Re: Incorrect FSF Address error from rpmlint

Matěj Cepl wrote: > You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public > License along with Foobar. If not, see > . I just use the standard GPLv3+ template for my new GPLv2+ projects (with only the version changed to 2), inclu

Re: Why isn't F2FS support in the Kernel?

On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > From what I read it has the possibility of getting rid of FAT / NTFS on > flash devices; > which would be a good thing - and I thought that would be something the > Fedora community > would be interested with participating. UDF has been in

Re: Why isn't F2FS support in the Kernel?

On 2014-12-24, 20:59 GMT, Reindl Harald wrote: > then why did you write the angry "*PLONK"? PLONK is not angry. http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/P/plonk.html defines it in this way: plonk: excl.,vt. [Usenet: possibly influenced by British slang ‘plonk’ for cheap booze, or ‘plonker’

Re: Why isn't F2FS support in the Kernel?

Am 24.12.2014 um 21:20 schrieb Matěj Cepl: On 2014-12-24, 11:10 GMT, drago01 wrote: I think you are a smart guy so you know better as well than ask somebody else to work for you on your pet project. He already apologized ... no need to dig out the old mails ... let the thread die. Yes, my p

Re: Why isn't F2FS support in the Kernel?

On 2014-12-24, 11:10 GMT, drago01 wrote: >> I think you are a smart guy so you know better as well than ask >> somebody else to work for you on your pet project. > > He already apologized ... no need to dig out the old mails ... let the > thread die. Yes, my point was mainly to post the URL of bui

Re: Abotu setting 'PermitRootLogin=no' in sshd_config

> On Wednesday, 24 December 2014 11:01 PM, Mike Pinkerton wrote: > Remotely installed on bare metal. I see. Is there a provision that you could edit the kick-start file? Or supply parameters to it?? If so, it could be possible to enable remote root login post install. If not, let's see how we

Re: [Test-Announce] New Fedora 22 Nightly compose test event: 20141222 (Adam Williamson)

On Mon, 22 Dec 2014 17:43:39 -0800, Adam Williamson said: Once again I noticed a new nightly test event was 'needed' while testing relval changes! So the new testing nightly is 20141222. I've tested the x86_64 network install image on real hardware for the Server. It did work. We use a 199

Re: Abotu setting 'PermitRootLogin=no' in sshd_config

On 24 Dec 2014, at 09:29, P J P wrote: On Wednesday, 24 December 2014 3:07 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: At some loss of usability. To often we hear "This is better for security, therefore we should do it" without considering the usability trade-off. It'll help if you could define this some

Re: Why isn't F2FS support in the Kernel?

On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 3:00 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote: > I think you are a smart guy so you know better as well than ask > somebody else to work for you on your pet project. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Building_a_custom_kernel > > > Thanks for the link, I'll take a look at it. I don't really

Re: Incorrect FSF Address error from rpmlint

On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 2:53 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote: > However, I don't think that the “How to use GNU license for your > own software” has any contractual significance whatsoever in > using, so I don’t see anything bad in upgrading even the > instructions for GPLv2 to the Internet age (of course,

Re: Abotu setting 'PermitRootLogin=no' in sshd_config

> On Wednesday, 24 December 2014 3:07 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: > At some loss of usability. To often we hear "This is better for > security, therefore we should do it" without considering the usability > trade-off. It'll help if you could define this some loss of usability. If it is about remo

Re: How to take ownership of orphaned package: ddclient

On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 10:57:14 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> You will need to convince a sponsor to sponsor you. >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group?rd=Extras/HowToGetSponsored >> >> Many sponso

rawhide report: 20141224 changes

Compose started at Wed Dec 24 05:15:05 UTC 2014 Broken deps for i386 -- [3Depict] 3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0 [Sprog] Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0) [aeskulap] aes

Re: Why isn't F2FS support in the Kernel?

On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote: > On 2014-12-22, 17:20 GMT, Gerald B. Cox wrote: >> It isn't about a single module... you're a smart guy... you >> know better. > > I think you are a smart guy so you know better as well than ask > somebody else to work for you on your pet projec

Re: Why isn't F2FS support in the Kernel?

On 2014-12-22, 17:20 GMT, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > It isn't about a single module... you're a smart guy... you > know better. I think you are a smart guy so you know better as well than ask somebody else to work for you on your pet project. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Building_a_custom_kernel

Re: Incorrect FSF Address error from rpmlint

On 2014-12-23, 21:06 GMT, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > Upstream had a few files that had the old address. I've > noticed the GPLv3 doesn't have an address in it's notice. Is > it sufficient to instruct upstream to just remove the address > for GPLv2. Not that they're going to move again, but seems

Re: Where should a package place facter facts?

On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 20:10:08 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Are packages really supposed to put files in "/local/"? > > no - /usr/local/ is admin area - period True - ignoring the 'period' ;) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/d

Re: How to take ownership of orphaned package: ddclient

On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 10:57:14 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > You will need to convince a sponsor to sponsor you. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group?rd=Extras/HowToGetSponsored > > Many sponsors like to see you put together a package for review or > 'pre'

Re: Abotu setting 'PermitRootLogin=no' in sshd_config

On 27/11/14 14:52, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 8:06 AM, P J P wrote: >> > Overall this feature adds more value to Fedora, than its perceived short >> > term cost. > I agree, from a basic security standpoint, that it's the simplest > change with the largest return on investmen