On Sun, 2014-07-06 at 13:48 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 06.07.2014 13:41, schrieb Sandro Mani:
> > On 06.07.2014 13:38, drago01 wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 04:26:07PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> >>>
> * A script automati
On 07/07/2014 12:03 PM, Thomas Woerner wrote:
> On 07/07/2014 02:55 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> Thomas, the real question here is this: If a package wants to install
>> (and maintain) its own set of firewalld service definitions, is the
>> approach Stef took the best one? If so, we should submi
Hey everyone! Thinking of running for FESCo but haven't made up your mind?
Now is the time -- the nomination period closes at 23:59:59 UTC today. (That
is, _very soon_.)
See https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2014-July/003219.html
for details, and add your nomination here:
https:/
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 03:35:16PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Just as a quick aside, I'd like to note that what you've all just
> witnessed is a perfect example of Open Source working exactly as it
> should. A mistake was made and another eagle-eyed contributor spotted
> it immediately.
>
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 15:25:52 -0400 (EDT)
Tomas Hozza wrote:
> Hi Jaromir was an intern at Red Hat and finished today.
> I think it is OK if you remove his acls right away.
ok. I assume then he doesn't want to continue to maintain those
packages?
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/06/2014 07:41 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> On 06.07.2014 13:38, drago01 wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Till Maas
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 04:26:07PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
>>>
* A script automating most of the pro
- Original Message -
> Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
> for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
> unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested
> in maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their email
>
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Artifex Maximus wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Till Maas wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 04:26:07PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
>>
>> > * A script automating most of the process of validating and processing the
>> > request can be found at
>> >
>> > h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116601
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from Fedo
On 07.07.2014 20:58, Artifex Maximus wrote:
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Till Maas wrote:
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 04:26:07PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
* A script automating most of the process of validating and processing the
request can be found at
https://github.com/manisandro/fedora
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Till Maas wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 04:26:07PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
>
> > * A script automating most of the process of validating and processing the
> > request can be found at
> >
> > https://github.com/manisandro/fedora-process-simple-patch/blob/mas
Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested
in maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their email
addresses in FAS). If they're not int
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/07/2014 01:03 PM, Thomas Woerner wrote:
> On 07/07/2014 02:55 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On 07/04/2014
> 07:36 AM, Thomas Woerner wrote:
On 07/03/2014 09:32 PM, Stef Walter wrote:
> On 03.07.2014 15:39, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> I'm loo
On 07/07/2014 02:55 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/04/2014 07:36 AM, Thomas Woerner wrote:
On 07/03/2014 09:32 PM, Stef Walter wrote:
On 03.07.2014 15:39, Rex Dieter wrote:
I'm looking into providing a predefined firewalld service
definition f
On Mon, 07.07.14 17:07, Pavel Raiskup (prais...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Monday 07 of July 2014 15:57:30 Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Mon, 07.07.14 14:48, Pavel Raiskup (prais...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > > I'd always advise against inventing addition configuration files that
> > > > are neither
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
7 packages were orphaned
eclipse-p2-discovery [f19, f20] was orphaned by kdaniel
Equinox p2 discovery
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/eclipse-p2-discov
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/06/2014 03:43 AM, William wrote:
>> On Thu, 2014-07-03 at 10:05 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Stephen Gallagher
>>> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> There is a reference to a "clustering" group inside the "servers"
> category in comps-f21.xml.in, but no definition of "clustering"
> anywhere that I can see. Also:
>
> [comps]$ make validate
> ...
> comps-f21.xml:46: element packagereq: Relax
On Monday 07 of July 2014 15:57:30 Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 07.07.14 14:48, Pavel Raiskup (prais...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > I'd always advise against inventing addition configuration files that
> > > are neither the daemons own, nor systemd's.
> >
> > I hope we can call this as a system
On even weeks WG meeting will be at 12:00 UTC, 14:00 Central Europe,
8:00 (noon) Boston, 5:00 San Francisco, 21:00 Tokyo in #fedora-meeting
on Freenode.
= Topics =
* new members, two free seats
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks
* Docker plans
* Tasklist
* https://fedoraproject.o
On Mon, 07.07.14 14:48, Pavel Raiskup (prais...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> On Friday 04 of July 2014 00:09:03 Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Mon, 23.06.14 16:23, Pavel Raiskup (prais...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > $ cat /etc/postgresql/postgresql@com_example
> > > PGDATA=/some/path/pg/com_example
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 10:32:25AM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Jul 2014 18:01:00 +0200, David Howells wrote:
> > I'm seeing this message:
> >
> > extracting debug info from
> > /home/dhowells/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/cross-gcc-4.9.0-2.fc21.x86_64/usr/lib/gcc/hppa-linux-gnu/4.9.0/libcloog-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116612
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|mmasl...@redha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/06/2014 03:43 AM, William wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-07-03 at 10:05 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Stephen Gallagher
>> wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On 07/03/2014 01:42 AM, William wro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/03/2014 05:47 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:14:52PM +0200, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
>>> In a sense, there's a certain amount of this definition that
>>> every Fedora install will have. The Products then add to this
>>>
On 07/01/2014 11:31 AM, Marcela Maslanova wrote:
Env and Stacks Working Group has noble plan to make development in
Fedora easier and also work with new technologies, which are not in
Fedora yet.
The whole statement can be found here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks/Product_Require
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/04/2014 07:36 AM, Thomas Woerner wrote:
> On 07/03/2014 09:32 PM, Stef Walter wrote:
>> On 03.07.2014 15:39, Rex Dieter wrote:
>>> I'm looking into providing a predefined firewalld service
>>> definition for kde-connect, per
>>> https://bugzilla
Dne 27.6.2014 18:34, Juan Orti Alcaine napsal(a):
El Sábado, 28 de junio de 2014 00:31:26 Christopher Meng escribió:
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
He is or was a Red Hat employee.
No.
Please use this email address:
(...)
Thank you.
Hi Juan,
Have you tried to c
On Friday 04 of July 2014 00:09:03 Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 23.06.14 16:23, Pavel Raiskup (prais...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > $ cat /etc/postgresql/postgresql@com_example
> > PGDATA=/some/path/pg/com_example
> > PGPORT=@SOMEPORT@
> > $ systemctl start postgresql@com_example
> >
> >
Hi everyone!
It's time to summarize where we are with Fedora 21 release as we're now
really close to all that release fun. Tomorrow, on 2014-07-08 we will
branch Fedora 21 from rawhide, according to the schedule [1].
* If there is anything blocking you/your product or if there's potential
risk of
Hi Kevin,
> Not impossible, but we would probibly want it running inside Fedora
> Infrastructure and need to be careful security wise.
That is also a part of our design.
Kind regards,
-- Jan Pacner
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis
On Fri, 04 Jul 2014 18:01:00 +0200, David Howells wrote:
> I'm seeing this message:
>
> extracting debug info from
> /home/dhowells/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/cross-gcc-4.9.0-2.fc21.x86_64/usr/lib/gcc/hppa-linux-gnu/4.9.0/libcloog-isl.so.4
> /usr/lib/rpm/debugedit: -b arg has to be either the same length
Dne 1.7.2014 19:17, Rex Dieter napsal(a):
KDE SIG has been discussing moving forward with another kde x.y+1 update for
Fedora 20, largely due to it's extended lifetime (and f21's delayed
release), extending the same rationale per
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/Update_policy
There have be
33 matches
Mail list logo
