On 10/17/2014 05:40 AM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
My comment was not meant to be argumentative, but rather
tongue-in-cheek. However, I do believe when changing a default, it
isn't about what is convenient for me. It's about what is best for the
entire community and what are the real world ramificati
My comment was not meant to be argumentative, but rather tongue-in-cheek.
However, I do believe when changing a default, it isn't about what is
convenient for me. It's about what is best for the entire community and
what are the real world ramifications. I'm not buying the "let's change
the defau
On 10/16/2014 05:10 PM, Jan Chaloupka wrote:
Have you considered installing the timer file, but without the
dependency? If systemd is there, it could use it, otherwise not.
That
would make a whole lot more sense to me than creating another package,
and would be my recommendation.
Nope, th
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 14:40:50 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> We seem to have a number of broken dependencies in F21 that have gone
> unfixed for a quite some time. Not sure what's up with them; the
> maintainers are supposed to get daily notifications to make sure these
> don't go unnoticed.
>
> Doe
Gerald B. Cox composed on 2014-10-16 12:52 (UTC-0700):
> Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> And parallelization (as others in the thread have suggested) will not help
>> at all on the single-core machine I'm typing this on.
> Single-Core? Really Kevin? Even the One Laptop Per Child machines are
> dual-cor
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Jerry James wrote:
>> One of my packages has picked up a dependency on libpuma in a new release:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135654
>>
>> Would someone care to do a review swap? Thanks,
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Kevin Kofler
wrote:
> And parallelization (as others in the thread have suggested) will not help
> at all on the single-core machine I'm typing this on.
>
Single-Core? Really Kevin? Even the One Laptop Per Child machines are
dual-core. ;-)
--
devel mailing li
On Thursday, 16 October 2014 at 16:47, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 14:40 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We seem to have a number of broken dependencies in F21 that have gone
> > unfixed for a quite some time. Not sure what's up with them; the
> > maintainers are s
On 10/15/2014 11:50 PM, Jakub Filak wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-10-15 at 16:55 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>
>> We used to have the ability to get statistics grouped by packager,
>> right, or am I mis-remembering?
>
> We still have it, but you can filter by packager only on 'Problems'
> page:
>
> h
Hello,
The currently proposed fedora maintainer instructions for the
system-wide crypto policy are mainly for the C language. Could some
experienced in other languages (e.g., ruby/python) propose some text for
them?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Nmav/CryptoPolicies
regards,
Nikos
--
dev
Latest & greatest, please.
Especially since django 1.7 brought south (migrations) to core.
Also, in a couple of months, I believe that a lot of folks would love to use
1.7, so let's make their life easier (by NOT doing 'pip install').
Tomas
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
h
On 16 October 2014 16:25, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
> I have pushed all my fedora 21 updates as an individual updates now.
Cool, thanks. Any chance you could mark those in the spreadsheet
somehow? e.g. Make the packages have a red background or something.
Thanks.
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/25/2014 02:46 PM, Rich Mattes wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Antonio Trande
> mailto:anto.tra...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all.
>
> On 08/25/2014 01:39 PM, build...@fedoraproject.org
> -Original Message-
> From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:devel-
> boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Ryan S. Brown
> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 09:59
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: Django-1.7 for Fedora 21
>
> On 10/16/2014 09:32 AM, S
On 10/16/2014 04:49 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 10/16/2014 01:30 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:35:13AM +0200, Jan Chaloupka wrote:
Forwarding Colin's response
=
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 09:47:41AM -0500, Chris Adam
On 10/16/2014 04:47 PM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 14:40 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
## json-c soname bump
json-c seems to have dropped the
/usr/include/json -> /usr/include/json-c
symlink.
This breaks packages, which depend upon /usr/include/json,
e.g. libverto-jsonrpc.
Wa
On 10/16/2014 06:16 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>> [freesteam] freesteam-ascend-2.1-6.20140724svn753.fc21.armv7hl
>> requires libascend.so.1
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-August/201840.html
Likely fixed by
https://admi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> [freesteam] freesteam-ascend-2.1-6.20140724svn753.fc21.armv7hl
> requires libascend.so.1
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-August/201840.html
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org
http://fedoraos.wo
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 16:27:57 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > It looks like one could simply prepend
> >
> > /usr/lib64/qt5/bin
> >
> > to $PATH to make available the executables, which are renamed to avoid
> > conflicts with other Qt versions.
>
> There you have your "wrapper script":
> export
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 16 October 2014 10:51, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
>> Mega updates, sound a litlle wrong to me so late in the F21 cycle, Fine for
>> rawhide (f22)
>
> I did think about creating a new update for each build, but that's so
> much clicking. F
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 04:47:29PM +0200, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 14:40 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We seem to have a number of broken dependencies in F21 that have gone
> > unfixed for a quite some time. Not sure what's up with them; the
> > maintainers ar
Ian Malone wrote:
> "I have an internet flatrate at 150 mbs, and downloading the full rpms
> is ALOT faster than the the work that the delta rpms requires."
>
> Wow. Good to see normal users are taken into account.
I have a normal Austrian broadband connection, and it is still much faster
to jus
On 10/16/2014 02:40 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> [gnome-python2-desktop]
>> gnome-python2-metacity-2.32.0-18.fc21.armv7hl requires
>> libmetacity-private.so.0
And replying to my own mail, this should be fixed with:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-python2-desktop-2.32.0-20.fc21
--
On 10/16/2014 01:30 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:35:13AM +0200, Jan Chaloupka wrote:
Forwarding Colin's response
=
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 09:47:41AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Jan Chaloupka said:
there h
On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 14:40 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We seem to have a number of broken dependencies in F21 that have gone
> unfixed for a quite some time. Not sure what's up with them; the
> maintainers are supposed to get daily notifications to make sure these
> don't go unnotice
Rex Dieter wrote:
> * there's a developer tool 'qtchooser' that allows users to switch between
> default Qt developer environments. For the Qt5 qmake case,
> $ qtchooser -qt=qt5 -run-tool=qmake
> qtchooser is a little controversial (not universally endorsed by the kde-
> sig), so currently it is n
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Some confusion here trying to use Fedora's Qt 5 packages, and it seems
> they cannot be use quickly.
Depends on the build system you (or the upstream project you're packaging)
use:
* CMake: just works
* qmake: call qmake-qt5 and it'll find all the rest just fine
* qbs: h
On 10/16/2014 09:32 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>
> There are no Django applications that are part of the install sets of
> any of the Products or Spins so far as I am aware, so the risk to the
> Project deliverable dates would be minimal. I'd suggest bringing it to
> FESCo for a more complete
On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 14:46 +0200, Matthias Runge wrote:
> On 16/10/14 14:25, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > in Fedora 21, we have Django-1.6. Django-1.7 was released a few weeks
> > ago. As we're
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:35:13AM +0200, Jan Chaloupka wrote:
> Forwarding Colin's response
> =
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 09:47:41AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> >Once upon a time, Jan Chaloupka said:
> >> there has been a discussion about if we need cache for
On 16/10/14 14:40, Kalev Lember wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We seem to have a number of broken dependencies in F21 that have gone
> unfixed for a quite some time. Not sure what's up with them; the
> maintainers are supposed to get daily notifications to make sure these
> don't go unnoticed.
>
> Does any
Thanks for bringing this up. Speaking of broken Ruby stuff:
[rubygem-linecache19]
rubygem-linecache19-0.5.13-6.fc20.armv7hl requires libruby.so.2.0
[rubygem-ruby-debug-base19]
rubygem-ruby-debug-base19-0.11.26-6.fc20.armv7hl requires libruby.so.2.0
A while ago, I suggested to dr
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 14:40:50 +0200,
Kalev Lember wrote:
Does anyone have ideas how to deal with these packages?
I have been meaning to deal with meshmagick. I actually did a small
part of the changes locally. The issue is that stricter checking by
gcc is resulting in the package not bu
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 07:24:53 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> There are several strategies:
>
> * The -qt5 convention is already used by most distributions, so many
> applications/tools have adapted to it already. If you're aware of any that
> haven't yet, I'd be happy to help produce upstreamable p
On 16/10/14 14:25, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> in Fedora 21, we have Django-1.6. Django-1.7 was released a few weeks
> ago. As we're in feature freeze, but still pre-beta. I'd like to ask for
> opinions, if
Hi all,
We seem to have a number of broken dependencies in F21 that have gone
unfixed for a quite some time. Not sure what's up with them; the
maintainers are supposed to get daily notifications to make sure these
don't go unnoticed.
Does anyone have ideas how to deal with these packages?
I wond
Dne 16.10.2014 v 14:09 Matthew Miller napsal(a):
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 01:54:41PM +0200, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
>> Which goes back to the idea of either moving %{_unitdir} to the
>> filesystem package, or having a systemd-filesystem package...
I can't see nothing against guidelines [1]. They sa
Hi
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
> Hello,
>
> in Fedora 21, we have Django-1.6. Django-1.7 was released a few weeks
> ago. As we're in feature freeze, but still pre-beta. I'd like to ask for
> opinions, if an upgrade to Django-1.7 would be still acceptable.
>
> I have a
There are several strategies:
* The -qt5 convention is already used by most distributions, so many
applications/tools have adapted to it already. If you're aware of any that
haven't yet, I'd be happy to help produce upstreamable patches to implement
such support.
* qt5-qtbase-devel provides r
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 01:54:41PM +0200, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> Which goes back to the idea of either moving %{_unitdir} to the
> filesystem package, or having a systemd-filesystem package...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1153638
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
--
devel
On 10/16/2014 12:03 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 05:53:41PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
I discussed this with Peter Schiffer and the end result was in the
future the man-db cron should be removed and man-db database should
be updated with rpm triggerand the cron j
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 05:53:41PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> I discussed this with Peter Schiffer and the end result was in the
> future the man-db cron should be removed and man-db database should
> be updated with rpm triggerand the cron job should be kept as is
> until then, presic
On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 13:34 +0200, Jan Chaloupka wrote:
> On 10/16/2014 12:56 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Dne 16.10.2014 v 10:35 Jan Chaloupka napsal(a):
> >> Forwarding Colin's response
[... snip ...]
> >> Have you considered installing the timer file, but without the
> >> dependency? If systemd i
user: limb set for cheeselee acl: watchbugzilla of package:
perl-Net-Dropbox-API from: to: Approved on branch: el6
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Net-Dropbox-API
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Compose started at Thu Oct 16 05:15:05 UTC 2014
Broken deps for i386
--
[3Depict]
3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0
[Agda]
ghc-Agda-2.3.2.2-5.fc22.i686 requires libHSterminfo-0.3.2.5-ghc7.6.3.so
ghc-Ag
Some confusion here trying to use Fedora's Qt 5 packages, and it seems they
cannot be use quickly.
$ rpm -qa qt5\*|sort
qt5-qtbase-5.3.2-3.fc21.x86_64
qt5-qtbase-devel-5.3.2-3.fc21.x86_64
qt5-qtbase-gui-5.3.2-3.fc21.x86_64
qt5-qtbase-ibase-5.3.2-3.fc21.x86_64
qt5-qtbase-mysql-5.3.2-3.f
Hello,
in Fedora 21, we have Django-1.6. Django-1.7 was released a few weeks
ago. As we're in feature freeze, but still pre-beta. I'd like to ask for
opinions, if an upgrade to Django-1.7 would be still acceptable.
I have a copr available containing Django-1.7 [1]
Thoughts?
Matthias
[1] https:
On 10/16/2014 12:56 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 16.10.2014 v 10:35 Jan Chaloupka napsal(a):
Forwarding Colin's response
=
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 09:47:41AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Jan Chaloupka said:
there has been a discussion about if w
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 02:32:49 -0700, Moez Roy wrote:
> Tripwire fails to build for F21 and Rawhide. Is there a proven
> packager out there who has some spare time to submit a fix for this?
Where is the package maintainer?
The non-responsive maintainer procedure ought to get restarted for him,
if t
Compose started at Thu Oct 16 07:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc21.1.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) =
0:1.1.6-2.fc21
[audtty]
audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.armv7hl requires libaudcli
Dne 16.10.2014 v 10:35 Jan Chaloupka napsal(a):
> Forwarding Colin's response
> =
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 09:47:41AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
>> Once upon a time, Jan Chaloupka said:
>> > there has been a discussion about if we need cache for man-db for
>> us
On 16 October 2014 10:51, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
> Mega updates, sound a litlle wrong to me so late in the F21 cycle, Fine for
> rawhide (f22)
I did think about creating a new update for each build, but that's so
much clicking. For something as simple as this an update with ~30
packages is very eas
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Richard Hughes
wrote:
> If you maintain a font in Fedora, or are a provenpackager, I could
> really need your help this weekend. Basically, we want to implement
> AppStream metadata[1] for all the fonts we want to show in the
> software center. I've already made
If you maintain a font in Fedora, or are a provenpackager, I could
really need your help this weekend. Basically, we want to implement
AppStream metadata[1] for all the fonts we want to show in the
software center. I've already made a good start, and now other people
are starting to help as well, s
Tripwire fails to build for F21 and Rawhide. Is there a proven
packager out there who has some spare time to submit a fix for this?
Relevant info:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1107464
https://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/tripwire.git/
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?t
Forwarding Colin's response
=
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 09:47:41AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Jan Chaloupka said:
> there has been a discussion about if we need cache for man-db for users
> which use man pages or update system only from time to ti
56 matches
Mail list logo
