On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 02.01.2015 um 21:05 schrieb Miloslav Trmač:
>>
>> Here, GUIs _as a category_ (not necessarily the GUIs we are currently
>> providing) should always be better than CLIs _as a category_ simply because
>> the GUI can in the worst case just
was retired because were having multiple failed builds from fedora 15
see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843203
2015-01-03 2:28 GMT-04:30 Christopher Meng :
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to know why yaws was retired as it's a Web server still being
> used by many people, can someone tell me wha
Hi,
I'd like to know why yaws was retired as it's a Web server still being
used by many people, can someone tell me what happened there in the
past?
I feel unaccountably unhappy when I see that almost other major
distributions ship it still with the latest 1.99 version however I can
only install
Richard Hughes wrote:
>> It seems that many command line utilities in Security spin can be
>> considered applications since security spin provides .desktop files and
>> icons for many of them!
>
> No, we ignore any with the ConsoleOnly hint.
But why is an interactive TUI with a .desktop file not
Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
> Apart from the "Application" discussion, I really like to see a new
> "Development Libraries" concept in Gnome software just like Fonts and
> Input sources, which lets a developer to look for libraries and rate
> them. Some of them can even have screenshots: GUI libraries
Am 02.01.2015 um 21:05 schrieb Miloslav Trmač:
Here, GUIs _as a category_ (not necessarily the GUIs we are currently
providing) should always be better than CLIs _as a category_ simply because the
GUI can in the worst case just copy the CLI layout and behavior so it will not
be worse than a C
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Les Howell wrote:
My question, then would be what about applications that require input
at
startup? How does this fit with the practice of chainables such as
grep
-n temp *| tail -f | tee > foo.txt
The original premise of *nix systems was to have tools that di
On 02/01/15 01:15 PM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
Probably true, but it already includes fonts and input sources. So,
someone has felt that 'front-end applications only' is too narrow.
Now, where you can draw the line?
I exaggerated.
Did you try that? The problem with searching for "C++" is t
On Fri, 2015-01-02 at 10:47 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 1 January 2015 at 22:25, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
> > it's just funny that something like gedit and
> > Windows notepad can be considered 'applications' but GCC can't!
>
> We're using this definition here:
> https://github.com/hughsie/
On 2 January 2015 at 13:30, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-01-02 at 12:36 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On 2 January 2015 at 06:48, Richard Hughes
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On 2 January 2015 at 11:45, Hedayat Vatankhah <
> > > hedayat@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Yes, I know. And I s
/*Luya Tshimbalanga*/ wrote on Fri, 02 Jan 2015 12:25:49 -0800:
On 01/01/15 04:21 PM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
Well, I was really surprised that developers are considered a target
audience here. GNOME Software *might* be considered good enough for
normal users, but its far from usable for
On 01/02/2015 08:48 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
Okay, lets do a thought experiment. Is a console application anything
that exists in /usr/bin? If not, what additional rules are required
for a "sane" set? Are all files in /usr/bin "applications"?
Actually, yes, I believe that every one of them se
On Fri, 2015-01-02 at 12:36 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 2 January 2015 at 06:48, Richard Hughes
> wrote:
>
> > On 2 January 2015 at 11:45, Hedayat Vatankhah <
> > hedayat@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Yes, I know. And I say that it might be OK for a "GNOME
> > > Application", but
> >
On 01/01/15 04:21 PM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
Well, I was really surprised that developers are considered a target
audience here. GNOME Software *might* be considered good enough for
normal users, but its far from usable for a developer; even a
developer who don't want to touch the termina
/*Richard Hughes */ wrote on Fri, 2 Jan 2015
13:48:51 +:
On 2 January 2015 at 11:45, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
Yes, I know. And I say that it might be OK for a "GNOME Application", but
doesn't seem to be OK for Fedora application.
There's no such thing as a "Fedora application".
Maybe
- Original Message -
> well, and that is why there are tasks you *can * do 1000 times more
> better in a terminal or in a 3-liner shell script with one or two params
> and others where you are much faster using the GUI
>
> this world is grey
>
> hence everybody start using Linux should *k
On 2 January 2015 at 06:48, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 2 January 2015 at 11:45, Hedayat Vatankhah
> wrote:
> > Yes, I know. And I say that it might be OK for a "GNOME Application", but
> > doesn't seem to be OK for Fedora application.
>
> There's no such thing as a "Fedora application".
>
>
Wher
Hi,
python-pillow split off the sane library into a separate project, review
request for the package is here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178191
Happy to review in exchange.
Thanks,
Sandro
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/
On 2 January 2015 at 11:45, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
> Yes, I know. And I say that it might be OK for a "GNOME Application", but
> doesn't seem to be OK for Fedora application.
There's no such thing as a "Fedora application".
> It seems that many command line utilities in Security spin can be co
/*Richard Hughes */ wrote on Fri, 2 Jan 2015
10:47:21 +:
On 1 January 2015 at 22:25, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
it's just funny that something like gedit and
Windows notepad can be considered 'applications' but GCC can't!
We're using this definition here:
https://github.com/hughsie/appst
Compose started at Fri Jan 2 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[aeskulap]
aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.i686 requires libofstd.so.3.6
aesku
On 1 January 2015 at 22:25, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
> it's just funny that something like gedit and
> Windows notepad can be considered 'applications' but GCC can't!
We're using this definition here:
https://github.com/hughsie/appstream-glib#what-is-an-application
> Certainly, the concept of 'c
On 2 January 2015 at 10:02, Alec Leamas wrote:
> Here is a some common ground, indeed. Seems that we agree on that installing
> CLI stuff is something that should be handled in a developer-oriented
> workstation
If you're using gcc, you're using a terminal. We supply two command
line package mana
On 31/12/14 16:25, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 30 December 2014 at 23:31, Chris Murphy wrote:
b.) Would it be helpful, friendlier, and better emphasize the special
focus, if these group install items mentioned above were exposed in
GNOME Software with an appropriate icon?
We could do this righ
24 matches
Mail list logo
