PHP webapp configuration (apache / nginx / php)

Hi, Lot of webapp in fedora repository requires httpd + mod_php Reminder: since Fedora 21 we have now 3 working (out-of-the-box) way to have a webserver with php enabled: - apache + mod_php (the trivial way, but not the best for perf) - apache + php-fpm (using network socket of UDS since F22) -

nonresponsive maintainer - Axel Thimm

I'm continuing the nonresponsive maintainer process for Axel Thimm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186467 Axel, your last login in FAS was on 2013-08-30 (according to fedora_active_user.py) and your last official build in koji was on 2011-05-09 (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/

Re: More gcc 5 issues - calling C++ from C

On 02/17/2015 03:48 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: I'm starting to see a segfault in the plplot tests building on F23. I see that the C code is calling some C++ code in this case. This has worked before for a long time so I'm wondering what has changed it this regard. valgrind reports: 11: ==2818

Re: How to install Rawhide?

On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 20:28:09 +0100 Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:55:37 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > 1. "fedup --network rawhide" : failed with a missing image? > > >Why doesn't it work by default? > > > > Strange. The mirrormanager mirrorlist for images looks good he

Re: Advice on naming a new library package - libunicode or courier-unicode?

On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 10:17:12AM -0800, Brian C. Lane wrote: > I'm trying to get the new version of maildrop ready and they split out > unicode support into a new library. The name of their archive is > courier-unicode, but the actual name of the library installed is > libunicode. That's what I p

Re: whatever happened to yum + btrfs snapshotting?

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote: > On 2015-02-17, 13:17 GMT, Josh Boyer wrote: >> Now, it is possible to do this in dnf (either with btrfs or with dm >> snapshots) but I'm not aware of anyone working on it. Fedora has the >> Snapper tool available in the repos, which could do sn

More gcc 5 issues - calling C++ from C

I'm starting to see a segfault in the plplot tests building on F23. I see that the C code is calling some C++ code in this case. This has worked before for a long time so I'm wondering what has changed it this regard. valgrind reports: 11: ==28186== Invalid read of size 8 11: ==28186==at 0x

Re: whatever happened to yum + btrfs snapshotting?

On 2015-02-17, 13:17 GMT, Josh Boyer wrote: > Now, it is possible to do this in dnf (either with btrfs or with dm > snapshots) but I'm not aware of anyone working on it. Fedora has the > Snapper tool available in the repos, which could do snapshotting > outside of dnf as well. Yeah, just that I w

Re: [Proposal] Ring-based Packaging Policies

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 08:05:30PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 17.02.2015 um 17:54 schrieb Mathieu Bridon: > >Le mardi 17 février 2015 à 17:39 +0100, Ralf Corsepius a écrit : > >>On 02/17/2015 05:18 PM, Petr Pisar wrote: > >> > >>>Why not to create a new repository with reduced policy as >

Re: deadline for fedora org to appy in google summer of code 2015

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:44:01AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > long as > > > I think someone needs to step up as the main coordinator for Fedora > > and work with OSAS to make sure this is set. > > ... that. This would be nice, because I see an opportunity to get some development done fo

Re: How to install Rawhide?

On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:55:37 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > 1. "fedup --network rawhide" : failed with a missing image? > >Why doesn't it work by default? > > Strange. The mirrormanager mirrorlist for images looks good here, and > the images look fine. Ah... it's because they are not signed.

Re: Now Publishing fedora developer PGP keys in DNSSEC

Hi, On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 06:10:13PM -0500, Paul Wouters wrote: > I could put them under fedor...@fedoraproject.org ? Please use fedora-xx-primary and fedora-xx-secondary, these are now used starting with Fedora 23. Regards Till -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://adm

Re: [Proposal] Ring-based Packaging Policies

Am 17.02.2015 um 17:54 schrieb Mathieu Bridon: Le mardi 17 février 2015 à 17:39 +0100, Ralf Corsepius a écrit : On 02/17/2015 05:18 PM, Petr Pisar wrote: Why not to create a new repository with reduced policy as Stephen proposed with the one-way dependency rule (between current Fedora and the

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 22 Branched 20150217 nightly compose nominated for testing

2015-02-17 14:11 GMT+01:00 : > Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event > for Fedora 22 Branched 20150217. Please help run some tests for this > nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly > release validation testing,

orphaning kmplayer

I'm orphaning the kmplayer package (for f22+), last release was ~3 years ago, and it's project site @ http://kmplayer.kde.org/ is no more. (not sure if it's related at all to http://kmplayer.com/ , but that one doesn't appear to be opensource) -- Rex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedorapr

Re: recent/new Plasma5 crashes under investigation

Rex Dieter wrote: > Miloslav Trmač wrote: > >>> and now Qt(4) doesn't build either, bug, >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192464 >>> >>> Any help, advice would be appreciated (particularly input from gcc >>> maintainers). >>> >>> >>> FESCo, work on the Plasma5 change/feature is

Re: Removal of Fedora Planet post links from start.fedoraproject.org

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 04:02:35PM +0530, Sumit Bhardwaj wrote: >> Hope its the right place to discuss this. Recently, during the redesign >> of the start.fedoraproject.org page, the links to updated/new posts from >> planet.fedoraproject.or

Re: Removal of Fedora Planet post links from start.fedoraproject.org

Well, I understand your point Matthew. Yes, often the post are on the geekier side and may not be related to Fedora project as such, but most of them are about Linux in general and day to day problems/solutions in a Linux user's life. I am not aware of the intentions behind the Planet Fedora aggreg

Re: [Proposal] Ring-based Packaging Policies

On 02/17/2015 05:59 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 05:39:48PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: Why not to create a new repository with reduced policy as Stephen proposed with the one-way dependency rule (between current Fedora and the new easy-for-beginners repository)? Because t

Re: [Proposal] Ring-based Packaging Policies

> > > > Also RH and other distros history repeatedly has told the lesson > > such will not fly and are doomed to fail. > > It seems to have been working just fine in RPMFusion, where the free > and nonfree repositories have different standards for inclusion, and > where packages in nonfree can depe

Re: [Proposal] Ring-based Packaging Policies

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:54:24AM +0800, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > Le mardi 17 février 2015 à 17:39 +0100, Ralf Corsepius a écrit : > > On 02/17/2015 05:18 PM, Petr Pisar wrote: > > > > > Why not to create a new repository with reduced policy as > > > Stephen proposed with the one-way dependency ru

Re: [Proposal] Ring-based Packaging Policies

On 02/17/2015 05:54 PM, Mathieu Bridon wrote: Le mardi 17 février 2015 à 17:39 +0100, Ralf Corsepius a écrit : On 02/17/2015 05:18 PM, Petr Pisar wrote: Why not to create a new repository with reduced policy as Stephen proposed with the one-way dependency rule (between current Fedora and the n

Re: [Proposal] Ring-based Packaging Policies

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 05:39:48PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >Why not to create a new repository with reduced policy as > >Stephen proposed with the one-way dependency rule (between current > >Fedora and the new easy-for-beginners repository)? > Because this would establish a 2-class society,

Re: How to install Rawhide?

On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 17:02:32 +0100 Michael Schwendt wrote: > 1. "fedup --network rawhide" : failed with a missing image? >Why doesn't it work by default? Strange. The mirrormanager mirrorlist for images looks good here, and the images look fine. Ah... it's because they are not signed. Re-ru

Re: [Proposal] Ring-based Packaging Policies

Le mardi 17 février 2015 à 17:39 +0100, Ralf Corsepius a écrit : > On 02/17/2015 05:18 PM, Petr Pisar wrote: > > > Why not to create a new repository with reduced policy as > > Stephen proposed with the one-way dependency rule (between current > > Fedora and the new easy-for-beginners repository)

Re: Removal of Fedora Planet post links from start.fedoraproject.org

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:07:37AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > Hope its the right place to discuss this. Recently, during the redesign > > of the start.fedoraproject.org page, the links to updated/new posts from > > planet.fedoraproject.org were removed. Any specific reason for this? > Often,

Re: [Proposal] Ring-based Packaging Policies

On 02/17/2015 05:18 PM, Petr Pisar wrote: Why not to create a new repository with reduced policy as Stephen proposed with the one-way dependency rule (between current Fedora and the new easy-for-beginners repository)? Because this would establish a 2-class society, with double standards stand

Re: Removal of Fedora Planet post links from start.fedoraproject.org

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 05:12:35PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > Often, those posts were not Fedora related, and generally out of our > > control. I'm glad you found them usually interesting — that's valuable > > feedback. > I was under impression Fedora about community and friendship. > Not abo

Re: [Proposal] Ring-based Packaging Policies

On 2015-02-17, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Stephen Gallagher > wrote: >> == Proposal == >> With these things in mind, I'd like to propose that we amend the >> packaging policy by splitting it into two forms: > > I think this needs to go beyond simple policy. It needs som

Re: Removal of Fedora Planet post links from start.fedoraproject.org

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:07:37AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 04:02:35PM +0530, Sumit Bhardwaj wrote: > > Hope its the right place to discuss this. Recently, during the redesign > > of the start.fedoraproject.org page, the links to updated/new posts from > > planet.fedor

Re: Removal of Fedora Planet post links from start.fedoraproject.org

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 04:02:35PM +0530, Sumit Bhardwaj wrote: > Hope its the right place to discuss this. Recently, during the redesign > of the start.fedoraproject.org page, the links to updated/new posts from > planet.fedoraproject.org were removed. Any specific reason for this? Often, those p

How to install Rawhide?

1. "fedup --network rawhide" : failed with a missing image? Why doesn't it work by default? 2. "yum distro-sync" with rawhide repo enabled : first encountered upgrade path violation problems, unresolved deps. Then after enabling only the rawhide repo, it locked up hard after updating ~900

Re: Orphaning and seeking comaintainers of some packages

On 02/17/2015 02:19 AM, Christopher Meng wrote: > Hi, > > There are some packages I don't use anymore, feel free to take them: > > libntlm > python-durus > barry > spambayes > rblcheck > tokyocabinet > jaxodraw > flterm > libquvi > libquvi-scripts > quvi > python-django-socialregistration > daypl

Re: deadline for fedora org to appy in google summer of code 2015

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:21:47AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > I may have misunderstood the conversation I'm remembering. Apologies > for any confusion. The main issue is that we as a project can't take any money, even if Google really wants to send it somewhere. I don't think there's a problem as

Re: deadline for fedora org to appy in google summer of code 2015

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:21:47AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon > wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 09:43:45AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon > >> wrote: > >> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 08:13:49

Re: deadline for fedora org to appy in google summer of code 2015

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 09:43:45AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 08:13:49AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Itamar

Planned Outage: pkgs.fedoraproject.org - 2015-02-19 09:00 UTC

Planned Outage: Migration to gitolite3 - 2015-02-19 09:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2015-02-19 09:00 UTC, which will last approximately 3 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2015-02-19 09:00

Re: deadline for fedora org to appy in google summer of code 2015

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 09:43:45AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon > wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 08:13:49AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Itamar Reis Peixoto > >> wrote: > >> > https://www.google-melange.com/g

Re: deadline for fedora org to appy in google summer of code 2015

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 08:13:49AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Itamar Reis Peixoto >> wrote: >> > https://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/homepage/google/gsoc2015 >> > >> > 3 days, 5 hours remaining >> >> I

Re: Results of a test mass rebuild of rawhide/x86_64 with gcc-5.0.0-0.5.fc22

On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Marek Polacek wrote: > odb-2.3.0-8.fc22.src.rpm > build failure because the gcc plugin API has changed. > odb has been updated to 2.4.0 which supports the new gcc 5.0 plugin API, but whenever I try to do the rebuild it fails to find libcutl (which I rebui

Re: deadline for fedora org to appy in google summer of code 2015

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 08:13:49AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Itamar Reis Peixoto > wrote: > > https://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/homepage/google/gsoc2015 > > > > 3 days, 5 hours remaining > > I don't believe Fedora will be applying to this any longer in an > off

Re: [Proposal] Ring-based Packaging Policies

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > == Proposal == > With these things in mind, I'd like to propose that we amend the > packaging policy by splitting it into two forms: I think this needs to go beyond simple policy. It needs some buildsystem enforcement as well. > === Co

Fedora 22 Changes Completion deadline in one week - 2015-02-24

Greetings! Fedora 22 Change Checkpoint: Completion deadline (testable) is in one week - 2015-02-24 [1] and we're getting closer to this date. Other important milestones are scheduled for this date: * Alpha Freeze * Software String Freeze * Bodhi activation point At this point, all accepted change

Re: whatever happened to yum + btrfs snapshotting?

Dne 17.2.2015 v 14:17 Josh Boyer napsal: Now, it is possible to do this in dnf (either with btrfs or with dm snapshots) but I'm not aware of anyone working on it. Fedora has the Snapper tool available in the repos, which could do snapshotting outside of dnf as well. There's a Snapper plugin fo

Re: Access to failed builds [Was: gcc5 ICE xserver build on ARM]

Josh Boyer writes: > We should not include preprocessed source files by default without the user > knowing and agreeing. People use gcc to build proprietary source still. There's a check box to this effect in ABRT. It's not much different from sending backtraces or some other things that ABRT

Re: whatever happened to yum + btrfs snapshotting?

Dne 17.2.2015 v 13:53 Neal Becker napsal(a): > Some time back there was discussion of being able to rollback yum updates via > btrfs snapshotting. As I recall, it turned out that the default btrfs > install > was not setup correctly to make this feasible (I had briefly tested it on my > machin

Re: whatever happened to yum + btrfs snapshotting?

Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Neal Becker wrote: >> Some time back there was discussion of being able to rollback yum updates via >> btrfs snapshotting. As I recall, it turned out that the default btrfs >> install was not setup correctly to make this feasible (I had briefl

Re: whatever happened to yum + btrfs snapshotting?

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Neal Becker wrote: > Some time back there was discussion of being able to rollback yum updates via > btrfs snapshotting. As I recall, it turned out that the default btrfs install > was not setup correctly to make this feasible (I had briefly tested it on my > mach

Re: Regarding google summer of code 2015

Oh I see. Did not know about these. I put it on fedora just cause it's my favorite distro. Thank you! On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > See above. "voice recognition" and accent immunity is not a "python" > > sort of problem, it's a massive ongoi

Re: deadline for fedora org to appy in google summer of code 2015

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: > https://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/homepage/google/gsoc2015 > > 3 days, 5 hours remaining I don't believe Fedora will be applying to this any longer in an official capacity. josh -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org h

Re: Regarding google summer of code 2015

Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > See above. "voice recognition" and accent immunity is not a "python" > sort of problem, it's a massive ongoing computer and speech research > issue. Pick something *smaller*. I would also add to that that Fedora would probably be the wrong mentoring organization for suc

Re: Removal of Fedora Planet post links from start.fedoraproject.org

On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 16:02:35 +0530 Sumit Bhardwaj wrote: > Hi All, > > Hope its the right place to discuss this. Recently, during the > redesign of the start.fedoraproject.org page, the links to > updated/new posts from planet.fedoraproject.org were removed. Any > specific reason for this? You

[Test-Announce] Fedora 22 Branched 20150217 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 22 Branched 20150217. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

deadline for fedora org to appy in google summer of code 2015

https://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/homepage/google/gsoc2015 3 days, 5 hours remaining -- Itamar Reis Peixoto -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Regarding google summer of code 2015

Oh my! Thank you Mr. Nico! :) I will pick up a smaller project for google summer of code. However, I am too much obsessed with voice recognition systems. But now I understand that it is not a small issue. Someday, I will surely work on speech synthesis. As you mentioned above, it is certainly not d

Re: Orphaning and seeking comaintainers of some packages

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:19 AM, Christopher Meng wrote: > Hi, > > There are some packages I don't use anymore, feel free to take them: > > libntlm > python-durus > barry > spambayes > rblcheck > tokyocabinet > jaxodraw > flterm > libquvi > libquvi-scripts > quvi > python-django-socialregistratio

whatever happened to yum + btrfs snapshotting?

Some time back there was discussion of being able to rollback yum updates via btrfs snapshotting. As I recall, it turned out that the default btrfs install was not setup correctly to make this feasible (I had briefly tested it on my machine). I haven't heard anything since - this seems like a

[Bug 1193422] perl-System-Command-1.111 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193422 Petr Šabata changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: Copr routinely swamped by nightly builds

On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 11:35:57 +0100 Thomas Moschny wrote: > 2015-02-17 5:34 GMT+01:00 Kevin Kofler : > > IMHO, one of 2 things needs to happen: > > a) Copr gets a massive increase of resources (builders) to handle > > the load, OR > > b) we disallow nightly builds of huge packages such as python3

Re: Regarding google summer of code 2015

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 5:49 AM, Abhilash Mhaisne wrote: > Sir / Madam, >I am an engineering student, and gsoc aspirant. I want to > develop a easy-to-use voice recognition system, which would be capable of > judging even minor changes in accents, for fedora systems. And I'd l

Re: Access to failed builds [Was: gcc5 ICE xserver build on ARM]

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 07:19:35AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Feb 17, 2015 7:10 AM, "Peter Robinson" wrote: > > > > > Indeed, reproducing the failures only to get a /tmp/ccXX.out file > > > is not exactly fun. > > > > > > In a related vein, I think ABRT should bundle the /tmp/ccXX.out >

Re: Access to failed builds [Was: gcc5 ICE xserver build on ARM]

On Feb 17, 2015 7:10 AM, "Peter Robinson" wrote: > > > Indeed, reproducing the failures only to get a /tmp/ccXX.out file > > is not exactly fun. > > > > In a related vein, I think ABRT should bundle the /tmp/ccXX.out > > files to its reports as well. From time to time we get reports as >

Re: npth (was: Re: Orphaning and seeking comaintainers of some packages)

On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:13:29 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > > nPth - The New Pth library : isn't that one of the forks of "pth" to be > > developed more actively? > > > > It isn't used by any package yet according to repoquery. > > > > It has been imported just 23 months ago. Are you aware of an

Re: Access to failed builds [Was: gcc5 ICE xserver build on ARM]

> Indeed, reproducing the failures only to get a /tmp/ccXX.out file > is not exactly fun. > > In a related vein, I think ABRT should bundle the /tmp/ccXX.out > files to its reports as well. From time to time we get reports as > , but suc

Re: Access to failed builds [Was: gcc5 ICE xserver build on ARM]

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 08:45:09AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: >> On 17/02/15 07:21, David Airlie wrote: >> >> > Well I can't provide any info, I don't have an ARM box here, and it >> > happens in the buildroot which I don't think I can access

Re: yum or dnf in the Fedora 22 Docker base image?

Not that I know of. On 02/16/2015 09:50 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: > Thanks! Are there tracking bugs in Bugzilla I can subscribe to? > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: >> On 02/16/2015 12:31 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Danie

Re: ANNOUNCE: OCaml compiler will be updated in Fedora Rawhide

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:26:06AM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Richard W.M. Jones > wrote: > > > > Update: It's nearly half way through the rebuilds now. Expected to be > > all finished by this time tomorrow. > > What's the state of rawhide expected to be in

Re: ANNOUNCE: OCaml compiler will be updated in Fedora Rawhide

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Update: It's nearly half way through the rebuilds now. Expected to be > all finished by this time tomorrow. What's the state of rawhide expected to be in the interim? Is today/tomorrow's compose going to be hosed? Peter -- devel m

Re: gcc5 ICE xserver build on ARM

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:18:54AM +, Peter Robinson wrote: >> Please file a bug and mark it a blocker to ARMTracker bug. It might be >> similar to some of the other ARM ICEs we're getting but I'd sooner >> have a dupe than miss a bug. P

Re: gcc5 ICE xserver build on ARM

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:18:54AM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > Please file a bug and mark it a blocker to ARMTracker bug. It might be > similar to some of the other ARM ICEs we're getting but I'd sooner > have a dupe than miss a bug. Put the details of the koji tasks in the > BZ and we can eithe

Re: gcc5 ICE xserver build on ARM

>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 07:14:43AM +0100, Marek Polacek wrote: >> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:26:57AM -0500, David Airlie wrote: >> > > Just kicked off an Xserver build in rawhide, >> > > >> > > and it appears gcc ICE. >> > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=8960146&name=build.

Re: gcc5 ICE xserver build on ARM

David Airlie wrote: > Not sure how best to proceed. Can the software be cross-compiled? If so, I could provide you with a cross-compiler. David -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproje

FUDCon APAC 2015 - Call for Papers

Hi All, FUDCon - The Fedora Users & Developers Conference is back and this time to be held in Pune – one of the premiere IT & Software hubs of India!. FUDCon is a major free and open source software event held in various regions around the world, with the aim of bringing Fedora community memb

Regarding google summer of code 2015

Sir / Madam, I am an engineering student, and gsoc aspirant. I want to develop a easy-to-use voice recognition system, which would be capable of judging even minor changes in accents, for fedora systems. I wish to implement this system in python, making use of

Re: Copr routinely swamped by nightly builds

2015-02-17 5:34 GMT+01:00 Kevin Kofler : > IMHO, one of 2 things needs to happen: > a) Copr gets a massive increase of resources (builders) to handle the load, > OR > b) we disallow nightly builds of huge packages such as python3 in Copr, > because the infrastructure does not scale to that kind of

Removal of Fedora Planet post links from start.fedoraproject.org

Hi All, Hope its the right place to discuss this. Recently, during the redesign of the start.fedoraproject.org page, the links to updated/new posts from planet.fedoraproject.org were removed. Any specific reason for this? I, for one, used those links for quickly going through the new blog posts.

Re: ANNOUNCE: OCaml compiler will be updated in Fedora Rawhide

Update: It's nearly half way through the rebuilds now. Expected to be all finished by this time tomorrow. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora Windows cross-compiler.

Re: npth (was: Re: Orphaning and seeking comaintainers of some packages)

On 2/17/15, Michael Schwendt wrote: > nPth - The New Pth library : isn't that one of the forks of "pth" to be > developed more actively? > > It isn't used by any package yet according to repoquery. > > It has been imported just 23 months ago. Are you aware of any anything > that uses it? Maybe yo

npth (was: Re: Orphaning and seeking comaintainers of some packages)

On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 17:19:38 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > These below are packages I seldom use, feel free to comaintain them: > > NetPIPE > PyMca > roxterm > autoconf-archive > freetalk > unhide > firehol > npth nPth - The New Pth library : isn't that one of the forks of "pth" to be develop

Orphaning and seeking comaintainers of some packages

Hi, There are some packages I don't use anymore, feel free to take them: libntlm python-durus barry spambayes rblcheck tokyocabinet jaxodraw flterm libquvi libquvi-scripts quvi python-django-socialregistration dayplanner gengetopt code2html elementary-icon-theme drehatlas-widelands-fonts pycrypto

Re: Access to failed builds [Was: gcc5 ICE xserver build on ARM]

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 09:56:20AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 08:45:09AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: > > On 17/02/15 07:21, David Airlie wrote: > > > > > Well I can't provide any info, I don't have an ARM box here, and it > > > happens in the buildroot which I don't think

Re: Access to failed builds [Was: gcc5 ICE xserver build on ARM]

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 08:45:09AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: > On 17/02/15 07:21, David Airlie wrote: > > > Well I can't provide any info, I don't have an ARM box here, and it > > happens in the buildroot which I don't think I can access to get the > > files out from. > > I've been bitten by thi

Access to failed builds [Was: gcc5 ICE xserver build on ARM]

On 17/02/15 07:21, David Airlie wrote: > Well I can't provide any info, I don't have an ARM box here, and it > happens in the buildroot which I don't think I can access to get the > files out from. I've been bitten by this several times. We need to find a better way to handle issues like this: w