On 02/14/2015 04:33 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> IMHO, it is the job of the EPEL package of mock to disable the
> config_opts['package_manager'] = 'dnf' option in the shipped version of the
> Rawhide configs.
But then you will not be warned that your results may differ from Koji.
--
Miroslav Such
On 02/13/2015 04:42 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> See also: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Bootstrapping
However I have to note that this is very new guideline and not yet implemented
in neither mock nor koji.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS
Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer,
On 02/06/2015 11:41 AM, David Howells wrote:
> Can rpmbuild be taught to produce a 'build logs' rpm (or tarball or something)
> that isn't automatically added to the installation set by koji/bodhi and that
> can get generated even in the event of a build failure?
rpmbuild is very low level tool. I
On 14. 2. 2015 at 22:28:53, M. Edward Borasky wrote:
> Right now, the fedora:rawhide image on Docker Hub uses yum instead of
> dnf, as does the Fedora 21 release. Is there any plan to switch this
> release over to dnf?
Not likely. Porting of the system components is being done in F22+. Even if
a
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> (Logistical note: please keep all replies to this thread on
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org)
> [...]
> === Core Packages ===
> Any package that is provided on a release-blocking medium (which at
> present includes Fedora Atomic, Fedora Cl
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 11:08:55PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Feb 2015 18:17:56 +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
>
> > either package bugs, or GCC bugs. As things stand, just about 19 packages
> > did
> > not build due to bugs in gcc-5.0.0-0.5.fc22. All GCC bugs except one are
> > f
On Sun, 8 Feb 2015 18:17:56 +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
> either package bugs, or GCC bugs. As things stand, just about 19 packages did
> not build due to bugs in gcc-5.0.0-0.5.fc22. All GCC bugs except one are
> fixed
> at this time, and I promise I will fix the remaining one before long.
gcc
Il 15/02/2015 22:01, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 23:44:18 +0100
gil wrote:
a fix for this problem is:
(see
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/java-service-wrapper.git/tree/java-service-wrapper.spec
)
Well, this doesn't seem like a fix, but more of a workaround and a bit
prone
On Sun, 15 Feb 2015 07:04:02 -0500 (EST)
Jens Petersen wrote:
> BTW why is the arch order of the branched report and the rawhide
> report different?
No idea at all.
They both call/use repodiff exactly the same way (from the same
function even).
So, perhaps repodiff just puts them in the orde
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 21:59:06 +0100
Björn Esser wrote:
> Am Freitag, den 13.02.2015, 13:53 -0700 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
> > On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:47:07 -0800
> > Susi Lehtola wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > > as has happened many times before, the GCC bump in rawhide has
> > > broken all F
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 23:44:18 +0100
gil wrote:
> a fix for this problem is:
> (see
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/java-service-wrapper.git/tree/java-service-wrapper.spec
>
> )
Well, this doesn't seem like a fix, but more of a workaround and a bit
prone to failure if new arches are added,
On Sun, 15 Feb 2015 13:32:57 -0600
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "KF" == Kevin Fenzi writes:
...snip...
> KF> Additionally, FPC folks have done a great job recently (mostly due
> KF> to Tibbs hard work) in catching up with their backlog. Bundling
> KF> requests I would think would be muc
> "KF" == Kevin Fenzi writes:
KF> I know in the past the FPC has talked about relaxing the bundling
KF> guidelines, perhaps we could get some of them to weigh in here?
Yeah, we had a big discussion about that a while back, where we sort of
agreed on a basic change of philosophy regarding som
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2015-02-16
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's QA meeting time again! We have a few miscellaneous topics to
cover, I think - F22 Alpha prep, t
BTW why is the arch order of the branched report and the rawhide report
different?
> Compose started at Sun Feb 15 07:15:03 UTC 2015
> Broken deps for armhfp
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http:/
15 matches
Mail list logo
