> Why? Rsnapshot and AMANDA are already available, stable, and quite robust.
> They seem to cover just the niches you're aiming at, and the performance and
> security ramifications have already been worked out. Plus, neither requires
> an SQL database, which makes them much more robust.
>
> It's
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> It seems to me like we have a lot of /usr/lib64 rpaths being added to
> binaries
> now that were not previously. Anyone know why?
Something libtool-related with arts/kdelibs3 stuff, but I think I
successfully fixed them today.
-- rex
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Jon wrote:
>>
>> Fedora's recent tendency to override the published file system hierarchy
>> specs, at whim, and replace them with symlinks is problematic, unnecessary,
>> and is breaking things. In this case, /media is defined in the upstream
>> specs as the l
On 08/13/2014 01:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 13:50:53 -0700
Samuel Sieb wrote:
I would recommend changing the wording as, at least to me, that
sounds like a closed list. There is no indication that someone could
actually send to the list if they were subscribed.
Well, I'm n
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 22:05:35 +0100
David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 14:56 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > Well, I'm not sure why this is suddenly confusing.
>
> Because I misunderstood and thought that the trans@ list might
> actually be somewhere that people should post to for
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:05:35PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Because I misunderstood and thought that the trans@ list might actually
> be somewhere that people should post to for one-off advice and
> assistance (or to point out broken links on the web page), without
> wanting to subscribe and
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:05:35PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 14:56 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > Well, I'm not sure why this is suddenly confusing.
>
> Because I misunderstood and thought that the trans@ list might actually
> be somewhere that people should post t
David Woodhouse wrote:
Because I misunderstood and thought that the trans@ list might actually
be somewhere that people should post to for one-off advice and
assistance (or to point out broken links on the web page), without
wanting to subscribe and take a daily interest in l10n matters.
While
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 14:56 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Well, I'm not sure why this is suddenly confusing.
Because I misunderstood and thought that the trans@ list might actually
be somewhere that people should post to for one-off advice and
assistance (or to point out broken links on the web
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 13:50:53 -0700
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 08/13/2014 12:50 PM, Andrew Schultz wrote:
> > David Woodhouse wrote:
> >> Mail sent to tr...@lists.fedoraproject.org, from the email address
> >> associated with my Fedora account, basically tell me to go away:
> >>
> >> "You are not
On 08/13/2014 12:50 PM, Andrew Schultz wrote:
David Woodhouse wrote:
Mail sent to tr...@lists.fedoraproject.org, from the email address
associated with my Fedora account, basically tell me to go away:
"You are not allowed to post to this mailing list, and your message
has been automati
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 15:50 -0400, Andrew Schultz wrote:
> David Woodhouse wrote:
> > Mail sent to tr...@lists.fedoraproject.org, from the email address
> > associated with my Fedora account, basically tell me to go away:
> >
> > "You are not allowed to post to this mailing list, and your messa
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 09:55:37PM +0200, Dhiru Kholia wrote:
> I noticed the same earlier and I am not sure how the stack protection
> works for assembly language files (it seems to be a super hard problem).
>
> Can some compiler / toolchain folks handle this question?
>
Long story short: assem
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014, Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Dhiru Kholia wrote:
> Now, I need your feedback and cool ideas to improve this project :-)
>
> I notice that several packages that I maintain that include assembly
> language files showed up in your results, even though th
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> Bleh, I just ran a script to generate it from git. I have no idea why it
> had an underbar in it previously, but the files themselves didn't
> change.
>
FYI, I have filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129865 under
the presum
David Woodhouse wrote:
Mail sent to tr...@lists.fedoraproject.org, from the email address
associated with my Fedora account, basically tell me to go away:
"You are not allowed to post to this mailing list, and your message
has been automatically rejected. If you think that your message
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Dhiru Kholia
wrote:
> Now, I need your feedback and cool ideas to improve this project :-)
>
I notice that several packages that I maintain that include assembly
language files showed up in your results, even though the C portions of
those packages are, in fact,
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2014-08-12)
===
Meeting started by mitr at 17:03:50 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-08-13/fesco.2014-08-13-17.03.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
Greetings!
Alpha Change Deadline slips one more week due to requested glibc/GCC mass
rebuild [1]. Alpha Change Deadline is now 2014-08-19.
For full schedule check out [2]. I'll update TJ schedule ASAP.
[1] https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5962
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/21
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:22:17AM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> iwl5000-firmware-8.83.5.1_1-38.fc21.1 iwl5000-firmware-8.83.5.1-39.fc22.1
> iwl5000-firmware-8.83.5.1_1-38.fc21.1 < iwl5000-firmware-8.83.5.1-39.fc22.1
>
> So that's an upgrade, right? But yum distro-sync disagrees:
> ...
> Downgradin
I'd like to add a new Fedora project for translation.
The instructions in the guide at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N/Guide#How_do_I_add_a_module_to_Transifex.3F_.28.23add-transifex.29
have a link to a page which doesn't exist.
Mail sent to tr...@lists.fedoraproject.org, from the email addre
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Fedora Rawhide Report <
rawh...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> linux-firmware-20140808-39.gitce64fa89.fc22.1
> -
> * Fri Aug 08 2014 Kyle McMartin
> 20140808-39.gitce64fa89.1
> - Update from upstream linux-firmware.
> - Nuk
>
> Fedora's recent tendency to override the published file system hierarchy
> specs, at whim, and replace them with symlinks is problematic, unnecessary,
> and is breaking things. In this case, /media is defined in the upstream specs
> as the location for removable media. Not /run/media. Not
>
- Original Message -
> I have a question about [1], the policy limiting what services may
> be started/enabled by default (when the RPM is installed).
>
> # If a service does not require configuration to be functional and
> # does not listen on a network socket, it may be enabled by de
Hi -
I have a question about [1], the policy limiting what services may
be started/enabled by default (when the RPM is installed).
# If a service does not require configuration to be functional and
# does not listen on a network socket, it may be enabled by default
# [...]
# All other s
> On Jul 28, 2014, at 16:18, Derek Pressnall wrote:
>
>
>
> I have a question about contributing a package to Fedora. Is it common for
> the author of an open source package to act as package maintainer? Or is it
> better to have someone else be the package maintainer (who is more
> expe
+Ruby-sig
bcc fedora-devel
> >
> > Hey, sorry for not getting some of these updated (you also didn't stay
> on #fedora-ruby long enough for me to respond). I find that updating many
> of these breaks API, because ruby library authors are really good at fixing
> security problems while introducing
> On Aug 5, 2014, at 3:28, Ahmad Samir wrote:
>
>> On 04/08/14 19:13, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
>> Can someone point me to discussion which ended in /media being symlink
>> to /run/media directory?
>>
>> I am now looking at Picasa rescanning 40GB of pictures just because
>> /media/storage/ dis
Compose started at Wed Aug 13 07:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[APLpy]
APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs
[GraphicsMagick]
GraphicsMagick-1.3.19-7.fc21.armv7hl requires libjbig.so.2.0
[NetworkManager-l2tp]
# F21 Blocker Review meeting #6
# Date: 2014-08-13
# Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
We've got another blocker meeting coming up this week. As of today
there are 6 proposed blockers and 1 proposed FE for F21 Alpha. The full
list can be
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 01:57:17PM +0200, Stefan Ringel wrote:
> >>because that a package is required (gstreamer1-rtsp-server version
> >>=>1.4.0) for build gnome-dvb-daemon version 0.2.90 . Have you other
> >>ideas?
> >if gstreamer1-rtsp-server is a new package, then it must follow the
> >process
Am 13.08.2014 um 13:51 schrieb Dan Horák:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 13:46:53 +0200
Stefan Ringel wrote:
Am 13.08.2014 um 13:42 schrieb Dan Horák:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 13:33:27 +0200
Stefan Ringel wrote:
Am 13.08.2014 um 10:43 schrieb Tomasz Torcz:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:36:18AM +0200, Stefa
On Wed 13 Aug 2014 01:46:53 PM CEST Stefan Ringel wrote:
> Am 13.08.2014 um 13:42 schrieb Dan Horák:
>> On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 13:33:27 +0200
>> Stefan Ringel wrote:
>>
>>> Am 13.08.2014 um 10:43 schrieb Tomasz Torcz:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:36:18AM +0200, Stefan Ringel wrote:
> Can anybo
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 13:46:53 +0200
Stefan Ringel wrote:
>
> Am 13.08.2014 um 13:42 schrieb Dan Horák:
> > On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 13:33:27 +0200
> > Stefan Ringel wrote:
> >
> >> Am 13.08.2014 um 10:43 schrieb Tomasz Torcz:
> >>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:36:18AM +0200, Stefan Ringel wrote:
>
Am 13.08.2014 um 13:42 schrieb Dan Horák:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 13:33:27 +0200
Stefan Ringel wrote:
Am 13.08.2014 um 10:43 schrieb Tomasz Torcz:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:36:18AM +0200, Stefan Ringel wrote:
Can anybody help me? I have:
ActionNotAllowed: policy violation (build_from_srpm)
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 13:33:27 +0200
Stefan Ringel wrote:
>
> Am 13.08.2014 um 10:43 schrieb Tomasz Torcz:
> > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:36:18AM +0200, Stefan Ringel wrote:
> >> Can anybody help me? I have:
> >>
> >> ActionNotAllowed: policy violation (build_from_srpm)
> > IIRC, only --scratch
Am 13.08.2014 um 10:43 schrieb Tomasz Torcz:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:36:18AM +0200, Stefan Ringel wrote:
Can anybody help me? I have:
ActionNotAllowed: policy violation (build_from_srpm)
IIRC, only --scratch build are allowed from SRPMs.
other problem:
koji -d add-pkg --owner=stefanri
Hello,
New minor version was released yesterday. All summed up on our blog:
http://dnf.baseurl.org/2014/08/12/dnf-0-6-0-released/
Cheers,
Ales
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 02:52:27PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
> for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
> unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested
> in maintaining their packages (and if so
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:36:18AM +0200, Stefan Ringel wrote:
> Can anybody help me? I have:
>
> ActionNotAllowed: policy violation (build_from_srpm)
IIRC, only --scratch build are allowed from SRPMs.
--
Tomasz Torcz "God, root, what's the difference?"
xmpp: zdzich...@chrome.p
Can anybody help me? I have:
ActionNotAllowed: policy violation (build_from_srpm)
Stefan Ringel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
41 matches
Mail list logo
