# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2015-01-26
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
We haven't met for a bit, so let's get together and check in on where
we're all at. I'm expecting ro
> On Jan 23, 2015, at 5:34 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 23 Jan 2015, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>
>> In Fedora 22, we will be producing four network install ISOs:
>> * Fedora Server
>> - Server branding
>> - Default environment group: Fedora Server
>> - Auto-partitioning defaults: LVM
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> My experience with the new package process is that the review process in
> Step 6 doesn't work. For some of my packages it took 3 months for a
> reviewer to appear, some others more, some where reviewed faster. My
> understanding is that it depends on how interestin
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> (Cross-posted to the WG mailing lists; please reply only to devel@)
>
> == Overview ==
>
> Today in #anaconda, we had a discussion of the plans for network install
> media for Fedora 22. We acknowledged that the network install (and more
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
In Fedora 22, we will be producing four network install ISOs:
* Fedora Server
- Server branding
- Default environment group: Fedora Server
- Auto-partitioning defaults: LVM on XFS (except /boot)
- Responsible WG: Server WG
I got bitten by the f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 18:40:11 +0100
Jan Zeleny wrote:
> -- snip --
>
> > koji internally writes out mock configs for every task and it has
> > not mechanism to support using different backends. additionally
> > some of the builders are rhel6 so whate
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 13:27:46 -0700
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
...snip...
> There's one issue we are looking into to be aware of, builds now
> give: SysCallError: (-1, 'Unexpected EOF')
> instead of watching the build you just started. The build is running
> fine and you can follow it on the web interfac
(Cross-posted to the WG mailing lists; please reply only to devel@)
== Overview ==
Today in #anaconda, we had a discussion of the plans for network install
media for Fedora 22. We acknowledged that the network install (and more
generally, unattended installation) story in Fedora 21 was somewhat
l
Just FYI, we updated the koji hub(s) today.
We were hoping it would be a complete non event, but alas, there was a
short window where a link was not setup correctly and some builds
failed. ;( Sorry for the trouble and please do resubmit.
The old hubs were 32 bit rhel6 instances, and the new ones
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 03:15:10AM +0100, Haïkel wrote:
2015-01-21 11:49 GMT+01:00 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos :
Besides, some submitters do not try hard enough to find reviewers:
* some reviews do not provide usable links to spec and srpm breaking usage of
semi-automated reviewing tool. The mor
On 01/23/2015 10:53 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> on servers and static machines you don't need any dynamic network
> configuration
which is why NM in F22 will have a "configure-and-quit" mode for such
machines
-- Dan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.
-- snip --
> koji internally writes out mock configs for every task and it has not
> mechanism to support using different backends. additionally some of the
> builders are rhel6 so whatever is done has to work on rhel6 and fedora.
Huh, I was under the impression that everything was already migrat
On 23.01.2015 15:12, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:44:23 +0100
> poma wrote:
>
>> On 23.01.2015 10:51, Martin Stransky wrote:
>>> Folk,
>>>
>>> There's a live 0-day flash vulnerability which is not fixed yet
>>> [1][2]. If you use flash plugin I recommend you to enable the
>>> click
Dne Čt 22. ledna 2015 14:54:47, Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> On Wed, 2015-01-21 at 13:40 +0100, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > On 21. 1. 2015 at 11:07:31, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > > > > 1) DNF will be the default package manager for F22 [2], so
> > > > > > everything is
> > > > > > ok here.
> > > > >
>
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Matthias Runge
wrote:
> On 23/01/15 16:59, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>
>>>
>>> sandbox -X will also add more protection.
>>
>> Unless I'm mistaken, sandbox -X hasn't worked in almost a year.
>>
> I gave it a try;
>
> sandbox -X
> /usr/bin/sandbox:
> /usr/sbin/seunsh
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 04:59:31PM +0100, drago01 wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> > libflashplayer.so runs within the Mozilla-plugin I believe. If so it
> > would be confined
> > if you have not turned on the unconfined_mozilla_plugin_transition boolean.
> >
>
>
Once upon a time, Matthias Runge said:
> /usr/sbin/seunshare is required for the action you want to perform.
>
> Sadly, a naive (and not so naive) dnf reporequery, repoquery and yum
> search did not show the right dep.
Don't know about dnf, but a simple "yum install /usr/sbin/seunshare"
will do
On 23/01/15 16:59, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> sandbox -X will also add more protection.
>
> Unless I'm mistaken, sandbox -X hasn't worked in almost a year.
>
I gave it a try;
sandbox -X
/usr/bin/sandbox:
/usr/sbin/seunshare is required for the action you want to perform.
Sadly, a naive (a
On 01/23/2015 09:29 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 01/23/2015 10:25 AM, poma wrote:
Until this is resolved, is this a valid way:
$ sandbox -X -T tmp -t sandbox_web_t firefox
to cover this security issue, or can we isolate only libflashplayer.so,
not the entire browser.
Daniel, can you comment.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/23/2015 04:29 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
> On 01/23/2015 10:25 AM, poma wrote:
>> On 23.01.2015 15:12, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>> On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:44:23 +0100 poma
>>> wrote:
>>>
On 23.01.2015 10:51, Martin Stransky wrote:
> Folk,
On Jan 23, 2015 7:47 AM, "Daniel J Walsh" wrote:
>
>
> On 01/23/2015 10:25 AM, poma wrote:
> > On 23.01.2015 15:12, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >> On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:44:23 +0100
> >> poma wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 23.01.2015 10:51, Martin Stransky wrote:
> Folk,
>
> There's a live 0-day fl
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
> On 01/23/2015 10:25 AM, poma wrote:
>> On 23.01.2015 15:12, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>> On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:44:23 +0100
>>> poma wrote:
>>>
On 23.01.2015 10:51, Martin Stransky wrote:
> Folk,
>
> There's a live 0-day flash
Am 23.01.2015 um 12:44 schrieb poma:
On 23.01.2015 10:51, Martin Stransky wrote:
There's a live 0-day flash vulnerability which is not fixed yet [1][2].
If you use flash plugin I recommend you to enable the click-to-play mode
for it.
Are we covered with
$ rpm -q flash-plugin
flash-plugin-11.2
Am 22.01.2015 um 18:44 schrieb poma:
Lukáš 'Allo 'Allo
I see that some people are trying to "modernize" Fedora.
But what about RHEL relictum - initscripts, particularly now that we have
NetworkManager/ModemManager and systemd-networkd,
when will this package "fall off"?
hopefully never until
On 01/23/2015 03:24 PM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
No specific agenda for today, but i'll be there in case there are any
points we want/need to bring up prior to DevConf.
So mainly:
Agenda:
- Open Floor
Thanks & regards, Phil
Meeting ended Fri Jan 23 15:39:44 2015 UTC. Information about MeetBot
commit 3feb092344ab4659ff7078f78c19082a79c376cb
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Fri Jan 23 16:28:18 2015 +0100
1.04 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Encode-Locale.spec | 30 +-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 10 delet
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181529
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Encode-Locale-1.04-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Encode-Locale-1.04-1.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:37:34AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 04:41:53AM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> I agree on the systemd-filesystem side of things, the binaries sounds
> >> like it would be
On 01/23/2015 10:25 AM, poma wrote:
> On 23.01.2015 15:12, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:44:23 +0100
>> poma wrote:
>>
>>> On 23.01.2015 10:51, Martin Stransky wrote:
Folk,
There's a live 0-day flash vulnerability which is not fixed yet
[1][2]. If you use flash
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 06:44:08PM +0100, poma wrote:
>
> Lukáš 'Allo 'Allo
>
> I see that some people are trying to "modernize" Fedora.
> But what about RHEL relictum - initscripts, particularly now that we have
> NetworkManager/ModemManager and systemd-networkd,
> when will this package "fall
Please update to latest version
On Fri 23 Jan 2015 03:33:51 PM CET Carlos Morel-Riquelme wrote:
> Hi folks, i try to run fedora packager over spec and src.rpm files before
> created, but i always have this error:
>
> [empateinfinito@localhost review]$ fedora-review --mock-config
> fedora-rawhide
Hi folks, i try to run fedora packager over spec and src.rpm files before
created, but i always have this error:
[empateinfinito@localhost review]$ fedora-review --mock-config
fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -n ssr
INFO: Processing local files: ssr
INFO: Getting .spec and .srpm Urls from : Local files in
/h
No specific agenda for today, but i'll be there in case there are any
points we want/need to bring up prior to DevConf.
So mainly:
Agenda:
- Open Floor
Thanks & regards, Phil
--
Philipp Knirsch | Tel.: +49-711-96437-470
Manager Core Services| Fax.: +49-711-96437-111
Re
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:44:23 +0100
poma wrote:
> On 23.01.2015 10:51, Martin Stransky wrote:
> > Folk,
> >
> > There's a live 0-day flash vulnerability which is not fixed yet
> > [1][2]. If you use flash plugin I recommend you to enable the
> > click-to-play mode for it.
>
> Are we covered with
Lukáš 'Allo 'Allo
I see that some people are trying to "modernize" Fedora.
But what about RHEL relictum - initscripts, particularly now that we have
NetworkManager/ModemManager and systemd-networkd,
when will this package "fall off"?
poma
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 23.01.2015 10:51, Martin Stransky wrote:
> Folk,
>
> There's a live 0-day flash vulnerability which is not fixed yet [1][2].
> If you use flash plugin I recommend you to enable the click-to-play mode
> for it.
Are we covered with
$ rpm -q flash-plugin
flash-plugin-11.2.202.438-release.x86_64
On 23/01/15 13:12, John Florian wrote:
On 01/22/2015 03:17 PM, John Florian wrote:
If I read this page[1] correctly, python3-pyparted should be available
starting with F20, yet…
Did I miss something?
Looks like apps doesn't quite handle subpackages correctly. So while
pyparted
is in F20, th
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015, at 08:07 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Which is something I find a really questionable idea btw. There's a
> lot of stuff systemd does, and it's naive to believe you can just not
> do them and get away with it in a container.
The discussion is more subtle than that - with
> -Original Message-
> From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:devel-
> boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Orion Poplawski
> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 18:14
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora
> Subject: Re: python3-pyparted in F20/F21?
>
> On 01/
Hi everyone,
Elections Questionnaire needs more questions for Fedora Magazine
interviews! If you have anything you'd like to ask candidates to
FESCo, add it to the wiki today.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Elections/Questionnaire
Thanks
Jaroslav
___
de
On Fri, 23.01.15 04:41, Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > systemd-filesystem sounds like a good idea. As for this proposal -- while it
> > might reduce the size of the buildroot used to build packages depending on
> > systemd-related macros, what would the effect be on minimal insta
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 07:45:21PM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > On Jan 21, 2015, at 8:00, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > Also I'd like to point out that if two packages offer the same provide, by
> > definition it means they are 100% exchangeable from the perspective of that
> > functionality.
>
>> current kernels being removed
>
> This was fixed almost a year ago
>
>> and other such issues
>
> Name them please. Or better yet, report them.
That issue about removing core packages isn't fixed properly. I said I
would do some testing and had a little bit of spare time today so did
some testi
On 01/22/2015 03:58 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> This is not really true. Koji write out its own mock configs and will
> not be using dnf for any operations. for anytime soon. koji hass no
> way to use different tools to install chroots we will continue to use
> yum to install the buildroots for th
Hi Sergio,
Indeed, that is the same bug. I'm away from the computer until Monday, so
I'll do the stable release updates then - unless a comaintainer can do it
over the weekend.
The stable updates will probably be just bug fixes and won't introduce the
packaging split or version bump.
Cheers,
-
Hello,
2015-01-23 11:04 GMT+01:00 Michel Alexandre Salim :
> Hi all,
>
> From python-sphinx-1.2.2-6.fc22 onwards support for building LaTeX
> documentation using Sphinx has been split off into the -latex subpackage
> (so that Sphinx can be installed without pulling in TeXLive).
>
> (There's also
Hi all,
>From python-sphinx-1.2.2-6.fc22 onwards support for building LaTeX
documentation using Sphinx has been split off into the -latex subpackage
(so that Sphinx can be installed without pulling in TeXLive).
(There's also a bug discovered when doing this split -- the python3 build
wasn't shipp
Folk,
There's a live 0-day flash vulnerability which is not fixed yet [1][2].
If you use flash plugin I recommend you to enable the click-to-play mode
for it.
There's also a Fedora Firefox update with such change [3].
ma.
[1]
https://isc.sans.edu/diary/Flash+0-Day+Exploit+Used+by+Angler+Ex
- Original Message -
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015, at 12:00 PM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
>
> > How exactly is Fedora Atomic generated? It seems that
> > fedpra-cloud-atomic.ks has no %packages section...
> > I can find out how we're doing with Atomic assuming I know how it's
> > constructed
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 04:41:53AM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> I agree on the systemd-filesystem side of things, the binaries sounds
>> like it would be better described as systemd-utils with a provides for
>> -units.
> Thi
Dne 22.1.2015 v 15:30 Jan Zelený napsal(a):
> On 22. 1. 2015 at 15:06:34, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:33:31 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>> Dne 20.1.2015 v 14:22 Bohuslav Kabrda napsal(a):
1) DNF will be the default package manager for F22 [2], so everything is
ok here
Compose started at Fri Jan 23 05:15:03 UTC 2015
New package: bats-0.4.0-1.20141016git3b33a5a.fc22
Bash Automated Testing System
New package: perl-Dancer2-0.158000-1.fc22
Lightweight yet powerful web application framework
New package: radamsa-0.4-2.fc22
Test
52 matches
Mail list logo
