On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 07:00 -0800, Casey Jao wrote:
> I understand where you are coming from and that a fedora user is
> likely to see frequent updates of lots of other packages anyway. But
> on slower moving distros where systems components rarely get more
> than security updates, browsers migh
Parag Nemade writes:
> I actually got more confused when pmachata built harfbuzz without
> giving specific information in the changelog.
The reason was that I was rebuilding both Boots and ICU deps, and since
I just took a list of conflicts en blocks (as explained in another
e-mail), I needed a
Mikolaj Izdebski writes:
> I don't know why 0.9.38-3 was built, it looks like unnecessary build.
Yes, it is.
About 30 packages diverged after f22-boost side-tag had been created.
It's impractical to check by hand whether any happened to be already
rebuilt in the short window since the merge. S
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2015-02-05 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2015-02-05 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PST
2015-02-05 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EST
2015-02-05 1
WG meeting should be newly on Thu at 13:00 UTC on odd weeks and at 18:00
UTC on even weeks (this week is even). But since nobody volunteered to
hold one, let's meet the next week, Thu 13:00 UTC.
Honza
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/li
Dne 4.2.2015 v 16:13 Parag Nemade napsal(a):
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
>> On 02/04/2015 02:21 PM, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I remember one year back also harfbuzz was attempted by 2 people on
>>> the same day for libicu rebuilds and now this time 3
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
> On 02/04/2015 02:21 PM, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I remember one year back also harfbuzz was attempted by 2 people on
>> the same day for libicu rebuilds and now this time 3 builds by 2
>> people.
>>
>> http://koji.fedoraproject
I understand where you are coming from and that a fedora user is likely
to see frequent updates of lots of other packages anyway. But on slower
moving distros where systems components rarely get more than security
updates, browsers might be one of the more frequently updated pieces of
software.
Pe
On 02/04/2015 02:21 PM, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
> Hi,
> I remember one year back also harfbuzz was attempted by 2 people on
> the same day for libicu rebuilds and now this time 3 builds by 2
> people.
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=606443
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/ko
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 07:11:20PM +0100, Petr Machata wrote:
> openoffice.org-diafilterdep: libreoffice
Rebuilt.
D.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 06:51:46PM +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
> Hi,
> I remember one year back also harfbuzz was attempted by 2 people on
> the same day for libicu rebuilds and now this time 3 builds by 2
> people.
We did the rebuild in a side tag (together with the boost update, to
save t
Petr Machata wrote on 02/04/2015 03:11 AM:
Hi,
Most of the mass rebuild finished last week already, but due to FOSDEM
and other circumstances (like me leaving the result file on my home NFS
out of reach yesterday) I'm only getting to writing this now. A bunch
of Boost-related bugs have been alr
Hi,
I remember one year back also harfbuzz was attempted by 2 people on
the same day for libicu rebuilds and now this time 3 builds by 2
people.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=606443
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=609035
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/k
Greetings, all!
The elections for FESCo - January 2015 have concluded, and the results
are shown below.
A total of 283 ballots were cast, meaning a candidate could accumulate
up to 1981 votes (283 * 7).
The results for the elections are as follows:
# votes | name
- +-
On 02/02/2015 05:01 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Hello,
in Fedora Rawhide there is a new major version of mongoDB 2.6. With this
new version names of mongoDB configuration files will be changed - to
reflect names used in upstream rpms
(http://downloads-distro.mongodb.org/repo/redhat/os/x86_64/RPMS
On 2015-02-03, Jan Včelák wrote:
> License of Datovka was changed from LGPLv2+ to GPLv3+ starting with
> version 4.
>
Please note, there is one BSD-licensed file (which, if I recall
correctly, is compiled on Win32 only).
-- Petr
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.
Compose started at Wed Feb 4 05:15:02 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[aeskulap]
aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.i686 requires libofstd.so.3.6
aesku
On 4 February 2015 at 07:46, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> Current maintainer of gimp-elsamuko. Upstream recently added metainfo.xml
> needed for Gnome Software in their package and I would like to update the
> spec file to reflect the change[1]. Do I need to remove the appstream
> metadata part?
Us
18 matches
Mail list logo
