havege in polarssl not enabled and maintainer refuses to enable it (#1069394)

2014-09-30 Thread Jonathan Dieter
The havege functions in the polarssl package are currently disabled in the Fedora package. Newer releases of dolphin-emu, which are in a popular external repository, require these functions. According to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069394#c1, the HAVEGE feature is disabled be

Re: Multiple directory ownership including filesystem package

2014-09-30 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 05:45:15PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > > In principle all fixes should be upstreamed, but this is a trivial > > packaging change that can be easily and safely done just in > > Fedora. > >

rawhide report: 20140930 changes

2014-09-30 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
Compose started at Tue Sep 30 17:31:06 UTC 2014 Broken deps for i386 -- [Agda] ghc-Agda-2.3.2.2-5.fc22.i686 requires libHSterminfo-0.3.2.5-ghc7.6.3.so ghc-Agda-2.3.2.2-5.fc22.i686 requires libHShaskeline-0.7.0.3-ghc7.6.3.so

Python/Django developers needed: Ask Fedora

2014-09-30 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi Ask Fedora (http://ask.fedoraproject.org) uses Askbot which is a Django based web application. We need a few developers to implement some bug fixes and features for askbot and while upstream developers are active, our requirements are pretty high. So if anyone here wants to help out, please

Re: Multiple directory ownership including filesystem package

2014-09-30 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > In principle all fixes should be upstreamed, but this is a trivial > packaging change that can be easily and safely done just in > Fedora. > Agreed but also note that even packages that install to the recommended location

Re: Multiple directory ownership including filesystem package

2014-09-30 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 09:32:08PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 1:57 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > > >> > >> On a side note, that's the legacy location for bash completion > >> snippets. The modern one

F-21 Branched report: 20140930 changes

2014-09-30 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Tue Sep 30 16:27:39 UTC 2014 Broken deps for armhfp -- [PyQuante] PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc21.1.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) = 0:1.1.6-2.fc21 [audtty] audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.armv7hl requires libaudcli

Re: Multiple directory ownership including filesystem package

2014-09-30 Thread Ville Skyttä
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 1:57 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Hi > > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote: > >> >> On a side note, that's the legacy location for bash completion >> snippets. The modern one from which they're loaded on demand is: >> $ pkg-config --variable=completionsdi

Fedora ARM Status Meeting 2014-10-01 (**NEW!** Time)

2014-09-30 Thread Paul Whalen
Good afternoon folks, Please join us tomorrow (Wednesday, Oct 1st) at 2PM EDT (6PM UTC) for the Fedora ARM status meeting in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode. On the agenda so far.. 1) Kernel Status Update 2) Aarch64 a) Status update b) 21_Alpha_TC1 3) F21 Armhfp Beta Pl

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 26 September 2014 15:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

2014-09-30 Thread Vincent Batts
On 30/09/14 12:40 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: On Tue, Sep 30, 2014, at 11:55 AM, Václav Pavlín wrote: Tianon also mentioned future feature which would support signed images - we would probably want to produce such signed image by ourselves, not just give Docker rootfs and let them sign it. Ho

Re: EPEL [Rdo-list] Using RHEL-7 with Juno

2014-09-30 Thread Alan Pevec
> In addition to the standard RHEL base repositories please ensure the > following repositories are also enabled. > > [rhel-7-server-extras-rpms] > name = Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Server - Extras (RPMs) > > [rhel-7-server-optional-rpms] > name = Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Server - Optional (RPMs)

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 26 September 2014 15:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

2014-09-30 Thread Colin Walters
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014, at 11:55 AM, Václav Pavlín wrote: > Tianon also mentioned future feature which would support signed images - > we would probably want to produce such signed image by ourselves, not > just give Docker rootfs and let them sign it. How does this intersect with https://github.

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 26 September 2014 15:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

2014-09-30 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 05:55:40PM +0200, Václav Pavlín wrote: > I talked to Tianon from Docker today on IRC and our current output > of build in Koji is not acceptable as input for their official > images repo - they use Dockerfiles to build even base images - input > is a Dockerfile and tarred ro

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 26 September 2014 15:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

2014-09-30 Thread Václav Pavlín
Hey, So to follow on the topic of publishing F21 Alpha base image... I talked to Tianon from Docker today on IRC and our current output of build in Koji is not acceptable as input for their official images repo - they use Dockerfiles to build even base images - input is a Dockerfile and tarre

Re: unresponsive maintainer: chkr

2014-09-30 Thread Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 16:50 +0200, Christian Krause wrote: > Hi Nikos, > > I'm sorry that I haven't responded earlier. I was under the impression > that your request only affected EPEL and that you have contacted the > EPEL maintainer now. I just re-read the conversation - it looks like > that I h

Meeting minutes from Env and Stacks WG meeting (2014-09-30)

2014-09-30 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
#fedora-meeting: Env and Stacks (2014-09-30) Meeting started by mmaslano at 13:03:32 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-09-30/env-and-stacks.2014-09-30-

Re: Go packaging

2014-09-30 Thread Haïkel
2014-09-30 16:20 GMT+02:00 Richard W.M. Jones : > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:19:01AM +0200, Haïkel wrote: >> @Rich Jones: I agree with you that gaining experience, but that could >> be done using a copr repository or granting exceptions for a limited >> set of packages. > > Well the specific case w

Re: unresponsive maintainer: chkr

2014-09-30 Thread Christian Krause
Hi Nikos, I'm sorry that I haven't responded earlier. I was under the impression that your request only affected EPEL and that you have contacted the EPEL maintainer now. I just re-read the conversation - it looks like that I have overseen that the request was indeed for the fedora branches (at le

Re: How to handle upgrades to Fedora 21

2014-09-30 Thread Matěj Cepl
On 2014-09-24, 16:22 GMT, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > In Czech we say "Když se kácí strom, létají třísky" I have to admit I have hard time with this proverb. Whenever I hear somebody to use it is usually to cover for his mistakes or worse (it was a favorite proverb of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki

Re: How to handle upgrades to Fedora 21

2014-09-30 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Petr Hracek wrote: > Preupgrade assistant performs assessment of the system from the > "upgradeability" point of view. > It is based on OpenSCAP engine. > It reports potential risks for in-place upgrading system. > fedup can call our API. For sure. > Was th

[389-devel] please review: Ticket 47900 - Adding an entry with an invalid password as rootDN/password admin is incorrectly rejected

2014-09-30 Thread Mark Reynolds
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47900 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47900/0001-Ticket-47900-Adding-an-entry-with-an-invalid-passwor.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

[perl-EV/f21] Update to 4.18

2014-09-30 Thread Mathieu Bridon
commit 89cd6ed077a532bec7b4d1a00e4047cdb7d23803 Author: Mathieu Bridon Date: Sat Sep 6 23:05:55 2014 +0200 Update to 4.18 .gitignore |1 + perl-EV.spec |8 +--- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore

Re: Go packaging

2014-09-30 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:19:01AM +0200, Haïkel wrote: > @Rich Jones: I agree with you that gaining experience, but that could > be done using a copr repository or granting exceptions for a limited > set of packages. Well the specific case was that libguestfs has golang bindings, and we wanted to

Re: How to handle upgrades to Fedora 21

2014-09-30 Thread Petr Hracek
Preupgrade assistant performs assessment of the system from the "upgradeability" point of view. It is based on OpenSCAP engine. It reports potential risks for in-place upgrading system. fedup can call our API. For sure. That's all. On 09/30/2014 03:59 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: HI On Tue, Sep

[Bug 1147143] perl-MIME-EncWords-1.014.3 is available

2014-09-30 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147143 Xavier Bachelot changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

Re: How to handle upgrades to Fedora 21

2014-09-30 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Petr Hracek wrote: In RHEL we are using preupgrade-assistant [1] which does this work. > If user write a check script then it will inform user that upgrade is not > supported. > The check script can also inform user that e.g. mariadb changed structure > and it'

Re: How to handle upgrades to Fedora 21

2014-09-30 Thread Petr Hracek
Or better say, fedup remains as tool for upgrades. On 09/30/2014 03:57 PM, Petr Hracek wrote: No, definitely not. preupgrade-assistant is only the tool which informs user or admin what was change against the newest version and recommend actions for inplace upgrades. But as I mentioned. Curren

Re: How to handle upgrades to Fedora 21

2014-09-30 Thread Rahul Sundaram
HI On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Petr Hracek wrote: > > No, definitely not. > > preupgrade-assistant is only the tool which informs user or admin > what was change against the newest version and recommend actions for > inplace upgrades. > But as I mentioned. Currently now it's not available i

Re: How to handle upgrades to Fedora 21

2014-09-30 Thread Petr Hracek
No, definitely not. preupgrade-assistant is only the tool which informs user or admin what was change against the newest version and recommend actions for inplace upgrades. But as I mentioned. Currently now it's not available in Fedora. Preupgrade-assistant doesn't modify system at all. On 0

Re: How to handle upgrades to Fedora 21

2014-09-30 Thread Haïkel
2014-09-30 15:04 GMT+02:00 Petr Hracek : > > In RHEL we are using preupgrade-assistant [1] which does this work. > If user write a check script then it will inform user that upgrade is not > supported. > The check script can also inform user that e.g. mariadb changed structure > and it's required t

unresponsive maintainer: chkr

2014-09-30 Thread Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
Hello, I've requested the maintainer of vpnc to split vpnc-script from this package and allow a new package that can be maintained independently (I can be maintainer of it). The reason for the split is that the vpnc-script package is used in more than just vpnc, and him being unresponsive prevents

Re: How to handle upgrades to Fedora 21

2014-09-30 Thread Petr Hracek
On 09/24/2014 06:22 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: - Original Message - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 There has been some discussion in various forums lately about how we will handle fedup upgrades from Fedora 20 to Fedora 21 products. Several suggestions have been made tha

Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2014-10-01)

2014-09-30 Thread Matthew Miller
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2014-10-01 17:00 UTC' Links to all tickets bel

Re: Go packaging

2014-09-30 Thread Haïkel
2014-09-30 11:42 GMT+02:00 Florian Weimer : > > I tried, didn't work. It's not surprising because filing bugs doesn't fix > them. > If package owner doesn't answer or have no good reasons, just CC a provenpackager and he will fix it for you. H. > -- > Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security >

Re: Go packaging

2014-09-30 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:42:10AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 09/30/2014 10:53 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > >On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:37:46AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > >>On 09/29/2014 08:54 PM, Haïkel wrote: > >>>Currently, there is *no* golang packaging guidelines approved, so we

Re: Go packaging

2014-09-30 Thread Florian Weimer
On 09/30/2014 10:53 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:37:46AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: On 09/29/2014 08:54 PM, Haïkel wrote: Currently, there is *no* golang packaging guidelines approved, so we shouldn't have accepted golang packages in the first place. I think this

Re: Proposal: Increasing application icon sizes to 64px

2014-09-30 Thread Daniel Vrátil
On Monday 29 of September 2014 12:40:30 Richard Hughes wrote: > On 29 September 2014 12:23, Matěj Cepl wrote: > > Couldn’t we just stop this madness of bitmaps? +10 > > SVGs are not a silver bullet. Well, it's better than bitmaps. > You'd want a very different source SVG > file for an icon th

Re: Go packaging

2014-09-30 Thread Haïkel
@Matthew: I'm just stating a fact, the absence of guidelines does not mean that we can accept reviews. In this case, you can't help but violate a few general guidelines when you use the golang toolchain, for instance: "statically linked executables", that would require an exception from fesco on ca

Re: Go packaging

2014-09-30 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:37:46AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 09/29/2014 08:54 PM, Haïkel wrote: > >Currently, there is *no* golang packaging guidelines approved, so we > >shouldn't have accepted golang packages in the first place. > > I think this is problematic considering that some other

Re: Go packaging

2014-09-30 Thread Florian Weimer
On 09/29/2014 08:54 PM, Haïkel wrote: Currently, there is *no* golang packaging guidelines approved, so we shouldn't have accepted golang packages in the first place. I think this is problematic considering that some other languages violates their language-specific packaging guidelines with co

Re: Wallpapers in portrait orientation

2014-09-30 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
- Original Message - > Hi, > I'm thinking can we ship for Fedora 22 some wallpapers in portrait > orientation? > > We always shipped wallpapers in landscape mode. But I - and quite people > around me - have monitors rotated by 90°, which I personally find much > better for development. > R

Re: Go packaging

2014-09-30 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
How does gccgo affect the packaging of libraries? Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, bindings from many

Re: Go packaging

2014-09-30 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 08:54:08PM +0200, Haïkel wrote: > Currently, there is *no* golang packaging guidelines approved, so we > shouldn't have accepted golang packages in the first place. > https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/382 While we should be working on packaging guidelines, it has been ver