On 05/15/2014 06:30 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 05/15/2014 06:14 PM, Michael Simacek wrote:
>> I've updated log4j in rawhide today.
>>
>> The packages that are known to be broken by this update are:
>
> Have you rebuilt axis and slf4j? They take classes from log4j and copy
> them into their RP
There are many broken redirect links, please fix asap.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 08:35:27PM -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
> On Thursday, May 15, 2014, 12:42:25 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > More fallout from pkgdb2?
>
Yeah. The script that updates the package email aliases was still pointing
at the staging instance (for testing). So it wasn't picking up
On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 09:56 -0400, James Antill wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 10:42 +0300, Marius A wrote:
>
> > Wow, this is exactly what I was looking for. Thanks!
> > On Fedora 21, any way to apply these before installing to SDD from live usb
> > image? e.g. open terminal, run fs filter's, the
On Thursday, May 15, 2014, 12:42:25 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> More fallout from pkgdb2?
I just send an email to this list about weird problems I have been
experiencing with the ppc mailing list. When I tried to log on to
check my options, I got a 502 proxy error about a DNS lookup fa
Has anyone else noticed problems with the Fedora mailing lists today?
As of last night, I am not getting copied on my posts, but can see
them at https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ppc/2014-May/date.html
I tried checking my mail options, at
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/options/pp
That is true. The last ghemical release is from 2011 (v 3.0.0). We have
2.9.9 in Fedora.
To have this updated version I've created a COPR build here[1] (builds OK
on my machine).
Too bad I don't have the time to be a packager anymore...
[1] - http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/lspooky/ghemical/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/15/2014 11:06 AM, Henrique Junior wrote:
> Hi, I was taking a look at Fedora Package DB and saw that some very
> important computational chemistry softwares (ghemical, mopac,
> mpqcare... ) marked as orphaned in F20, is that correct? As a
> c
2014-05-15 22:49 GMT+02:00 T.C. Hollingsworth :
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > This is usefully detailed, but it’s not always clear what parts need to
> be
> > done by “other developers” (to use the template wording), particularly
> the
> > two “will need to be modif
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> This is usefully detailed, but it’s not always clear what parts need to be
> done by “other developers” (to use the template wording), particularly the
> two “will need to be modified” references to Ruby/Java/Node.js .
The known affected pa
On Qui, 2014-05-15 at 00:51 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> After more than 15 months in development, today we deployed pkgdb2
> into production at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/
>
> pkgdb is the application that manages package metadata for Fedora, including
> commit access for packag
On 05/15/2014 06:14 PM, Michael Simacek wrote:
I've updated log4j in rawhide today.
The packages that are known to be broken by this update are:
Have you rebuilt axis and slf4j? They take classes from log4j and copy
them into their RPMs.
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team
--
On 05/15/2014 10:44 AM, Jerry James wrote:
%{_libdir}/libgc.so.1.0.3 exists in both F-20 and Rawhide, and both
have an soname of libgc.so.1, but the two libraries are NOT
compatible. I just discovered this by accident while trying to
rebuild ecl for a totally different reason. It fails like so:
I've updated log4j in rawhide today.
The packages that are known to be broken by this update are:
apache-commons-logging
apacheds
avalon-logkit
azureus
bookkeeper
eclipse-wtp-sourceediting
eclipse-wtp-webservices
hazelcast
jamonapi
jboss-logmanager-log4j
jbossws-common-tools
jdom2
log4j-jboss-logm
Hi, I was taking a look at Fedora Package DB and saw that some very
important computational chemistry softwares (ghemical, mopac, mpqcare... )
marked as orphaned in F20, is that correct?
As a chemist I'm very concerned about that.
No luck contacting carllibpst to ask.
--
*Henrique C. S. Junior*
Q
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 07:12:11AM -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > After more than 15 months in development, today we deployed pkgdb2
> > into production at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/
> >
> > pkgdb is the application that manages package metadata for Fe
%{_libdir}/libgc.so.1.0.3 exists in both F-20 and Rawhide, and both
have an soname of libgc.so.1, but the two libraries are NOT
compatible. I just discovered this by accident while trying to
rebuild ecl for a totally different reason. It fails like so:
libeclmin.a(alloc_2.o): In function `init_a
I don't have the time nor to will to deal with it anymore.
Master is orphan now, feel free to pick it up. If noone does it in a week I'll
deprecate the package.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 03:57:24PM +0530, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:11:47AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for three package
> > maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive maintainer
> > policy t
Hi,
fuse-encfs does not use proper encryption and upstream was not very
active recently. Therefore I decided to orphan it on Fedora and EPEL. If
someone is interested in fixing it, please take it. Otherwise it will be
retired eventually.
Regards
Till
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproje
As we dropped last weeks meeting early due to low attendance we're going
to cover the same topics this week again:
Agenda:
- Follow up / status update merge reviews
- Open floor
Thanks & regards, Phil
--
Philipp Knirsch | Tel.: +49-711-96437-470
Manager Core Services| F
- Original Message -
> After more than 15 months in development, today we deployed pkgdb2
> into production at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/
>
> pkgdb is the application that manages package metadata for Fedora, including
> commit access for packagers, bugzilla assignment, and scm
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 10:11:47AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for three package
> maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive maintainer
> policy to find out if they are still interested in maintaining their
> packages (an
On Thu, 15 May 2014 12:16:25 +0200
Alejandro Álvarez Ayllón wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am having trouble recompiling one of the rpms I maintain because of
> this error
>
> DEBUG util.py:282:
> http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repo/rhel/rhel-i386-server-5/getPackage/krb5-devel-1.6.1-70.el5_9.2
Hello all,
I am having trouble recompiling one of the rpms I maintain because of
this error
DEBUG util.py:282:
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repo/rhel/rhel-i386-server-5/getPackage/krb5-devel-1.6.1-70.el5_9.2.i386.rpm:
[Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found
DEBUG util.py:282: Trying oth
25 matches
Mail list logo
