Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola (fas: deji)

2014-07-26 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 07/26/2014 11:17 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Sorry for the long delay here. ;( There was a issue with the pkgdb2 api > to do this, then I was traveling, etc. > > It's now been done. > > The following packages are looking for a new point of contact on at > least one branch: > > (Note that many

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola (fas: deji)

2014-07-26 Thread nonamedotc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 07/26/2014 12:17 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > atlas babl bibletime cln clucene exaile exempi galternatives gegl > gparted grads libctl libibverbs libmlx4 libmthca libqalculate > mpich mpich2 nautilus-actions ncview netcdf o3read qalculate-gtk > qal

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola (fas: deji)

2014-07-26 Thread Igor Gnatenko
On Fri, 2014-06-20 at 00:15 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > Hi, Hi, > Given that Deji Akingunola is maintainer of a couple of high-profile > packages, I'd like to double-check whether really no-one knows how to > reach him. The packages he is maintainer for are: > > atlas > babl > bibletime > cln >

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola (fas: deji)

2014-07-26 Thread Sandro Mani
On 26.07.2014 19:17, Kevin Fenzi wrote Sorry for the long delay here. ;( There was a issue with the pkgdb2 api to do this, then I was traveling, etc. It's now been done. The following packages are looking for a new point of contact on at least one branch: (Note that many of them have co-maint

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola (fas: deji)

2014-07-26 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 09:01:33 -0600 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 22:03:30 +0800 > Christopher Meng wrote: > > > My opinion is, you should only comaintain what you want, not take > > over other's packages. > > > > If FESCo member could give consent of adding someone as an admin(not >

Trouble retiring package on F21 branch

2014-07-26 Thread Gerard Ryan
Hi, We're trying to retire package eclipse-wtp-common on F21 and Rawhide. My understanding is that this should be done F21 first, then Rawhide. F21 has proven problematic so far. Bug is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117475 History: 1. Package eclipse-wtp-common is obsoleted

F-21 Branched report: 20140726 changes

2014-07-26 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Sat Jul 26 07:15:02 UTC 2014 Broken deps for armhfp -- [APLpy] APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs [PyKDE] PyKDE-3.16.6-14.fc20.armv7hl requires sip-api(10) >= 0:10.0 [audtty] audtty-0.1.12-9.fc

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Orphaning packages

2014-07-26 Thread Arjun AK
On Tuesday 22 Jul 2014 10:53:10 AM Susi Lehtola wrote: > Hi, > > > due to relocation to another continent and starting a new job, I have > to refocus my reduced time for Fedora on packages that I actively use. > So, I'm orphaning the following packages: > > > dopewars > efte > firehol > gdpc