Hi
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 12:18 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> So what exactly is the problem the target audience has? They want
> GNOME Packages to be included again by default so they have both an
> application GUI installer, and a packages GUI installer?
That is potentially one way to address i
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Chris Murphy < wrote:
>>
>> There's already an application that does this, it's GNOME
>> Packages or use yum/dnf.
>
>
> If this was the answer, there wouldn't be so many repeated discussions about
> it.
/*Aleksandar Kurtakov */ wrote on Sun, 4 Jan 2015
02:55:17 -0500 (EST):
- Original Message -
From: "Hedayat Vatankhah"
To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
Sent: Friday, January 2, 2015 11:15:58 PM
Subject: Re: Ramblings and questions regarding Fedora, but stemming from
Hi
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Björn Persson wrote:
> > I bet! I worry that the questions would quickly become annoying. But if
> > ports are going to be blocked by default, then there needs to be some
> > way for non-sysadmin users to open them.
>
> No, why? The ports
Hi
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Chris Murphy < wrote:
> There's already an application that does this, it's GNOME
> Packages or use yum/dnf.
>
If this was the answer, there wouldn't be so many repeated discussions
about it. Users don't differentiate between say htop and geany as much as
the
On 01/04/2015 06:46 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Gary Scarborough wrote:
Is workstation being aimed at new users or developers? And is the goal
the same for Gnome? If Gnome is aiming to cater to new users, then is it
the right primary DE for fedora? There seems to be a misalignment here.
I've be
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
>>
>> We're not filtering out packages that don't qualify as applications.
>> GNOME Software only searches the AppStream metadata
>
>
> Yes. My suggestion was to change that
How?
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2015-01-05
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
Hope everyone had a happy and safe winter solstice event of their
choice. Now it's time for the most
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 01/02/2015 01:10 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> python-pillow split off the sane library into a separate project,
> review request for the package is here:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178191
>
> Happy to review in exchang
Gary Scarborough wrote:
> Is workstation being aimed at new users or developers? And is the goal
> the same for Gnome? If Gnome is aiming to cater to new users, then is it
> the right primary DE for fedora? There seems to be a misalignment here.
I've been pointing out that misalignment from day
Björn Persson wrote:
> I bet! I worry that the questions would quickly become annoying. But if
> ports are going to be blocked by default, then there needs to be some
> way for non-sysadmin users to open them.
No, why? The ports just need to be closed, period. Non-sysadmin users
shouldn't be allo
Hi,
I want retire: seam-conversation, seam-parent, seam-solder
I do not have many reasons to keep them still
And if someone can take care of openjpa package or can give a help as
co-maintainer.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-2386
Unusable and not buildable with Java8. As last reso
Hi
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
>
> So, I thought that maybe every package *likes* to have its specific
> settings method; and therefore I proposed to have a global configuration
> which configures main package manager policy.
>
I agree with the problem. However I do
/*Reindl Harald */ wrote on Sun, 04 Jan 2015
19:19:20 +0100:
Am 04.01.2015 um 19:13 schrieb Hedayat Vatankhah:
<...>
DNF is using "/etc/dnf/dnf.conf" which is one reason more to finally
rename it back to YUM when it starts to replace it instead demand
users all over the world change workin
Am 04.01.2015 um 19:13 schrieb Hedayat Vatankhah:
/*Reindl Harald */ wrote on Sun, 04 Jan 2015
19:11:01 +0100:
Am 04.01.2015 um 19:02 schrieb Hedayat Vatankhah:
/*Rex Dieter */ wrote on Sat, 03 Jan 2015 16:58:32
-0600:
Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
<...>
Suggestion: Please add a single configur
/*Reindl Harald */ wrote on Sun, 04 Jan 2015
19:11:01 +0100:
Am 04.01.2015 um 19:02 schrieb Hedayat Vatankhah:
/*Rex Dieter */ wrote on Sat, 03 Jan 2015 16:58:32
-0600:
Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
<...>
Suggestion: Please add a single configuration file to configure common
package manager o
Am 04.01.2015 um 19:02 schrieb Hedayat Vatankhah:
/*Rex Dieter */ wrote on Sat, 03 Jan 2015 16:58:32
-0600:
Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
<...>
Suggestion: Please add a single configuration file to configure common
package manager options
I think you answered your own question => modify the .repo
/*Rex Dieter */ wrote on Sat, 03 Jan 2015 16:58:32
-0600:
Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
<...>
Suggestion: Please add a single configuration file to configure common
package manager options
I think you answered your own question => modify the .repo files
Thank you!!! Yes, I know that I can do it
Hi
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> We're not filtering out packages that don't qualify as applications.
> GNOME Software only searches the AppStream metadata
Yes. My suggestion was to change that
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Anshu Prateek wrote:
> hi,
>
> I am working on packaging an upstream (aerospike) which presently puts some
> of its file in /opt/aerospike.
>
> The two main folders in use (by upstream) are
>
> /opt/aerospike/sys/udf/lua - This has the user defined lua functions
>
On 4 January 2015 at 02:45, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Another alternative would be for GNOME Software to show packages perhaps
> optionally and deprioritize packages in the listing
We're not filtering out packages that don't qualify as applications.
GNOME Software only searches the AppStream metada
Compose started at Sun Jan 4 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[aeskulap]
aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.i686 requires libofstd.so.3.6
aesku
On 01/04/2015 10:34 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 3:01 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 01/04/2015 07:41 AM, Anshu Prateek wrote:
hi,
I am working on packaging an upstream (aerospike) which presently puts
some of its file in /opt/aerospike.
The two main folders in use (
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 3:01 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 01/04/2015 07:41 AM, Anshu Prateek wrote:
>>
>> hi,
>>
>> I am working on packaging an upstream (aerospike) which presently puts
>> some of its file in /opt/aerospike.
>>
>> The two main folders in use (by upstream) are
>>
>> /opt/aerosp
On 01/04/2015 07:41 AM, Anshu Prateek wrote:
hi,
I am working on packaging an upstream (aerospike) which presently puts
some of its file in /opt/aerospike.
The two main folders in use (by upstream) are
/opt/aerospike/sys/udf/lua - This has the user defined lua functions
shipped with the pac
- Original Message -
> From: "Alec Leamas"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Saturday, January 3, 2015 10:19:30 PM
> Subject: Re: Ramblings and questions regarding Fedora,but stemming
> from gnome-software and desktop environments
>
> On 03/01/15 20:26
26 matches
Mail list logo
