This is a minor release. For notable changes please see the upstream
release notes at
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Projects/NSS/NSS_3.17_release_notes
Rawhide and the f21 branch have been updated. It should appear in updates
testing for the stable branches early next week.
El
Hi,
I've met an issue since last year, as many python2 packages generate
.so files finally with 775 set:
non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/xxx.so 0775L
Is it suppose to be the default?
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
dev
Regarding https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1263
Does this policy change affect updates to older releases still receiving
updates? Or only F21 and later?
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.or
Il 19/Ago/2014 17:10 "Tomas Hozza" ha scritto:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello.
>
> ISC is working on new BIND 9.10 release which includes the seccomp
> functionality. It can be turned on by configuring BIND before build with
> "--enable-seccomp".
>
> ISC asked me to
On 08/19/2014 11:20 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:12:31AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
>> Once upon a time, Tomas Hozza said:
>>> That's where seccomp kicks in, it acts as a 2nd wall of defence. In case
>>> of a security hole being present in the server process, it goes furthe
Yay, welcome Michael ;)
- Original Message -
> Hi all,
>
> Just a quick note to welcome our newest contributor, Michael Catanzaro.
> I've just sponsored him to the packager group.
>
> Michael is very active upstream in GNOME and does a lot of work on GNOME
> games suite. His first Fedora
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:18:29AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131423
> http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/menhir/
> menhir - an LR(1) parser generator
It turns out this package already exists in Fedora :-)
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualiza
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131377
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|st...@silug.or
user: pghmcfc set for pghmcfc acl: watchcommits of package:
perl-DateTime-Format-Mail from: Approved to: Approved on branch: el5
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-DateTime-Format-Mail
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki
user: pghmcfc changed point of contact of package: perl-DateTime-Format-Mail
from: orphan to: pghmcfc on branch: el5
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-DateTime-Format-Mail
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs
This is pretty much the same scenario as the last one I reported, namely
competing updates where the "wrong" update wins. Here's the blow by blow
account of what happened.
9 May 2014
mclasen submits update FEDORA-2014-6201 (
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-6201/vte3-0.34.9-2.f
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:12:31AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Tomas Hozza said:
> > That's where seccomp kicks in, it acts as a 2nd wall of defence. In case
> > of a security hole being present in the server process, it goes further
> > than a chroot, it prevents the attacker fr
On Tue 19 Aug 2014 05:12:31 PM CEST, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Tomas Hozza said:
>> That's where seccomp kicks in, it acts as a 2nd wall of defence. In case
>> of a security hole being present in the server process, it goes further
>> than a chroot, it prevents the attacker from makin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello.
ISC is working on new BIND 9.10 release which includes the seccomp
functionality. It can be turned on by configuring BIND before build with
"--enable-seccomp".
ISC asked me to kindly ask Fedora community if they would be willing to
test it. Cu
Once upon a time, Tomas Hozza said:
> That's where seccomp kicks in, it acts as a 2nd wall of defence. In case
> of a security hole being present in the server process, it goes further
> than a chroot, it prevents the attacker from making socket connections
> orexecuting his code, as his "playing
- Original Message -
> On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 10:07 -0400, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > That’s the right thing to do of course, but leaves the users with an
> > unusable system in the mean time. Could the update description at
> > least generally point to how to work around this if the certifi
On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 10:07 -0400, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> That’s the right thing to do of course, but leaves the users with an
> unusable system in the mean time. Could the update description at
> least generally point to how to work around this if the certificate
> owner is not (sufficiently qui
Dne 19.8.2014 15:01, Sandro Mani napsal(a):
>
> On 19.08.2014 15:01, Neal Becker wrote:
>> Something like github for fedora, where I can view/dl arbitrary
>> files? I'd like
>> to be able to view a spec file for any given package, without d/l the
>> whole
>> package.
>>
> Hi,
>
> Look here: http:/
On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 10:07 -0400, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > If you experience such situations, the right approach is to contact the
> > owner of the certificate (or the server), and ask them to get a
> > replacement certificate, or to install a replacement certificat
#fedora-meeting: Env and Stacks (2014-08-19)
Meeting started by hhorak at 13:05:26 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-08-19/env-and-stacks.2014-08-19-13
- Original Message -
> If you experience such situations, the right approach is to contact the
> owner of the certificate (or the server), and ask them to get a
> replacement certificate, or to install a replacement certificate on
> their SSL/TLS server.
That’s the right thing to do of cou
Compose started at Tue Aug 19 07:15:03 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[APLpy]
APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs
[PyKDE]
PyKDE-3.16.6-14.fc20.armv7hl requires sip-api(10) >= 0:10.0
[audtty]
audtty-0.1.12-9.fc
On 19.08.2014 15:01, Neal Becker wrote:
Something like github for fedora, where I can view/dl arbitrary files? I'd like
to be able to view a spec file for any given package, without d/l the whole
package.
Hi,
Look here: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.f
Something like github for fedora, where I can view/dl arbitrary files? I'd like
to be able to view a spec file for any given package, without d/l the whole
package.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Tue 19 Aug 2014 01:40:55 PM CEST, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 08/19/2014 04:14 AM, Tomas Hozza wrote:
>> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
>> FESCo meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
>> irc.freenod
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 07:37:13AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 7:29 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> > I get this when I try to install vim via yum on my f21 candidate cloud
> > image:
> >
> > Package perl-Term-ANSIColor-4.03-2.fc21.noarch.rpm is not signed
> >
> > Is this on anyone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/19/2014 04:14 AM, Tomas Hozza wrote:
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
> FESCo meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on
> irc.freenode.net.
>
> To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
> http://
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 7:29 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> I get this when I try to install vim via yum on my f21 candidate cloud image:
>
> Package perl-Term-ANSIColor-4.03-2.fc21.noarch.rpm is not signed
>
> Is this on anyones radar already?
http://rawhidewatch.wordpress.com/2014/07/29/fedora-21-pack
I get this when I try to install vim via yum on my f21 candidate cloud image:
Package perl-Term-ANSIColor-4.03-2.fc21.noarch.rpm is not signed
Is this on anyones radar already?
Dusty
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedo
13.06.2014 01:42, Adam Williamson пишет:
> On Tue, 2014-05-13 at 18:56 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> apitrace 5.0 bundles libbacktrace, which looks like is living within the
>> gcc sources. libbacktrace is not build as a shared library from the gcc
>> sources, and not packaged.
>>
>> Is
WG meeting will be at 13:00 UTC (14:00 London, 15:00 Brno, 9:00 Boston,
22:00 Tokyo) in #fedora-meeting on Freenode.
= Topic =
* Flock -- what we learnt, what needs to be done
* OpenFloor
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
F
Hi everyone,
I've just pushed update [0] to Python 2.7.8 in Rawhide
which backports Python3 SSL module into Python2, this
patch was created by upstream [1] and will be part of Python2
in the next release. This effort already discovered minor
issue in test_ssl.py [2] while scratch building.
Next s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131423
http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/menhir/
menhir - an LR(1) parser generator
It's a simple package, so will swap for something not over-complex.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my pr
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '-MM-DD 17:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets belo
34 matches
Mail list logo
