On 01/19/2015 06:01 AM, gil wrote:
>
> Il 19/01/2015 05:52, Mikolaj Izdebski ha scritto:
>> On 01/17/2015 12:29 PM, gil wrote:
>>> Hi
>>> I want to report this problem, I do not know if they're already aware
>>> sorry for the noise ...
>> Fixed in javapackages-tools-4.3.2-3 (rhbz#1183407)
>>
> Tha
License of JUnit was changed from CPL to EPL starting with version 4.12
https://github.com/junit-team/junit/commit/3171c4b2
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fed
Il 19/01/2015 05:52, Mikolaj Izdebski ha scritto:
On 01/17/2015 12:29 PM, gil wrote:
Hi
I want to report this problem, I do not know if they're already aware
sorry for the noise ...
Fixed in javapackages-tools-4.3.2-3 (rhbz#1183407)
Thanks!
I'll try to rebuild my packages in an hour or two,
On 01/17/2015 12:29 PM, gil wrote:
> Hi
> I want to report this problem, I do not know if they're already aware
> sorry for the noise ...
Fixed in javapackages-tools-4.3.2-3 (rhbz#1183407)
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproje
libinput 0.8 had a soname bump and some API changes.
I've pushed the required patches and rebuilt the following packages in
rawhide for clutter, mutter, weston, and xorg-x11-drv-libinput.
Cheers,
Peter
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
Hi folks! Once again there's nothing much on the agenda this week. We
also don't have any proposed blockers to review, so no need to do
that. Probably we can get back into the swing next week as we start to
approach the Fedora 22 branch point (yep, it's coming!), but for now I
think we can take
Reported, Thank Reindl for the suggestion :)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183405
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
>
> Am 18.01.2015 um 21:04 schrieb Carlos Morel-Riquelme:
>
>> Hi folks, I installed pitivi in my F21 and F22 , but the app don't have
>> the ic
Am 18.01.2015 um 21:04 schrieb Carlos Morel-Riquelme:
Hi folks, I installed pitivi in my F21 and F22 , but the app don't have
the icon, obviously this isn't a but but i think that is important report
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/08/2014 09:47 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 09:10:59AM -0700, Pete Travis wrote:
>> On Dec 8, 2014 8:51 AM, "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek"
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 04:45:12PM -0700, Pete Travis
On Sun, 18 Jan 2015, Neal Becker wrote:
The articles author has responded here:
http://sockpuppet.org/stuff/dnssec-qa.html
This quote caught my attention:
DNSSEC deployment guides go so far as to recommend against deployment of DNSSEC
validation on end-systems. So significant is the inclinati
Hi folks, I installed pitivi in my F21 and F22 , but the app don't have the
icon, obviously this isn't a but but i think that is important report.
Info terminal
[empateinfinito@localhost ~]$ rpm -qa | grep -i pitivi
pitivi-0.94-4.fc21.x86_64
[empateinfinito@localhost ~]$
here is a screenshot >
Eventually I had taken over
python-html2text
rss2mail (depends on python-feedparser)
and have used them for a long time. Now it's time to move on.
The author of html2text has died two years ago. There are various forks
with different versioning schemes. There's also a new upstream for
rss2
Neal Becker wrote:
>This quote caught my attention:
>
>DNSSEC deployment guides go so far as to recommend against deployment
>of DNSSEC validation on end-systems.
Where are those guides, who wrote them, and what are their arguments
against local validation?
>So significant is the inclination
>aga
Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Jan 2015, Björn Persson wrote:
>
>> Both CAs and DNSSEC can be attacked by governments in different ways.
>> The author thinks that DNSSEC is more vulnerable. I happen to disagree,
>> but more importantly, those who feel that they need to can secure their
>> keys
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 10:28:24AM +0100, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> because of the fact that the autocorr-* packages belong to libreoffice,
> why not rename them to libreoffice-autocorr-*?
Because they are used outside libreoffice, namely by virtaal
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sho
On Sat, 17 Jan 2015, Paul Wouters wrote:
Furthermore, "government control is a simplistic overstatement". For
one, some government is in control of the TLD to begin with. They
can yank your domain or serve it with arbitrary content, regardless
of whether your certificate is validated by CA/PKIX o
Compose started at Sun Jan 18 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[aeskulap]
aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.i686 requires libofstd.so.3.6
aesku
17 matches
Mail list logo
