Il 22/05/2014 06:55, Mikolaj Izdebski ha scritto:
On 05/21/2014 08:06 PM, Robert Rati wrote:
So, who needed log4j2? It is massively incompatible with log4j1.2 and
isn't a simple port job. I would argue if log4j2 was actually needed,
it should have been introduced as a separate log4j2 package a
On 05/21/2014 08:06 PM, Robert Rati wrote:
> So, who needed log4j2? It is massively incompatible with log4j1.2 and
> isn't a simple port job. I would argue if log4j2 was actually needed,
> it should have been introduced as a separate log4j2 package and allow
> projects to port to it as they have
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2014-05-22 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2014-05-22 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT
2014-05-22 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT
2014-05-22 1
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> Rawhide has xz-compressed kernel modules. I think this is a good
> thing as it saves a lot of disk space in VMs.
>
> It did however necessitate a change in supermin (used by libguestfs).
> Upstream already supported xz-compressed modu
Rawhide has xz-compressed kernel modules. I think this is a good
thing as it saves a lot of disk space in VMs.
It did however necessitate a change in supermin (used by libguestfs).
Upstream already supported xz-compressed modules -- the patch was
contributed by Arch Linux which has been using th
- Original Message -
> From: "Robert Rati"
> To: "Aleksandar Kurtakov" , "Development discussions
> related to Fedora"
>
> Cc: "Fedora Big Data SIG" , "Fedora Java
> Development List"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 9:06:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [fedora-java] Hadoop + log4j2 = fullstop
>
So, who needed log4j2? It is massively incompatible with log4j1.2 and
isn't a simple port job. I would argue if log4j2 was actually needed,
it should have been introduced as a separate log4j2 package and allow
projects to port to it as they have time/need. This update log4j to an
incompatibl
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
- Original Message -
> From: "Robert Rati"
> To: "Fedora Big Data SIG" , "Development
> discussions related to Fedora"
> , "Fedora Java Development List"
>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 7:03:42 PM
> Subject: Hadoop + log4j2 = fullstop
>
> I'
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2014-05-21)
===
Meeting started by t8m at 17:00:01 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-05-21/fesco.2014-05-21-17.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
On 05/21/2014 06:25 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 21 May 2014 18:18:12 +0200
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Hi,
Before pkgdb2 it was possible to retrieve a plain text CSV list of
package/owners pairs.
What is the corrent URL to achieve the same with pgkdb2 or has this
feature been lost?
Well, ther
On Wed, 21 May 2014 18:18:12 +0200
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Before pkgdb2 it was possible to retrieve a plain text CSV list of
> package/owners pairs.
>
> What is the corrent URL to achieve the same with pgkdb2 or has this
> feature been lost?
Well, there is:
https://admin.fedorapro
Hi,
Before pkgdb2 it was possible to retrieve a plain text CSV list of
package/owners pairs.
What is the corrent URL to achieve the same with pgkdb2 or has this
feature been lost?
Ralf
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/deve
On 21 May 2014 17:03, Robert Rati wrote:
> I've been working on updating the hadoop package to the latest 2.4.0
> release and at this point I've resolved all the issues but I'm now blocked
> by the log4j2 update. log4j2 breaks the hadoop build pretty severely, and
> it doesn't seem the log4j2 te
I've been working on updating the hadoop package to the latest 2.4.0
release and at this point I've resolved all the issues but I'm now
blocked by the log4j2 update. log4j2 breaks the hadoop build pretty
severely, and it doesn't seem the log4j2 team has spent much time
thinking about how to pr
Am 21.05.2014 16:55, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
> On Tue, 20 May 2014 22:47:12 +0200
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>> simple example:
>>
>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=516900
>>
>> the page itself is encrypted
>>
>> *but* all the download-links are not
>> http://kojipkgs.fedorapr
On Tue, 20 May 2014 22:47:12 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
> simple example:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=516900
>
> the page itself is encrypted
>
> *but* all the download-links are not
> http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/gcc/4.8.2/18.fc20/src/gcc-4.8.2-18.
Hi all,
If you've been using GNOME 3.12 and updating packages with
gnome-software, you might have run into an issue with the update process
leaving behind a lot of duplicate packages:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=730451
This turned out to be an issue with PackageKit's Fedora packag
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 04:27:22PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 03:22:31PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > On Sáb, 2014-05-17 at 09:27 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 10:44 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> > > > There are many broken redire
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2014-05-21 17:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets belo
On Tue, 2014-05-20 at 18:08 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Well, you can't, really. Especially 5). For instance,
> libgssglue-0.4-2.fc19.x86_64 has so far been a "component_of" Fedora
> 19
> and Fedora 20, and is currently a "component_of" Fedora Rawhide.
>
Steve,
didn't we kill libgssglue ?
Is
Hi,
libsodium 0.5.0 will land in rawhide soon.
SONAME change: libsodium.so.4 --> libsodium.so.10
Thanks.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Noob here.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Cond
21 matches
Mail list logo
