More fallout from pkgdb2?
Original Message
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 04:38:59 + (UTC)
From: mailer-dae...@fedoraproject.org (Mail Delivery System)
To: or...@fedoraproject.org
This is the mail system at host pkgs01.phx2.fedoraproject
After more than 15 months in development, today we deployed pkgdb2
into production at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/
pkgdb is the application that manages package metadata for Fedora, including
commit access for packagers, bugzilla assignment, and scm changes notifications.
A few of the m
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:34:42PM -0400, Jan Lieskovsky wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Flavio Leitner"
> > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 6:29:07 PM
> > Subject: fedpkg update returning internal server error
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am trying
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 14 May 2014 13:20:24 -0500
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi All,
>
> It was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5877
> that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 21 for
> https://fedo
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2014-05-15 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2014-05-15 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT
2014-05-15 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT
2014-05-15 1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
It was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5877
that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 21 for
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC49
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F21Make40
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/J
On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 11:10 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 04:54:35PM +0200, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> > while attempting to package Go stuff I've created this tool that
> > automates the repetitive tasks in the similar manner to what cpanspec
> > does for Perl:
> > https://gi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2014-05-14)
===
Meeting started by sgallagh at 16:58:45 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-05-14/fesco.2
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 08:32:17PM +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> > [makerpm@t520 openvswitch]$ fedpkg update
> > Creating a new update for openvswitch-2.1.2-1.fc20
> > ServerError(https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/openvswitch/
Yep, this is due to the pkgdb2 upgrade.
We are working on issues and hope to have everything back up soon.
Sorry for any trouble...
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedo
- Original Message -
> From: "Flavio Leitner"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 6:29:07 PM
> Subject: fedpkg update returning internal server error
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to push openvswitch to f20, but I am receiving this:
>
> [makerpm@t520 openvswitc
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> I am trying to push openvswitch to f20, but I am receiving this:
>
> [makerpm@t520 openvswitch]$ fedpkg build
> Could not execute build: openvswitch-2.1.2-1.fc20 has already been built
> [makerpm@t520 openvswitch]$ fedpkg update
>
Hi,
I am trying to push openvswitch to f20, but I am receiving this:
[makerpm@t520 openvswitch]$ fedpkg build
Could not execute build: openvswitch-2.1.2-1.fc20 has already been built
[makerpm@t520 openvswitch]$ fedpkg update
Creating a new update for openvswitch-2.1.2-1.fc20
ServerError(https:
On Ter, 2014-05-13 at 15:03 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Ville Skyttä
> wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Richard Shaw
> wrote:
> > I would think you would need to step through the BR:'s get
> the capabilities
> >
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 04:54:35PM +0200, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> while attempting to package Go stuff I've created this tool that
> automates the repetitive tasks in the similar manner to what cpanspec
> does for Perl:
> https://github.com/lkundrak/go2rpm/blob/master/go2rpm.pl
It's kind of awesom
Hi,
while attempting to package Go stuff I've created this tool that
automates the repetitive tasks in the similar manner to what cpanspec
does for Perl:
https://github.com/lkundrak/go2rpm/blob/master/go2rpm.pl
Hopefully some might find this useful.
Opinions, suggestions, fixes and enhancements
I've always thought it would be super great to make a distinction of
BuildRequires, and things required to perform build tests... say
TestRequires.
Stepping through the BRs is probably not enough, tests could also be
disabled through this process.
Say for example perl or python scripts are used to
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Serf 0.4.5 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Serf_0.4.5
Change owner(s): Jeff Schroeder
Serf [1] is a decentralized solution for service discovery and orchestration
that is lightweight, highly available, and fault tolerant. This change is to
package ser
2014-05-14 15:17 GMT+02:00 Jaroslav Reznik :
> == Scope ==
> See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Web_Assets#Scope
>
This is usefully detailed, but it’s not always clear what parts need to be
done by “other developers” (to use the template wording), particularly the
two “will need to be mod
= Proposed System Wide Change: Web Assets =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Web_Assets
Change owner(s): T.C. Hollingsworth
This is multi-release change, already approved for Fedora 20.
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001197.html
Traditionally, Fedora
= Proposed Self Contained Change: SSSD GPO-Based Access Control =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SssdGpoBasedAccessControl
Change owner(s): Yassir Elley
This change will enhance SSSD, by adding support for centrally managed host-
based access control in an Active Directory (AD) environm
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Web Application Authentication =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Web_App_Authentication
Change owner(s): Jan Pazdziora , Jakub Hrozek
On operating system level, there are numerous authentication and identity
lookup mechanisms, some of them using sssd. W
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Review Board 2.0 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReviewBoard2
Change owner(s): Stephen Gallagher
Review Board is a powerful tool for managing patch reviews.
== Detailed Description ==
Review Board integrates with many types of repository (svn, git,
On May 14, 2014 9:05:39 PM GMT+10:00, Martin Stransky
wrote:
>Anyway, I'll update Fedora builds today.
Cool, thanks!
--
Bojan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-con
On Tue, 13 May 2014 19:23:50 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > I would think you would need to step through the BR:'s get the capabilities
> > of the packages that the -devel package pull in, and then check that against
> > the requires of the re
On 05/14/2014 12:37 PM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
On May 14, 2014 7:57:25 PM GMT+10:00, Martin Stransky
wrote:
The release notes are wrong, the patch is not applied in 29.0.1 but
only
in an upcoming Firefox 30.
Sure works in Windows with 29.0.1.
Actually it works because of backout bug 991767
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 09:14:14AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> As packages age sometimes build requirements chance and may not be caught
> by the package maintainer. Is there a known way of determining if there are
> unnecessary build requirements in a package?
Yes, using auto-buildrequires:
htt
On May 14, 2014 7:57:25 PM GMT+10:00, Martin Stransky
wrote:
>The release notes are wrong, the patch is not applied in 29.0.1 but
>only
>in an upcoming Firefox 30.
Sure works in Windows with 29.0.1.
--
Bojan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/
On 05/14/2014 10:20 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 08:59 +0200, Martin Stransky wrote:
Why do you think it's fixed in 29.0.1? I see only some Android and
network fixes there (http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-release/).
http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/29.0.1/releaseno
Il 24/04/2014 16:50, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
> Well, in the current plan (make libdb5 "compat" package and updating
> the libdb to v6), after the mass rebuild the packages would start
> using v6.
Yeah, which makes technical sense... but the concern is packagers who
aren't paying attention rebuil
On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 08:59 +0200, Martin Stransky wrote:
> Why do you think it's fixed in 29.0.1? I see only some Android and
> network fixes there (http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-release/).
http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/29.0.1/releasenotes/
--
Bojan
--
devel mailing list
deve
Martin Stransky wrote:
> Why do you think it's fixed in 29.0.1? I see only some Android and
> network fixes there (http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-release/).
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/29.0.1/releasenotes/
->https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/1003707
--
devel mailing list
devel@
Hi,
I just submitted[0] library for review, but there problem with
versioning or something (from upstream it should be static). I wrote
patch for doing shared library, but something went wrong.
Help me ;)
[0]https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097584
--
-Igor Gnatenko
--
devel mailing
Why do you think it's fixed in 29.0.1? I see only some Android and
network fixes there (http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-release/).
ma.
On 05/13/2014 11:34 PM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Could someone please build that. The blank PDF print thing is a bit
annoying with 29.
Thanks,
--
devel
34 matches
Mail list logo
