possibly problem with rawhide (systemd-217?): "Found ordering cycle on basic.target/start"

2014-10-30 Thread Matthew Miller
Updated my rawhide system. Now it doesn't boot cleanly. Will try to figure out the details in the morning (long week!), but "Found ordering cycle on basic.target/start" seems to be part of it, and I wanted to see if anyone else is hitting this (and possibly caution care on upgrading right now). N

Re: Remove Perl from minimal build root

2014-10-30 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 30 October 2014 14:02, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> If you have any comments, please speak up now. > > No comment, just lots of thanks! > > Richard I tried this, *twice*. Once way, way back when with Red Hat 6.x (not RHEL 6.x, Red Hat 6.x, thi

Font issues in F21

2014-10-30 Thread Orion Poplawski
As a fix for this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046341 The following symbolic link was added to xorg-x11-font-utils: lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 12 Aug 18 23:08 /usr/share/fonts/X11 -> ../X11/fonts This causes fontconfig to search the full X11 hierarchy whereas before it only search

Fedora 21 Beta status is Go, release on November 4, 2014

2014-10-30 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
At the Fedora 21 Beta Go/No-Go Meeting #3 that just occurred, it was agreed to Go with the Fedora 21 Beta by Fedora QA, Release Engineering and Development. Fedora 21 Beta will be publicly available on Tuesday, November 04, 2014. Meeting details can be seen here: Minutes: http://bit.ly/1tmPWzw Lo

Re: Remove Perl from minimal build root

2014-10-30 Thread Richard Hughes
On 30 October 2014 14:02, Vít Ondruch wrote: > If you have any comments, please speak up now. No comment, just lots of thanks! Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code

Re: Remove Perl from minimal build root

2014-10-30 Thread Matěj Cepl
On 2014-10-30, 14:04 GMT, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Vít Ondruch said: >> I am pretty sure, that this was already discussed many times, but I >> proposed to drop the seemingly last dependency of RPM on Perl in this >> [1] ticket and hence Perl from minimal buildroot (unless it will be

Re: RHEL 6.6 MPI mess

2014-10-30 Thread Dave Love
Doug Ledford writes: > There was a changeover in maintainership for this package internally, so > I'm coming into this issue cold. Thanks for responding. (I assume that means the Red Hat openmpi package.) I wasn't expecting to get it sorted out in RHEL, and wanted to avoid what looks like bein

Re: RHEL 6.6 MPI mess

2014-10-30 Thread Doug Ledford
On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 11:14 -0400, Peter Martuccelli wrote: > On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 14:27 +, Dave Love wrote: > > The undocumented openmpi and mpich updates in RHEL6.6 have broken binary > > compatibility and seem to be provoking general rebuilds of things in > > EPEL. While that may be OK for

Re: RHEL 6.6 MPI mess

2014-10-30 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 10/30/2014 08:27 AM, Dave Love wrote: > The undocumented openmpi and mpich updates in RHEL6.6 have broken binary > compatibility and seem to be provoking general rebuilds of things in > EPEL. Just a quick note - this discussion belongs on the EPEL mailing list. -- Orion Poplawski Technical

Re: RHEL 6.6 MPI mess

2014-10-30 Thread Peter Martuccelli
On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 14:27 +, Dave Love wrote: > The undocumented openmpi and mpich updates in RHEL6.6 have broken binary > compatibility and seem to be provoking general rebuilds of things in > EPEL. While that may be OK for things that are packaged in EPEL, it at > best doesn't help with ou

RHEL 6.6 MPI mess

2014-10-30 Thread Dave Love
The undocumented openmpi and mpich updates in RHEL6.6 have broken binary compatibility and seem to be provoking general rebuilds of things in EPEL. While that may be OK for things that are packaged in EPEL, it at best doesn't help with our HPC users' locally-built programs or local/copr-published

Re: Remove Perl from minimal build root

2014-10-30 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Vít Ondruch said: > I am pretty sure, that this was already discussed many times, but I > proposed to drop the seemingly last dependency of RPM on Perl in this > [1] ticket and hence Perl from minimal buildroot (unless it will be > pulled in by some other packages). The RPM maint

Remove Perl from minimal build root

2014-10-30 Thread Vít Ondruch
Hi everybody, I am pretty sure, that this was already discussed many times, but I proposed to drop the seemingly last dependency of RPM on Perl in this [1] ticket and hence Perl from minimal buildroot (unless it will be pulled in by some other packages). The RPM maintainers as well as Perl maintai

Re: upcoming libtool rebase (2.4.2 ~> 2.4.3)

2014-10-30 Thread Pavel Raiskup
On Wednesday 29 of October 2014 15:51:12 Kalev Lember wrote: > On 10/29/2014 03:20 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > Libtool upstream was able to cut the new release! > > Thanks Pavel for dealing with this! > > While you are at this, any chance you could try convincing upstream to > add /usr/lib64 to

rawhide report: 20141030 changes

2014-10-30 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Thu Oct 30 05:15:03 UTC 2014 Broken deps for i386 -- [3Depict] 3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0 [Macaulay2] Macaulay2-1.6-4.fc21.i686 requires libntl.so.3 [PyQuante] PyQuante-libint

Intend to retire/unless someone can help with/or cares about gluegen

2014-10-30 Thread Jon Ciesla
So gluegen is FTBFS in f21/22. From my repoqueries, nothing needs it, and if anyone's using it they should move to gluegen2, though it's also FTBFS. If no one steps up to assist (my Java-fu is weak), I'll retire it next week. -- http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/ ---

Re: upcoming libtool rebase (2.4.2 ~> 2.4.3)

2014-10-30 Thread Pavel Raiskup
On Wednesday 29 of October 2014 15:03:32 Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 03:20:31PM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > Libtool upstream was able to cut the new release! > > > > I'll rebase the Rawhide package probably by the end of the next week or > > so, if there are no objectio

Re: Cron jobs output are sent to the network by default

2014-10-30 Thread Robert Marcano
On 10/29/2014 05:06 PM, Moez Roy wrote: On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Robert Marcano wrote: I created a new bug [1] that explains that ssmtp is sending all cron jobs output to an external SMTP server. I marked it as a security bug, the security tag was removed and it was recommend to make i

F-21 Branched report: 20141030 changes

2014-10-30 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Thu Oct 30 07:15:03 UTC 2014 Broken deps for armhfp -- [PyQuante] PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc21.1.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) = 0:1.1.6-2.fc21 [audtty] audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.armv7hl requires libaudcli

Re: Q: Splitting existing pkg into subpackages?!

2014-10-30 Thread Alec Leamas
On 30/10/14 10:58, Sergio Pascual wrote: 2014-10-30 10:50 GMT+01:00 Alec Leamas mailto:leamas.a...@gmail.com>>: On 30/10/14 10:41, Sergio Pascual wrote: Hello 2014-10-30 10:32 GMT+01:00 Alec Leamas mailto:leamas.a...@gmail.com>

Re: Q: Splitting existing pkg into subpackages?!

2014-10-30 Thread Sergio Pascual
2014-10-30 10:50 GMT+01:00 Alec Leamas : > On 30/10/14 10:41, Sergio Pascual wrote: > >> Hello >> >> 2014-10-30 10:32 GMT+01:00 Alec Leamas > >: >> >> Hi all! >> >> >> Feeling dumb (again...) I have a package which I now need to split >> into subpackages.

Re: Q: Splitting existing pkg into subpackages?!

2014-10-30 Thread Alec Leamas
On 30/10/14 10:41, Sergio Pascual wrote: Hello 2014-10-30 10:32 GMT+01:00 Alec Leamas mailto:leamas.a...@gmail.com>>: Hi all! Feeling dumb (again...) I have a package which I now need to split into subpackages. [cut] Does this help? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrade_paths_

Re: Q: Splitting existing pkg into subpackages?!

2014-10-30 Thread Sergio Pascual
Hello 2014-10-30 10:32 GMT+01:00 Alec Leamas : > Hi all! > > > Feeling dumb (again...) I have a package which I now need to split into > subpackages. Also, I want the original package to just be an empty one > pulling in all the new subpackages, giving a smooth upgrade path > (installing the base

[Test-Announce] Fedora 21 Beta Go/No-Go Meeting, Thursday, October 30 @ 17:00 UTC

2014-10-30 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 21 Beta. Thursday, October 30, 2014 17:00 UTC (1 PM EDT, 10 AM PDT, 18:00 CET) Reminder: Europe already moved from summer time, winter is coming! "Before each publi

Q: Splitting existing pkg into subpackages?!

2014-10-30 Thread Alec Leamas
Hi all! Feeling dumb (again...) I have a package which I now need to split into subpackages. Also, I want the original package to just be an empty one pulling in all the new subpackages, giving a smooth upgrade path (installing the base package installs everything, as it used to be). My pro