On 10/09/2014 10:04 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 9 Oct 2014 18:05:03 +0200
Michael Schroeder wrote:
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 11:03:20AM -0400, Miloslav Trma?? wrote:
[...]
That documentation belongs upstream (and should _not_ be just
repeated within our packaging guidelines IMHO).
From an
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> On 10/08/2014 11:41 PM, Moez Roy wrote:
> > Summary of changes:
> >
> > 58461a8... Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_3 (*)
> > 7ec9589... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass (*)
> > f0a
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 05:39:34PM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
>I was curious about the rate of bug reporting in Fedora, and did this
>quick experiment. I thought it might be interesting to folks here who
>either work on the infrastructure or are curious about long-term
>collabo
- Original Message -
> From: "Christof Damian"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Cc: "Fedora PHP development team"
> Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 9:12:42 PM
> Subject: Re: Giving away all of my packages
>
> Remaining packages up for grabs:
>
> - python-progress
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
> we know about it, don't have any answer yet :-(
Okay, thanks for letting me know. I'd appreciate a note when you get
the problem resolved. Regards,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
h
On 10/08/2014 11:41 PM, Moez Roy wrote:
> Summary of changes:
>
> 58461a8... Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_3 (*)
> 7ec9589... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Mass (*)
> f0aeace... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_22_M (
I was curious about the rate of bug reporting in Fedora, and did this
quick experiment. I thought it might be interesting to folks here who
either work on the infrastructure or are curious about long-term
collaboration trends in Fedora.
I checked the date of reporting of every 10,000th bug (bu
On Thu, 9 Oct 2014 18:05:03 +0200
Michael Schroeder wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 11:03:20AM -0400, Miloslav Trma?? wrote:
> > [...]
> > That documentation belongs upstream (and should _not_ be just
> > repeated within our packaging guidelines IMHO).
>
> From an rpm upstream point of view, we
On 10/08/2014 12:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> This F21 change:
> http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/RPM-4.12
>
> has brought us 'weak dependencies', namely:
>
> Recommends, Suggests, Supplements and Enhances
>
> Rpm in f21 and rawhide sees these in spec files and builds fin
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014, at 11:09 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> especially as we are taking the RPM-level control away from the users
> completely in cloud
How is that?
> and Atomic images already.
See:
https://lists.projectatomic.io/projectatomic-archives/atomic-devel/2014-October/msg5.html
--
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 11:03:20AM -0400, Miloslav Trma?? wrote:
> [...]
> That documentation belongs upstream (and should _not_ be just repeated within
> our packaging guidelines IMHO).
From an rpm upstream point of view, we don't know much about what
those dependencies do. We simply relay the i
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 1:48 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
> Good idea! Thanks and done ...
In addition, http://rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/Dependencies terminates
rather abruptly, with "or B Supplements". That should at least be "or
B Supplements A." Actually, there are a few other wording mistakes in
th
On 10/8/14 8:39 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 08.10.2014 14:50, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis
>> wrote:
>>> Josh Boyer wrote on 07.10.2014 21:15:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
[...]
>>> http://kernel.opensuse.org/cgit/ke
- Original Message -
> The Fedora question would be not “what do the tags do” but “when is it
> appropriate to use Suggests, when Recommends, and when Requires”?
(And FWIW my take is that having this level of complexity in the dependency
system is a mistake that is making things complex f
- Original Message -
> Most importantly, we need to update packaging guidelines to explain
> what are the semantic differences between these different tags. But
> that's a minor update.
That seems to be well enough covered upstream. (Well modulo “does Fedora
actually do what the upstream
(reordering the citations!)
> > > Why should we ban weak dependencies if they really
> > > do nothing in YUM?
> >
> > We need a precise and detailed functional description about what these
> > "weak dependencies" are supposed to do.
>
> Do you mean something like this?
>
> http://rpm.org/wiki/Pa
I've got Sphinx... Will bump it at the end of the month when I get home.
On Oct 9, 2014 11:13 AM, "Christof Damian" wrote:
> Thanks Shawn.
>
> And more thanks also go to Remi and you for mentoring me and being
> patient with me learning the packaging process.
>
> Remaining packages up for grabs:
Thanks Shawn.
And more thanks also go to Remi and you for mentoring me and being
patient with me learning the packaging process.
Remaining packages up for grabs:
- python-progressbar ( hasn't changed for ages, might be time to retire it)
- sphinx ( regular updates )
On 9 October 2014 15:55, S
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 1:55 AM, Jamie Nguyen wrote:
> I think you should probably ignore the fact that Affix happens to be the
> first point of contact, and instead email "peter" or "jpo" who are the
> active maintainers.
I've notified them multiple times as well. BZ assigns the ticket to
the lis
You can assign the remaining php-* ones that Remi didn't take to me if you
would like.
On Oct 9, 2014 6:22 AM, "Christof Damian" wrote:
> I waited probably a bit long with this, but most of the packages have
> already co-maintainers that are doing a better job than me.
>
> Due to a job with more
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Synopsis:
c6b0eb651f8b95757ccee4f430d659bf Test-Synopsis-0.11.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Christof Damian
wrote:
> I waited probably a bit long with this, but most of the packages have
> already co-maintainers that are doing a better job than me.
>
> Due to a job with more responsibilities and less Red Hat, Fedora and PHP,
> I don't have the time
On 9 October 2014 15:03, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 10/09/2014 05:21 AM, Christof Damian wrote:
>>
>> mediawiki-wikicalendar -- Simple calendar extension for mediawiki (
>> master f21 f20 f19 el6 el5 )
>
>
> I noticed you are the upstream for this and it seems like very low
> maintenance (no
On 10/09/2014 05:21 AM, Christof Damian wrote:
mediawiki-wikicalendar -- Simple calendar extension for mediawiki (
master f21 f20 f19 el6 el5 )
I noticed you are the upstream for this and it seems like very low maintenance
(no update for 5 years). Would you still have time to act as upstream?
Compose started at Thu Oct 9 05:15:08 UTC 2014
Broken deps for i386
--
[Agda]
ghc-Agda-2.3.2.2-5.fc22.i686 requires libHSterminfo-0.3.2.5-ghc7.6.3.so
ghc-Agda-2.3.2.2-5.fc22.i686 requires libHShaskeline-0.7.0.3-ghc7.6.3.so
Compose started at Thu Oct 9 07:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc21.1.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) =
0:1.1.6-2.fc21
[audtty]
audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.armv7hl requires libaudcli
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all.
I'm working on Icecat-31's RPM building but I'm blocked by a strange
problem. Have you never seen something like that?
..
STOP! /home/sagitter/rpmbuild/BUILD/icecat-31.1.1/js/src/configure
has changed and needs to be run again.
Please rerun
I waited probably a bit long with this, but most of the packages have
already co-maintainers that are doing a better job than me.
Due to a job with more responsibilities and less Red Hat, Fedora and PHP,
I don't have the time needed to keep up with the Fedora Next and PHP
ecosystem changes.
It wa
On 09/10/14 06:28, Brandon Vincent wrote:
> Over the past month, I have tried contacting Keiran Smith (affix) in
> regards to nagios with no success [1].
>
> Is anyone aware to his present status in regards to the Fedora Project
> or possibly have an alternative method to reach him?
Strangely, no
On 10/02/2014 05:48 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
> On 10/02/2014 05:18 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 05:00:40PM +0200, Honza Horak wrote:
>>> Problem:
>>> Currently, copr allows to add a link to an arbitrary repo URL that is
>>> available for installing dependencies during buil
On 10/08/2014 11:04 PM, Haïkel wrote:
Before dnf gets promoted as the default package manager, it would be
interesting to do some widespread testing.
I would like to point out, that you can use weak dependencies in Copr in F21
and rawhide chroots.
Which should give you enough space for testing
2014-10-09 8:57 GMT+02:00 Ralf Corsepius :
>
> I do not.
>
I understand your point of view, in a different context (ie: dnf being
default package manager), I would have shared yours.
>
> We need a precise and detailed functional description about what these "weak
> dependencies" are supposed to d
-- snip --
> > Do you mean something like this?
> >
> > http://rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/Dependencies
>
> It would be nice if words "weak dependencies" at
> http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.12.0
> linked to
> http://rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/Dependencies#Weakdependencies
>
> Jan, do you have righ
On 9.10.2014 09:27, Jan Zelený wrote:
On 9. 10. 2014 at 08:57:42, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 10/09/2014 08:41 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 8.10.2014 23:04, Haïkel wrote:
2014-10-08 20:31 GMT+02:00 Kevin Fenzi :
Greetings.
This F21 change:
http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/RPM-4.12
has broug
On 9. 10. 2014 at 08:57:42, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 10/09/2014 08:41 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
> > On 8.10.2014 23:04, Haïkel wrote:
> >> 2014-10-08 20:31 GMT+02:00 Kevin Fenzi :
> >>> Greetings.
> >>>
> >>> This F21 change:
> >>> http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/RPM-4.12
> >>>
> >>> has br
On 10/09/2014 08:41 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 8.10.2014 23:04, Haïkel wrote:
2014-10-08 20:31 GMT+02:00 Kevin Fenzi :
Greetings.
This F21 change:
http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/RPM-4.12
has brought us 'weak dependencies', namely:
Recommends, Suggests, Supplements and Enhances
Rpm in
36 matches
Mail list logo
