On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 11:52 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 15:55 +0200, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 09:04 -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > > Good news, everyone! We (me and CC'd Vojtech Trefny) would like to
On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 18:03 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fri, 05.09.14 11:52, Matthias Clasen (mcla...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 15:55 +0200, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 09:04 -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > >
> > > > - Original Messa
On 09/05/2014 05:08 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
* packager requests new branch in pkgdb (2 clicks)
=> requests added to the scm admin queue
* cvsadmin checks the request/package (check if package exists in the RHEL for
EPEL branch request - check if the user is a packager done in pkgd
On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 18:03 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> This update has caused a lot of pain for Epiphany. Could you take a look
> at [1] when you get a chance and help us figure out what's gone wrong?
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134602#c3
Sorry for the delay. I've
On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 12:36 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> $ gem fetch power_assert
> ERROR: Could not find a valid gem 'power_assert' (>= 0), here is why:
> Unable to download data from https://rubygems.org/ -
> SSL_connect returned=1 errno=0 state=SSLv3 read server certificate B:
> certif
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Farkas Levente wrote:
> if you read lennart mail you can see "it's a step back" which is an
> idealism and which is what i really replying.
>
Whether or not you read it that way, it's not appropriate in a Fedora
mailing list to attack another person. Sure, we ca
On 09/05/2014 09:27 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 20:53 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
>
>>
>> system-config-lvm was removed from rhel7 while g-d-u is not able to
>> configure lvm. so it _definitely_ a step forward. and really not agree
>> with you about the root user usage. you
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 03:27:07PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 20:53 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
> > system-config-lvm was removed from rhel7 while g-d-u is not able to
> > configure lvm. so it _definitely_ a step forward. and really not agree
> > with you about the root
On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 20:53 +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
>
> system-config-lvm was removed from rhel7 while g-d-u is not able to
> configure lvm. so it _definitely_ a step forward. and really not agree
> with you about the root user usage. you imho those who would like to
> configure disk and lvm
On 09/05/2014 06:03 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fri, 05.09.14 11:52, Matthias Clasen (mcla...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 15:55 +0200, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 09:04 -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
> Good n
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 05:08:39PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> In the last months, Till and I together with infrastructure and
> release-engineering have been thinking and working on how we could improve the
> current workflow for new package and new branch.
>
> To give you a
commit d0aade5ae895c54aa4ffd5a7cfe82d04ac922af9
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Fri Sep 5 19:03:16 2014 +0100
Update to 0.79
- New upstream release 0.79
- Add t/000-compile-modules.t
- Eliminate File::Basename from test/
- Eliminate spurious trailing whitespace
-
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 06:03:58PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fri, 05.09.14 11:52, Matthias Clasen (mcla...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 15:55 +0200, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 09:04 -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > >
> > > > - Origina
2014-09-05 17:08 GMT+02:00 Pierre-Yves Chibon :
> Dear all,
>
> In the last months, Till and I together with infrastructure and
> release-engineering have been thinking and working on how we could improve the
> current workflow for new package and new branch.
>
> To give you an idea, this is the cu
Dear all,
In the last months, Till and I together with infrastructure and
release-engineering have been thinking and working on how we could improve the
current workflow for new package and new branch.
To give you an idea, this is the current workflow:
Current new-package procedure:
On Fri, 05.09.14 11:52, Matthias Clasen (mcla...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 15:55 +0200, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 09:04 -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > > Good news, everyone! We (me and CC'd Vojtech Trefny) wou
On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 15:55 +0200, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 09:04 -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > > Good news, everyone! We (me and CC'd Vojtech Trefny) would like to
> > > introduce you the next generation tool for storage management
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 11:05:29AM +0200, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
> Good news, everyone! We (me and CC'd Vojtech Trefny) would like to
> introduce you the next generation tool for storage management -- the
> **blivet-gui** tool [1]_.
Nice work! I really like the kickstart writing option.
--
dev
On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 11:05 +0200, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
> P.S. Do you know about any other mailing lists or individuals that may
> be interested in this announcement? Feel free to forward the message
> and
> spread the word!
Hi Vratislav!
Could you perhaps write up a post for the fedoramagaz
On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 09:04 -0400, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> > Good news, everyone! We (me and CC'd Vojtech Trefny) would like to
> > introduce you the next generation tool for storage management -- the
> > **blivet-gui** tool [1]_. It is a GUI tool based on the bliv
Dne 5.9.2014 15:04, Bastien Nocera napsal(a):
- Original Message -
Good news, everyone! We (me and CC'd Vojtech Trefny) would like to
introduce you the next generation tool for storage management -- the
**blivet-gui** tool [1]_. It is a GUI tool based on the blivet python
library (orig
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 08:52:42AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Also I do not recall any lengthy discussions on systemd when it was
> proposed. It was just one of these "Feature"-announcement pages hardly
> anybody reads. I recall later discussions when systemd became feature
> bloated and when c
On 09/04/2014 06:28 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
ok. Lets back up here before we start talking implementation...
What would be in this dist-git?
Everything what is going to be built in Copr.
Any legally allowed in Fedora code/projects?
Yes. See
https://fedorahosted.org/copr/wiki/UserDocs#WhatI
- Original Message -
> Good news, everyone! We (me and CC'd Vojtech Trefny) would like to
> introduce you the next generation tool for storage management -- the
> **blivet-gui** tool [1]_. It is a GUI tool based on the blivet python
> library (originally Anaconda's storage management and
Compose started at Fri Sep 5 07:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[APLpy]
APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs
[PyKDE]
PyKDE-3.16.6-14.fc20.armv7hl requires sip-api(10) >= 0:10.0
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-
Broken deps for i386
--
[APLpy]
APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc22.1.i686 requires libint(x86-32) =
0:1.1.6-2.fc21
[audtty]
audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.i686 requires libaudclient
Hi fellow packagers!
On behalf of secondary architectures maintainers I have a small request
to you:
If your package uses Boost then next time you will make changes please
take a look at m4/ax_boost_base.m4 file.
There can be such piece of code there:
--
Good news, everyone! We (me and CC'd Vojtech Trefny) would like to
introduce you the next generation tool for storage management -- the
**blivet-gui** tool [1]_. It is a GUI tool based on the blivet python
library (originally Anaconda's storage management and configuration
tool) inspired by GParted
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 08:52:42AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 09/04/2014 09:01 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 05:50:42PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >>On 09/04/2014 05:37 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >>
> >>>Do we really need another systemd thread?
> >>
> >>Yes, because F
As per the Fedora 21 schedule [1], Fedora 21 Alpha Test Compose 6 (TC6)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5940#comment:9 .
Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs)
and testing
30 matches
Mail list logo
