dockerfiles within a week.
https://github.com/mikedep333/Fedora-Dockerfiles/tree/add-x2go
(X2Go was already added in F20)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/X2Go
Example Dockerfile with systemd:
https://github.com/
- Original Message -
> From: "Moez Roy"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Cc: "David Airlie" , "Adam Jackson" ,
> "Till Maas"
> Sent: Monday, 2 March, 2015 1:15:19 PM
> Subject: Re: hardening breaks X.org
>
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 5:16 PM, David Airlie wrote:
>
On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 5:16 PM, David Airlie wrote:
> So the rebuild to use hardened builds by default in rawhide, broke X.org.
>
> Thanks guys, my system is more secure, but I can't run any apps.
>
> Anyways enough snark from me, the problem seems to be that hardening
> makes bind now override RT
On 3/2/15, David Airlie wrote:
> So the rebuild to use hardened builds by default in rawhide, broke X.org.
>
> Thanks guys, my system is more secure, but I can't run any apps.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Harden_all_packages_with_position-independent_code:
"Fedora users might notice les
So the rebuild to use hardened builds by default in rawhide, broke X.org.
Thanks guys, my system is more secure, but I can't run any apps.
Anyways enough snark from me, the problem seems to be that hardening
makes bind now override RTLD_LAZY options, and the X server relies
on the RTLD_LAZY on it
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 09:49:48AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 24-02-15 18:34, drago01 wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>Hi All,
> >>
> >>As described here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibinputForXorg
> >>
> >>We've been working on making
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi all,
Could someone please review a package I submitted today?
xfce4-pulseaudio-plugin -->
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197520
I would, of course, be willing to do a review in exchange.
Thanks,
Mukundan.
- --
GPG key: 00E8658
Hi,
On Sunday, 01 March 2015 at 15:45, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Audacious 3.6 has been released.
>
> This is another chance for interested people to join and help deciding how
> to proceed with the Fedora packages. I'm still looking for co-maintainers,
> too, especially some who have an opinion
Michael,
Thanks for sharing that.
I think it'd be the best to go with the flow. That is, use the QT GUI. In
the long run I think it is best to avoid maintaining multiple packages. I
haven't seen the new QT GUI to be honest, it might be ugly, but still :)
Perhaps if there is too much rage about i
When I try to push to stable:
This update has not yet met the minimum testing requirements defined in
the Package Update Acceptance Criteria
bugfix
Something is out of sync in bodhi it seems.
Forwarded Message
Subject: [Fedora Update] [comment] x2goserver-4.0.1.19-1.fc22
Da
On 03/01/2015 02:30 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
On Sun, 01 Mar 2015 01:20:26 -0800
Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 02/28/2015 10:42 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I receive a yellow box telling me: "This update has not yet met the
minimum testing requirements defined in the Package Update
Acceptance Criteria"
Audacious 3.6 has been released.
This is another chance for interested people to join and help deciding how
to proceed with the Fedora packages. I'm still looking for co-maintainers,
too, especially some who have an opinion on how to package it.
I've been building pre-releases for it via Fedora C
On Sun, 01 Mar 2015 01:20:26 -0800
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 02/28/2015 10:42 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > I receive a yellow box telling me: "This update has not yet met the
> > minimum testing requirements defined in the Package Update
> > Acceptance Criteria"
> >
> > Something definitely doesn'
On Fri, 20 Feb 2015 15:36:11 -0500, Ralph Bean wrote:
> If you encounter bugs or have requests for enhancement, as always please do
> file them[6][7][8]..
Done. Thanks for a premature April Fool's prank. ;)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai
On 03/01/2015 10:20 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 02/28/2015 10:42 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I receive a yellow box telling me: "This update has not yet met the
minimum testing requirements defined in the Package Update Acceptance
Criteria"
Something definitely doesn't work right.
Isn't it Alpha
On 02/28/2015 10:42 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I receive a yellow box telling me: "This update has not yet met the
minimum testing requirements defined in the Package Update Acceptance
Criteria"
Something definitely doesn't work right.
Isn't it Alpha freeze right now?
--
devel mailing list
deve
28 matches
Mail list logo
