Re: Abotu setting 'PermitRootLogin=no' in sshd_config

2014-11-23 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 07:11:27 + (UTC) > P J P wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Sshd(8) daemon by default allows remote users to login as root. >> >> 1. Is that really necessary? >> 2. L

[Test-Announce] 2014-11-24 @16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

2014-11-23 Thread Adam Williamson
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2014-11-24 # Time: 16:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! It's meeting time again tomorrow! We haven't met for a while, so let's sync up on Fedora 21 status an

Re: Abotu setting 'PermitRootLogin=no' in sshd_config

2014-11-23 Thread Dennis Gilmore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 07:11:27 + (UTC) P J P wrote: > Hello, > > Sshd(8) daemon by default allows remote users to login as root. > > 1. Is that really necessary? > 2. Lot of users use their systems as root, without even creating a > non-r

Re: Enable tapping by default

2014-11-23 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 09:42:39AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Nikos Roussos wrote: > > It's a UX thing, so the Workstation WG seems like the best place to > > decide this (at least for Gnome). > > But the Workstation WG has no decision power over other desktop > environments, such as KDE, which

Re: Enable tapping by default

2014-11-23 Thread Peter Hutterer
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 10:30:21AM +0100, Till Maas wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 02:27:53PM +0300, Mustafa Muhammad wrote: > > Hi, I am testing Fedora 21 beta and -like all previous versions- click > > by tapping is off by default. > > Several bug reports concerning this were closed as NOTABUG,

Re: Fedora scientific packaging

2014-11-23 Thread Amit Saha
- Original Message - > From: "Sandro Mani" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > , scit...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2014 5:32:43 AM > Subject: Fedora scientific packaging > > Hello, > > Some time ago I started working on packaging Salome, th

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

2014-11-23 Thread Rejy M Cyriac
On 11/23/2014 06:56 PM, Benjamin Kreuter wrote: > On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 02:59 -0800, Benjamin Kerensa wrote: > >> Personally I prefer data over knee jerk reactions because honestly this is >> what I see going on. I don't see a demand from users that want a different >> default I see developers who

Re: Fedora 21 Final blocker bug status report #1

2014-11-23 Thread Cole Robinson
On 11/22/2014 12:15 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: Hi folks! We're now into the Fedora 21 Final freeze period, and we really need to address blocker bugs promptly to try and make the scheduled release date. On the current schedule Go/No-Go will happen on 2014-12-04, which means we really need the fin

Re: Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

2014-11-23 Thread Corey Sheldon
If you want it in some cases (ie chrome i do ) learn to use it and accept that Fedora is FOSS minded so support for your endeavours may vary as will functionality and use/lack of funding projects for said FOSS projects deal or find another "tool" Corey W Sheldon Freelance IT Consultant, Multi-

Re: Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

2014-11-23 Thread Benjamin Kreuter
On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 02:59 -0800, Benjamin Kerensa wrote: > Personally I prefer data over knee jerk reactions because honestly this is > what I see going on. I don't see a demand from users that want a different > default I see developers who want to choose a different default based on > their ow

xcf-pixbuf-loader unmaintained

2014-11-23 Thread Michael Schwendt
A package with Fedora packaging bugs that are unhandled for years, e.g. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/668159 Upstream development has stopped, too. As one can see in the %changelog, it's still the same software since 2009/2010. In Fedora bugzilla, there is no response. The upstream developer has re

rawhide report: 20141123 changes

2014-11-23 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sun Nov 23 05:15:02 UTC 2014 Broken deps for i386 -- [3Depict] 3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0 [Sprog] Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0) [cab] cab-0.1.

F-21 Branched report: 20141123 changes

2014-11-23 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Sun Nov 23 07:15:03 UTC 2014 Broken deps for armhfp -- [avro] avro-mapred-1.7.5-9.fc21.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce avro-mapred-1.7.5-9.fc21.noarch requires hadoop-client [gearbox] gearbox-10.11-8

Re: Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

2014-11-23 Thread Corey Sheldon
Well I'll go on the record as niether a firefox user OR gnome (chrome/ium & xfce), and to be honest, what tv station or other sporting event for that matter doesn't do the same ? So its okay there ? because I pay for a ticket to watch a show/game, besides defaults are there for functionality OOB N

Re: Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

2014-11-23 Thread Benjamin Kerensa
On Nov 22, 2014 11:48 PM, "Kevin Kofler" wrote: > > Benjamin Kerensa <…@mozillausa.org> wrote: > [snip] > > Well, we can stop reading right at "mozillausa.org"… Of course the rest of > the mail is a totally biased plug. > Biased why because I work on Firefox? I work on a lot of Open Source project

Re: Enable tapping by default

2014-11-23 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 02:27:53PM +0300, Mustafa Muhammad wrote: > Hi, I am testing Fedora 21 beta and -like all previous versions- click > by tapping is off by default. > Several bug reports concerning this were closed as NOTABUG, but > tapping is useful for us (people who use it), I don't think

Re: Suggested Freeze Policy change for Fedora 22+

2014-11-23 Thread Kevin Kofler
Stephen Gallagher wrote: > These new rules don't ban "preventing a slip", they attempt to eliminate > the unreasonable demands we're putting on our volunteer QA team *every > week during Freeze*. It's gotten out of hand and it's burning people > out. > > The primary problem is that when we slip, t

Re: Enable tapping by default

2014-11-23 Thread Kevin Kofler
Peter Hutterer wrote: > that sounds like bug, please file it here: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=xorg, component > Input/synaptics with one or more evemu recordings attached that triggered > an accidental tap. > > while tapping has its drawbacks, it's not supposed to be tha

Re: Enable tapping by default

2014-11-23 Thread Kevin Kofler
Lukas Zapletal wrote: > I am not interested in tapping at all (I actually hate random clicks and > I always disable this), but if you really want to see this, why don't > you start a new screen in Gnome to present a selection during the first > boot. Maybe Gnome folks will like the idea, maybe not.

Re: Enable tapping by default

2014-11-23 Thread Kevin Kofler
Nikos Roussos wrote: > It's a UX thing, so the Workstation WG seems like the best place to > decide this (at least for Gnome). But the Workstation WG has no decision power over other desktop environments, such as KDE, which, incidentally, is what the original poster happens to use. And I insist

Re: Taskotron depcheck broken/incomplete (was: Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F21 tree)

2014-11-23 Thread Kevin Kofler
Adam Williamson wrote: > http://tirfa.com/current-state-of-depcheck-and-paths-forward.html Sigh. This shows that once again a purported replacement for a working piece of software was deployed before it was able to perform the allegedly replaced tool's most important task, even though the proble