On 09/05/2014 05:08 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Dear all,
In the last months, Till and I together with infrastructure and
release-engineering have been thinking and working on how we could improve the
current workflow for new package and new branch.
To give you an idea, this is the current wo
On 09/08/2014 08:32 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 12:17 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
0) The autoqa note above. The maintainer could override that and push
to testing.
2) F21 is currently in Alpha freeze. Only updates that fix accepted
blockers or freeze exceptions go to stabl
On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 12:17 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> 0) The autoqa note above. The maintainer could override that and push
> to testing.
> 2) F21 is currently in Alpha freeze. Only updates that fix accepted
> blockers or freeze exceptions go to stable. As far as I know, this
> update doesn't.
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2014-09-08
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's everyone's favourite time...meeting time!
We have the usual Fedora 21 figurings-out to do, but
On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 18:49 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 06:54:03PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > > We need to decide if just because you manage to get an important core
> > > package into Fedora 4
On Sat, 2014-09-06 at 22:36 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> We need to decide if just because you manage to get an important core
> package into Fedora 4 years ago, that means you can forever more push
> any old stuff you want into Fedora, without going back and consulting
> with the community
On Sat, 2014-09-06 at 22:30 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:35:10AM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > /tmp has nothing to do with systemd
>
> The tmp-on-tmp misfeature is to do with systemd.
It's implemented as a systemd mount because...that's how we do mounts
now. Th
Hi All,
Per discussion in the #fedora-cloud meeting last Friday I would like to
start a thread about the names of the Docker and Atomic deliverables for F21.
I know of at least a few cases where there has been confusion regarding
what deliverable has been the subject of a conversation on IRC as
On 09/06/2014 09:23 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/06/2014 03:09 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 07:52:52AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/05/2014 05:08 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
I wonder if we should rather create an empty branch and let the
packager merge
the
On Qua, 2014-08-27 at 15:30 +0200, Václav Pavlín wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is new fakesystemd build for F21 which should fix the breakage,
> sorry.
Hi,
I think this still breaking rpmfusion builds , in some packages like
kplayer [1]. rpmfusion got a older version of Mock, Version: 1.1.21 [2]
e
On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 20:24:58 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 07.09.2014 um 20:17 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
> > On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 20:06:03 +0200
> > Reindl Harald wrote:
> >>
> >> Am 07.09.2014 um 19:55 schrieb drago01:
> >>> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Reindl Harald
> >>> wrote:
> t
Am 07.09.2014 um 20:17 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
> On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 20:06:03 +0200
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 07.09.2014 um 19:55 schrieb drago01:
>>> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Reindl Harald
>>> wrote:
there must be something wrong in the infrastructure
* the update has
Thanks!
2014-09-07 14:58 GMT-03:00 Simo Sorce :
> On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 01:12 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is (Samba) Fedora 20 still not capable of being Active Directory Domain
> > Controller?
> >
> > I mean is that page current:
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Samba4
On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 20:06:03 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 07.09.2014 um 19:55 schrieb drago01:
> > On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Reindl Harald
> > wrote:
> >> there must be something wrong in the infrastructure
> >>
> >> * the update has more than enough karma
> >> * it's even not visibl
Am 07.09.2014 um 19:55 schrieb drago01:
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> there must be something wrong in the infrastructure
>>
>> * the update has more than enough karma
>> * it's even not visible in updates-testing
>>
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/firefox-3
Am 07.09.2014 um 19:49 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
> On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 06:54:03PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>
>>> We need to decide if just because you manage to get an important core
>>> package into Fedora 4 years ago, that
On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 01:12 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is (Samba) Fedora 20 still not capable of being Active Directory Domain
> Controller?
>
> I mean is that page current:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Samba4#Current_status ?
>
> Thanks in advance!
It is current, and
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> there must be something wrong in the infrastructure
>
> * the update has more than enough karma
> * it's even not visible in updates-testing
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/firefox-32.0-1.fc20,xulrunner-32.0-1.fc20,thunderbird-ligh
there must be something wrong in the infrastructure
* the update has more than enough karma
* it's even not visible in updates-testing
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/firefox-32.0-1.fc20,xulrunner-32.0-1.fc20,thunderbird-lightning-3.3-3.fc20,thunderbird-31.1.0-1.fc20
signature.asc
Desc
On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 06:54:03PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> > We need to decide if just because you manage to get an important core
> > package into Fedora 4 years ago, that means you can forever more push
> > any old stuff you w
Hi,
You should edit the yum debug level (/etc/yum.conf) and provide your yum log,
instead of saying “cannot install”, “refuse my effort” etc.
“Wait and see” is not a good attitude to solve a problem. Bashing a question
onto others and not giving out enough information is also not preferable
The basic issue is I have a kernel and headers no longer available. So, I
try to upgrade but yum refuses my efforts. Never mind, I will wait and it
will be solved one way or another.
L:
On Sep 7, 2014 12:58 PM, "Reindl Harald" wrote:
>
> Am 07.09.2014 um 12:47 schrieb Pál, László:
> > Harald,
Am 07.09.2014 um 12:47 schrieb Pál, László:
> Harald, Thank you for extra helpful response. I'll do my best to
> figure out on my own and stop disturbing you
i don't get why that offended response
* yum clean all && yum upgrade to get the newest packages
* you need "kernel-devel" and not only
Harald, Thank you for extra helpful response. I'll do my best to figure
out on my own and stop disturbing you.
L:
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Broken deps for i386
--
[APLpy]
APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc22.1.i686 requires libint(x86-32) =
0:1.1.6-2.fc21
[audtty]
audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.i686 requires libaudclient
Compose started at Sun Sep 7 07:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[APLpy]
APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs
[PyKDE]
PyKDE-3.16.6-14.fc20.armv7hl requires sip-api(10) >= 0:10.0
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-
first: that's the wrong mailing list!
Am 07.09.2014 um 09:26 schrieb Pál, László:
> A few weeks ago I had to upgrade my kernel due to some nvidia related issue.
> Currently I have the following
>
> Installed Packages
> Name: kernel
> Arch: x86_64
> Version : 3.15.10
> Release
Am 07.09.2014 um 05:55 schrieb Tomasz Torcz:
> On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 10:18:20PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> Whenever my laptop boots, the hard disk is pegged at 100% and the
>> machine is unusable for another 2 minutes because of
>> "systemd-readahead", a misguided attempt to optimize th
Hi!
Samba4 in Fedora can't be a AD DC still. You should rebuild srpm with
proper spec changes or build it from sources.
krege.
Hi,
Is (Samba) Fedora 20 still not capable of being Active Directory Domain
Controller?
I mean is that page current:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Samba4
Yes, it was yum but I have the same for dnf. The error message is installed
package is not available (both for kernel and headers). How much time
needed to able to install a package after pushed to stable?
Thx
L:
On 7 September 2014 09:58, P J P wrote:
>Hello Pal,
>
> On Sunday, 7 Septemb
Hello Pal,
On Sunday, 7 September 2014 12:57 PM, "Pál, László" wrote:
>A few weeks ago I had to upgrade my kernel due to some nvidia related issue.
>Installed package kernel-headers-3.15.10-200.fc20.x86_64 (from updates) not
>available.
>Error: Nothing to do
What was the yum command used h
On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 12:27 +0200, Martin Stransky wrote:
> So the Firefox-gtk3 may be slowly moved
> to the Fedora one.
Martin,
Can I request you to please provide f21 packages in the copr too?
--
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Join Fe
Hi,
A few weeks ago I had to upgrade my kernel due to some nvidia related
issue. Currently I have the following
Installed Packages
Name: kernel
Arch: x86_64
Version : 3.15.10
Release : 200.fc20
Size: 137 M
Repo: installed
>From repo : updates
Installed
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 11:18 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> Whenever my laptop boots, the hard disk is pegged at 100% and the
> machine is unusable for another 2 minutes because of
> "systemd-readahead", a misguided attempt to optimize the boot process.
> Did we agree to this when we adopted sy
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Sáb, 2014-09-06 at 22:36 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 10:31:45AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 16:11:37 +0100,
>> > Sérgio Basto wrote:
>> > >Hi,
>> > >[1]
>> > >since Fedora hav
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 11:36 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 10:31:45AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 16:11:37 +0100,
>> Sérgio Basto wrote:
>> >Hi,
>> >[1]
>> >since Fedora have some responsibility, unfortunately I think the group
>> >have some
36 matches
Mail list logo
