Right now, the fedora:rawhide image on Docker Hub uses yum instead of
dnf, as does the Fedora 21 release. Is there any plan to switch this
release over to dnf?
I'm in the process of refactoring my remix - big pieces of it are
going into Docker images. I'm wondering if it's worth porting the main
w
On Sat, 2015-02-14 at 18:30 -0800, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Adam Williamson <
> adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> > Do note my follow-up email about this compose being DOA, though.
>
> Dang! Any ETA for a live one? I have a gcc "bug" I want to
> troub
[i686]
> requires ghc(base-4.7.0.2-6d16fd65767daf67b7606bd63b471328)
[x86_64]
> requires ghc(base-4.7.0.2-cb23b5265b6e147094c0cd9ac819acb1)
I fixed the ghc ABI hash breakage (caused by ghc-7.8.4-40 -> ghc-7.8.4-41) for
F22 and F23
so the next reports should be better, and also got bus
> Am 14.02.2015 um 17:02 schrieb Jens Petersen:
> > AFAICT now the ABI changes are due to -40 having
> > been built with make -j16 on i686 and x86_64.
> >
> > In future I will use -j4 or less again
>
> don't get me wrong but if the number of threads of the complier changes
> ABI of the result the
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Do note my follow-up email about this compose being DOA, though.
Dang! Any ETA for a live one? I have a gcc "bug" I want to
troubleshoot. I've got a huge compile that works with F21 but died
painfully with Rawhide a few days back.
--
O
Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> Devel,
>
> I would like to un-retire mumble, but that requires ice.
>
> I've just fixed ice to compile on f21 without much effort.
> So I think I'll un-retire ice and mumble and maintain them
> unless anyone objects.
>
> Is there any reason ice was orphaned and retired
On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 09:27:44 -0700
Dave Johansen wrote:
> I'm working on packaging include-what-you-use and it's not building
> on ARM. I don't have access to ARM hardware to do the necessary
> debugging, so I just opened a bugzilla to document it (
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1
n Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 11:38:13AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Jakub Jelinek
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 09:25:50AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
> > > > I'm working on packaging include-wh
In my case, I was updating coin-or packages when one of then
started failing at link time, only on i686, like this:
undefined reference to
`CoinMessageHandler::operator<<(std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > const&)'
I tried to, temporarily fix it by, only on i686 building with
"-D_GLIBC
- Original Message -
> From: "Radek Holy"
> To: "James Antill"
> Cc: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2015 7:53:50 PM
> Subject: Re: another dnf kernel issue?
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "James Antill"
> > To: "Radek Holy"
>
- Original Message -
> From: "James Antill"
> To: "Radek Holy"
> Cc: ndbeck...@gmail.com, "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 8:28:44 PM
> Subject: Re: another dnf kernel issue?
>
> On Tue, 2015-02-10 at 04:01 -0500, Radek Holy wrote:
>
> >
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 11:38:13AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 09:25:50AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
> > > I'm working on packaging include-what-you-use and it works just fine with
> > > Fedora 21, but in rawh
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 09:25:50AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
> > I'm working on packaging include-what-you-use and it works just fine with
> > Fedora 21, but in rawhide the tests are failing with std::length_error
> > exceptions ( http://
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 09:25:50AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
> I'm working on packaging include-what-you-use and it works just fine with
> Fedora 21, but in rawhide the tests are failing with std::length_error
> exceptions ( http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8936112 ).
> I was th
On Sat, 2015-02-14 at 13:04 -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
> adamw...@fedoraproject.org composed on 2015-02-14 04:21 (UTC-0800):
>
> > Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test
> > event for Fedora 22 Branched 20150214. Please help run some tests
> >
adamw...@fedoraproject.org composed on 2015-02-14 04:21 (UTC-0800):
> Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
> for Fedora 22 Branched 20150214. Please help run some tests for this
> nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
I'm working on packaging include-what-you-use and it's not building on ARM.
I don't have access to ARM hardware to do the necessary debugging, so I
just opened a bugzilla to document it (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192713 ). Hopefully, someone
can figure out what the problem is an
I'm working on packaging include-what-you-use and it works just fine with
Fedora 21, but in rawhide the tests are failing with std::length_error
exceptions ( http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8936112 ).
I was thinking that maybe this was because clang/llvm needs to be rebuilt
becau
Am 14.02.2015 um 17:02 schrieb Jens Petersen:
ghc-7.8.4-41.fc22
-
Oh dear - gcc5 changes all the ghc library ABI hashes.
Sorry my initial hunch seems incorrect.
AFAICT now the ABI changes are due to -40 having
been built with make -j16 on i686 and x86_64.
In future I will us
> > ghc-7.8.4-41.fc22
> > -
>
> Oh dear - gcc5 changes all the ghc library ABI hashes.
Sorry my initial hunch seems incorrect.
AFAICT now the ABI changes are due to -40 having
been built with make -j16 on i686 and x86_64.
In future I will use -j4 or less again.
Jens
--
devel ma
Updates seem to have been pushed out now, thanks!.
But I see a different problem with my update. Taskotron failure which
I don't understand:
not ok - depcheck for Bodhi update systemd-216-20.fc21 # FAIL
---
arch: x86_64
details:
output: |-
Build systemd-216-20.fc21 failed depche
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Qui, 2015-02-12 at 14:41 -0500, Corey Sheldon wrote:
>> Aka patience and to be totally honest and blunt, if you have a
>> alpha/beta tester group and or a solid forum/mailing list with updates
>> to status this should seriously not be a set
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 22 Branched 20150214. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On 02/14/2015 09:38 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
Who will review the new packages of these multiple versions?
The process having been applied so far is the "adding a compat-package".
In most cases this basically means to fork-off a package from an
existing package and have this package revie
>
>
>
Who will review the new packages of these multiple versions? If we don't
review it I think it's horrible to carry obsolete stuffs.
Maintaining several version of the same library is not easy as you think,
basically once a developer wants to install version X while then another
people want to
25 matches
Mail list logo
