On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 15:36:41 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 15:34 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
so, yeah, bit of a mess. You can probably get onto the 0.81.0-5 packages
manually with a bit of judicious --nodeps use or 'yum shell' use, but
it'd be best if the packages
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 16:00 -0700, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> I'm ready to start my application testing on a Fedora 21 virtual
> machine. What's the quickest way for me to get one built? Is there a
> 'net install' ISO file somewhere I can use?
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/dev
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 09:05:29AM +0930, William wrote:
>
> Thank you both for your response. It's appreciated.
>
> > >
> > > * Files in systemd's sysusers configuration directory will be used as a
> > > data source to create /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow.
> >
> > Also, /etc/group and /etc/gsha
We're currently working on a number of things to improve input devices in
libinput - the future input stack for wayland developers. What we need
is data to base our assumptions on, so I'm hereby asking the list to provide
some.
If you don't have a touchpad, please disregard this email.
If you're o
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 08:35 -0700, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014, at 05:42 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >
> > > Two examples from the top of my head:
> > > * Some tftpd implementations use it as the base path (and chroot into it)
> > > * Some anonymous ftpd implementation have s
Thank you both for your response. It's appreciated.
> >
> > * Files in systemd's sysusers configuration directory will be used as a
> > data source to create /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow.
>
> Also, /etc/group and /etc/gshadow.
>
> > Under what conditions are these two files created / touched?
I'm ready to start my application testing on a Fedora 21 virtual
machine. What's the quickest way for me to get one built? Is there a
'net install' ISO file somewhere I can use?
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:38 AM, poma wrote:
> On 10.07.2014 18:31, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGN
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 15:34 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> so, yeah, bit of a mess. You can probably get onto the 0.81.0-5 packages
> manually with a bit of judicious --nodeps use or 'yum shell' use, but
> it'd be best if the packages were fixed up, and I figured I'd let folks
> know about the pr
I just thought it'd be good to alert Fedora 21 and 22 users to this
issue.
Some major changes were introduced to the 'ceph' package in the 0.81.0-3
build, and maintained in the 0.81.0-4 build. These builds were done for
all current releases, but not submitted as updates to any stable
release, so l
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 12:35 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 10:19:52PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > ddclient seems to have been retired apparently as a part of this
>
> > process, going by the commit:
> >
> > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ddclient.git/commit/?id=f74143
I've a system that's zeroing out .bash_history at every reboot. Is this
happening to everyone? Intended?
--
"The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant
words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation)
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!
Felix Miata
On 10.07.2014 18:31, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/10/2014 11:45 AM, poma wrote:
On 10.07.2014 13:11, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
One thing I discovered last night. There's a bug with the new
fedora-release packages and yum/dnf are kind of arbitrari
On Thu, 10.07.14 12:44, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 17:18 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > We /do/ plan on the syncing anyway, because some admins are
> > still used to vipw their passwd databases and there are legacy scripts
> > around, but still -- could we, when t
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 12:44:29PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 17:18 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > We /do/ plan on the syncing anyway, because some admins are
> > still used to vipw their passwd databases and there are legacy scripts
> > around, but still -- could we, when th
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 17:18 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> We /do/ plan on the syncing anyway, because some admins are
> still used to vipw their passwd databases and there are legacy scripts
> around, but still -- could we, when the SSSD interface is available,
> call out from systemd-sysusers to t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/10/2014 12:45 PM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> On 07/10/2014 04:34 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> Basically, in order to swap out the productized and
>> non-productized release packages, it's not actually as simple as
>> 'yum swap fedora-release-stan
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:25:48 -0600,
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
We will get mash fixed today and tomorrow rawhide should return to
normal.
Thanks for taking care of this and the updates/updates-testing repos.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
On 07/10/2014 04:34 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Basically, in order to swap out the productized and non-productized
> release packages, it's not actually as simple as 'yum swap
> fedora-release-standard fedora-release-server'. The way the dependency
> processing works in yum and dnf will general
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/10/2014 11:45 AM, poma wrote:
> On 10.07.2014 13:11, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>> One thing I discovered last night. There's a bug with the new
>> fedora-release packages and yum/dnf are kind of arbitrarily
>> picking from fedora-release-[stan
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 10:03:05 -0500
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> Are we going to have empty updates and updates-testing repos for
> branched this time around? This affects the spin-kickstarts package
> (and possibly the release packages) as normally we want updates
> enabled, but if there isn't going
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 11:18:23 -0500
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> Another thing that seems odd today is that no rpms in this morning's
> rawhide repo have fc22 in their names. I would have expected this
> morning's build to have started enough after branching to pick up at
> least a few fc22 builds.
Another thing that seems odd today is that no rpms in this morning's
rawhide repo have fc22 in their names. I would have expected this
morning's build to have started enough after branching to pick up at least
a few fc22 builds.
I'll be more worried if this persists in tomorrow's rawhide, but
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Fedora Rawhide Report
wrote:
> sssd-1.12.0-1.fc21
> --
> * Wed Jul 09 2014 Jakub Hrozek - 1.12.0-1
> - New upstream release 1.12.0
> - https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/Releases/Notes-1.12.0
The previous version was 1.12.0-4.fc21.beta2.
$ rpmdev
On 10.07.2014 13:11, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
One thing I discovered last night. There's a bug with the new
fedora-release packages and yum/dnf are kind of arbitrarily picking
from fedora-release-[standard|cloud|server|workstation] to install if
you just update. (This is in large part because th
On 07/10/2014 05:22 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 07:04:21AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>> http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/server-wg/server-wg.2014-02-25-16.00.html
>> That's why I said the *specific* netinstall he was asking for. The
>> Fedora Server netinstall w
I'd be game
Corey W Sheldon
Owner, 1st Class Mobile Shine
310.909.7672
www.facebook.com/1stclassmobileshine
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Brendan Jones
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> does anyone have any objection to a new comps group containing packages
> currently present in the Fedora Jam audio
Hi all,
does anyone have any objection to a new comps group containing packages
currently present in the Fedora Jam audio spin?
We will be discussing names further within the music creation SIG /
fedora-music mailing list soon, but Audio Production or Music Creation
are two that immediately
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014, at 05:42 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> > Two examples from the top of my head:
> > * Some tftpd implementations use it as the base path (and chroot into it)
> > * Some anonymous ftpd implementation have similar use (chroot into ~ftp)
But these aren't really usable with
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 07:04:21AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/server-wg/server-wg.2014-02-25-16.00.html
> That's why I said the *specific* netinstall he was asking for. The
> Fedora Server netinstall wouldn't be producing a non-productized
> result, w
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 10:30:27AM -0400, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > Hi, for Atomic I'd like to investigate the new systemd-sysusers, so I
> > wrote up a Change:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SystemdSysusers
>
> A move to something more declarative m
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 23:37:39 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
sudo yum-config-manager --enable fedora
and, optionally, enable updates-testing:
sudo yum-config-manager --enable updates-testing
The updates-testing repo isn't there yet. I am hoping we get empty
repos created for both update
Are we going to have empty updates and updates-testing repos for branched
this time around? This affects the spin-kickstarts package (and possibly
the release packages) as normally we want updates enabled, but if there
isn't going to be an updates repo for a while, then we'll need to
disable it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/10/2014 09:53 AM, Mike Pinkerton wrote:
>
> On 10 Jul 2014, at 07:04, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 07/09/2014 05:08 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 04:42:23PM -0400,
Hi,
I intend to upgrade OpenSceneGraph to 3.2.1 (Jul 4th) on rawhide.
This change will introduce SONAME bumps in OpenSceneGraph-provided
libraries and thus is likely to introduce broken package dependencies.
I intend to take care about these and to launch rebuilds where necessary.
Depending
On 10 Jul 2014, at 07:04, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/09/2014 05:08 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 04:42:23PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
I do not know which or if any Spins will be providing the
specific net install CD
On Qui, 2014-07-10 at 15:18 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 10.07.2014 15:15, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> > On Sex, 2014-07-04 at 12:12 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> Am 04.07.2014 12:02, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> >>> http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/fedora/kde.repo
> >>> have 3 repos is
Agenda:
- Introduction of Benedikt Morbach, intern working on buildreq
reduction (and potential other stuff if time permits ;))
- Talk with Michal Sekletar as candidate for WG
- Vaclav Pavlin presenting minimal Docker image for Fedora (133MB)
- Open floor
Thanks & regards, Phil
--
Philipp
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:31 PM, James Antill wrote:
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
> meeting Thursday at 2014-07-10 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
> irc.freenode.net.
>
>
> For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The
> report of t
Am 10.07.2014 15:15, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> On Sex, 2014-07-04 at 12:12 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 04.07.2014 12:02, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
>>> http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/fedora/kde.repo
>>> have 3 repos is to use kde stable ? this will equal to future Fedora
>>> 20 , with k
On Sex, 2014-07-04 at 12:12 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 04.07.2014 12:02, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> > http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/fedora/kde.repo
> > have 3 repos is to use kde stable ? this will equal to future Fedora
> > 20 , with kde 13 , many years ago I try use kde-redhat and
On Thu, 10.07.14 17:16, William (will...@firstyear.id.au) wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 08:17 +0300, Oron Peled wrote:
> > A non-API related question...
>
> >
> > Generally, I prefer the explicit systemd settings over home directory
> > with "magical" effects, but I wonder if anyone is aware of
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:00:12AM +0200, Phil Knirsch wrote:
> Ups, seems i'm living in the future already. :)
>
> Meeting is of course on Friday, not Thursday, so hope to see you
> there tomorrow!
Sure, will be there.
>
> Thanks & regards, Phil
Michal
>
> On 07/09/2014 05:23 PM, Phil Knir
Am 10.07.2014 14:30, schrieb Rex Dieter:
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> Am 08.07.2014 21:38, schrieb Rex Dieter:
>>> Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
until now https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=542357
for whatever reason did it not make to bodhi -
>>>
>>> it was submitted early
On Thu, 10.07.14 08:17, Oron Peled (o...@actcom.co.il) wrote:
>
>
> A non-API related question...
>
> On Thursday 10 July 2014 01:49:41 Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > Please understand that we are not duplicating "adduser" here. Already in
> > the name of the tool we wanted to make clear thtat t
Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 08.07.2014 21:38, schrieb Rex Dieter:
>> Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>> until now https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=542357
>>> for whatever reason did it not make to bodhi -
>>
>> it was submitted early today,
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/10/2014 02:37 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hey folks! As we just hit a branch point, here's a refresher on
> what this means for folks who've been running Rawhide.
>
> If you want to keep running Rawhide, which will now contain
> packages tracke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/09/2014 05:08 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 04:42:23PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> I do not know which or if any Spins will be providing the
>> specific net install CD you're asking about. This will not be an
>> *offi
Compose started at Thu Jul 10 07:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[APLpy]
APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs
[PyKDE]
PyKDE-3.16.6-14.fc20.armv7hl requires sip-api(10) >= 0:10.0
[audtty]
audtty-0.1.12-9.fc
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 10:19:52PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> ddclient seems to have been retired apparently as a part of this
> process, going by the commit:
>
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/ddclient.git/commit/?id=f741436ca38fd6c36ffbfbb26b3131b278657faa
>
> but it wasn't listed in
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014, at 12:46 AM, William wrote:
> Under what conditions are these two files created / touched?
When systemd-sysusers is run.
> When I install a package and add a file to this sysuser directory, is
> only that user added to passwd and shadow?
The answer to this is pretty simp
So anyone that is using it to build their own packages, if you could check it
in the next three weeks.
David
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Ups, seems i'm living in the future already. :)
Meeting is of course on Friday, not Thursday, so hope to see you there
tomorrow!
Thanks & regards, Phil
On 07/09/2014 05:23 PM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
That sounds great Michal. If you could join us tomorrow at our meeting
at 15:00 UTC on #fedora-m
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 08:17 +0300, Oron Peled wrote:
> A non-API related question...
>
> Generally, I prefer the explicit systemd settings over home directory
> with "magical" effects, but I wonder if anyone is aware of existing
> system users which carry more complex semantics.
Perhaps look at
Am 10.07.2014 09:37, schrieb Al Dunsmuir:
> On Wednesday, July 9, 2014, 1:24:12 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 09.07.2014 19:18, schrieb Chris Adams:
>>> Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering said:
>>> Please, no! As soon as you use disparate systems in a network
>>> environment, having differin
On Wednesday, July 9, 2014, 1:24:12 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 09.07.2014 19:18, schrieb Chris Adams:
>> Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering said:
>> Please, no! As soon as you use disparate systems in a network
>> environment, having differing versions of UID_MIN (where recompilation
>> is r
55 matches
Mail list logo
