lördagen den 5 april 2014 13.18.15 skrev Paulo César Pereira de Andrade:
> 2014-04-03 7:50 GMT-03:00 Oden Eriksson :
> > Hello,
>
> Hi Oden,
>
> Small Linux world, isn't it ? :-)
Ha ha, yeah.
> > Been active with packaging, productization and maintaining packages for
> > Mandriva Linux si
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2014-04-07
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again today/tomorrow! Apologies for the late notice.
Let's take a look at the plan
On 4/6/14 14:32, Christopher Meng wrote:
> PS. If you have gearman packaged, I'm happy again.
No, that must be someone else. I am just a gearmand user.
Sven
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http:/
On Thu, 03 Apr 2014 14:29:16 +0200
Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> On 04/03/2014 03:46 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
...snip...
> > For whoever is going to approach infra about signing the packages in
> > copr it probably makes more sense to either talk about enhancing
> > sigul to work with copr or getti
On 04/06/2014 03:11 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> [totpcgi]
> totpcgi-selinux-0.5.5-1.fc21.noarch requires
> file:///usr/share/doc/selinux-policy/html/index.html
>
> If I understand correctly such packages which need extra selinux policy,
> shouldn't they depend on a more vital dep instead
If Petr has promised to sponsor you then you don't need to be panic anymore
:)
Welcome.
PS. If you have gearman packaged, I'm happy again.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/c
Hi,
I am a perl and c developer, working on monitoring related opensource products
like naemon, thruk, mod-gearman, etc... Beeing a debian guy for a long time now
i thought fedora might worth a look.
First review requests are:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080204
https://bugzilla.r
Am Sat, 05 Apr 2014 14:39:14 +
schrieb devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org:
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 08:27:59 -0500
> From: Michael Catanzaro
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora
>
> Subject: Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
> Message-ID: <139670447
[totpcgi]
totpcgi-selinux-0.5.5-1.fc21.noarch requires
file:///usr/share/doc/selinux-policy/html/index.html
If I understand correctly such packages which need extra selinux policy,
shouldn't they depend on a more vital dep instead of this?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.o
