On 06/28/2014 10:56 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
So, sure, we could sign drpms and yum/dnf could check that, but they
still need to assemble the final rpm in order to pass it to rpm.
The questi
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>> So, sure, we could sign drpms and yum/dnf could check that, but they
>> still need to assemble the final rpm in order to pass it to rpm.
>>
>
> The question, to my understanding, whic
On Fri, 2014-06-27 at 18:38 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi,
> Rpm 4.12 alpha just got released:
> http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-announce/2014-June/45.html
Wow. Cool!
> The plan is to update rawhide to this shiny new version first thing on
> Monday morning and babysit as nee
Hi
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 12:45 PM, DAVID Clément wrote:
> Hi,
>
> AFAIK Fedora packages should not use weak dependencies (Recommends and so
> on). What's the recommended usage of them ?
>
> Is there any plan to update Packaging Guidelines on this topic ?
>
> For instance: for scilab I split sc
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> So, sure, we could sign drpms and yum/dnf could check that, but they
> still need to assemble the final rpm in order to pass it to rpm.
>
The question, to my understanding, which may be wrong, is whether the
contents of the assembled rpm nee
Hi,
AFAIK Fedora packages should not use weak dependencies (Recommends and so
on). What's the recommended usage of them ?
Is there any plan to update Packaging Guidelines on this topic ?
For instance: for scilab I split scilab binary and help to reduce the size
of the main package. The help pac
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 01:12:21PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Upstream have unbundled labltk (Tk, *not* Gtk, user interface) and
> > camlp4, so those will now need to be packaged as separate SRPMs. I
> > might not bother with labltk.
On Sat, 28 Jun 2014 12:51:07 +0200
drago01 wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Florian Weimer
...snip...
> > The signature is on the RPM header, not the payload. The RPM
> > header only lists digests of individual files (after decompression).
> >
> > So this shouldn't make a difference
Hi folks,
I'm looking to swap reviews for brd, a tool that scans directories and
files for damage due to decay of storage medium:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112434
Any takers?
Regards,
Jeff
--
Jeff Backus
jeff.bac...@gmail.com
http://github.com/jsbackus
--
devel mailing li
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 06/27/2014 07:13 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:11:53 +0200
>> drago01 wrote:
>>
>>> That wasn't about "poor" as in slow vs. "great" as in fast but
>>> bandwith capped vs. not.
>>>
>>> If building deltas are slow th
stardict-3.0.5-1 license revised from 'GPLv3' to 'GPLv3+ and GPLv2+ and CPL'
-robin
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 06/27/2014 07:13 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:11:53 +0200
drago01 wrote:
That wasn't about "poor" as in slow vs. "great" as in fast but
bandwith capped vs. not.
If building deltas are slow the solution is not to disable them but to
find out why there are slow and fix that.
Yes, it fixes my issue, thank you
2014-06-28 2:06 GMT+02:00 Andrew Price :
> On 27/06/14 23:58, Sergio Pascual wrote:
>
>> Hello, I have updated two laptops runing F20 today. After the update, on
>> both of them (Asus and Dell) the trackpad has turned very slow, and
>> unaffected of any change
13 matches
Mail list logo
