On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 23:54:10 +0200
Till Maas wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:36:28PM -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
>
> > Please do not start deleting ppc32-only packages.
> >
> > A few of us would like to resurrect ppc32, likely initially
> > as a Fedora Remix. Deleting ppc32-only pa
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 09:42:02PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Till Maas wrote:
>
> > gdome2 sundaram
> >
>
> I have retired this already. What more should I do?
You need to retire it in pkgdb. Btw. the retiring reason cou
Hi
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> gdome2 sundaram
>
I have retired this already. What more should I do?
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http
On Monday, June 2, 2014, 5:54:10 PM, Till Mass wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:36:28PM -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
>> Please do not start deleting ppc32-only packages.
>>
>> A few of us would like to resurrect ppc32, likely initially as a
>> Fedora Remix. Deleting ppc32-only packages
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 10:39:56PM +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> # repoquery --whatrequires liblcms.so.1 --source
> cinepaint-1.4-5.fc20.src.rpm
> cmyktool-0.1.6-0.6.pre1.fc20.src.rpm
> DevIL-1.7.8-16.fc20.src.rpm
> entangle-0.5.3-2.fc20.src.rpm
> f-spot-0.8.2-11.fc20.src.rpm
> geeqie-1.1-13.fc2
On Monday, June 2, 2014, 5:15:18 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 16:52 -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
>> On Monday, June 2, 2014, 10:05:22 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> > On Sat, 2014-05-31 at 10:33 -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
>> >> Is the mga450 supported? Aside from formal graphics test
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 12:56:58PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 11:24:09AM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> >
> > The following packages did not build for two releases (no new build
> > since 2013-07-25) and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched,
>
> I might have used the wr
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:36:28PM -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
> Please do not start deleting ppc32-only packages.
>
> A few of us would like to resurrect ppc32, likely initially as a
> Fedora Remix. Deleting ppc32-only packages just adds more work
> to that effort.
ok, but I guess t
On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 22:39:56 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> geeqie-1.1-13.fc20.src.rpm
In Rawhide it has been built with a patch and LCMS2 for some time.
For F20, there's something in updates-testing already, too.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.or
Remi Collet wrote:
>Le 01/06/2014 00:30, Björn Persson a écrit :
>> Remi Collet wrote:
>>> Because of lack of interest, I plan to orphan the following
>>> packages (Fedora + EPEL)
>>>
>>> mysql++ (3.1.0 in rawhide, 3.2.1 available)
>>
>> I have systems in stable production mode that use MySQ
On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 16:52 -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
> On Monday, June 2, 2014, 10:05:22 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > On Sat, 2014-05-31 at 10:33 -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
> >> Is the mga450 supported? Aside from formal graphics test days, I can
> >> run whatever tests required on x86 (both 32-bi
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 10:39:56PM +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> python-pillow-2.2.1-4.fc20.src.rpm
>
This one can be fixed by upgrading to 2.3.0 (or greater. 2.4.0 is current).
2.4.0 is what's in rawhide. Not sure if that's safe to push back to f20 and
earlier. (Although I see that there's an
On Monday, June 2, 2014, 10:05:22 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-05-31 at 10:33 -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
>> Is the mga450 supported? Aside from formal graphics test days, I can
>> run whatever tests required on x86 (both 32-bit and 64-bit).
> Define "supported". I believe for PowerPC i
Hello,
I'm orphaning lcms, this package has seen few security issue and upstream
claim it's deprecated over lcms2
rhel 7 doesn't depends on it for the few package, so it might be an option
not to build lcms support for certain package
# repoquery --whatrequires liblcms.so.1 --source
DevIL-1.7.
On Monday, June 2, 2014, 2:53:33 PM, Till Mass wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:01:53AM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
>> On Sun, 1 Jun 2014 11:24:09 +0200
>> Till Maas wrote:
>> > yaboot dwmw2, dwmw2, fkocina,
>>
>> this is a secondary arch only package since F-12, so it s
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:01:53AM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Jun 2014 11:24:09 +0200
> Till Maas wrote:
> > yaboot dwmw2, dwmw2, fkocina,
>
> this is a secondary arch only package since F-12, so it should be
> excluded from the FTBFS list in primary koji
Actu
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:01:53AM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> > yaboot dwmw2, dwmw2, fkocina,
>
> this is a secondary arch only package since F-12, so it should be
> excluded from the FTBFS list in primary koji
This needs special attention from Dennis:
https://fedorahost
29.05.2014 17:43, Till Maas wrote:
> Since the mass rebuild will start in a week (2014-06-06) it is a good
> time to start cleaning up Fedora. After the mass rebuild, packages that
> fail to build for two releases will be be added to this list. Since this
> is the first run after adapting the scrip
02.06.2014 12:15, Remi Collet пишет:
> Le 28/05/2014 18:32, Pavel Alexeev a écrit :
>>> mysql-connector-python (1.1.6 in rawhide, 1.2.1 recently released)
> Orphaned.
>
>>> mysql-utilities (1.3.6 in rawhide, 1.4.3 recently released)
> Orphaned
>> Looks interesting. If it is Mariadb compatible I cou
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> After looking at the link you provided, it's easy to see that we must
> have Android SDK packaged which is non-free IMO.
It's plausible that Qt5 could be buildable against Replicant, though.
--Andy
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fed
2014-05-29 22:28 GMT+02:00 Tim St Clair :
> I've been seeing this bug crop up in many circles:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099282
>
At a first glance this seems like a bug in llvm-config, nothing obviously
related to “default” cflags.
http://llvm.org/docs/CommandGuide/llvm-con
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
13 packages were orphaned
-
amtu [master] was orphaned by sgrubb
Abstract Machine Test Utility (AMTU)
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/amtu
docker [maste
On Sat, 2014-05-31 at 10:33 -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
> Is the mga450 supported? Aside from formal graphics test days, I can
> run whatever tests required on x86 (both 32-bit and 64-bit).
Define "supported". I believe for PowerPC in RHEL we build the matroxfb
driver for this card, so that plus
On 2 June 2014 11:23, Daiki Ueno wrote:
> I see. So, just applied a patch to turn the missing-header errors into
> warnings (should be available as 0.19-2).
Works great, thanks!
Richard.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Richard Hughes writes:
> I think quite a lot of software will fail to rebuild (mostly stuff
> using rosetta) with this change in the pending F21 mass rebuild.
>
>> (But, oh, msgfmt seems to mistreat the warning here. Sorry about that
>> and will fix it ASAP.)
>
> I think a warning is fine, an er
On 2 June 2014 10:02, Daiki Ueno wrote:
> However, the non-warning errors have been there for a long time. Isn't
> it time to fix them? If this is really too strict, we can revert this
> in the next minor release and advise users until the next major release.
I think quite a lot of software wil
Richard Hughes writes:
> po/gscan2pdf-ab.po:7: header field 'Last-Translator' still has the
> initial default value
> po/gscan2pdf-ab.po:7: warning: header field 'Language' missing in header
> msgfmt: found 2 fatal errors
>
> This builds fine in F20. I think a newer gettext may be being more
> st
On Sun, 1 Jun 2014 11:24:09 +0200
Till Maas wrote:
>
> The following packages did not build for two releases (no new build
> since 2013-07-25) and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched,
> unless someone successfully builds them till then. If you know for
> sure that the package should b
I'm trying to build a new upstream release of gscan2pdf -- but a lot
of other upstream software also looks affected, this is the build
failure:
/usr/bin/perl -MExtUtils::Command -e 'mkpath' --
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/gscan2pdf-1.2.5-1.fc21.noarch/usr/share/locale/ab/LC_MESSAGES
msgfmt -c po/gsca
Le 28/05/2014 18:32, Pavel Alexeev a écrit :
>> mysql-connector-python (1.1.6 in rawhide, 1.2.1 recently released)
Orphaned.
>> mysql-utilities (1.3.6 in rawhide, 1.4.3 recently released)
Orphaned
> Looks interesting. If it is Mariadb compatible I could take it.
Yes most commands works with M
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 01/06/2014 00:30, Björn Persson a écrit :
> Remi Collet wrote:
>> Because of lack of interest, I plan to orphan the following
>> packages (Fedora + EPEL)
>>
>> mysql++ (3.1.0 in rawhide, 3.2.1 available)
>
> I have systems in stable production mo
After looking at the link you provided, it's easy to see that we must
have Android SDK packaged which is non-free IMO.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 05/31/2014 11:17 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
How can this be fixed in default firewalld config so that Fedora 21 has
nfs with correct ports?
There's open BZ for this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975060
--
Jiri
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http
33 matches
Mail list logo
