Hi,
I am using copr to build another candidate for lyx-2.1 and the build
fails for me with no message related with the failure:
http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jamatos/lyx-21/builds/
The only file I get is in this case build-9287.log that is useless.
I have built the package locally
ddclient is currently orphaned in Fedora since 2013-10-21.
If no one else steps up, I offer to take ownership as I use this program
daily and already maintain a small number of packages for Fedora.
Kind regards,
Tilmann
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedora
On 2014-04-14, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>= Proposed Self Contained Change: SDDM as the default KDE display manager
> instead of KDM =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SDDMinsteadOfKDM
>
Is the SDDM mature enough to replace more-or-less working KDM?
I ask because there has not been a relea
On 04/14/2014 08:57 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
But disabling it has no useful purpose, you are just going to make
another account all powerful to compensate, either by giving sudo powers
or other similar mechanism, what you loose is the ability to properly
recover a system.
However, one benefit to di
On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 23:57 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 08:49 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > On 04/14/2014 09:21 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim
> > > wrote:
> > >> Apologies for being late to the discussion
On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 08:49 +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> On 04/14/2014 09:21 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim
> > wrote:
> >> Apologies for being late to the discussion as well - just wanted to note
> >> that I've been running root-
On 04/14/2014 09:21 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim
> wrote:
>> Apologies for being late to the discussion as well - just wanted to note
>> that I've been running root-password-less configurations for some time
>> (by using passwd -l to lock o
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 7:16 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> Rails depends on exact v8
> version, which means v8 3.14 must have also their own SCL as part of the SCL.
Stupid question: what in rails depends on v8 exactly?
The only thing that Requires v8 in Fedora besides nodejs and mongodb
is rubyge
On Apr 14, 2014, at 4:27 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 14, 2014, at 4:04 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
Create a boot menu entry can be skipped if it's not a dual boot system.
/boot/efi/EFI/BOOT contains shim.ef
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 8:19 AM, Peter MacKinnon wrote:
> Is there circumstances whereby new reviews can be approved without FPC
> exception if those assets have not yet been packaged under the new web asset
> packaging guidelines and layout?
There's currently a blanket exception for jQuery:
http
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Apr 14, 2014, at 4:04 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>>>
>>> Create a boot menu entry can be skipped if it's not a dual boot system.
>>> /boot/efi/EFI/BOOT contains shim.efi as bootx64.efi which is run by default
>>> on a system without
On Apr 14, 2014, at 4:04 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> Create a boot menu entry can be skipped if it's not a dual boot system.
>> /boot/efi/EFI/BOOT contains shim.efi as bootx64.efi which is run by default
>> on a system without an NVRAM entry already pointing to shim or grub, and a
>> f
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
>> = Proposed System Wide Change: Ruby193 in SCL =
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby193_in_SCL
>>
>> Change owner(s): Marcela Mašláňová
>>
>> Ruby 1.9.3 with Rails 3.2.8 is still comm
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Apr 9, 2014, at 12:59 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 7:41 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>>
>>> You need to install or reinstall grub2-efi and shim packages.
>>
>> Aha, a correct answer! Thanks! Based on this hint,
On Apr 9, 2014, at 12:59 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 7:41 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>> You need to install or reinstall grub2-efi and shim packages.
>
> Aha, a correct answer! Thanks! Based on this hint, I think I figured
> it out. I updated the
> wiki accordingl
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 04:20:16PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
> > = Proposed Self Contained Change: Remote Journal Logging =
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remote_Journal_Logging
> >
> > Change owner(s): Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> >
Summary of changes:
68b8927... Updating to upstream 1.2, rhbz #1086545. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://ad
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 04:15:50PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > ** Replace NetworkManager, etc. with systemd-networkd.
> > ** Make sure only just kernel-core, not kernel and kernel-drivers, is
> > installed (see the related change: Modular Kernel Packaging for Cloud [1]).
> > ** Make sure onl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071125
Massimo Paladin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
- Original Message -
> I naively ported my Django app to Python 3 and didn't realize WSGI was going
> to be an issue. I saw python3-django was available for Fedora 20 and thought
> I was all set until I saw in my httpd logs that python2.7 seems to be the
> assumed default for mod_wsgi. Aft
On 14 April 2014 21:10, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> "How do I locally check changes to my appdata inside gnome-software, as
> opposed to just appdata-validate?"
Now it's a case of cloning and building
https://github.com/hughsie/createrepo_as and then doing
./createrepo_as --basename=test path/to/pac
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
> = Proposed System Wide Change: Ruby193 in SCL =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby193_in_SCL
>
> Change owner(s): Marcela Mašláňová
>
> Ruby 1.9.3 with Rails 3.2.8 is still commonly used by many projects. Let's
> provide Ruby and Rails i
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
> = Proposed Self Contained Change: Remote Journal Logging =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remote_Journal_Logging
>
> Change owner(s): Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>
> Systemd journal can be configured to forward events to a remote server.
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
> == Scope ==
> As mentioned, there's really various changes that are quite independent of
> each other but share the common goal.
>
> * Proposal owners:
> ** Replace NetworkManager, etc. with systemd-networkd.
> ** Make sure only just kernel-core, not
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
> == Scope ==
> * Proposal owners:
> ** Rebase to make-4.0
> ** 6 patches need to be updated to work with new sources
> ** 14 patches will be removed as they are already supported by the make-4.0
> rebase
> ** make.spec will be updated
> ** local build a
Richard Hughes (hughsi...@gmail.com) said:
> > - How long does it take that the new appdata is propagated to gnome-software
>
> I do new builds nearly every day, but the builds that are shipped in
> gnome-software and pushed to users is usually updated every month or
> so.
A FAQ related to this
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" (johan...@gmail.com) said:
> So let's just clear this matter once and for all...
>
> Is the baseWG supposed to be responsible for the decisions and direction and
> the length of maintenance of those 1806 components they self defined as a
> part of the baseWG?
In the same
On 04/14/2014 07:32 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
Ok the patch worked fine for building on my F20, which I did as a test,
however it failed the build in rawhide.
The only clue I can get is this:
configure: WARNING: unable to include
What's in the configure log file regarding this?
--
devel mailing li
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote:
One thing I would like to note is that in machines which don't have a
hardware clock, I had problems starting bind and unbound, because the date
was back to 1970 in each boot, so the root dns key was not yet valid and
there were no valid dns resolv
I naively ported my Django app to Python 3 and didn't realize WSGI was
going to be an issue. I saw python3-django was available for Fedora 20
and thought I was all set until I saw in my httpd logs that python2.7
seems to be the assumed default for mod_wsgi. After reading the README
and more,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 12:00 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Apr 2014, Dan Williams wrote:
>>
>> > But another scenario I've seen: older Netgear routers which intercept
>> > "www.routerlogin.net" as the setup page. The instructions l
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014, Dan Williams wrote:
Ok, that could be a problem. This is a user setting up wifi on a router
they just bought, so it has no upstream connection yet, is not yet
configured at all, and they are just following the directions in the
printed brochure they got with the router. Wh
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014, William Brown wrote:
How do you setup DNS over TLS?
Unbound has this capability already build in. unbound-control activates
via (currently via dnssec-triggerd, in the future via NM) using the
keywords tcp-upstream or ssl-upstream.
I meant for say bind, but okay.
bind d
On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 12:00 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Apr 2014, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> > But another scenario I've seen: older Netgear routers which intercept
> > "www.routerlogin.net" as the setup page. The instructions literally
> > are:
> >
> > 1) connect your computer to the r
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014, Dan Williams wrote:
But another scenario I've seen: older Netgear routers which intercept
"www.routerlogin.net" as the setup page. The instructions literally
are:
1) connect your computer to the router with a cable
2) go to www.routerlogin.net
3) follow the setup guide in
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 05:19:17PM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
How certificates are managed for sender and receiver parts?
By some external means... This could be automated, e.g. using
certmaster, but I don't want to tie to a specific
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 05:19:17PM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> How certificates are managed for sender and receiver parts?
By some external means... This could be automated, e.g. using
certmaster, but I don't want to tie to a specific certificate
distribution implementation.
> Who generates
On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 10:21 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> > Or how would you suggest this is solved. For arguments sake lets
> > say:
> >
> > SSID: myawesomeopenhotspot
> > DHCP provides no domain-name info.
> > I CNAME all records to my.hotspot. until authenticated.
>
> If this does not do http(s)
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 10:01:00 -0500
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 14:53:04 +0200,
>poma wrote:
> >
> >- Nightly live and image composes
> >http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes
> >"This page lists testing composes created nightly for all currently
> >approved
= Proposed System Wide Change: Use license macro in RPMs for packages in
Cloud Image =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Use_license_macro_in_RPMs_for_packages_in_Cloud_Image
Change owner(s): Matthew Miller , Tom Callaway
Use new %license macro to separate license files from documentatio
= Proposed System Wide Change: Smaller Cloud Image Footprint =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Smaller_Cloud_Image_Footprint
Change owner(s): Sandro Mathys & Cloud SIG
Shrink the footprint of our cloud images as far as reasonably, and within the
given timeframe, possible.
== Detailed
>
> >> unbound does not really care about transparent proxy's on port 53. As
> >> long as they don't break DNS (and DNSSEC). If they redirect port 53 to
> >> some broken DNS server, unbound will try to work around it. If port 53
> >> is broken it will attempt DNS over port 80 of various fedorapro
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 14:53:04 +0200,
poma wrote:
- Nightly live and image composes
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes
"This page lists testing composes created nightly for all currently
approved spins from the Spins SIG git repository. Any questions or
problems, please po
Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
===
3 packages were orphaned
openstack-nova [EL-6,devel,f19,f20] was orphaned by xqueralt
OpenStack Compute (nova)
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/openstack-nova
o
- Nightly live and image composes
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes
"This page lists testing composes created nightly for all currently
approved spins from the Spins SIG git repository. Any questions or
problems, please post to the Spins SIG mailing list."
mailto:fedora-sp...@li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085432
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1087536
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzi
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> = Proposed Self Contained Change: SDDM as the default KDE display manager
> instead of KDM =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SDDMinsteadOfKDM
>
> Change owner(s): Martin Briza & KDE SIG
>
> Retire KDM as the default display manage
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
1) What if I don't use systemd to start whatever program needs the
updated
data? (might not be a daemon for example)
Right, for say Evolution which runs in a user session, it obviously has
to do any mail format migrations when it starts in
On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 09:44 +0200, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> On Sun 13 Apr 2014 08:42:43 PM CEST Simo Sorce wrote:
> > [snip] I know little to nothing about java bindings so if it is
> > substantial work I will just remove the java binding and ask rel eng to
> > pull the subpackage.
>
> You ca
commit 0fd4f7174d73d1163d65a94bca92ae6adaeadf9f
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Mon Apr 14 16:22:04 2014 +0200
Do not touch Test::Builder internals
371-Don-t-grab-at-Test-Builder-hash-keys.patch | 38
perl-Test-Aggregate.spec |8 -
2 f
= Proposed Self Contained Change: SDDM as the default KDE display manager
instead of KDM =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SDDMinsteadOfKDM
Change owner(s): Martin Briza & KDE SIG
Retire KDM as the default display manager of the KDE Fedora Spin in favor of
SDDM.
== Detailed Descriptio
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 6:50 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim
wrote:
> On 04/11/2014 11:18 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>> - Original Message -
>>> = Proposed System Wide Change: The securetty file is empty by default =
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/securetty_file_is_empty_by_default
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014, William Brown wrote:
This seems like a sane(ish) method of doing this. What happens if the
hotspot page is down? Why not use a mirror-like setup with yum where you
try 2 or 3 mirrors and if they fail then you declare it to be a portal?
It has multiple A records matching th
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 02:07:07PM +0200, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote:
> One thing I would like to note is that in machines which don't have
> a hardware clock, I had problems starting bind and unbound, because
> the date was back to 1970 in each boot, so the root dns key was not
> yet valid and there
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Remote Journal Logging =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remote_Journal_Logging
Change owner(s): Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Systemd journal can be configured to forward events to a remote server.
Entries are
= Proposed System Wide Change: Ruby193 in SCL =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby193_in_SCL
Change owner(s): Marcela Mašláňová
Ruby 1.9.3 with Rails 3.2.8 is still commonly used by many projects. Let's
provide Ruby and Rails in SCL even for Fedora. Rails depends on exact v8
version,
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Remote Journal Logging =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remote_Journal_Logging
Change owner(s): Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Systemd journal can be configured to forward events to a remote server.
Entries are forwarded including full metadata, and are s
On 04/11/2014 11:18 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> = Proposed System Wide Change: The securetty file is empty by default =
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/securetty_file_is_empty_by_default
>>
>> Change owner(s): quickbooks
>>
>> The securetty file is empt
On 04/14/2014 10:51 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 08:44:29AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 13 April 2014 13:21, Markus Mayer wrote:
As a side note: build.log contains the following error:
error: Couldn't exec /usr/lib/rpm/appdata.prov: No such file or directory
Does
On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 09:24 +0100, Mat Booth wrote:
> On 14 April 2014 08:44, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>
> > On Sun 13 Apr 2014 08:42:43 PM CEST Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > [snip] I know little to nothing about java bindings so if it is
> > > substantial work I will just remove the java binding an
Thanks a lot,
I will push this patch and rebuild in rawhide.
Simo.
On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 09:44 +0200, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> On Sun 13 Apr 2014 08:42:43 PM CEST Simo Sorce wrote:
> > [snip] I know little to nothing about java bindings so if it is
> > substantial work I will just remove the
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Move to ImageFactory For Cloud Image
Creation =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Move_to_ImageFactory_For_Cloud_Image_Creation
Change owner(s): Ian McLeod , Dennis Gilmore
dgilm...@fedoraproject.org
Create images using Anaconda in Koji rather than appl
= Proposed System Wide Change: Fedora 21 Make 4.0 Update =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F21Make40
Change owner(s): Patsy Franklin
This change brings Make 4.0 to Fedora 21.
== Detailed Description ==
The purpose of this update is to synchronize Fedora with the most recent Make
relea
On 04/11/2014 07:23 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
You are coming to this conclusion how exactly?
The baseWG having to send special endorsement of the proposal in their name.
So let's just clear this matter once and for all...
Is the baseWG supposed to be responsible for the decisions and direction
= Proposed System Wide Change: SCL =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SCL
Change owner(s): Marcela Mašláňová
SCL - Software Collections - are popular packaging format above rpm. Let's
enable them for Fedora. More details on upstream page [1].
== Detailed Description ==
My first draft [
commit bd828da35526bd0416750515033f9a57deaeb6f8
Author: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Mon Apr 14 14:14:19 2014 +0200
2.0116 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-XML-LibXML.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gi
One thing I would like to note is that in machines which don't have a
hardware clock, I had problems starting bind and unbound, because the
date was back to 1970 in each boot, so the root dns key was not yet
valid and there were no valid dns resolvers to update time by ntp. I had
to hardcode so
On 11. 4. 2014 at 17:08:49, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > So, having /usr/lib/passwd storing the same limited set of data is
> > not the right long-term thing. Unfortunately, AFAIK the fuller
> > interface isn't ready yet.
>
> Yeah, it'd be nic
On Mon 14 Apr 2014 10:24:46 AM CEST Mat Booth wrote:
> On 14 April 2014 08:44, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>
>> On Sun 13 Apr 2014 08:42:43 PM CEST Simo Sorce wrote:
>> > [snip] I know little to nothing about java bindings so if it is
>> > substantial work I will just remove the java binding and
On 14 April 2014 08:44, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> On Sun 13 Apr 2014 08:42:43 PM CEST Simo Sorce wrote:
> > [snip] I know little to nothing about java bindings so if it is
> > substantial work I will just remove the java binding and ask rel eng to
> > pull the subpackage.
>
> You can't just "
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 08:44:29AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 13 April 2014 13:21, Markus Mayer wrote:
> > As a side note: build.log contains the following error:
> > error: Couldn't exec /usr/lib/rpm/appdata.prov: No such file or directory
>
> Doesn't exist on my system either, so no idea
On Sun 13 Apr 2014 08:42:43 PM CEST Simo Sorce wrote:
> [snip] I know little to nothing about java bindings so if it is
> substantial work I will just remove the java binding and ask rel eng to
> pull the subpackage.
You can't just "pull" packages. You'll have to properly "Obsoletes:
lasso-java" i
On 13 April 2014 13:21, Markus Mayer wrote:
> What I'm interested in is:
> - Directory, Name, ownership and permissions for appdata.xml files
Just the default permissions and groups are required, no special handling.
> - %post/%postun scriptlets (if needed)
Nope, none.
> - If appdata-validate
73 matches
Mail list logo
